scholarly journals Application of two lines of chemotherapy: gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel and liposomal irinotecan with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patient with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Oncoreview ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3(43)) ◽  
pp. 68-72
Author(s):  
Krystyna Ostrowska-Cichocka ◽  
Marek Z. Wojtukiewicz
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Distant Metastases ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Liposomal Irinotecan ◽  
Line Of Therapy ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic cancer is a disease with high mortality. It is predicted to become the second leading cause of cancer death in some regions of the world. Frequent diagnosis at an advanced stage contributes to 5-year survival at a highly unsatisfactory level of 2–9%. Due to the lack of early symptoms, nearly 80% of patients receive a diagnosis when distant metastases develop. So far, the most frequently used programs in the treatment of patients with pancreatic cancer in the stage of neoplastic spreading include: FOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan, leucovorin), gemcitabine alone or in combination with nab-paclitaxel or erlotinib. Based on the results of the phase III study NAPOLI-1, liposomal irinotecan in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV ) was approved as the first regimen for use in the second or subsequent line of therapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer previously treated with gemcitabine. This paper presents a case of a patient with advanced pancreatic cancer who was treated with two lines of chemotherapy – gemcitabine in combination with nab-paclitaxel and liposomal irinotecan with 5-FU/LV . The treatment was well tolerated and was considered a valuable therapeutic option. A 2-year overall survival was obtained from the diagnosis of the disease.

PANCREOX: A Randomized Phase III Study of Fluorouracil/Leucovorin With or Without Oxaliplatin for Second-Line Advanced Pancreatic Cancer in Patients Who Have Received Gemcitabine-Based Chemotherapy

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (32) ◽  
pp. 3914-3920 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharlene Gill ◽  
Yoo-Joung Ko ◽  
Christine Cripps ◽  
Annie Beaudoin ◽  
Sukhbinder Dhesy-Thind ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
Second Line ◽  
European Organization ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
Previously Treated

Purpose The standard of care for second-line therapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer after gemcitabine-based therapy is not clearly defined. The CONKO-003 phase III study reported a survival benefit with second-line fluorouracil (FU) and oxaliplatin using the oxaliplatin, folinic acid, and FU (OFF) regimen. 1 PANCREOX was a phase III multicenter trial to evaluate the benefit of FU and oxaliplatin administered as modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6; infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) versus infusional FU/leucovorin (LV) in this setting. Patients and Methods Patients with confirmed advanced pancreatic cancer who were previously treated with gemcitabine therapy and with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 were eligible. A total of 108 patients were randomly assigned to receive biweekly mFOLFOX6 or infusional FU/LV until progression. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary end point. Results Baseline patient characteristics were similar in both arms. No difference was observed in PFS (median, 3.1 months v 2.9 months; P = .99). Overall survival (OS) was inferior in patients assigned to mFOLFOX6 (median, 6.1 months v 9.9 months; P = .02). Increased toxicity was observed with the addition of oxaliplatin, with grade 3/4 adverse events occurring in 63% of patients who received mFOLFOX6 and 11% of those who received FU/LV. More patients in the mFOLFOX6 arm withdrew from study due to adverse events than in the FU/LV arm (20% v 2%), whereas the use of postprogression therapy was significantly higher in the FU/LV arm (25% v 7%; P = .015). No significant differences were observed in time to deterioration on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 global health scale. Conclusion No benefit was observed with the addition of oxaliplatin, administered as mFOLFOX6, versus infusional FU/LV in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer previously treated with first-line gemcitabine.

Updated results of the GEST study: Randomized phase III study of gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) versus S-1 versus gemcitabine (GEM) in unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer in Japan and Taiwan.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4035-4035 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akira Fukutomi ◽  
Takuji Okusaka ◽  
Kazuya Sugimori ◽  
Hideki Ueno ◽  
Tatsuya Ioka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Advanced Disease ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Locally Advanced Disease ◽  
Phase Iii Study

