Reliability and validity of Six-Spot Step Test (SSST) in stroke survivors

Author(s):  
Tai-Wa LIU ◽  
Shamay S. NG ◽  
Ka-Yuen CHEUNG ◽  
Ming-Yeung CHEUNG ◽  
Ryan N. HUNG ◽  
...  
Circulation ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 125 (suppl_10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth E Taylor-Piliae ◽  
L. Daniel Latt ◽  
Bruce M Coull

Background: Gait velocity is an objective, fundamental indicator of post-stroke walking ability. Most stroke survivors have diminished aerobic endurance and paretic leg strength, with one or both of these conditions affecting their gait velocity. Other reported underlying factors affecting gait velocity include functional disability, balance and cognitive impairment. Objective: To examine potential independent predictors of gait velocity in chronic stroke. Methods: Cross-sectional design using baseline data from the first 100 community-dwelling stroke survivors enrolled in an exercise intervention study. Eligible subjects included men and women aged ≥ 50 years and at ≥ 3 months post-stroke. Subjects completed a comprehensive, self-administered health survey prior to their baseline study visit. At the baseline visit, functional disability (Modified Rankin Scale), aerobic endurance (2-minute step-test), leg strength (timed 5-chair stand test), balance (single-leg stance) and cognitive impairment (Mini-Mental Status Exam) were assessed. Gait speed was assessed using a valid and reliable timed 4-meter walk test designed for older adults with disabilities; to calculate gait velocity (meters/second). Multiple linear regression was conducted to explore potential independent predictors of gait velocity. Results: Subjects (n=100) were on average 70±10 years old, and 39±49 months post-stroke. The majority reported an ischemic stroke (68/100) with hemiparesis (80/100); and were married (59/100), White/European-American (78/100), college-educated (79/100), men (54/100). Subjects had an average gait velocity of 0.75±0.23 meters/second, categorized as limited community walkers. Approximately 37% of the variance in gait velocity, could be explained by the optimal combination of the independent variables in the model: functional disability, aerobic endurance, leg strength, balance, and cognitive impairment (R 2 =0.37, F 5,74 =8.64, p<0.01). Only better aerobic endurance (t 1,74 =3.41, p<0.01) and leg strength (i.e. faster chair stand time) (t 1,74 =–2.23, p=0.03) contributed uniquely and significantly to faster gait velocity. Conclusion: A hallmark of gait dysfunction in chronic stroke is slow gait velocity, even among well-educated, community-dwelling survivors. Gait velocity is simple to measure requiring only a stopwatch and flat surface for walking. Our findings are similar to reports by others that diminished aerobic endurance and leg strength are major contributors to slow gait velocity in chronic stroke. Long term rehabilitation efforts are needed to improve gait velocity in chronic stroke, and may need to incorporate multifaceted strategies concurrently, focusing on aerobic endurance and leg strength, to maximize community ambulation and reintegration.


2008 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 292-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dawn P. Gill ◽  
Gareth R. Jones ◽  
GuangYong Zou ◽  
Mark Speechley

The purpose of this study was to develop a brief physical activity interview for older adults (Phone-FITT) and evaluate its test–retest reliability and validity. Summary scores were derived for household, recreational, and total PA. Reliability was evaluated in a convenience sample from a fall-prevention study (N= 43, 79.4 ± 2.9 years, 51% male), and validity, in a random sample of individuals in older adult exercise programs (N= 48, 77.4 ± 4.7 years, 25% male). Mean time to complete the Phone-FITT was 10 min for participants sampled from exercise programs. Evaluation of test–retest reliability indicated substantial to almost perfect agreement for all scores, with intraclass correlation coefficients (95% confidence intervals) ranging from .74 (.58–.85) to .88 (.8–.94). For validity, Spearman’s rho correlations of Phone-FITT scores with accelerometer counts ranged from .29 (.01–.53) to .57 (.34–.73). Correlations of Phone-FITT recreational scores with age and seconds to complete a self-paced step test ranged from –.29 (–.53 to –.01) to –.45 (–.68 to –.14). This study contributes preliminary evidence of the reliability and validity of the Phone-FITT.


2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 0-0 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chloe Witty ◽  
Thomas Heffernan ◽  
Leigh Riby

[b]Background: [/b]Research into stroke survivors and their partners have shown that the partner frequently rates the stroke survivor as less capable than the survivors rate themselves through self-report questionnaires or qualitative interviews; however, no research to date has used cognitive tasks as a method for in vestigation. This paper aims to investigate if the stroke survivor or the partner rate the stroke survivor as worse across all cognitive domains. [b]Material/ Methods:[/b]This research aimed to observe the incongruence of stroke survivors and their spouse’s perception of survivor functioning by rating their confidence on Picture Memory, Verbal Memory, Digit Span, Luria’s Three Step Test, NART and Raven’s Matrices. Participants, and to compare these score to see if either could predict the actual score. [b]Results: [/b]Showed that neither the stroke survivor nor the partner consistently rated functioning as worse, but there was a significant difference between the dyad. Further, the stroke survivor and the partner’s confidence had no relationship with raw scores. A thematic analysis was also conducted and themes emerged from the data. These were “Confidence,” “Insight into Ability,” and “Post-Stroke Changes.”[b]Conclusions:[/b]These themes were shown to interlink with the scores provided in the qualitative analysis, and implied that low self-efficacy may be crucial in post stroke recovery. Limitations and implications are discussed in full.


2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 1839-1845 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Y.F. Pang ◽  
Shirley S.M. Fong ◽  
Mimi M.Y. Tse ◽  
Eric W.C. Tam ◽  
Shamay SM Ng ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
R.S. Marinho ◽  
S.P. Jürgensen ◽  
J.F. Arcuri ◽  
C.L. Goulart ◽  
P.B. dos Santos ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
D. L. Santa Maria ◽  
George R. Kinnear ◽  
Jay T. Kearney ◽  
Thomas P. Martin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document