scholarly journals Holistic sustainability assessment systems for buildings and neighborhoods

Author(s):  
Constantinos Balaras ◽  
◽  
Kaliopi Droutsa ◽  
Elena Dascalaki ◽  
Simon Kotoyiannidis
Author(s):  
Giancarlo Paganin

Enabling sustainable growth is highly dependent on the ability of private capital to invest in projects capable of achieving sustainability objectives divided into the three economic, environmental and social components. The international financial system has defined criteria for assessing the sustainability of investments, also applicable in the construction sector. Still, these criteria do not always appear integrated with the sustainability assessment systems developed by the AEC (architecture, engineering and construction) industry. This article proposes reflections on the relationships between the sustainability indicators of sustainable finance and those typically used in the AEC industry with the purpose of identifying possible impacts on the disciplines involved in the design process.


2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-55
Author(s):  
Carlos Eduardo Silva ◽  
Ricardo Luiz Cavalcanti de Albuquerque Junior ◽  
Cláudia Moura de Melo ◽  
Rubens Riscala Madi

Brazil is the holder of the greatest biodiversity on the planet, and can not shirk regarding the development of monitoring templates related to nature conservation and sustainable use of natural resources. In this sense, this research aimed to develop a model for evaluating indicators based on the methodology MESMIS (Marco para la Evaluación de Sistemas de Manejo de Recursos Naturales incorporando Indicadores de Sustentabilidade) for use in its level of fishing communities or extractive related to protected areas, based on the existing community of fishermen in the surrounding National Forest Ibura, Brazil. The MESMIS the methodological basis was chosen for model development and evaluation indicators. Descriptive statistics analyzed censitariamente (N=100) with the minimum (MIN), medium (MED), desirable (P75), and maximum (MAX). The resulting model consists of 14 sustainability indicators that meet the attributes: (a) productivity, (b) stability, resilience and reliability, (c) adaptability, (d) equity, (e) self-management. It is possible to conclude that there is technical feasibility and to develop mathematical models of sustainability assessment systems based on indicators. When reviewed in complex revealed that artisanal fisheries developed in the analyzed system has a Relative Sustainability Index (IRS) of 26%. The results also demonstrated that it is possible to reach an IRS=33% based on the local situation (P75).


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 46-58
Author(s):  
Gustavo Henrique Bruno Polli

With the arising of environmental problems from the construction sector, the sustainability issues gained more space, making sustainability assessment tools emerge. These tools are based on the global definition of sustainability that meets Environmental, Economic, and Social criteria, and each system has a different and peculiar methodology. This paper aims to analyse the structure adopted by these European sustainability assessment systems: BREAM UK, DGBN (Germany), ITACA (Italy), LiderA (Portugal), and HQE (France), showing an overview of each system assisted by the SWOT Matrix, enabling the reader to better understand their differences. There are no superior or inferior systems, but each system notably performs much better in a subject or goal.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 1903 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela Mischen ◽  
George Homsy ◽  
Carl Lipo ◽  
Robert Holahan ◽  
Valerie Imbruce ◽  
...  

In order to understand the impact of individual communities on global sustainability, we need a community sustainability assessment system (CSAS). While many sustainability assessment systems exist, they prove inadequate to the task. This article presents the results of a systematic review of the literature on existing sustainability assessment systems; offers a definition of a sustainable community; provides a multi-scale, systems approach to thinking about community; and makes recommendations from the field of performance measurement for the construction of a CSAS.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 100271
Author(s):  
Suélen Bebber ◽  
Bianca Libardi ◽  
Suane De Atayde Moschen ◽  
Marcelo Benetti Correa da Silva ◽  
Ana Cristina Fachinelli ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Thomas Lützkendorf ◽  
Petr Hájek ◽  
Antonín Lupíšek ◽  
Andrea Immendörfer ◽  
Sylviane Nibel ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document