Effect of Chlorhexidine Treatment Prior to Fiber Post Cementation on Long-Term Resin Cement Bond Strength

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. E72-E80 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Durski ◽  
M Metz ◽  
G Crim ◽  
S Hass ◽  
R Mazur ◽  
...  

SUMMARY The purpose of this study was to evaluate the push-out bond strength of two different adhesive cements (total etch and self-adhesive) for glass fiber post (GFP) cementation in simulated, long-term service (thermocycling) when the root canal is treated with chlorhexidine before cementation. One hundred twenty premolar specimens with a single root canal were selected, endodontically treated, and shaped for GFP cementation (n=120). The specimens were randomly placed into one of 12 groups (10 specimens each) according to cement (T = total-etch RelyX ARC or S = self-adhesive RelyX Unicem), treatment with chlorhexidine (N or Y: without or with), and number of thermal cycles (00, 20, or 40: 0, or 20,000 or 40,000 cycles): 1. TN00, 2. TN20, 3. TN40, 4. TY00, 5. TY20, 6. TY40, 7. SN00, 8. SN20, 9. SN40, 10. SY00, 11. SY20, 12. SY40. The root of each specimen was cut perpendicular to the vertical axis, yielding six 1.0 mm-thick sections. A push-out bond strength test was performed followed by statistical analysis using a factorial analysis of variance. Pairwise comparisons of significant factor interactions were adjusted using the Tukey test. Significant differences of push-out bond strengths were found in the four main effects (resin cement [p<0.0001], treatment with chlorhexidine [p<0.0001], number of cycles [p<0.0001], and root third [p<0.0001]) and all interactions (p<0.05 for all). Both resin cements produced higher bond strength in the cervical third followed by the middle third, and lower values were detected in the apical third. Additionally, the results suggest that the use of an additional disinfection treatment with chlorhexidine before the cement application produced the highest push-out bond strength regardless of root third. Further, the thermocycling simulation decreased the bond strength for both resin cements long-term when the chlorhexidine was not applied before cementation. However, when the root canal was treated with chlorhexidine and the fiber post was cemented with self-adhesive cement, the bond strength increased after 0, 20,000 and 40,000 cycles.

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 350-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thiago Lopes de Freitas ◽  
Rafael Pino Vitti ◽  
Milton Edson Miranda ◽  
William Cunha Brandt

Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different glass fiber posts (GFPs) diameters on the push-out bond strength to dentin. Forty unirradicular human teeth were endodontically treated and used for cementation of GFPs (White Post DC, FGM) with different diameters (n=10): P1 - ø 1.6 mm coronal x 0.85 mm apical; P2 - ø 1.8 mm coronal x 1.05 mm apical; P5 - ø 1.4 mm coronal x 0.65 mm apical; and PC - customized post number 0.5 with composite resin (Tetric Ceram A2, Ivoclair Vivadent). All GFPs were cemented into the root canal using a dual-curing luting composite (Variolink II, Ivoclar Vivadent). One slice (1.7 mm) of each root third of cemented GFP (cervical, middle, and apical) was submitted to push-out testing. Failure modes of all specimens were classified as: adhesive failure between resin cement and post; adhesive failure between dentin and resin cement; cohesive failure within resin cement, post or dentin; and mixed failure. The data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (a=0.05). The highest bond strength values were presented for the P2 and PC groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the GFP thirds in each group. The groups P2, P5, and PC showed predominantly adhesive failure. For P1, the most prevalent type of failure was adhesive between resin cement and post. It may be concluded that a glass fiber post that is well adapted to the root canal presents higher bond strength values, regardless of GFP third.


2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. E167-E176 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Bitter ◽  
A Maletic ◽  
K Neumann ◽  
L Breschi ◽  
G Sterzenbach ◽  
...  

