Students’ Perception of Teaching Methods in Pharmacology in a Malaysian Medical School

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 16
Author(s):  
Renu Agarwal ◽  
Nafeeza Mohd Ismail

Introduction: The study attempts to evaluate the students’ perception of pharmacology as a subject, its usefulness in future practice, teaching methods currently used, and their patterns of learning and preparing for exams. Methods: A structured, self-administered questionnaire was distributed to second year medical students. Results: Of the 125 students who participated, 22.73 % considered pharmacology more important than any other subject. The students found small group sessions most interesting followed by directed self-learning, computer aided learning and lectures. Of those who responded, 79 and 66 % suggested to increase the small group and directed-self-learning sessions respectively. Up to 40 % of the students felt that pharmacology teaching must be through case-based discussions and 20 % requested for more practical sessions. Conclusions: It appears that majority of students entering the medical schools has little prior knowledge of pharmacology. While going through the preclinical years they understood the importance of pharmacology and its application in future practice, however, they tend to develop interest in one or other topics. Students prefer to have a greater number of small group sessions as they feel that these sessions are most useful for learning. Majority of the students tend to use both the textbooks and lecture notes and study regularly for better performance in examinations. The students also preferred to have more case-based learning sessions incorporated into the small group sessions.

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Annette Burgess ◽  
Elie Matar ◽  
Chris Roberts ◽  
Inam Haq ◽  
Lucy Wynter ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Two established small-group learning paradigms in medical education include Case-based learning (CBL) and Team-based learning (TBL). Characteristics common to both pedagogies include the use of an authentic clinical case, active small-group learning, activation of existing knowledge and application of newly acquired knowledge. However, there are also variances between the two teaching methods, and a paucity of studies that consider how these approaches fit with curriculum design principles. In this paper we explore student and facilitator perceptions of the two teaching methods within a medical curriculum, using Experience based learning (ExBL) as a conceptual lens. Methods A total of 34/255 (13%) Year 2 medical students completed four CBLs during the 2019 Renal and Urology teaching block, concurrent to their usual curriculum activities, which included weekly TBLs. Questionnaires were distributed to all students (n = 34) and CBL facilitators (n = 13). In addition, all students were invited to attend focus groups. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. Results In total, 23/34 (71%) of students and 11/13 (85%) of facilitators completed the questionnaires. Twelve students (35%) participated in focus groups. Findings indicate their experience in CBL to be positive, with many favourable aspects that built on and complemented their TBL experience that provided an emphasis on the basic sciences. The learning environment was enriched by the CBL framework that allowed application of knowledge to solve clinical problems within the small groups with consistent facilitator guidance and feedback, their capacity to focus discussion, and associated efficiencies in learning. Conclusion While the TBL model was integral in developing students’ knowledge and understanding of basic science concepts, the CBL model was integral in developing students’ clinical reasoning skills. The strengths of CBL relative to TBL included the development of authentic clinical reasoning skills and guided facilitation of small group discussion. Our findings suggest that delivery of a medical curriculum may be enhanced through increased vertical integration, applying TBL in earlier phases of the medical program where the focus is on basic science principles, with CBL becoming more relevant as students move towards clinical immersion.


2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wan Anita

<p align="center"><strong><em>ABSTRACT</em></strong></p><p align="center"><strong><em> </em></strong></p><p>Partograph is normal delivery and monitoring tools as well as clinical decision-making tool, because with the partograf the normal delivery will not be evaluated. Partograf documenting skills are competencies that must be owned by students who will become midwives in providing midwifery care during labor. In the implementation of learning, there are various methods that can be used for the Student Center Learning (SCL) either in class, laboratories and clinics. The purpose of this literature review was also to examine the extent of care documentation on labor topics, especially teaching methods to improve students' ability to do the documentation has been investigated. Methods This study is a systematic review. The results of this literature review showed an influence on the teaching methods of documentation skills of midwifery care during labor. The learning method used in the study include the case study method, demonstrations, multimedia, case based learning, simulations, exercises, small group discussions, study guides jobsheet, peer tutoring and cooperative STAD type. Each of these learning methods have advantages and disadvantages. There is no method of learning the best, but we recommend the use of the method in learning adapted to the purpose of learning to be achieved in order to be more effective and have significant results.</p><p><em>Key Word : Learning methods, documentation, partograf.</em></p><p align="center"><strong> </strong></p><p align="center"><strong>Abstrak </strong></p><p>Partograf adalah alat pemantauan persalinan normal dan juga sebagai alat pengambilan keputusan klinis, karena dengan adanya partograf maka persalinan yang tidak normal akan dapat dievaluasi. Ketrampilan mendokumentasikan partograf merupakan kompetensi yang harus dimiliki oleh mahasiswa yang nantinya akan menjadi bidan dalam memberikan asuhan kebidanan pada persalinan. Dalam pelaksanaan pembelajaran terdapat beragam metode pembelajaran yang dapat digunakan untuk <em>Student Center Learning</em> (SCL) baik dikelas, laboratorium maupun klinik. Tujuan <em>literature review</em> ini juga untuk melihat sejauhmana topik dokumentasi asuhan pada persalinan khususnya metode pembelajaran untuk meningkatkan ketrampilan mahasiswa dalam melakukan dokumentasi telah diteliti. Metode Penelitian ini merupakan <em>systematic review</em>. Hasil literature review ini menunjukkan terjadi pengaruh metode pembelajaran terhadap ketrampilan dokumentasi asuhan kebidanan pada persalinan. Metode pembelajaran yang digunakan dalam penelitian antara lain metode studi kasus, demonstrasi, multimedia, case based learning, simulasi, latihan, small group discussion, penuntun belajar jobsheet, peer tutoring serta kooperatif type STAD. Masing-masing metode pembelajaran memiliki kelebihan dan kekurangan. Tidak ada metode pembelajaran yang terbaik, tetapi sebaiknya penggunaan metode dalam pembelajaran disesuaikan dengan tujuan dari pembelajaran yang akan dicapai agar lebih efektif dan memiliki hasil signifikan.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p>Kata Kunci : Metode pembelajaran, dokumentasi, partograf</p>


2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 52
Author(s):  
Xiuquan Shi ◽  
Yanna Zhou ◽  
Haiyan Wang ◽  
Tao Wang ◽  
Chan Nie ◽  
...  