4035 Background: The GEST study (Ioka et al. ASCO 2011, Abstract 4007) demonstrated the non-inferiority of S-1 to GEM with respect to the primary endpoint of overall survival (OS) in patients with pancreatic cancer (PC). We now report the updated results of this study. Methods: The GEST study was a randomized, 3-arm, phase III study. Chemotherapy-naive patients with unresectable advanced PC, an ECOG Performance status (PS) of 0-1, and adequate organ functions were randomly assigned to receive GEM (1000 mg/m2, iv, d1, 8 and 15, q4w), S-1 (80/100/120 mg/day based on BSA, po, d1-28, q6w), or GS (GEM 1000 mg/m2, iv, d1 and 8 plus S-1 60/80/100 mg/day based on BSA po, d1-14, q3w). The primary endpoint was OS, used to assess the non-inferiority of S-1 and the superiority of GS to GEM. Patient information was updated in July 2011. Results: At the time of this follow-up analysis, median follow-up was 29.8 months with 795 OS events, compared with 18.4 months with 710 OS events out of 832 patients at the previous analysis. Median OS was 8.8 months (95% CI: 8.0–9.7) in the GEM group and 9.7 months (95% CI: 7.6-10.8) in the S-1 group (HR=0.96, 97.5% CI: 0.79-1.17, p<0.001 for non-inferiority), which is consistent with prior results (HR=0.96, 97.5% CI: 0.78-1.18, p<0.001). In the GS group, median OS was 9.9 months (95% CI: 9.0-11.2). The HR was 0.91 (97.5%CI: 0.75-1.11, p=0.28 for superiority versus the GEM group). On subgroup analysis, GS was associated with a non-statistically significant trend toward better OS compared with GEM among patients with locally advanced disease and those with a PS of 1. Median OS was 12.7 months (95% CI: 9.7–14.9) in the GEM group and 15.9 months (95% CI: 13.0-19.7) in the GS group (HR=0.72, 95% CI: 0.51-1.03) among patients with locally advanced disease, and 6.2 months (95% CI: 4.9–8.3) in the GEM group and 9.6 months (95% CI: 8.0-10.9) in the GS group (HR=0.62, 95% CI: 0.46-0.83) among patients with a PS of 1. Conclusions: The non-inferiority of S-1 to Gem in terms of the primary endpoint of OS was reconfirmed. Monotherapy with S-1 can be used as one of the standard treatments for advanced PC. As for GS therapy, there is room for further investigation.

CanStem303C trial: A phase III study of napabucasin (BBI-608) in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), leucovorin, irinotecan (FOLFIRI) in adult patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3619-TPS3619 ◽  
Author(s):  
Axel Grothey ◽  
Manish A. Shah ◽  
Takayuki Yoshino ◽  
Eric Van Cutsem ◽  
Julien Taieb ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Cancer Stem Cells ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
Study Population ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Line Of Therapy

TPS3619 Background: Cancer stem cells are considered to be fundamentally important for resistance to therapy, recurrence and metastasis. Napabucasin is a first-in-class cancer stemness inhibitor in development identified by its ability to inhibit STAT3-driven gene transcription and spherogenesis of cancer stem cells (Li et al, PNAS 112(6):1839, 2015). Preclinically, napabucasin sensitizes cancer cells to chemotherapeutics, including 5-FU and irinotecan. Encouraging anticancer activity in advanced CRC was observed in a phase Ib/II (Bendell et al, GI ASCO 2017) study of 63 pts with disease control rate (DCR) of 93% (28/30) and overall response rate (ORR) of 33% (10/30) in FOLFIRI-naïve pts who have had an on-study RECIST evaluation. On the basis of these data, a phase III trial is being conducted in North America, Europe, Australia, and Asia. Methods: This study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02753127) will assess the efficacy of napabucasin+FOLFIRI vs FOLFIRI in pts with mCRC (n = 1250). Addition of bevacizumab (bev) is permissible per investigator choice. Pts must have failed 1 prior line of therapy with oxaliplatin and a fluoropyrimidine +/- bev for metastatic disease. Pts are randomized 1:1 to receive napabucasin 240 mg PO BID plus FOLFIRI bi-weekly, or FOLFIRI bi-weekly (bev may be added to FOLFIRI by investigator choice) and stratified by geography, time to progression on 1st-line therapy, RAS mutation status, bev as part of study treatment and primary tumor location. Treatment will continue until disease progression, or another discontinuation criterion. Primary endpoint is overall survival (OS) in the general study population (ITT) (HR 0.80 for OS improvement from 12.54 to 15.68 months); secondary endpoints include OS in the biomarker positive (biomarker+) population, progression free survival (PFS) in the ITT population, PFS in biomarker+ population, ORR and DCR in the ITT and in biomarker+ populations, safety and quality of life. Also, blood and tumor archival tissue will be assessed for PK and biomarker analyses. Global enrollment is underway. Clinical trial information: NCT02753127.

