scholarly journals Hukuman Mati Bagi Koruptor Pada Saat Keadaan Tertentu (Pandemi COVID-19) Perspektif Hukum Nasional dan Hukum Islam

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 137-150
Author(s):  
Dahyul Daipon
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Death Penalty ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
The Government

The current condition of the Covid-19 pandemic is a time where almost everyone feels social and economic difficulties. Communities whose regions apply restrictions/quarantines are highly dependent on assistance from the government. This paper is a study and analysis of one question how the death penalty can be applied to perpetrators of corruption during the Covid-19 outbreak or pandemic. In the criminal law that applies in Indonesia, the death penalty for perpetrators of criminal acts of corruption is contained in Article 2 paragraph 2 of Law no. 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes. Meanwhile, in Islamic law, corruption is categorized as jarimah ta'zir. The results of this study conclude that during a pandemic, the death penalty can be applied to corruptors in accordance with the provisions of Article 2 of the Anti-Corruption Law and the provisions of Islamic criminal law as jarimah ta'zir. There are fundamental differences in the application of the death penalty for corruptors according to positive law and Islamic criminal law, especially with regard to the conditions required for the imposition of the death penalty. Even though this seems cruel according to human rights supporters, this needs to be a concern for all law enforcers so that they can carry out strict law enforcement against perpetrators of corruption crimes during the pandemic.

scholarly journals PROBLEMATIKA PENERAPAN PIDANA MATI DALAM KONTEKS PENEGAKAN HUKUM DI INDONESIA

2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 207
Author(s):  
Slamet Tri Wahyudi
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Death Penalty ◽  
Government Policy ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Government Policies ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
The People ◽  
The Government

Law enforcement without direction and not based on the three pillars of the justice of law, legal certainty and the benefits to society can break the law anyway even violate human rights. As one of the policies of the government that are not considered mencerminakan the values of justice and disturbing for the people, the government policy that acts of omission or delay in the application of the death penalty. This research is a normative legal normative juridical approach. The data collected is secondary data were analyzed using qualitative methods juridical analysis. Based on these results it can be concluded that in the application of the death penalty there are serious legal issues, this is due to government policies that commit omission or delay in the execution of the death penalty is a violation of human rights as stipulated in Article 28 of the 1945 Constitution. Keywords: Death penalty, Justice, Legal Certainty, Law

scholarly journals PIDANA MATI DAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA

to-ra ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 57
Author(s):  
Nikson Gans Lalu
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Death Penalty ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Life Time ◽  
Draft Code ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
The People ◽  
Pros And Cons ◽  
Individual Protection ◽  
The Individual

Death penalty is regulated in positive law of Indonesia, both governed in Civil Code and outside Code of Criminal Law, such in the Terrorism Law, Narcotics Law, and Corruption Crime Act Eradication Law. This indicates that death penalty is viewed as relevant in line with the crime dynamics growing in the community. Debates regarding death penalty among the pros and cons still take place in Indonesia so it raises a question among the people, how the existence of death penalty is seen of the viewpoints of Pancasila and Human Rights? Indeed, Pancasila contains balance value between one principle to another. If the Pancasila is seen partialy, then the answer arises on the question is the death penalty is contradictory to the Pancasila and Human Rights, however some answer also indicate it is not contracdictory to the Pancasila and Human Rights. National Draft Code of Criminal Law consistently retains the death penalty. However, in it‟s formulation policy remains considering the individual protection, namely enactment on provisions regarding “the suspension of death penalty execution” or “conditional death penalty, “if in the probation period (10 years) the convicted criminal does not show a good conduct, then the death penalty may be changed to life time imprisonment or 20 years imprisonment. The basic idea of maintaining the death penalty is to avoid people‟s demand/reaction which is revenge in nature or “extralegal execution” in nature.   Kata Kunci: Pidana mati

scholarly journals The Completion of Terrorism According to the Indonesian Positive Law

Rechtsidee ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sri Suatmiati ◽  
Febrina Hertika Rani
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Attorney General ◽  
Penal Policy ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Terrorism Financing ◽  
The Government ◽  
Governmental Institutions ◽  
Regulation Of Law

