scholarly journals DIÁLOGO SOBRE OS FUNDAMENTOS DA EDUCAÇÃO: RECORTES E DISCUSSÕES, VOL. V

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 161
Author(s):  
Eliane Pimentel Camillo Barra Nova de Melo

A coleção Fundamentos da Educação: Recortes e Discussões chega ao seu quinto volume todos publicados pela Paco Editorial. O presente volume foi lançado em 2015 e contem 406 páginas, escritas por 21 autores, dentre eles graduados, especialistas, mestrandos, mestres, doutorandos, doutores, pós-doutores, todos estudiosos do campo educacional e comprometidos em compreender melhor tal fenômeno. Para isso buscaram, nesta obra, desvendar o pensamento pedagógico dos seguintes estudiosos: Charles Darwin, Herbert Spencer, Édouard Claparède, Adolphe Ferrière, Henri Wallon, Roger Cousinet, Alexander Luria, Alexei Leontiev, Ana Teberosky, Emília Ferreiro, Howard Gardner, Hannah Arendt, Augusto Comte, Émile Durkheim, B.F. Skinner, Lawrence Stenhouse, Anton Makarenko, Florestan Fernandes, Louis Althusser e Michel Foucault.

1999 ◽  
Vol 21-22 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-117
Author(s):  
Sandra Caponi

Tomando como ponto de partida os trabalhos de Nietzsche, Hannah Arendt e Michel Foucault, este escrito pretende problematizar a lógica interna da compaixão piedosa, pois, como tentaremos mostrar, ela parece instaurar uma modalidade peculiar de exercício de poder que se estrutura a partir do binômio servir-obedecer. A partir desses autores, pretendemos ler alguns exemplos que a história da humanidade nos apresenta para ilustrar o exercício dessa "cruel compaixão".


2014 ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Flavio Guglielmi

Las lecturas contemporáneas de la política restituyen dimensiones generalmente desatendidas por la modernidad liberal. Para dicha propuesta, un factor importante es la distinción entre poder, fuerza y violencia. Gran parte de la modernidad despliega una idea de política que involucra dichas nociones como si fueran elementos intercambiables o con las mismas propiedades. Para repensar la política y restituir sus dimensiones se vuelve indispensable analizar los componentes mencionados; señalando sus alcances, diferencias y relaciones. El presente trabajo se basa en el estudio de dos autores contemporáneos que problematizaron dicha temática y que ejercieron una gran influencia en el campo de la teoría política: Hannah Arendt y Michel Foucault. Ambos presentan percepciones sobre poder, violencia y fuerza que emergen al considerarlas como tipos de acciones que difieren respecto a su finalidad y medios de actuar. La hipótesis que pretende responder el presente escrito es si dicha distinción corresponde también a una diferencia entre una actuación inmanente y otra de tipo trascendente.


1999 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-115
Author(s):  
Carlos Augusto Peixoto Junior

Este trabalho tem como objetivo abordar o tema do racismo através de uma análise que procura enfatizar seus aspectos discursivo e afetivo. Neste sentido, recorremos às teses de pensadores como Hannah Arendt e Michel Foucault para fundamentar uma perspectiva histórico-filosófica sobre o discurso racista, e ao enfoque psicanalítico para caracterizar as diferentes formas de expressão do ódio racista.


Author(s):  
Michael A. Peters ◽  
Marek Tesar ◽  
Kirsten Locke

Michel Foucault was born in Poitiers in 1926 and died of AIDS in 1984 at the age of 57. In his short life span Foucault became an emblem for a generation of intellectuals: someone who embodied in his work the most-pressing intellectual issues of his time. In his inaugural lecture at the Collège de France, he named as his closest supports and models Georges Dumèzil, Georges Canguilhem (the philosopher of biology who succeeded Gaston Bachelard at the Sorbonne), and Jean Hyppolite. He was a student both of Louis Althusser and Maurice Merleau-Ponty. He grew up in the tradition of a history of philosophy that dominated the French university, a history that gave pride of place to Hegel and helped to legitimate the contemporaneous emphases on phenomenology and existentialism, especially as it developed in the thought of Jean-Paul Sartre. He was classified by the popular press as a member of the structuralist Gang of Four, along with Claude Lévi-Strauss, Jacques Lacan, and Roland Barthes. Foucault in 1964 indicated his intellectual debts in an early essay titled “Nietzsche, Freud, Marx,” yet his relationship to Marx and Marxism was more complex and problematic than his engagement with Nietzsche, whose Genealogy of Morals (originally published in 1887) provided a model for historical study. He came to Nietzsche through the writings of Georges Bataille and Maurice Blanchot, both of whom exercised tremendous influence on his work. Yet, it was Nietzsche and Martin Heidegger who helped Foucault to frame up his life’s work as the history by which human beings become subjects and to change the emphasis of his early work from political subjugation of “docile bodies” to individuals as self-determining beings continually in the process of constituting themselves as ethical subjects. In this article we focus on internationally published English editions to avoid confusion and to provide readers a balanced overview of top-quality sources currently available.


