scholarly journals Batas Waktu Pelaksanaan Pidana Mati dalam Perspektif Kepastian Hukum dan Keadilan di Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 12-30
Author(s):  
Leo Arwansyah ◽  
Andi Najemi ◽  
Aga Anum Prayudi
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Death Penalty ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Capital Punishment ◽  
Time Limit ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Laws And Regulations

The purpose of this article is to find out how the aspects of legal certainty and justice in the implementation of the death penalty in Indonesia and how the concept of the deadline for the execution of capital punishment that is legal and just. By using the normative juridical method, this article shows that the aspects of certainty and justice regarding the time limit for the implementation of the death penalty are still not regulated in positive law, the practice of capital punishment often raises problems related to the time limit for execution, aspects of legal certainty and justice for death convicts have not. guaranteed, so that it is necessary to renew the laws and regulations related to the implementation of the death penalty both in material criminal law, formal criminal law, and criminal law enforcement. Abstrak Tujuan artikel ini adalah untuk mengetahui bagaimana aspek kepastian hukum dan keadilan dalam pelaksanaan pidana mati di Indonesia serta bagaimana konsep batas waktu pelaksanaan pidana mati yang berkepastian hukum dan berkeadilan. Dengan menggunakan metode yuridis normatif, artikel ini menunjukkan aspek kepastian dan keadilan mengenai pengaturan batas waktu pelaksanaan pidana mati masih belum terdapat pengaturannya di dalam hukum positif, praktik  pidana mati kerap menimbulkan persoalan terkait batas waktu pelaksanaan eksekusi, aspek kepastian hukum dan keadilan bagi terpidana mati belum terjamin, sehingga perlu pembaharuan terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan terkait pelaksanaan pidana mati baik dalam hukum pidana materiil, hukum pidana formal, maupun hukum pelaksanaan pidana.

scholarly journals Hukuman Mati Bagi Koruptor Pada Saat Keadaan Tertentu (Pandemi COVID-19) Perspektif Hukum Nasional dan Hukum Islam

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 137-150
Author(s):  
Dahyul Daipon
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Death Penalty ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
The Government

The current condition of the Covid-19 pandemic is a time where almost everyone feels social and economic difficulties. Communities whose regions apply restrictions/quarantines are highly dependent on assistance from the government. This paper is a study and analysis of one question how the death penalty can be applied to perpetrators of corruption during the Covid-19 outbreak or pandemic. In the criminal law that applies in Indonesia, the death penalty for perpetrators of criminal acts of corruption is contained in Article 2 paragraph 2 of Law no. 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes. Meanwhile, in Islamic law, corruption is categorized as jarimah ta'zir. The results of this study conclude that during a pandemic, the death penalty can be applied to corruptors in accordance with the provisions of Article 2 of the Anti-Corruption Law and the provisions of Islamic criminal law as jarimah ta'zir. There are fundamental differences in the application of the death penalty for corruptors according to positive law and Islamic criminal law, especially with regard to the conditions required for the imposition of the death penalty. Even though this seems cruel according to human rights supporters, this needs to be a concern for all law enforcers so that they can carry out strict law enforcement against perpetrators of corruption crimes during the pandemic.

scholarly journals DIKOTOMI PIDANA MATI SEBAGAI HAK ASASI MANUSIA DI INDONESIA MENURUT HUKUM POSITIF DAN HUKUM PIDANA ISLAM

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (01) ◽  
pp. 15-33
Author(s):  
Muhammad Afif
Keyword(s):  
Death Penalty ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Capital Punishment ◽  
Subject Matter ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
The Public ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Difference

