Survival time, lifespan, and quality of life in dogs with idiopathic Fanconi syndrome

2004 ◽  
Vol 225 (3) ◽  
pp. 377-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer H. Yearley ◽  
Dale D. Hancock ◽  
Katrina L. Mealey
2021 ◽  
Vol In Press (In Press) ◽  
Author(s):  
Negin Nourbakhsh ◽  
Bahareh Tahani ◽  
Azadeh Moghaddas

Background: Recently, therapeutic decision-making in oncology is changed to a big challenge for both patients and involved oncologists due to an increase in available treatment modalities with a variety of benefits or adverse effects. Objectives: The current study aimed at comparing the perception of treatment priorities regarding lengthening of survival time or maintenance of the quality of life (QoL) among patients with cancer by health care professionals (HCPs). Methods: The current cross-sectional study was conducted on patients with cancer, their relatives, and healthcare professionals in the referral cancer center of Omid affiliated to Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. To identify treatment choices, priority, and related variables influencing their opinions, all participants were interviewed using a standard and valid questionnaire in Persian. The collected data were analyzed using the SPSS software version 20, and the P-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 299 participants, including 100 patients, 109 relatives, and 90 HCPs (74.2% nurses, 20.2% physicians, 5.6% others) participated in the study. The priority of treatment between survival time (66.1% for relatives vs. 47.9% for patients and 21.3% for HCP) and QoL (33.9% vs.52.1% and 78.7%) was significantly different between the three groups (P < 0.001). Most of the HCPs, patients, and their relatives believed that the physician is the only person who should accept the responsibility of treatment choices and process (98.9% vs. 100% and 98%, respectively; P = 0.002). Conclusions: Among the Iranian population, both the length of life and QoL were valuable; however, it was observed that patients with cancer and HCPs preferred mostly to expand the QoL, while the length of life was more valuable for relatives. Also, all patients, their relatives, and HCPs preferred to choose the physicians as the decision-makers. The results of the study can be helpful in choosing treatment regimens and designing clinical trials.


Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 3684
Author(s):  
Danielle B. Tometich ◽  
Kelly A. Hyland ◽  
Hatem Soliman ◽  
Heather S. L. Jim ◽  
Laura Oswald

Living with metastatic cancer, or metavivorship, differs from cancer survivorship and has changed as novel treatments have increased survival time. The purpose of this narrative review is to describe factors that impact challenges in metavivorship within a conceptual framework to guide future research. This review focuses on the specific metavivorship outcomes of progressive disease, survival time, symptoms, distress, financial toxicity, and quality of life. We describe the predisposing, precipitating, and perpetuating (3P) model of metavivorship. Understanding the biological, psychological, and social 3P factors that contribute to the development and maintenance of challenges in metavivorship provides a roadmap for future research. Implications of this model include prevention by targeting predisposing factors, management of precipitating factors after onset of metastatic disease, and treatment of perpetuating factors to reduce symptoms and improve quality of life during the chronic phase of metavivorship. This can be accomplished through biopsychosocial screening efforts, monitoring of patient-reported outcomes, education and communication interventions, interdisciplinary symptom management, advance care planning, and behavioral interventions to cultivate psychological resilience.


Author(s):  
Zongyan Li ◽  
Xiaofeng Jiang ◽  
Hua Xiao ◽  
Shaoyi Chen ◽  
Wenfeng Zhu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Photodynamic therapy (PDT) can be performed as palliative therapy for cholangiocarcinoma, while there is currently insufficient evidence for the efficacy. The aim of this study was to explore the clinical efficacy and safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)- or percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy (PTCS)-directed PDT combined with stent placement for unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 62 patients with unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Thirty patients received PDT using hematoporphyrin combined with biliary stent placement (PDT+stent group), including 22 receiving ERCP-directed PDT and 8 receiving PTCS-directed PDT. Survival time, quality of life, and postoperative adverse events were compared to 32 patients receiving biliary stent placement alone (Stent-only group). Results After 42 months of follow-up, median survival time was significantly longer in the PDT+stent group than the Stent-only group (14.2 vs. 9.8 months, P = 0.003). In the PDT+stent group, the median survival time was longer in the 6 patients with recurrence after surgical resection than the 24 patients without prior surgical resection (20.0 vs. 13.0 months, P = 0.017). The QOL total scores was significantly higher in the PDT+stent group than the Stent-only group at postoperative 6, 9, and 12 months (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative adverse events between the two groups (24 [38.7%] vs. 20 [29.0%], P = 0.239). Conclusion ERCP- or PTCS-directed PDT + stent placement can prolong the survival of patients with unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma, especially those with recurrence and improve quality of life without increasing adverse events.