2018 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 149-162
Author(s):  
Ian Leask ◽  

This article examines the possibility that phenomenology was “always already” a theological enterprise, by outlining some of the foundational criticisms levelled by Michel Foucault and Louis Althusser. For both thinkers, the phenomenological stress on “lived experience” grants an undue primacy to the realm of “interiority”; as a result, subjectivity is left, not just reified, but also deified. By contrast, both Foucault and Althusser will argue for understanding the subject as constituted rather than constitutive; philosophy’s task, accordingly, is to delineate the broader structures (economic, ideological, discursive, linguistic, etc.) that create “lived experience,” rather than to hypostatize the subject as the privileged bearer of logos. As well as outlining the contours of this critique, however, the article indicates some of the shortcomings entailed in a total disavowal of “lived experience.”


Author(s):  
Thomas Dixon

‘Altruism’ was coined by the French sociologist Auguste Comte in the early 1850s as a theoretical term in his ‘cerebral theory’ and as the central ideal of his atheistic ‘Religion of Humanity’. This book traces this new language of ‘altruism’ as it spread through British culture between the 1850s and the 1900s, and in doing so provides a portrait of Victorian moral thought. Drawing attention to the importance of Comtean positivism in setting the agenda for debates about science and religion, this volume challenges received ideas about both Charles Darwin and Herbert Spencer as moral philosophers. Darwin saw sympathy and love, not only selfishness and competition, throughout the natural world. Spencer was the instigator of an Anti-Aggression League and an advocate of greater altruism in Britain’s dealings with the ‘lower races’. The book also sheds light on the rise of popular socialism in the 1880s, on the creation of the idealist ‘altruist’ in novels of the 1890s, and on the individualistic philosophies of Friedrich Nietzsche, Oscar Wilde, and G. E. Moore—authors considered by some to be representative of fin de siècle ‘egomania’. This wide-ranging study in the history of ideas is relevant to contemporary debates about altruism, evolution, religion, and ethics.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 50-57
Author(s):  
M Rizky Prawira

Istilah politik dan kebenaran telah secara umum dipergunakan bersama-sama dan dipadankan di masyarakat tanpa suatu pendefinisian yang jelas. Hal ini membuat penggunaan kedua term atau istilah ini menjadi ambigu dan tumpang tindih. Selain itu, dari sisi teori dan praktiknya sendiri, hubungan antar politik dan kebenaran masih belum dapat ditelaah oleh masyarakat luas. Sebagai tindak lanjut dari isu ini, paper ini menguraikan konsep kebenaran (truth) dan politik (politics) dari Hannah Arendt dan teori kekuasaan (power), pengetahuan (knowledge) dan kebenaran (truth) dari Michel Foucault. Setelah itu, paper ini melakukan perbandingan antar kedua teori ini dengan tujuan untuk mengetahui gambaran yang tepat mengenai hubungan antara politik dan kebenaran serta sejauh mana keduanya dapat dipisahkan satu sama lain. Melalui analisis perbandingan kedua teori terkait hubungan antara politik dan kebenaran ilmiah atau kebenaran rasional, dapat disimpulkan bahwa seberapa jauh kebenaran ilmiah dapat dipisahkan dari politik akan ditentukan melalui cara kebenaran tersebut didapatkan. Jika suatu kebenaran ilmiah didapatkan sendiri atau secara independen, tanpa suatu proses penelitian yang melibatkan pihak lain serta institusi, maka kebenaran tersebut tetap dapat berada di luar wilayah politik, jika tidak, kebenaran tersebut pasti akan menjadi elemen hubungan manusia yang bersifat politis.


Em Tese ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 196
Author(s):  
Letícia Malloy

Este ensaio objetiva apresentar reflexões sobre o romance Diario de la guerra del cerdo, escrito pelo argentino Adolfo Bioy Casares e publicado no ano de 1969. Toma-se por foco a análise de três eixos temáticos de relevo constantes do referido texto literário, quais sejam, a velhice, a memória e o poder. Para tanto, dialoga-se perspectivas teóricas de Simone de Beauvoir, no que toca à velhice, e Gerard Genette e Phillipe Lejeune acerca do narrador e do registro de memórias. Discorre-se, ainda, a respeito das relações de poder fomentadas ao longo do romance com fundamento em teses desenvolvidas por Michel Foucault, Louis Althusser e Pierre Bourdieu.PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Adolfo Bioy Casares; velhice; conflito geracional; memória; relações de poder


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document