SUMMARY Objectives: The aim of the study was to investigate the effects of various self-adhesive resin cements on the push-out bond strengths and nanoleakage expression at the luting interfaces of fiber posts immediately and after one year of aging. Methods and Materials: One hundred forty-four extracted human anterior teeth were endodontically treated. After post space preparation, fiber posts were luted using five commercially available self-adhesive resin (SAR) cements and a core build-up material applied with a self-etch adhesive (BF: Bifix SE/Rebilda Post, VOCO; CSA: Clearfil SA Cement/Rely X Fiber Post, 3M ESPE; RX: RelyX Unicem 2/Rely X Fiber Post, 3M ESPE; SPC: Speed Cem/FRC Postec, Ivoclar Vivadent; SMC: Smart Cem/X Post, Dentsply; RB: Rebilda DC-Futurabond/Rebilda Post; n=22). For each group, half of the specimens were subjected to thermocycling (TC) (5°C-55°C, 10,000 cycles) and stored humid for one year at 37°C. Push-out bond strength data of six slices (thickness 1 mm) per root and nanoleakage expression of representative specimens were evaluated after 24 hours (baseline) and after TC and storage for one year (aging), respectively. Results: Bond strength differed significantly among resin cements (p<0.0005) and the location inside the root canal (p<0.0005), but not by aging (p=0.390; repeated-measures analysis of variance). SMC (14.6±5.8 MPa) and RX (14.1±6.8 MPa) revealed significantly higher bond strength compared to BF (10.6±5.4 MPa) and RB (10.0±4.6 MPa) but differed not significantly from SPC (12.8±4.8) MPa; CSA (6.1±4.6 MPa) revealed significantly lower bond strength compared to all other investigated materials (p<0.05; Tukey Honestly Significantly Different). Qualitative nanoleakage analysis revealed more silver deposits at the interface in all groups after aging. For CSA, a large amount of silver deposits inside the cement was also observed at baseline and after aging. Conclusions: Fiber post luting using SAR cements demonstrated reliable bond strengths. Product-specific differences and initial degradation effects could be demonstrated.


2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. 559-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matheus Coelho Bandéca ◽  
Adriano Augusto Melo de Mendonça ◽  
Etevaldo Matos Maia Filho ◽  
Fausto da Silva Bramante ◽  
Darlon Martins Lima ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT This study evaluated the influence of relining fiber posts on the bond strength (BS) of resin cements in the root canal. Forty bovine teeth were divided in four groups (n = 10)G1 (ARC)—fiber post cemented with resin cement RelyX ARC; G2 (ARC+Z350)—relined fiber post cemented with RelyX ARC; G3 (U200)—fiber post cemented with self-adhesive cement RelyX U200; G4 (U200+Z350)—relined fiber post cemented with RelyX U200. The roots were sectioned in six 1.2-mm slices and the push-out test was performed. Data were analyzed by three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). For the conventional resin cement, there was no significant difference between groups G1-ARC (15.5 ± 3.8) and G2-ARC+Z350 (16.1 ± 4.5). For the self-adhesive cement, the results revealed higher BS values for relined posts G4-U200 + Z350 (19.9 ± 7.9) as compared to non-relined posts G3-U200 (14.4 ± 4.5). For both cements, in groups of relined posts, the apical and the cervical thirds presented similar BS. Relining enhances the performance of the self-adhesive resin cement, and the interaction between relining and root third influences the BS to the conventional resin cement. How to cite this article Conde DM, Rodrigues VP, de Fátima Carvalho Souza S, Bauer JRO, da Silva Bramante F, Lima SNL, Filho EMM, Bandeca MC, de Mendonça AAM, Lima DM. Influence of Relining Post on the Bond Strength of Resin Cements. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015;16(7):559-564.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Sonali Bansod ◽  
Ashwini Gaikwad ◽  
Abhijit Jadhav