Eksekusi hukuman mati dalam hukum positif Indonesia dilakukan dengan cara hukuman mati, yang berarti bahwa eksekusi hukuman mati tidak dilakukan di depan orang banyak atau tidak dipublikasikan. Dalam hukum pidana Islam, dieksekusi dengan cara dipenggal, dilempar dengan batu (Rajam) dan dieksekusi di depan umum, artinya eksekusi hukuman mati disaksikan oleh publik. Jenis penelitian merupakan penelitian normative.Pokok bahasan dari artikel ini adalah bagaimana eksekusi hukuman mati memberikan efek jera bagi masyarakat? karena salah satu tujuan hukuman mati adalah memberikan efek jera kepada seseorang / masyarakat agar tidak melakukan kejahatan. Tidak ada perbedaan antara eksekusi hukuman mati dilihat dalam hukum positif Indonesia dan hukum Islam, pada dasarnya kedua tindak pidana tersebut sama-sama memberikan efek jera berupa ketakutan kepada publik untuk melakukan kejahatan atau tindakan yang melanggar hukum. Perbedaan antara hukum positif Indonesia dan hukum Islam, hanya dalam hal prosedur eksekusi. Abstract The execution of the death penalty in Indonesian positive law is carried out by means of a death shot, meaning that the execution of the death penalty is not carried out in front of a crowd or unpublished. In Islamic criminal law, the execution is executed by beheaded, thrown with stone (Rajam) and the execution is executed in front of the public, meaning that the execution of capital punishment is witnessed by the public. this type of research is normative research. The subject matter of this article is how the execution of capital punishment theoretically gives more deterrent effect to society? because one of the objectives of criminalizing, especially capital punishment is to give deterrent effect to a person / society in order not to commit a crime / crime. The execution of the death penalty between two criminal sides namely the positive crime of Indonesia and Islamic crime, basically the two criminal act equally give a deterrent effect in the form of fear to the public to commit a crime or a crime that violates the law. It's just possible to see the difference between positive criminal Indonesia and Islamic crime in terms of the procedure of execution execution.  

scholarly journals Criminal law politics on regulation of criminal actions in Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Suci Ramadani ◽  
Elwi Danil ◽  
Fadilla Sabri ◽  
Aria Zurnetti
Keyword(s):  
Death Penalty ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Legal History ◽  
Comparative Law ◽  
Scientific Paper ◽  
Prison Sentence ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Laws And Regulations

This paper aimed to discuss the legal politics of regulating narcotics and illegal drugs in Indonesia. Using normative legal research methods, this normative legal research focuses on an inventory of positive law, legal principles and doctrines, legal findings in cases in concreto, legal systematics, comparative law, and legal history. The writing of this scientific paper uses primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. Primary legal materials are in the form of laws and regulations related to the issues raised, including Law No. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. Secondary legal materials are materials that explain primary legal materials, such as law books. The results of the research are supported by the opinions of legal experts (doctrine), as well as legal journals related to this research, among others, that narcotics legal politics is the main point in forming a legal system in the form of laws and regulations that regulate criminal acts as described above, Articles 111, 112 has a reasonably heavy prison sentence, which is a minimum of 4 years, and a maximum sentence of 20 years, even the death penalty.

scholarly journals PENYELESAIAN PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA RINGAN MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG DALAM PERSPEKTIF RESTORATIF JUSTICE (Adjudication Of Misdemeanor Based On Legislation In Current Perspectives)

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 337
Author(s):  
Sri Mulyani
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Strong Reaction ◽  
Small Communities ◽  
The Public ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Procedure Code