In positive law, completion of  terrorism in Indonesia solved through Penal Policy/Policies of criminal law by issuing and publishing various legal products, a Substitute Regulation of Law (Perpu) No. 1 of 2002 regarding the eradication of criminal acts of terrorism, reinforced into Law Act No. 15 of 2003 the Government is also issuing Substitute Regulation of Law (Perpu) No. 2 of 2002 regarding the enactment of the Substitute Regulation of Law (Perpu) No. 1 in 2002 reinforced into Law Act No.16 of 2003 and Law Act No. 9 of 2013 regarding the prevention and eradication of criminal acts of Terrorism Financing, until forming the anti terror units from both the indonesian army forces, police or non governmental institutions. Police (Densus 88) as the main actor of law enforcement and disruption network of terror along with the Attorney General and justice system.

scholarly journals Batas Waktu Pelaksanaan Pidana Mati dalam Perspektif Kepastian Hukum dan Keadilan di Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 12-30
Author(s):  
Leo Arwansyah ◽  
Andi Najemi ◽  
Aga Anum Prayudi
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Death Penalty ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Capital Punishment ◽  
Time Limit ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Laws And Regulations

The purpose of this article is to find out how the aspects of legal certainty and justice in the implementation of the death penalty in Indonesia and how the concept of the deadline for the execution of capital punishment that is legal and just. By using the normative juridical method, this article shows that the aspects of certainty and justice regarding the time limit for the implementation of the death penalty are still not regulated in positive law, the practice of capital punishment often raises problems related to the time limit for execution, aspects of legal certainty and justice for death convicts have not. guaranteed, so that it is necessary to renew the laws and regulations related to the implementation of the death penalty both in material criminal law, formal criminal law, and criminal law enforcement. Abstrak Tujuan artikel ini adalah untuk mengetahui bagaimana aspek kepastian hukum dan keadilan dalam pelaksanaan pidana mati di Indonesia serta bagaimana konsep batas waktu pelaksanaan pidana mati yang berkepastian hukum dan berkeadilan. Dengan menggunakan metode yuridis normatif, artikel ini menunjukkan aspek kepastian dan keadilan mengenai pengaturan batas waktu pelaksanaan pidana mati masih belum terdapat pengaturannya di dalam hukum positif, praktik  pidana mati kerap menimbulkan persoalan terkait batas waktu pelaksanaan eksekusi, aspek kepastian hukum dan keadilan bagi terpidana mati belum terjamin, sehingga perlu pembaharuan terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan terkait pelaksanaan pidana mati baik dalam hukum pidana materiil, hukum pidana formal, maupun hukum pelaksanaan pidana.

scholarly journals Tinjauan Yuridis Tentang Pengurangan Masa Pidana (Remisi) terhadap Tindak Pidana Narkotika

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 137-142
Author(s):  
Ni Kadek Nilawati Dwi Cahya ◽  
Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi ◽  
I Made Minggu Widyantara
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Regional Office ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Directorate General ◽  
The Government

Indonesia is a rule of law which gives relief to prisoners every year, referred to as remission, is a policy of the government in order to reduce criminal penalties for each suspect caught in criminal law. Remission is given to those who during the sentence meet the provisions as people who are entitled to remission as well-behaved, and comply with any applicable regulations at the place of punishment. For someone who during his sentence is always against the rules cannot be given a remission. This study aims to determine the regulation of reducing the criminal period and determine the provision of remissions for narcotics offenders. The research method used is a type of normative legal research conducted by the method of recording and assessment based on legal materials. Researchers study and gather information through legal science books without deviating from positive law in order to conclude a conclusion. The implementation of the remission for narcotics offenders, namely the determination of the remission, is carried out by the decision of the head of the regional office on behalf of the minister, after issuing the stipulation of the head of the regional office must submit a report on the determination of the reduction of the criminal period to the minister of the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights cq. Directorate General of Corrections.

scholarly journals Juridical Analysis of the Amount of Diyat Toward Armed Conflict Victims in Aceh

