scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Levonadifloxacin in the Management of Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia (CABP): Findings of a Retrospective, Real-World, Multi-centre Study

Author(s):  
Dr. Prahlad Prabhudesai ◽  
Dr. Ashish Jain ◽  
Dr. Prashant Borade ◽  
Dr. Abhijeet Khandelwal ◽  
Kapil Mehta ◽  
...  

Background: Community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) remains a global public health threat and is a leading cause of hospitalization and infection-linked mortality. Levonadifloxacin is a novel benzoquinolizine antibiotic with a broad-spectrum activity including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and CABP-pathogens. Methods: This multi-centre, retrospective, post-marketing, real-world study assessed the efficacy and safety of levonadifloxacin oral and/or intravenous therapy in the treatment of CABP. Data from 338 patients above 17 years-of-age who received levonadifloxacin (oral or intravenous or both) was collected from 89 healthcare facilities across India. Information on clinical condition, comorbidities, complications, and details of concurrent therapy (including antimicrobial agents) was also collected. Study outcomes were clinical and microbial success at the end of therapy while safety was assessed based on clinical and laboratory adverse events. Results: Of the 338 patients, 244 (72.2%) were male, 93 (27.5%) were female and 1 (0.43%) was a transgender. About 294 (87.0%) patients were hospital-treated and 44 (13%) received outpatient treatment. About 248 (73.4%) patients received intravenous levonadifloxacin treatment, 79 (23.4%) received oral and 11 (3.3%) received intravenous followed by oral levonadifloxacin therapy. The common comorbid conditions were diabetes (14.2%) and hypertension (8.6%). Mean duration of levonadifloxacin therapy was 6.4 days. Clinical and microbial success in levonadifloxacin-treated patients was 95.0% (321/388) and 96.8% (150/155), respectively. Conclusions: Levonadifloxacin showed promising clinical outcomes and safety when used as an intravenous and/or oral for the treatment of CABP, both in outpatients as well as hospitalized patients.

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 90-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Girish M. Bhopale

Antimicrobial drugs resistant microbes have been observed worldwide and therefore alternative development of antimicrobial peptides has gained interest in human healthcare. Enormous progress has been made in the development of antimicrobial peptide during the last decade due to major advantages of AMPs such as broad-spectrum activity and low levels of induced resistance over the current antimicrobial agents. This review briefly provides various categories of AMP, their physicochemical properties and mechanism of action which governs their penetration into microbial cell. Further, the recent information on current status of antimicrobial peptide development, their applications and perspective in human healthcare are also described.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S579-S580
Author(s):  
Louis D Saravolatz ◽  
Joan Pawlak

Abstract Background Delafloxacin is a recently approved anionic fluoroquinolone antibiotic with broad-spectrum activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms. The drug has been approved for patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections including those caused by methicillin-resistant S. aureus. There is limited data available against methicillin-resistant S. aureus blood isolates (MRSABI), vancomycin intermediate strains (VISA), vancomycin-resistant strains (VRSA), daptomycin non-susceptible strains (DNSSA) and linezolid-resistant S. aureus (LRSA). Methods Antimicrobial activity of delafloxacin, levofloxacin, vancomycin, daptomycin, ceftaroline, and linezolid was determined against recent (2016–2018) MRSABI (110), VRSA (15), VISA (35), DNSSA (40), and LRSA (6). Broth microdilution testing using Mueller–Hinton broth was used to determine minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) according to CLSI guidelines. FDA breakpoints were used to determine delafloxacin susceptibility, and CLSI breakpoints were used for all other antibiotics. Results Antimicrobial MIC90 expressed in mg/L and (% susceptible) None of the LRSA were susceptible to delafloxacin or levofloxacin. All strains that were susceptible to the antimicrobial agents above had an MBC that was the same as the MIC or one dilution greater except for linezolid which demonstrated an MBC that was more than eight-fold greater than the MIC. For MRSABI isolates with a levofloxacin MIC ≥ 8 mg/L (55/110) suggesting multiple mutations in the quinolone-resistant determining region, the delafloxacin MIC90 was 1 mg/L with a 36.4% susceptibility rate. Conclusion Delafloxacin demonstrates superior activity to levofloxacin against recent MRSA blood isolates, VISA, VRSA, and DNSSA. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


2001 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 51-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Landen ◽  
M Möller ◽  
GS Tillotson ◽  
R Kubin ◽  
G Höffken

Moxifloxacin, a new 8-methoxyfluoroquinolone, was evaluated in a large community-based study involving 16 007 patients over a 9-month period. This study was designed as a large post-marketing observational study of the speed, efficacy and tolerability of moxifloxacin when used in clinical practice for the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia, or acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. Physicians and patients were specifically questioned about overall efficacy and safety as well as symptom relief. According to physicians' assessments 96.3% of patients were cured or improved after moxifloxacin treatment. Symptom relief (‘feeling better’) occurred in almost 70% of patients by day 3 and only 2.3% reported an adverse drug reaction. No individual adverse drug reaction was reported at a frequency above 1%. Among the 209 events considered as serious, only 34 were regarded as possibly or probably related to therapy. There were no moxifloxacin-related clinically relevant cases of phototoxicity, hepatotoxicity or cardiotoxicity. Overall, 92.1% of patients considered moxifloxacin to have been beneficial.


VASA ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 134-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirko Hirschl ◽  
Michael Kundi

Abstract. Background: In randomized controlled trials (RCTs) direct acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) showed a superior risk-benefit profile in comparison to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Patients enrolled in such studies do not necessarily reflect the whole target population treated in real-world practice. Materials and methods: By a systematic literature search, 88 studies including 3,351,628 patients providing over 2.9 million patient-years of follow-up were identified. Hazard ratios and event-rates for the main efficacy and safety outcomes were extracted and the results for DOACs and VKAs combined by network meta-analysis. In addition, meta-regression was performed to identify factors responsible for heterogeneity across studies. Results: For stroke and systemic embolism as well as for major bleeding and intracranial bleeding real-world studies gave virtually the same result as RCTs with higher efficacy and lower major bleeding risk (for dabigatran and apixaban) and lower risk of intracranial bleeding (all DOACs) compared to VKAs. Results for gastrointestinal bleeding were consistently better for DOACs and hazard ratios of myocardial infarction were significantly lower in real-world for dabigatran and apixaban compared to RCTs. By a ranking analysis we found that apixaban is the safest anticoagulant drug, while rivaroxaban closely followed by dabigatran are the most efficacious. Risk of bias and heterogeneity was assessed and had little impact on the overall results. Analysis of effect modification could guide the clinical decision as no single DOAC was superior/inferior to the others under all conditions. Conclusions: DOACs were at least as efficacious as VKAs. In terms of safety endpoints, DOACs performed better under real-world conditions than in RCTs. The current real-world data showed that differences in efficacy and safety, despite generally low event rates, exist between DOACs. Knowledge about these differences in performance can contribute to a more personalized medicine.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document