Subgroup analysis by measurable metastatic lesion (ML) number and selected lesion locations (LL) at baseline (BL) in NAPOLI-1: A phase III study of liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI)±5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) in patients (pts) with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) previously treated with gemcitabine-based therapy.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 460-460
Author(s):  
Jens T. Siveke ◽  
Richard Hubner ◽  
Teresa Mercade Macarulla ◽  
Andrea Wang-Gillam ◽  
Andrew Peter Dean ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Metastatic Lesion ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Pivotal Phase ◽  
Clear Trend ◽  
Prognostic Effect ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Liposomal Irinotecan ◽  
Post Hoc

460 Background: We report a post hoc, exploratory analysis of pts with BL ML number and LL data who received nal-IRI+5-FU/LV, nal-IRI or 5-FU/LV in NAPOLI-1, a pivotal, phase 3 trial (NCT01494506). nal-IRI+5-FU/LV increased median OS (mOS) vs 5-FU/LV (6.1 vs 4.2 mo [HR=0.67; p=0.012]). Methods: ML (1, 2, 3, >3) and LL were recorded (local investigator) at BL. Pts with >1 LL were counted for each location. Results: 354 of 417 ITT pts had measurable BL ML and 1,080 LL were recorded. There was no clear trend in the percentage of pts with KPS ≥80 in 1- >3 ML (range 87%-95%) or LL (range 89%-94%) subgroups. ML 1 (n=81), 2 (n=65) and 3 (n=24) subgroups were small. nal-IRI+5-FU/LV significantly improved mOS vs. 5-FU/LV in pts with 2/>3 ML (n=184/24); nal-IRI+5-FU/LV had numerically higher mOS vs. 5-FU/LV for all LL (Table). nal-IRI+5-FU/LV had favourable median PFS (mPFS) vs. 5-FU/LV in pts with 1–>3 ML (range 2.0-4.2 vs. 1.4-1.9 mo; HR range 0.35-0.88) and for all LL (range 2.8-4.2 vs. 1.4-2.0 mo; HR range 0.39-0.55). Conclusions: Low pt numbers across groups and repeat counting of pts in LL subgroups preclude firm conclusions on treatment efficacy, pending further analyses. Allowing for these limitations, we detected no clear prognostic effect on outcomes of higher BL ML number or LL in NAPOLI-1 ITT pts. nal-IRI+5-FU/LV improved mOS vs. 5-FU/LV in some ML groups and across LL groups; improvement in mPFS vs. 5-FU/LV in the ITT population was maintained in all subgroups. Clinical trial information: NCT01494506. [Table: see text]

PANOVA: A phase II study of TTFields (150 kHz) concomitant with standard chemotherapy for front-line therapy of advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma—Updated efficacy results.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15790-e15790 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel Benavides ◽  
Carmen Guillen ◽  
Fernando Rivera ◽  
Javier Gallego ◽  
Jose A. Lopez-Martin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Skin Toxicity ◽  
Distant Metastases ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Grade 3

e15790 Background: TTFields are a non-invasive, regional antimitotic treatment modality, which has been approved for the treatment of glioblastoma by the FDA. TTFields predominantly act by disrupting the formation of the mitotic spindle during metaphase. TTFields were effective in multiple preclinical models of pancreatic cancer. PANOVA was the first trial testing TTFields in pancreatic cancer patients. Results from the first arm of the study, testing TTFields in combination with gemcitabine, have demonstrated superiority in efficacy compared to historical controls (Rivera F. et al, J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl 4S; abstr 269). Methods: Twenty advanced pancreatic cancer patients were enrolled in the second arm of PANOVA and treated with TTFields in combination with gemcitabine concomitant to nab-paclitaxel. All patients had unresectable tumors, an ECOG performance score of 0-1 and no prior therapy. The primary endpoint was the incidence and severity of adverse events. Results: The median age was 68.2 (range – 58-81) and most patients (65%) had an ECOG score of 1. Twelve patients (60%) had distant metastases. Ten patients (50%) had serious AEs during the study period. Eleven patients (55%) had treatment-related skin toxicity, of which 5 had grade 3 toxicity. No TTFields-related serious AEs were reported. The median PFS was 12.7 months (95% CI 5.4, NA): 9.3 months in patients with metastatic disease, and not reached in locally-advanced patients. PFS rate at 6 months was 65%: 50% in metastatic disease and 87.5% in locally advanced patients. Of the evaluable tumors, 40% had partial response and another 47% stable disease. The median OS was not reached, and the 1-year survival rate was 72% (62.5% in metastatic disease and 87.5% in locally advanced disease). Conclusions: TTFields concomitant to gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel are safe for advanced pancreatic cancer patients, with promising clinical outcome which doubled historical data. A phase III trial is planned, testing the efficacy of TTFields combined with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in locally-advanced pancreatic cancer patients. Clinical trial information: NCT01971281.

