scholarly journals Labor Law: LMRA: Stock Purchase Plan as Subject of Compulsory Collective Bargaining

1955 ◽  
Vol 53 (7) ◽  
pp. 1003
Author(s):  
Edward W. Powers
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malek Said

Meanwhile, digitalization has become a "mega-topic" in the legal debate. The implications of a changed working life are occasionally approached in individual employment law and social law. So far, however, little attention has been paid to the changes arising from a dependent world population to an independent performance of tasks, which is significant for the scope of collective bargaining agreements. The author therefore deals abstractly with the overriding question of how the old collective labor law system fits into the modern structures of working life. For this reason, the author develops a legislative proposal that upholds the constitutional and supranational implications of personnel reach.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Julia López López

Collective Labor Law as a mechanism of agency through workers representation has been challenged more than ever during recent last decades. The policies that have adjusted labor rights to new scenarios of economic policies have impacted collective bargaining structures and contents. The debates on centralization and de-centralization, workers participation, unions and workers strategies to countervail the erosion of labor rights have been part of the social agenda. Among the debates one very important one involves the study of the cases of the Basque Country and Catalonia. Their models of collective bargaining allow us to examine different strategies to achieve social goals through collective action with more successful results in the Basque case. El Derecho Colectivo del Trabajo como mecanismo de agency para las representaciones de los trabajadores ha tenido en las últimas décadas uno de los periodos más desafiantes en la consecución de sus objetivos sociales. Las políticas de ajuste a la crisis económica con nuevos escenarios políticos han impactado no solo en las estructuras de negociación colectiva sino además en los contenidos de los convenios. Debates en torno a centralización-descentralización, participación, estrategias para contrarrestar los efectos de erosión de los derechos sociales han sido parte de la agenda social. Entre los debates, el estudio que se refiere a los casos de País Vasco y Catalunya, en cuanto a las estructuras de negociación, es interesante a la hora de presentar las diferencias estratégicas y los mejores resultados en el caso vasco.


1994 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 277-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Tucker

Until recently, North American labor law historiography has been dominated by the view that the legal regime regulating trade unions and collective bargaining has passed through three stages of development: repression, toleration, and promotion. This evolutionary narrative served the function of justifying current collective bargaining schemes by showing them to be the progressive realization of political and industrial pluralism. Confidence in the narrative, however, is eroding. In part, this is fuelled by the crisis of the current collective bargaining regime. It no longer appears to be able to deliver the goods. Not coincidentally, critical scholars have also chosen this moment to scrutinize the Whiggish history produced by writers committed to the Wagner Act model and have found it wanting.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document