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 104-113
Author(s):  
Munawarsyah Munawarsyah ◽  
Januddin Januddin ◽  
Muhammad Jafar
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Armed Conflict ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Central Government ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
The Government ◽  
Responsible Party ◽  
Standard Concept

Islamic criminal law recognizes a kind of punishment called as diyat (compensation) for victims of murder and torture which has been apologized by the victim or family of victim. Diyat is amount of money or properties that should be paid by the perpetrator due to the death or damage of victim body. The legal basis for the determination of diyat can be found in Koran, chapter Al-Baqarah verse 178. Apart from that, there is Hadist of Muhammad Prophet written by Abu Dawud (peace be upon him), explaining the amount of diyat based on crime category whether murder or torture.Aceh Governance has implemented this kind of punishment as a solution on criminal offences in realizing and fulfilling justice for armed conflict victims since 2002. In providing the policy of such payment for the victims in Aceh is based on the assumption that they are under the responsibility of state, therefore the government has determined the compensation on them. The amount of the compensation provided for the victims is not equal to the amount ruled by Islamic criminal law. Therefore, it is interesting to explore regarding the concept becoming the basic for determining it by Aceh Government, and compared it to the amount ruled by the law.The research reveals that the sum of money for the compensation of what called diyat based on Islamic criminal law is the standard concept but it can be replaced by sum of money or properties that have equal price. The basic rules for this punishment in Islamic criminal law can be found in Al-Baqarah verse 178 of Koran. Moreover, regarding the sum of payment that should be provided can be found in Hadith of Prophet of Muhammad Peace be upon him which is told by Imam Abu Daud, mercy Allah for him. Practically, in Islamic criminal law the court, responsible persons and a due date for the payment must decide it.  The rule consisting in the Islamic law is really different from the implementation of compensation done by Aceh Government towards the victims in Aceh. It is recommended that the Aceh Government should realize the rules of the sum of compensation that should be received by the victims or the families based on the determination of the Court as a legal basis. In addition, the Central government as the main responsible party in repairing the condition of the society after the conflict should become the priority and absolute. The law enforcement in fulfilling the rights in Aceh should be done by involving some parties especially priest. Hence the society of the victims in Aceh obtains justice and legal certainty to get their rights.

Substantive Criminal Law

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Butt ◽  
Tim Lindsey
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Law Reform ◽  
Aceh Province ◽  
The Government ◽  
Dutch Colonialism

The sources of Indonesian criminal law are numerous. The backbone of substantive criminal law is the Criminal Code (KUHP), which was first applied in Indonesia during Dutch colonialism in 1918 and endorsed in 1946, after Independence. Today, most of this Code remains intact but for a handful of additions and deletions. Criminal law reform has proceeded largely through enactment of ‘special criminal laws’ governing particular offences. The government has, for many years, recognized that the Code is out-of-date, and replacements have been drafted and debated but none agreed upon. The most recent draft, which this chapter discusses, retains or adds controversial offences, including defamation, prostitution, homosexuality, and blasphemy. Meanwhile, Aceh province has had authority to impose its own criminal laws, based on Islamic law, since 2006. These are, by modern standards, archaic and appear to breach a range of human rights, both domestic and international.

Kontrol Keimigrasian terhadap Kunjungan Orang Asing di Provinsi Aceh

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Safrida Safrida
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Immigration Law ◽  
Limited Budget ◽  
Aceh Province ◽  
Directorate General ◽  
The Government ◽  
Supervisory Staff ◽  
And Control ◽  
Staff Number

The government, through the Directorate General of Immigration, an Indonesian government agency under the Ministry of Law and Human Rights, has carried out one of its duties and functions, namely the supervision and control of foreigners residing in Indonesian territory, based on Law Number 6, 2011 concerning Immigration. The supervision or control is carried out to enforce the law, especially the immigration law. The class II Lhokseumawe Immigration Office in the Aceh province, which is the technical implementation unit for immigration in the region, has carried out its duties and functions of monitoring and controlling foreigners in its working area since the release of regulation No. 6, 2011. The results of this study reported that the implementation of supervision of foreigners at the Lhokseumawe Immigration Office has been carried out properly based on the regulation concerning Immigration and Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights. But some constraints are still encountered, particularly lack of supervisory staff number, the width of the working area, and the limited budget. The author's suggestion should be that the implementation of supervision and control of foreigners at this working area should be carried out as often as possible and at the same time, the stakeholder (government) should resolve the obstacles met by staffs so that the immigration law enforcement can be achieved and improved.