Tindak pidana ringan adalah perkara yang diancam dengan pidana penjara atau kurungan paling lama 3 (tiga) bulan dan atau denda sebanyak-banyaknya Rp 7.500; (tujuh ratus lima puluh ribu rupiah) dan penghinaan ringan, berkaitan dengan banyaknya kasus Tindak Pidana Ringan yang yang terjadi di Indonesia, yang melibatkan masyarakat kecil yang dapat diakses oleh publik sehingga menimbulkan simpati masyarakat luas yang akhirnya memberikan advokasi. Latar belakang tulisan ini adalah penegakkan hukum Tindak Pidana Ringan ini mendapat reaksi yang keras dari masyarakat atas ketidak puasanpenyelesaian yangtidak memenuhi rasa keadilan.Tujuan dari penulisan ini dapat digunakan sebagai pedoman dalam rangka menciptakan kepastian hukum, ketertiban dan perlindungan hukum terutama bagi masyarakat, tersangka maupun para pencari keadilan dan kebenaran. Metode yang digunakan adalah normatif yuridis melalui kajian peraturan perundang-undangan, doktrin, dan yurisprudensi perkara tindak pidana ringan. Tulisan ini membahas tentang pengertian tindak pidana ringan, hukum positif yang mengatur tindak pidana ringan dengan kesimpulan antara lain adalah bahwa pengaturan hukum tentang kejahatan ringan pada dasarnya telah diatur dalam KUHAP dan KUHP dan PERPU. bahkan dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung (PERMA) Nomor 2 Tahun 2012 Tentang Penyesuaian Batasan Tindak pidana Ringan dan jumlah denda dalam KUHAP.AbstractA misdemeanor is a case that shall be charged to imprisonment of up three years and/or to a maximum fine of seven hundred and fifty thousand rupiahs. Relating to a number of the misdemeanor in Indonesia, that involves the small communities which can be accessed by the public so that it make sympathy of society and then give them advocation. The background of this writing is law enforcement of misdemeanor that has a strong reaction from people in dissatisfaction of its adjudication because it is far from a sense of fairness. Whereas the purpose of this writing can be a guideline in order to create a legal certainty, orderliness and law protection especially society, the accused or the seekers of truth and justice. This method of writing is a normative juridical by legislation study, doctrine, and jurisprudence. It discusses the understanding of misdemeanor, a positive law that order it. It concludes that law arrangements about misdemeanor basically has been ruled in the Criminal Law Procedure Code (KUHAP) and the Criminal Code (KUHP) and government regulation in lieu of Law (PERPU), even in the regulation of Supreme Court Number 2, Year 2012 concerning The Adjustment Limitation of Misdemeanor and Fine in the Criminal Law Procedure Code (KUHAP.

scholarly journals Konsepsi Hukum Progresif dalam Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 35-39
Author(s):  
Efraim Mbomba Reda ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
I Made Minggu Widyantara
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Role Models ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Legal Positivism ◽  
Sociology Of Law ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Descriptive Method

Progressive law puts forward the sociology of law rather than legal certainty which is the focus of legal positivism. In Indonesia, this law was coined by Satjipto Rahardjo. This study aims to determine the formulation of progressive law in future criminal law, and to determine the actualization of the concept of progressive law in regulating corruption in Indonesia. The research method used is a normative legal research method with statute and conceptual approaches. The technique of collecting legal materials in this study is a descriptive method that aims to obtain the meaning of reality related to the problems to be discussed and solved in this study. The results show that in the current Criminal Code Bill, progressive law has been regulated, to be precise in Article 2 paragraph (1) and (2). Progressive law is also regulated in Law no. 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power. Then, the actualization of progressive law in regulating corruption in Indonesia is a judge with the powers that take into account the sociological context of society in making decisions. Judges, prosecutors and lawyers can certainly discuss together in eradicating corruption. Efforts are also being made to reconstruct and redefine the power of law enforcement. This arrangement can also encourage the KPK to be more progressive in eradicating corruption, as well as building law enforcers who have morality so that they can become role models and increase public participation, for example by forming NGOs in preventing or fighting corruption in various agencies.

scholarly journals Takzir sebagai Hukuman dalam Hukum Pidana Islam

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 255-272
Author(s):  
Usammah Usammah
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Legal System ◽  
National Level ◽  
Public Law ◽  
Community Life ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Sharia Law ◽  
Interesting Part ◽  
Western Law

