scholarly journals Proposal of Interoperability of the Different Health Information Systems, as a Strategy to Improve the Handling of Information and Decision-Making

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 12823-12830
Author(s):  
Wilver Auccahuasi et al., Wilver Auccahuasi et al., ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Information Systems ◽  
Health Information ◽  
Health Information Systems

scholarly journals Health Information Systems In The Decision-Making Process In Primary Care

10.3823/1873 ◽  
2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ericka Silva Holmes ◽  
Sérgio Ribeiro dos Santos ◽  
Alexandra Fraga Almeida ◽  
Jéssica Helena Dantas de Oliveira ◽  
Gyl Dayara Alves de Carvalho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Information Systems ◽  
Health Information ◽  
Health Information Systems ◽  
Decision Making Process

Key Health Information Systems Outsourcing Issues from Six Hospital Cases

2011 ◽  
pp. 136-149
Author(s):  
Chad Lin ◽  
Yu-An Huang ◽  
Chien-Fa Li ◽  
Geoffrey Jalleh
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Information Systems ◽  
Health Information ◽  
User Involvement ◽  
Evaluation Process ◽  
Health Information Systems ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Management Skills ◽  
Key Issues ◽  
Outsourcing Contracts

Traditionally, little attention has been paid by hospitals to the key issues in the health information systems (HIS) outsourcing decision-making process. This is important given that the HIS outsourcing can play a key role in assisting hospitals in achieving its business objectives. However, the decision-making process of HIS outsourcing in hospitals is under-studied, especially in the management of their HIS outsourcing contracts. Therefore, the main objectives of this book chapter are to: (1) examine key issues surrounding the management and implementation of HIS outsourcing in Taiwanese hospitals; and (2) identify issues that are crucial in managing and implementing HIS outsourcing in hospitals. Four key issues and problems were identified in the HIS outsourcing process: lack of implementation in IS investment evaluation process, problems in managing HIS outsourcing contracts, lack of user involvement and participation in HIS outsourcing process, and failure to retain critical HIS contract management skills and project management capabilities in-house. Solutions and recommendations are provided to deal with key issues that are critical in the management and implementation of HIS outsourcing in hospitals.

Health Information Systems and Migrant Health in Europe

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise Biddle ◽  
Kayvan Bozorgmehr ◽  
Rosa Jahn
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Information Systems ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Health System ◽  
Health Information ◽  
Health Monitoring ◽  
Health Information Systems ◽  
Migrant Health ◽  
European Region ◽  
High Quality

Ensuring the health of migrants and access to appropriate health services presents a challenge to health systems in the age of global migration. Reliable and timely information is key to decision-making in all sectors of the health system to ensure that health system goals are met. Such information is even more important among a mobile, sometimes rapidly changing, dynamic and heterogeneous migrant population. While health information systems (HIS) are crucial for effective functioning of other health system blocks as well as for evidence-informed decision-making, they are often sidelined in health system policy and development. Looking across the World Health Organization (WHO) European Region, HIS for migrants are deficient both in their overall availability and their integration into regular monitoring structures. Less than half of the 53 member states routinely report health data for refugees and migrants. Most of the routinely collected data on migrant and refugee health can be identified in countries with strong population-based records, with some good practice examples of well-integrated and high-quality health monitoring surveys, disease-specific registries, and “parallel” HIS in migrant-specific settings. Overall, however, HIS in the WHO European Region are not able to provide data of sufficient quality and comparability to be well integrated into regular health monitoring structures. The reasons for this can be highlighted by five key barriers to improved information systems for migrant health: barriers in recording data, standardizing data collection, harmonizing migrant indicators, producing high-quality data, and sharing information. Better integration can be achieved through increased multilateral collaboration for the harmonization of indicators, strengthening of governance frameworks for data-sharing and protection measures, and the increased use of currently underutilized data collection mechanisms, including health monitoring surveys and medical records from refugee reception facilities. These steps will remain essential for the adequate planning and provision of needs-based care for refugees and migrants.

scholarly journals Researching, Co-creating and Testing Innovations in Paper Health Information Systems (PHISICC) to Support Health Workers Decision-making: Protocol of a Multi-country, Transdisciplinary, Mixed-methods Research Programme in Three Sub-saharan Countries

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xavier Bosch-Capblanch ◽  
David O’Donnell ◽  
L Kendall Krause ◽  
Christian Auer ◽  
Angela Oyo-Ita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Information Systems ◽  
Health Information ◽  
Health Workers ◽  
Health Information Systems ◽  
Primary Health ◽  
Frontline Health Workers ◽  
Rural Settings ◽  
Sub Saharan

Abstract BackgroundHealth Information Systems are crucial to provide data for decision-making and data demands are constantly growing. However, the link between data and decisions is not always rational nor linear and the management of data ends up overloading frontline health workers, who may have to compromise the health care. Despite limited evidence, there is an increasing push for the digitalisation of Health Information Systems, which faces enormous challenges, particularly in remote, rural settings in low- and middle-income countries. Paper-based tools will continue to be used and this warrants efforts to make them more responsive to local needs. Paper Health Information Systems (PHISICC) is a transdisciplinary, multi-country research initiative to create and test innovative paper-based Health Information Systems in three Sub-Saharan African countries.MethodsThe PHISICC initiative is taking place in remote, rural settings, in Côte d’Ivoire, Mozambique and Nigeria, through partnership with Ministries of Health and research institutions. We began with research syntheses to acquire the most up to date knowledge on Health Information Systems. These were coupled with field work in the three countries to understand the current design, patterns and contexts of use, and health care worker perspectives. Frontline health workers, with designers and researchers, used co-creation methods to produce the new PHISICC tools. This suite of tools is being tested in the three countries. Throughout the project, we have engaged with a wide range of stakeholders and have kept the highest scientific standards to keep it relevant to health policy in each of the three countries.DiscussionWe have deployed a comprehensive research approach to ensure the robustness and future policy uptake of the finding. Beyond the resulting paper-based tool design innovations, our process itself was innovative. Rather than emphasizing the data management compliance aspects we focused instead on frontline health workers’ decision-making; by tackling the whole scope of health care areas in Primary Health Care rather than incremental improvement to existing tools, we developed an entirely new design approach and language for a suite of tools in Primary Health Care. The initiative is being tested in remote, rural areas where the most vulnerable live.