scholarly journals Takzir sebagai Hukuman dalam Hukum Pidana Islam

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 255-272
Author(s):  
Usammah Usammah
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Legal System ◽  
National Level ◽  
Public Law ◽  
Community Life ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Sharia Law ◽  
Interesting Part ◽  
Western Law

Memformalisasikan syariat Islam baik dalam ranah kehidupan bermasyarakat dan sosial, dalam bernegara dan berbangsa tidak jarang terjadi perdebatan, baik perdebatan sosial-politik maupun keagamaan. Perdebatan itu di samping menyangkut memahami ajaran agama dan hubungannya dengan negara-bangsa, juga dalam memahami sistem hukum yang ada dalam negera, lebih-lebih bahwa negera menganut sistem hukum positif yang lebih banyak dipengaruhi oleh hukum barat. Gagasan pemberlakuan hukum pidana Islam tidak serta merta dapat dijalankan dengan baik tanpa adanya legislasi dan pembentukan hukum pidana Islam materil sebagai hukum positif yang berlaku. Juga bahwa hukum pidana Islam adalah hukum publik yang membutuhkan kekuasaan negara baik dalam pembentukannya maupun dalam penegakannya. Dalam hubungannya dengan legislasi dan pembentukan hukum (qanun syariat Islam), maka hal yang sangat menarik adalah bagaimana menentukan bentuk jarimah dan uqubatnya baik yang termasuk dalam kategori hudud, qisas, dan takzir sebagai bagian dari sistem penegakan hukum syariat Islam. Takzir as a Punishment in Islamic Criminal Law The formalizing of Islamic Sharia Law both in the realm of social and community life and also in the state and national level. This issue is frequently debatable, both in socio-political as well as in religious matter. The debate is not only about understanding religious teachings and their relationship with the nation, but also about understanding the legal system applicable in the country, especially the country which apply a positive legal system that influenced by western law. The idea of enforcing Islamic Criminal Law cannot be carried out properly without the existence of legislation and the establishment of Islamic Criminal Law as a positive law that enforced. In addition, Islamic Criminal Law is a public law that requires state power both in its formation and in its enforcement. In relation to legislation and the formation of law (Qanun Sharia), the very interesting part is how to determine the form of rahmah and uqubat both are included in the hudud, qisas and takzir categories as part of the Islamic Sharia law enforcement system.

scholarly journals Legal Certainty on The Implementation of Death Criminal Decisions that have Permanent Law Power in Indonesia(A Review of the Death Criminal Decision on Narcotics in 2014-2018)

2021 ◽  
Vol 07 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
ALI JOHARDI WIROGIOTO ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Death Penalty ◽  
Research Method ◽  
First Principle ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Religious Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
International Conventions ◽  
Principle Of Legality

The principle of legal certainty applied to the principle of extra ordinary crime is contrary to the respect for humanity as the most fundamental human rights principle and the principle of legality is associated with positive law and international conventions. The results of this study are intended to seek or find arguments for the certainty of the execution of the death penalty for the community, family, convicts and the state, so that the research on death penalty decisions in narcotics cases that occurred from 2014 to 2018. This research method is included in normative juridical law research. The conclusion is, sentencing with the threat of the death penalty can still be applied in Indonesia in narcotics crime cases is appropriate. Therefore, the death penalty, of course, state law does not conflict with religious law/teachings, in other words, the death penalty does not conflict with the first precepts because the first principle of Pancasila is Belief in One God, which means based on the beliefs/religions of each person who in carrying out/believes His religion is also guaranteed in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, which is contained in Article 28 E paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) and Article 29 paragraph (2).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document