Aim: To compare the push-out bond strength and modes of failure of fiber post cemented with different adhesive resin cements. Materials and Method: Forty five single rooted teeth were randomly divided into three groups as, group 1- Fluorocore 2+, group 2- Rely-X U200 and group 3-G-Cem, according to the adhesive resin cement used. The roots were subjected to chemo-mechanical preparation and cemented with adhesive resin cement. The teeth were sectioned into slices of the different root thirds and tested for bond strength (push out). Results were analysed using Chi square, Mann Whitney U and Kruskal Wallis test was used to find the significance of study parameters between three or more groups, with p = 0.05 for statistical significance. Result: Push out bond strength of Fluorocore 2+ is significantly higher at coronal level than apical level. No significant difference observed between coronal, middle and apical levels in group 2 and in group 3. Conclusion: Fluorocore 2+ adhesive resin cement is best to use for luting the fibre post. Fluorocore 2+ forms better bonding with post as well as dentin proving its better efficiency clinically.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (01) ◽  
pp. 1058-1064
Author(s):  
Aamir Bashir ◽  
◽  
Adil Fayaz ◽  
Sandeep Kaur Bali ◽  
Shazana Nazir Qazi ◽  
...  

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare by means of Push-Out test the difference in bond strength of two different luting agents with fibre post, and the effect of anatomical root levels on the bond strength of each cement. Materials and Methods: A total of 40 freshly extracted maxillary central incisor and canine teeth were included in the study. The teeth were divided into two groups of twenty each, and were assigned to Groups A and B according to the luting agent (light cure, dual cure) used to cement the post inside the root canal. After decoronation, 10 mm standardized post spaces were prepared inside each root. Luting of fiber posts was carried out, as per manufacturers recommendations, with the respective luting agents. Each root was embedded in a cuboidal plaster block and sectioning was carried out to obtain three slices of 2.5 mm thickness from the coronal, middle and apical aspect of the root. This was followed by Push-Out testing on a Universal Testing Machine after a storage period of 2 months. The recorded data were subjected to statistical analysis. Results: Significant differences were found in the bond strength of light cure flowable composite and dual cure resin cement (p<.05) at different anatomical root levels. In the inter-group comparison it was found that dual cure presents superior mean bond strength in comparison with light cure composite. Conclusion: It was concluded from this study that dual cure resin cement is the best material for luting fiber post to root canal. The push-out bond strength was lower in the apical third than the coronal third for light activated cements. Also, light cure flowable composite performs better when shorter posts are used.


2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvia Michida ◽  
Amanda Maria de Oliveira Dal Piva ◽  
João Paulo Mendes Tribst ◽  
Rodrigo Othávio Assunção Souza ◽  
Geraldo Lombardo ◽  
...  

<p><strong>Objective</strong>: To evaluate the effect of different irrigation solutions prior to post cementation on the resin bonding to bovine root dentine. <strong>Material</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Methods</strong>: 60 bovine roots (16 mm) were prepared to 12 mm with specific drill of a double-tapered fiber post system, included in PMMA, and divided into 6 groups, considering the irrigation solutions (IS) prior to cementation: Gr1- saline solution (control), Gr2- NaOCl 0.5 %, Gr3- NaOCl 1 %, Gr4- NaOCl 2.5 %, Gr5- NaOCl 5 %, Gr6- Chlorexidine 2 % (solution). The root canals were irrigated with IS 20 ml during 10 min. Then they were rinsed with 20 ml of distilled water and dried with paper points. One fiber post was molded with polyvinylsiloxane and 60 posts made of resin cement (PRC) were obtained moments before the cementation. The root canal dentin was etched with H<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>3</sub> 37 %/15 s + washing/drying, a multi-bottle etch&amp;rinse adhesive system was applied and the PRC were resin luted with dual resin cement (DuolinkTM, Bisco). Each specimen was cut into 4 slices of ±1.8mm in thickness and submitted to push-out test (1 mm/min). <strong>Results</strong>: ANOVA showed that bond strength was significantly affected by IS (P&lt;0.0001). The highest bond strengths (MPa) were those for the groups 4 (3.51 ± 1.52) and 5 (3.0 ± 1.16). The groups 1 (0.70 ± 0.30), 2 (0.80 ± 0.24), 3 (1.26 ± 0.57) and 6 (0.90 ± 0.41) were statistically similar to each other. <strong>Conclusion</strong>: The resin bonding to the root dentine was higher when higher concentrations of hypochlorite solutions were used.</p><p><strong>Keywords</strong></p><p>Bond strength; Irrigation solutions; Push-out test; Resin cement; Root canal dentin.</p>