Memformalisasikan syariat Islam baik dalam ranah kehidupan bermasyarakat dan sosial, dalam bernegara dan berbangsa tidak jarang terjadi perdebatan, baik perdebatan sosial-politik maupun keagamaan. Perdebatan itu di samping menyangkut memahami ajaran agama dan hubungannya dengan negara-bangsa, juga dalam memahami sistem hukum yang ada dalam negera, lebih-lebih bahwa negera menganut sistem hukum positif yang lebih banyak dipengaruhi oleh hukum barat. Gagasan pemberlakuan hukum pidana Islam tidak serta merta dapat dijalankan dengan baik tanpa adanya legislasi dan pembentukan hukum pidana Islam materil sebagai hukum positif yang berlaku. Juga bahwa hukum pidana Islam adalah hukum publik yang membutuhkan kekuasaan negara baik dalam pembentukannya maupun dalam penegakannya. Dalam hubungannya dengan legislasi dan pembentukan hukum (qanun syariat Islam), maka hal yang sangat menarik adalah bagaimana menentukan bentuk jarimah dan uqubatnya baik yang termasuk dalam kategori hudud, qisas, dan takzir sebagai bagian dari sistem penegakan hukum syariat Islam. Takzir as a Punishment in Islamic Criminal Law The formalizing of Islamic Sharia Law both in the realm of social and community life and also in the state and national level. This issue is frequently debatable, both in socio-political as well as in religious matter. The debate is not only about understanding religious teachings and their relationship with the nation, but also about understanding the legal system applicable in the country, especially the country which apply a positive legal system that influenced by western law. The idea of enforcing Islamic Criminal Law cannot be carried out properly without the existence of legislation and the establishment of Islamic Criminal Law as a positive law that enforced. In addition, Islamic Criminal Law is a public law that requires state power both in its formation and in its enforcement. In relation to legislation and the formation of law (Qanun Sharia), the very interesting part is how to determine the form of rahmah and uqubat both are included in the hudud, qisas and takzir categories as part of the Islamic Sharia law enforcement system.

scholarly journals Legal Certainty on The Implementation of Death Criminal Decisions that have Permanent Law Power in Indonesia(A Review of the Death Criminal Decision on Narcotics in 2014-2018)

2021 ◽  
Vol 07 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
ALI JOHARDI WIROGIOTO ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Death Penalty ◽  
Research Method ◽  
First Principle ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Religious Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
International Conventions ◽  
Principle Of Legality

The principle of legal certainty applied to the principle of extra ordinary crime is contrary to the respect for humanity as the most fundamental human rights principle and the principle of legality is associated with positive law and international conventions. The results of this study are intended to seek or find arguments for the certainty of the execution of the death penalty for the community, family, convicts and the state, so that the research on death penalty decisions in narcotics cases that occurred from 2014 to 2018. This research method is included in normative juridical law research. The conclusion is, sentencing with the threat of the death penalty can still be applied in Indonesia in narcotics crime cases is appropriate. Therefore, the death penalty, of course, state law does not conflict with religious law/teachings, in other words, the death penalty does not conflict with the first precepts because the first principle of Pancasila is Belief in One God, which means based on the beliefs/religions of each person who in carrying out/believes His religion is also guaranteed in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, which is contained in Article 28 E paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) and Article 29 paragraph (2).

scholarly journals PROBLEMATIKA PENERAPAN PIDANA MATI DALAM KONTEKS PENEGAKAN HUKUM DI INDONESIA

2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 207
Author(s):  
Slamet Tri Wahyudi
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Death Penalty ◽  
Government Policy ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Government Policies ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
The People ◽  
The Government

