All the Faces of Research on Borderline Personality Pathology: Drawing Future Trajectories through a Network and Cluster Analysis of the Literature

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 3-30
Author(s):  
Ilaria M.A. BENZI ◽  
Rossella DI PIERRO ◽  
Pietro DE CARLI ◽  
Ioana Alina CRISTEA ◽  
Pietro CIPRESSO

"Borderline Personality Disorder is a severe condition that affects self and interpersonal dimensions and emotional and behavioral regulation. Since the last decades of the 20th century, an impressive amount of research and clinical contributions on BPD came from specific fields such as psychiatry, clinical psychology, psychopharmacology, and, more recently, cognitive neuroscience. All contributions tackled the challenges of finding reliable diagnostic categories, highlighting detailed developmental trajectories, and fostering effective treatment protocols. However, as results come from different areas, it is often challenging to depict a coherent and yet multifaceted framework on this topic. In this study, we conducted a scientometric analysis of the available literature on BPD to provide a systematic and comprehensive overview of research on BPD and emphasize historical changes, intertwining between fields and new areas of investigation. Results clearly show the evolution of research on BPD starting from the initial development of the construct, passing through the studies on treatment efficacy, the results of longitudinal studies, the advances in cognitive neurosciences, and the recent dimensional conceptualization in DSM-5. Moreover, it emphasizes promising areas of investigation, such as the relations of BPD with NSSI, ADHD, and vulnerable features of narcissism."

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 1031-1050
Author(s):  
Sheila R. Berkel ◽  
Ju‐Hyun Song ◽  
Richard Gonzalez ◽  
Sheryl L. Olson ◽  
Brenda L. Volling

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (12) ◽  
pp. 1649-1658
Author(s):  
Sophia Choukas-Bradley ◽  
Alison E. Hipwell ◽  
Savannah R. Roberts ◽  
Anne J. Maheux ◽  
Stephanie D. Stepp

2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 351-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aidan G. C. Wright ◽  
Maureen Zalewski ◽  
Michael N. Hallquist ◽  
Alison E. Hipwell ◽  
Stephanie D. Stepp

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Del Casale ◽  
Luca Bonanni ◽  
Paride Bargagna ◽  
Francesco Novelli ◽  
Federica Fiaschè ◽  
...  

Background: Patients with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) manifest affective and behavioural symptoms causing personal distress, relationship difficulties, and reduced quality of life with global functioning impairment, mainly when the disease takes an unfavourable course. A substantial amount of healthcare costs is dedicated to addressing these issues. Many BPD patients receive medications, mostly those who do not respond to psychological interventions. Objective: Our aim was to assess the efficacy of the most used strategies of pharmacological interventions in BPD with a comprehensive overview of the field. Methods: We searched the PubMed database for papers focused on the most used psychotropic drugs for BPD. We included randomized controlled trials and open studies in adult patients with BPD, focusing on the efficacy and tolerability of single classes of drugs with respect to specific clinical presentations that may occur during the course of BPD. Results: Specific second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) and/or serotonergic antidepressants can be effective for different core symptoms of BPD, mainly including mood symptoms, anxiety, and impulse dyscontrol. Some atypical antipsychotics can also be effective for psychotic and dissociative symptoms. Specific antiepileptics can be useful in some cases in treating specific BPD symptoms, mainly including mood instability, impulsiveness, and anger. Conclusions: No medication is currently approved for BPD, and clinicians should carefully assess the benefits and risks of drug treatment. Further studies are needed to identify specific personalized treatment strategies, also considering the clinical heterogeneity and possible comorbidities of BPD.


Author(s):  
Liang Wang ◽  
Xiaolong Xue ◽  
Yuanxin Zhang ◽  
Xiaowei Luo

Numerous studies in urban resilience have been published in the past decade. However, only a few publications have tracked the evolution trends of urban resilience research, the findings of which can serve as a useful guide for scholars to foresee worth-effort research areas and make the best use of precious time and resources. In order to fill the research gap, this study performed a scientometric analysis on the evolution trends of urban resilience research using a versatile software package-CiteSpace. The scientomentric analysis focuses on distribution of lead authors and their institutions, high frequency categories and keywords, high influential journals, author contribution, and evolutionary trends based on co-author analysis, co-word analysis, co-citation analysis and cluster analysis of documents. This study discoveries that first, the U.S., England, Australia, Canada, China and Sweden are the countries that make the most significant contributions in the advancement of urban resilience research; second, the existing urban resilience research focuses primarily on environmental studies, geography and planning development; third, hot topics of the urban resilience research keep shifting from 1993 to 2016; fourth, the knowledge body of urban resilience research consists of five clusters: resilience exploratory analysis, disaster resilience, urban resilience, urban resilience practice, and social-ecological systems; last, the emerging trends in urban resilience research include defining urban resilience, adaptation model, case studies, analytical methods and urban social-ecological systems, resulting in cutting-edge research areas in urban resilience.