Subgroup analysis by baseline pain intensity (BPI) and analgesic use (BAU) in NAPOLI-1: A phase III study of liposomal irinotecan (nal IRI)±5-fluorouracil/ leucovorin (5-FU/LV) in patients (pts) with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) previously treated with gemcitabine-based therapy.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 379-379
Author(s):  
Teresa Mercade Macarulla ◽  
Jens T. Siveke ◽  
Andrew Peter Dean ◽  
Richard Hubner ◽  
Jean-Frédéric Blanc ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Prognostic Effect ◽  
Baseline Pain Intensity ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Recorded Data ◽  
Liposomal Irinotecan ◽  
Post Hoc

379 Background: We report an exploratory, post hoc subgroup analysis in pts with BPI and BAU data receiving nal-IRI+5-FU/LV, nal-IRI or 5-FU/LV in NAPOLI-1 (NCT01494506). In this pivotal trial, nal-IRI+5-FU/LV improved median OS (mOS) vs. 5-FU/LV (6.1 vs. 4.2 mo [HR=0.67; p=0.012]). Methods: BPI/BAU included an average of 3-7 days pt-recorded data before randomisation. Greater values indicated greater pain for BPI using a 100 mm visual analogue scale. BAU was converted to morphine equivalent mg/day. Results: Of 417 ITT pts, 295 had BPI and 299 had BAU data. Mean and median BPI were 28.6 and 25.0, respectively, and BAU were 33.3 and 8.1 mg/day, respectively. The percentage of pts with KPS ≥ 80 was higher in ≤ mean/≤ median (n=159/148) BPI groups vs. > mean/> median (n=136/147) BPI groups (96-97 vs. 83%) and in ≤mean/≤median (n=207/150) BAU groups vs. > mean/> median (n=92/149) BAU groups (95-97 vs. 82-85%). mOS and median PFS (mPFS) were higher for nal-IRI+5-FU/LV vs 5-FU/LV in all groups, with ≤ mean/≤ median BPI or BAU showing better outcomes vs. > mean/> median BPI or BAU (Table). Conclusions: BPI and BAU appear to have a prognostic effect on outcomes in mPDAC pts in the NAPOLI-1 study. No predictive effect was observed, with nal-IRI+5-FU/LV showing higher mOS vs. 5-FU/LV in all groups. Clinical trial information: NCT01494506. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Biologically effective doses of 60-70Gy vs. >70Gy of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) combined with chemotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer: protocol of a phase III study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yusheng Ye ◽  
Xiaofei Zhu ◽  
Xianzhi Zhao ◽  
Lingong Jiang ◽  
Yangsen Cao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
Radiation Induced ◽  
Gi Toxicity ◽  
Effective Doses

Abstract Background: There is controversial on the correlation between biologically effective dose (BED, α/β=10) of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and clinical outcomes of patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Therefore, the aim of the study is to compare the survival benefits of BED10 of 60-70Gy with those of BED10＞70Gy.Methods: This study is a multicenter study. Patients with LAPC are randomly allocated into two groups. Arm1: SBRT with BED10 of 60-70Gy in 5-6 fractions combined with gemcitabine plus albumin-bound paclitaxel; Arm2: SBRT with BED10＞70Gy in 5-6 fractions combined with gemcitabine plus albumin-bound paclitaxel. The primary outcome is progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary outcomes are radiation-induced gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity, local control (LC) and overall survival (OS).Discussion: The pilot phase Ⅲ study could provide evidence for further decision making of prescription doses of SBRT for LAPC, which may improve survival outcomes without compromise of quality of life. The trial protocol has been approved by the Ethics committee of Shanghai Changhai hospital. The ethics number is CHEC2020-100.Trial registration: Clinical trials number: NCT04603586. Date of registration: 10/27/2020.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document