This paper aims to conduct the SD-CBL (study design with the case based learning, SD-CBL) in Epidemiologyteaching and evaluate its effect. Students from five classes were recruited, and a combined comprehensive teachingmodel of SD-CBL was used in the “Injury Epidemiology” chapter, while other chapters in “Epidemiology”curriculum were using a teaching model of case based learning (CBL) only or single PowerPoint (ppt) teaching (itwas considered as a traditional teaching in many universities). In the final of the semester, the effects of these threeteaching models were compared in different majors and different students source. We found that SD-CBLcomprehensive teaching model was better than ppt only and CBL teaching methods (P<0.001, P=0.007), and thesignificant differences were found in the increased scoring rate between different majors and different studentssource (P<0.001, P=0.015). Thus, we concluded that the SD-CBL teaching model is effective and worth to promotein “Epidemiology” teaching, especial in chapters of epidemiology application. Moreover, it is recommended toconduct SD-CBL teaching model in students, who are major in medicine and have good science basis.


Author(s):  
Hebat Allah Amin ◽  
Mohamed Alaaeldin Abdulmonem ◽  
Omar Gamal Goda ◽  
Mohamed Hany K. Shehata

Background: Implementing case-based learning (CBL) in the Integrated Modular Curriculum has proved a great efficiency in teaching medical students. We aim to develop and validate a customized model of CBL to integrate disciplines while meeting the requirements of our national academic reference standards. Phase I medical students reflection is presented. Methods: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, we present our experience in introducing CBL in a hybrid mixed model of teaching the pathology course to phase I, first batch (2016-2022 ) students. The data are collected from feedback questionnaires, the CBL implemented in the teaching of the pathology course is compared to the other implemented methods (didactic lectures, students presentations, PBL, and skillslabs), in the integrated modules. Also, a focus group has been conducted to receive the students reflection and suggestions for improvement. Results: Students satisfaction with CBL was the highest among all the teaching methods of the modules and other learning modalities with a mean of 4.770.46. Results were statistically significant (< 0.001). Conclusion: Most of the students declared that the customized CBL model is a convenient tool to be used in the Integrated Modular Curricula. Satisfaction is superior to that of didactic lectures and even other interactive teaching methods.


MedEdPORTAL ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bianca Nguyen ◽  
Gagani Athauda ◽  
Sanaz B. Kashan ◽  
Tracey Weiler ◽  
Rebecca L. Toonkel

Author(s):  
Sowmya Kaniganti ◽  
Nachiket Shankar ◽  
Satya Kishore Chivukula

Background: Active student centred learning is the need of the hour. Objectives being to compare the difference in the post test scores between students exposed to Case based learning (CBL) and Multiple choice questions (MCQ) (learning tool) during tutorials in Pharmacology for 2nd MBBS students. To understand the perception of students regarding teaching learning tools used in the study.Methods: This was a mixed methods study. Sixty eight students were divided into 2 groups. Hypertension and angina was discussed as CBL for Group 1 and as MCQ (Learning tool) for Group 2. One week later, cross over was done, Thyroid and Diabetes was discussed as MCQ for Group 1 and as CBL for Group 2. Post-test MCQ, pre validated questions (Likert scale) and open ended questions (qualitative) were distributed. Statistical Analysis: Difference in the post test scores in both the groups was analyzed using independent sample t test.Results: There was no significant difference in post test scores between CBL and MCQ groups. Questionnaire analysis suggested that both the methods provoked self-learning (45%). Thematic analysis demonstrated the positive experiences like motivated self-learning, clinical application, better understanding than theory classes and drawbacks being time consuming and fear of presentation.Conclusions: Since the study included both qualitative and quantitative analysis, the results can be elucidated comprehensively. This study implies that CBL and MCQ are effective and can be implemented into the curriculum of Pharmacology. This study can serve as an evidence to incorporate these tools in the curriculum.


2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sudheendra Kulkarni ◽  
Chandrakant Chillarge ◽  
Kumar Sai Sailesh

The present study was undertaken to observe the student's opinion regarding the case based learning for teaching medical microbiology. The study was conducted in the Department of Microbiology, Bidar Institute of Medical sciences, Bidar, North Karnataka. 100 second, year MBBS students were included in the study. Students were exposed to case based lecture (topic-H.Pylori). After the Case based learning (CBL), the opinion of students was taken by using self administered questionnaire with 5 point likert scale. In the present study most of the student's preferred case based learning. We recommend including CBL as a part and parcel of medical microbiology curriculum for better understanding of subject and for practical applications.


Author(s):  
Kavitha Chikkanayakanahalli Venugopal ◽  
Pavana Acharya ◽  
Lakshmi Bomalapura Ramamurthy ◽  
Sudeep Navule Siddappa ◽  
Tintu Susan Joy ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document