2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 764-784 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer E. Khoury ◽  
Kate Zona ◽  
Eszter Bertha ◽  
Lois Choi-Kain ◽  
Kate Hennighausen ◽  
...  

Theorists have suggested that attachment disorganization contributes to the development of borderline personality disorder (BPD). However, few studies have directly observed attachment-related interactions with parents. This study used a newly developed attachment-based coding system to examine whether individuals with BPD were more likely to exhibit disorganized interactions with their mothers than those with (a) other diagnoses (anxiety, depressive, or substance use diagnoses) or (b) no diagnosis. Results indicated that participants with BPD had a greater likelihood of disorganized attachment interactions than did both comparison groups. The odds ratio for disorganized attachment among BPD participants was almost 8 times that of participants without BPD. These results underscore the utility of observational assessments to capture the interpersonal features of BPD and highlight the potential value of examining the developmental trajectories of disorganized and controlling attachment behavior in order to identify pathways toward BPD.


2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 764-782 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianne Goodman ◽  
Uday Patel ◽  
Allison Oakes ◽  
Andrea Matho ◽  
Joseph Triebwasser

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 211
Author(s):  
Gasim Omer Elkhalifa Abd-Elfarag ◽  
Arthur Wouter Dante Edridge ◽  
René Spijker ◽  
Mohamed Boy Sebit ◽  
Michaël B. van Hensbroek

Nodding syndrome (NS) is a debilitating yet often neglected neurological disease affecting thousands of children in several sub-Saharan African countries. The cause of NS remains unknown, and effective treatment options are lacking. Moreover, knowledge regarding NS is scarce and is based on a limited number of publications, with no comprehensive overview published to date. Therefore, the aim of this scoping review was to summarise the current evidence and identify existing knowledge gaps in order to help clinicians, scientists, and policymakers develop guidelines for prioritising this severe condition. We searched the Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Scopus, and Global Health Library databases in accordance with the PRISMA extension for scoping review guidance and in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines and methodology for a scoping review, using keywords describing NS. We then extracted and presented the original data regarding the epidemiology, aetiology, pathophysiology, clinical features, diagnosis, management, and outcomes of NS, as well as community perceptions and the psychosocial and economic impact of NS. Out of 1470 identified articles, a total of 69 were included in this scoping review. Major gaps exist in understanding the aetiology and pathogenesis of NS. Future research is urgently needed not only to address these gaps, but also to study the treatment options, epidemiology, and psychosocial and economic impacts of NS. Innovative interventions and rehabilitation programmes designed to address the psychosocial and economic burdens associated with NS are also urgently needed.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
William C. Woods ◽  
Cara Arizmendi ◽  
Kathleen Gates ◽  
Stephanie Stepp ◽  
Paul A. Pilkonis ◽  
...  

Objective: Psychopathology research has relied on discrete diagnoses, which neglects the unique manifestations of each individual’s pathology. Borderline personality disorder combines interpersonal, affective, and behavioral regulation impairments making it particularly ill-suited to a “one size fits all” diagnosis. Clinical assessment and case formulation involve understanding and developing a personalized model for each patient’s contextualized dynamic processes, and research would benefit from a similar focus on the individual. Method: We use group iterative multiple model estimation, which estimates a model for each individual and identifies general or shared features across individuals, in both a mixed-diagnosis sample (N=78) and a subsample with a single diagnosis (n=24). Results: We found that individuals vary widely in their dynamic processes in affective and interpersonal domains both within and across diagnoses. However, there was some evidence that dynamic patterns relate to transdiagnostic baseline measures. We conclude with descriptions of two person-specific models as an example of the heterogeneity of dynamic processes. Conclusions: The idiographic models presented here join a growing literature showing that the individuals differ dramatically in the total patterning of these processes, even as key processes are shared across individuals. We argue that these processes are best estimated in the context of person-specific models, and that so doing may advance our understanding of the contextualized dynamic processes that could identify maintenance mechanisms and treatment targets.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document