scholarly journals Researching, characterising, co-creating and testing innovations in Paper Health Information Systems (PHISICC) to support frontline health workers decision-making: protocol of a multi-country, transdisciplinary, mixed-methods research programme in three Sub-Saharan countries

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xavier Bosch-Capblanch ◽  
David O'Donnell ◽  
L Kendall Krause ◽  
Christian Auer ◽  
Angela Oyo-Ita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Information Systems ◽  
Health Information ◽  
Health Workers ◽  
Health Information Systems ◽  
Frontline Health Workers ◽  
Rural Settings ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Sub Saharan

Abstract BackgroundHealth Information Systems (HIS) are crucial to provide data for decision-making and data demands are constantly growing. However, the link between data and decisions is not always rational nor linear and the management of data ends up overloading frontline health workers, who may have to compromise the health care. Despite limited evidence, there is an increasing push for HIS digitalisation, which faces enormous challenges, particularly in remote, rural settings in low- and middle-income countries. Paper-based tools will continue to be used and this warrants efforts to make them more responsive to local needs. Paper Health Information Systems (PHISICC) is a transdisciplinary, multi-country research initiative to create and test innovative paper-based HIS in three Sub-Saharan African countries.MethodsThe PHISICC initiative is taking place in remote, rural settings, in Côte d’Ivoire, Mozambique and Nigeria, through partnership with Ministries of Health and research institutions. We began with research syntheses to acquire the most up to date knowledge on HIS. These were coupled with field work in the three countries to understand the current design, patterns and contexts of use, and health care worker perspectives. Frontline health workers, with designers and researchers, used co-creation methods to produce the new PHISICC tools. This suite of tools is being tested in the three countries. Throughout the project we have engaged with a wide range of stakeholders and have kept the highest scientific standards to keep it relevant to health policy in each of the three countries.DiscussionWe have deployed a comprehensive research approach to ensure the robustness and future policy uptake of the finding. Beyond the resulting paper-based tool design innovations, our process itself was innovative. Rather than emphasizing the data management compliance aspects we focused instead on frontline health workers’ decision-making; by tackling the whole scope of health care areas in PHC rather than incremental improvement to existing tools, we developed an entirely new design approach and language for a suite of tools in Primary Health Care. The initiative is being tested in remote, rural areas where the most vulnerable live.

Accountability, Beneficence, and Self-Determination

2010 ◽  
pp. 274-286
Author(s):  
Tina Saryeddine
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Information Systems ◽  
Health Information ◽  
Health Informatics ◽  
Ethical Decision Making ◽  
Health Information Systems ◽  
Self Determination ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Ethical Problems ◽  
Accountability For Reasonableness

Existing literature often addresses the ethical problems posed by health informatics. Instead of this problem-based approach, this chapter explores the ethical benefits of health information systems in an attempt to answer the question “can health information systems make organizations more accountable, beneficent, and more responsive to a patient’s right to self determination?” It does so by unpacking the accountability for reasonableness framework in ethical decision making and the concepts of beneficence and self-determination. The framework and the concepts are discussed in light of four commonly used health information systems, namely: Web-based publicly accessible inventories of services; Web-based patient education; telemedicine; and the electronic medical record. The objective of this chapter is to discuss the ethical principles that health information systems actually help to achieve, with a view to enabling researchers, clinicians, and managers make the case for the development and maintenance of these systems in a client-centered fashion.

Key Health Information Systems Outsourcing Issues from Six Hospital Cases

2012 ◽  
pp. 824-837
Author(s):  
Chad Lin ◽  
Yu-An Huang ◽  
Chien-Fa Li ◽  
Geoffrey Jalleh
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Information Systems ◽  
Health Information ◽  
User Involvement ◽  
Evaluation Process ◽  
Health Information Systems ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Management Skills ◽  
Key Issues ◽  
Outsourcing Contracts

Traditionally, little attention has been paid by hospitals to the key issues in the health information systems (HIS) outsourcing decision-making process. This is important given that the HIS outsourcing can play a key role in assisting hospitals in achieving its business objectives. However, the decision-making process of HIS outsourcing in hospitals is under-studied, especially in the management of their HIS outsourcing contracts. Therefore, the main objectives of this book chapter are to: (1) examine key issues surrounding the management and implementation of HIS outsourcing in Taiwanese hospitals; and (2) identify issues that are crucial in managing and implementing HIS outsourcing in hospitals. Four key issues and problems were identified in the HIS outsourcing process: lack of implementation in IS investment evaluation process, problems in managing HIS outsourcing contracts, lack of user involvement and participation in HIS outsourcing process, and failure to retain critical HIS contract management skills and project management capabilities in-house. Solutions and recommendations are provided to deal with key issues that are critical in the management and implementation of HIS outsourcing in hospitals.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document