Law enforcement without direction and not based on the three pillars of the justice of law, legal certainty and the benefits to society can break the law anyway even violate human rights. As one of the policies of the government that are not considered mencerminakan the values of justice and disturbing for the people, the government policy that acts of omission or delay in the application of the death penalty. This research is a normative legal normative juridical approach. The data collected is secondary data were analyzed using qualitative methods juridical analysis. Based on these results it can be concluded that in the application of the death penalty there are serious legal issues, this is due to government policies that commit omission or delay in the execution of the death penalty is a violation of human rights as stipulated in Article 28 of the 1945 Constitution. Keywords: Death penalty, Justice, Legal Certainty, Law

scholarly journals TINDAK PIDANA TERORISME DARI PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PIDANA INTERNASIONAL

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rahma Yanti
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
International Criminal ◽  
International Crime ◽  
Transnational Crime ◽  
Criminal Court ◽  
International Criminal Law ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Sensitive Issue ◽  
International Conventions

Terrorism is one of transnational crime base on international conventions. One of national crime which consists of transnational aspects. Transnational crime convention only manage about how to run cooperation to eliminate national crime which across country borders. Terrorism hasn’t consider as International crime because there’s no unification about its definition. Terrorism still consider as a sensitive issue in each country related with rass, etnis, culture, religion, and geographical aspects. Terrorism law enforcement proses is each country positive law jurisdiction and not as International Criminal Court jurisdiction based on Rome Statuta.Keywords: Crime, Terrorism, International Criminal Law

scholarly journals Tindak Pidana Turut Serta Sebagai Perantara Suap Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-90
Author(s):  
Adeng Septi Irawan
Keyword(s):  
Economic Crisis ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Capital Punishment ◽  
The State ◽  
Penal Code ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
National Disaster ◽  
Muslim Scholars

Abstract: This article discusses about the sanction of criminal act as a bribery mediator under the perspective of Islamic Criminal Law. The criminal act as a bribery mediator is explained in the Penal Code in Article 55 Paragraph (1) ie those who do, who order to do, and who participate in doing the deed. The bribery crime is also described in Article 12 Sub-Article c of Law No. 31 year 1999 jo Law No. 20 year 2001 on the “eradication of corruption cases that punishment for the perpetrator of bribery, gratification, etc., will be imprisoned and/or sanction. Even in the specific provision, if corruption is done by causing harm to the state, such as a national disaster or at a time when the country is in a state of economic crisis, it can be subject to capital punishment. The purposes of applying punishment in positive law are to create certainty, justice, and legal benefit in Indonesia. The Islamic criminal law has made it clear that unlawful acts in bribery (isytirâk fî al jarîmah al-risywah) according to Muslim scholars are haram (unlawful). The punishment for the perpetrators of isytirâk fî al jarîmah al-risywah is ta'zîr. Keywords: Criminal act, bribery mediator, Islamic criminal law. Abstrak: Artikel ini membahas tentang sanksi tindak pidana turut serta sebagai perantara suap perspektif hukum pidana Islam. Tindak pidana turut serta dijelaskan dalam KUHP dalam pasal 55 ayat (1) yaitu mereka yang melakukan, yang menyuruh melakukan, dan yang turut serta melakukan perbuatan. Adapun tindak pidana suap dijelaskan dalam Pasal 12 huruf c UU Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 jo UU Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi bahwa ancaman hukuman bagi pelakunya, baik itu suap, gratifikasi, dan lain-lain, akan dikenakan hukuman penjara dan/atau denda. Bahkan dalam ketentuan khususnya, apabila korupsi dilakukan dengan mengakibatkan bahaya bagi negara, seperti terjadi bencana nasional atau pada saat negara dalam keadaan krisis ekonomi, maka dapat diancam hukuman mati. Tujuan penerapan hukuman tersebut adalah menciptakan kepastian, keadilan, dan kemanfaatan hukum di Indonesia. Hukum pidana Islam telah menjelaskan bahwa perbuatan melawan hukum dalam turut serta suap (isytirâk fî jarîmah al-risywah) menurut para ulama adalah haram dan hukumannya adalah ta’zîr. Kata Kunci: Tindak pidana, perantara suap, hukum pidana Islam.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document