CRITICAL THINKING ASPECT OF SUCCESSFUL ENGLISH LEARNERS IN THE 21ST CENTURY AT SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL

The skills to think critically on environmental pollution material is the skills of the learners to understand a condition that involves the process of reasoning about environmental pollution. Student’s critical thinking skills is an interaction between various factors, namely naturalist intelligence and motivation learning. Student who possess critical thinking skills are as good as those naturalist intelligence and those who are motivated to learn. This study aimed to determine the correlation between naturalist intelligence and motivation learning with student’s critical thinking skills in Jakarta on environmental pollution. This research was conducted at 68 Jakarta Senior High School on semester II of 2017/2018 school year. The method that was used is descriptive quantitative through correlational study. The sample used amount if 115 students of class X MIA. The result of prerequisite test finds that the data are normally distributed and homogeneous. The statistical hypothesis was done by linier regression test, liniearity test, and correlation coefficient test at α = 0,05. Based on these results, it is concluded there is a correlation between naturalist intelligence and motivation learning with student’s critical thinking skills on environmental pollution.

Download Full-text

IDENTIFIKASI KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN SISWA KELAS XI DI MAN 4 BANTUL PADA SUHU DAN KALOR

EDUSAINS ◽

10.15408/es.v12i1.12784 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 12 (1) ◽

pp. 30-37

Author(s):

Nur Arviyanto Himawan ◽

Jumadi Jumadi ◽

Edy Purwanto

Keyword(s):

High School ◽

21St Century ◽

Inductive Hypothesis ◽

Senior High School ◽

Reflective Abstraction ◽

Reasoning Skills ◽

Descriptive Method ◽

Reasoning Skill

AbstractReasoning skill is essential for students to have to face the challenges of the 21st century. This study aims to determine the percentage of students' reasoning skills based on deductive hypothesis, inductive hypothesis, and reflective abstraction. This research used a descriptive method involving 26 students of Islamic Senior High School 4 Bantul. The data from tests were analyzed quantitatively, while the data from interviews were analyzed qualitatively as supporting data. The results showed that the indicators of deductive hypothesis: Aspects of explaining a fact, there are 62% of students explained the facts correctly but were incomplete and 38% of students explained the facts incorrectly; Aspects of making conclusions deductively, there are 77% of students made correct conclusions but were incomplete and 23% of students made incorrect conclusions. Based on inductive hypothesis indicators: Aspects of making conclusions inductively, all students can make conclusions, but incorrect in associating equations; Aspects of giving reasons, all students gave incorrect reasons. Based on indicators of reflective abstraction: Aspects of developing concepts, there are 50% of students who can connect concepts in a case correctly and 50% of students incorrectly connect concepts in a case. This showed that students' reasoning skill is still low. AbstrakKemampuan penalaran penting dimiliki oleh siswa untuk menghadapi tantangan abad 21. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui persentase kemampuan penalaran siswa berdasarkan hipotesis deduktif, hipotesis induktif dan abstraksi reflektif. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif yang melibatkan 26 siswa MAN 4 Bantul. Data dari tes dianalisis secara kuantitatif, sedangkan data dari wawancara dianalisis secara kualitatif sebagai data pendukung. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pada indikator hipotesis deduktif: Aspek menjelaskan fakta, terdapat 62% siswa yang menjelaskan fakta secara tepat namun kurang lengkap dan 38% siswa kurang tepat dalam menjelaskan fakta; Aspek membuat kesimpulan secara deduktif, terdapat 77% siswa membuat kesimpulan dengan tepat namun kurang lengkap dan 23% siswa membuat kesimpulan yang kurang tepat. Berdasarkan indikator hipotesis induktif: Aspek membuat kesimpulan secara induktif, semua siswa dapat membuat kesimpulan, namun tidak tepat dalam mengaitkan persamaan; Aspek memberi alasan, semua siswa memberikan alasan yang kurang tepat. Berdasarkan indikator abstraksi reflektif: Aspek pengembangan konsep, sebanyak 50% siswa mampu menghubungkan konsep dalam suatu kasus secara tepat dan 50% siswa kurang tepat dalam menghubungkan konsep pada suatu kasus. Hal ini menunjukkan kemampuan penalaran siswa masih rendah.

Download Full-text

Developing Kvisoft Flipbook Maker-Based Physics E-Module to Build on Critical Thinking Skills of Senior High School Students

Proceedings of the 6th International Seminar on Science Education (ISSE 2020) ◽

10.2991/assehr.k.210326.074 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Silvia Anggri Wijaya ◽

Jumadi

Keyword(s):

High School ◽

High School Students ◽

Critical Thinking ◽

Thinking Skills ◽

Senior High School ◽

Critical Thinking Skills ◽

School Students ◽

Senior High School Students

Download Full-text

Pengaruh self dan peer assessment pada materi ekosistem terhadap berpikir aplikatif dan kritis siswa SMA

Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Sains ◽

10.21831/jpms.v5i1.13553 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 5 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Rachmi Nurhardini

Keyword(s):

High School ◽

Critical Thinking ◽

Peer Assessment ◽

Group Discussion ◽

Teacher Assessment ◽

Senior High School ◽

Control Group ◽

Cluster Sampling ◽

Group Design ◽

Experimental Group

AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh penerapan self dan peer assessment dalam metode diskusi kelompok pada materi ekosistem terhadap: (1) berpikir aplikatif dan (2) berpikir kritis siswa di SMA Negeri 2 Magelang. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen semu dengan rancangan pretest-postest with nonequivalent control group design. Populasi adalah siswa kelas X IPA SMA Negeri 2 Magelang. Sampel ditentukan menggunakan teknik cluster sampling. Kelompok eksperimen diberi perlakuan penerapan self dan peer assessment, kelompok kontrol diberi penilaian guru. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah tes, self dan peer assessment, wawancara serta observasi. Data dianalisis dengan ANCOVA. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa (1) penerapan self dan peer assessment dalam metode diskusi kelompok pada materi ekosistem tidak berpengaruh secara signifikan terhadap berpikir aplikatif, dan (2) penerapan self dan peer assessment dalam metode diskusi kelompok pada materi ekosistem berpengaruh positif terhadap berpikir kritis.Kata Kunci: self dan peer assessment, berpikir aplikatif dan berpikir kritis THE EFFECT OF SELF AND PEER ASSESSMENT ON ECOSYSTEM MATERIAL ON THE APPLICATIVE AND CRITICAL THINKING OF STUDENT OF STATE SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL AbstractThis study aims to know the effect of self and peer assessment application in group discussion method on ecosystem material on: (1) the applicative thinking and (2) the critical thinking of the students of State Senior High School 2 in Magelang. This research was a quasi experiment using the pretest-posttest with non-equivalent group design. The population comprised class X science students of X State Senior High School 2 in Magelang. A sample was established using the cluster random sampling technique. The two classes were assigned as an experimental group and control group. The students of the experimental group were taught using the self and peer assessment application, and the students in the control group were taught using the teacher assessment. The data were collected through a test, self and peer assessment, interview, and observation technique. The data were analyzed by ANCOVA. The results of the study show that (1) self and peer assessment application in group discussion about ecosystem materials does not significantly affect the students’ applicative thinking and (2) self and peer assessment application in group discussion about ecosystem materials significantly affects the students’ critical thinking.Keywords: Self and peer assessment, application thinking and critical thinking

Download Full-text