2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 246-250
Author(s):  
Fabrício Mezzomo Collares ◽  
Vicente Castelo Branco Leitune ◽  
Carolina Rocha Augusto ◽  
Patrícia Franken ◽  
Susana Maria Werner Samuel

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luiz Felipe Valandro ◽  
César Dalmolin Bergoli ◽  
Carolina Ceolin Druck ◽  
Gabriel Kalil Rocha Pereira

ABSTRACT Aim To evaluate the effect of fiber post surface treatments on push-out bond strength between fiber post and root dentin. Materials and methods Sixty bovine mandibular teeth (N = 60) were sectioned (16 mm), prepared (12 mm), embedded with acrylic resin and then allocated into six groups (n = 10): Gr1- Silane coupling agent (Sil) + Conventional resin cement AllCem (AlC); Gr2- Sil + Conventional resin cement RelyX ARC (ARC); Gr3- tribochemical silica coating (TBS) + AlC; Gr4– TBS + ARC; Gr5- No treatment (NT) + AlC; Gr6– NT+ ARC. Specimens were sectioned in four slices (2 mm) and submitted to push-out test. Fracture analyses were executed at x200. The values of the push-out bond strength were submitted to two-way ANOVA and Tukey test (á = 0.05). Results Resin cement did not affect the bond strength values (p = 0.9674), fiber post surface treatment affected the push-out bond strength (p = 0.0353), interaction between factors did not affected the values (p = 0.338). Tukey test did not show differences between the groups. Adhesive failure between cement and dentin was predominantly. Conclusion The fiber post surface treatment appears have no influence on bond strength between fiber post and root dentin. Clinical significance The tested fiber posts surface treatment appears do not influence the fiber post bond behavior. How to cite this article Druck CC, Bergoli CD, Pereira GKR, Valandro LF. Effect of two Resin Cements and two Fiber Post Surface Treatments on Push-out Bond Strength between Fiber Post and Root Dentin. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015;16(1):7-12.


2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 233-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Parnian Alizadeh Oskoee ◽  
Ahmad Nooroloyouni ◽  
Fatemeh Pornaghi Azar ◽  
Jafar Sajjadi Oskoee ◽  
Ahmad Pirzadeh Ashraf

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tânia Mara da Silva ◽  
Virgílio Vilas Boas Fernandes Junior ◽  
Rosemary Soares de Santana ◽  
Renata Marques de Melo Marinho ◽  
Márcia Carneiro Valera ◽  
...  

Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate in vitro the influence of 20% glycolic ginger extract on the bond strength of glass-fiber post cemented with etch-and-rinse or self-etching resin cement. Forty-eight bovine roots were standardized (17±0.5 mm) and randomly divided into two groups, according to irrigant used during biomechanical preparation: NaOCl: 1% sodium hypochlorite and GEN: 20% glycolic ginger extract. Root canal was prepared and randomly assigned to one of two subgroups (n=12), according to luting protocol: self-etching (RelyX U200) and etch-and-rinse (RelyX ARC). After 48 h, the roots were sectioned perpendicularly (4 in cervical third and 3 in middle third) and submitted to push-out bond strength test (50 kgf load cell, 1.0 mm/min). Failure mode was analyzed in SEM and stereomicroscopy. Data were analyzed by three-way ANOVA and Tukey tests (p<0.05). ANOVA revealed that there were no significant differences between U200 (2.01±0.17)B and ARC (1.93±0.12)B in GEN group, and at the cervical third for both irrigants, 2.69±0.16A and 2.54±0.17A, respectively. Middle third showed lower bond strength than cervical third, regardless the irrigant. Overall, the cervical third regardless the irrigant employed and the association between NaOCl and ARC, presented better adhesive performance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document