2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 142 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.S. Hong ◽  
J. Tian ◽  
Q.F. Han ◽  
Q.Y. Ni

Purpose We assessed the quality of life (qol) of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (npc) survivors with a survival time of more than 2 years in Fujian, China, and we analyzed factors influencing qol.Methods We calculated the prevalence of psychological distress and radiotherapy (rt)–induced symptoms in 216 npc survivors who participated in a cross-sectional survey. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (version 3.0) was used to assess the qol of npc survivors. Multiple linear regression was applied to analyze the factors influencing qol.Results The prevalence rates of rt-induced symptoms and psychological problems were 11.58% (95% ci: 7.21% to 15.58%) for difficulty in swallowing, 17.59% (95% ci: 12.51% to 22.67%) for mouth dryness or sores, 13.89% (95% ci: 9.28% to 18.50%) for nasal dryness or congestion, 18.52% (95% ci: 13.34% to 23.70%) for fatigue, 11.11% (95% ci: 6.92% to 15.30%) for frequent dizziness, 18.06% (95% ci: 12.93% to 23.19%) for decline in hearing, 14.81% (95% ci: 10.07% to 19.55%) for poor sleep quality, 18.52% (95% ci: 13.34% to 23.70%) for worry about disease recurrence, 18.98% (95% ci: 13.75% to 24.21%) for anxiety, and 25.00% (95% ci: 19.23% to 30.77%) for depression. Mean survival times were 4.32 ± 2.63 years in patients with mouth dryness or sores, 4.26 ± 2.90 years in patients with fatigue, and 5.60 ± 2.94 years in patients with a decline in hearing. The mean global qol score was 74.21 (95% ci: 72.22 to 76.20). At a significance level of α = 0.05, the factors influencing qol were age (p = 0.032), education level (p = 0.001), anxiety score (p < 0.001), depression score (p < 0.001), mouth dryness or sores (p < 0.001), fatigue (p = 0.027), and disease stage (p = 0.044).Conclusions The prevalence rates of mouth dryness or sores, fatigue, decline in hearing, depression, and anxiety were high in npc survivors with a survival time of more than 2 years. These rt-induced symptoms and psychological problems can last for many years after rt. The qol of the npc survivors was good. Factors influencing qol were age, education level, anxiety, depression, mouth dryness or sores, fatigue, and disease stage. Our results suggest that during clinical treatment, doctors should minimize the radiation dose to the ears of patients. In addition, our results emphasize the importance of providing oral and ear nursing and psychological care to npc survivors.


2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-50
Author(s):  
Przewłocki Sławomir ◽  
Ronikier Aleksander

Abstract Introduction: Terminal patients require proper care standards and professional team of doctors, physiotherapists, social workers, educators, psychologists and clergy directly involved in mitigating the suffering of a dying person. A physiotherapist as a member of such a team should be focused on sustaining the patient’s quality of life until the end at the level relevant to the patient’s health state. This quality of life should be perceived integrally as a combination of procedures reducing pain and physical suffering as well as improving physical fitness and mental well-being. Material and methods:The aim of the research was to define the role of physiotherapy in assessing mental and physical state of terminal patients; to determine the applicability of ADLs, GDS and BDI in diagnosing the validity and usefulness of tiresome physiotherapeutic procedures for terminal patients and to assess the applied tests in predicting terminal patients’ survival time. The research was carried out on the turn of 2012 and 2013 in the group of 103 subjects (74 females - 71.8% and 29 males - 28.2%) For the research the following methods were used: - Activity of Daily Living scale (ADL)- - Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) - Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) - Questionnaire regarding their willingness to participate in physiotherapeutic procedures. Results: In the research the range of diagnostic possibilities of the applied scales and tests, correlations between theses scales and tests as well as correlations between them and subjects’ age and survival time were assessed. Additionally, a questionnaire survey was carried out which assessed the willingness to participate in physiotherapeutic procedures. Strong stress, terminal state of the patient and generalisation of symptoms brought about the fact that only 14.6% of patients declared their willingness to participate in physiotherapeutic procedures. Conclusions: 1. Implementing physiotherapeutic and psychological diagnostic tests in everyday terminal care makes it easier to assess survival time of terminal patients and significantly improves their life and dying with dignity 2. Proper understanding of the symptoms of dying must serve as a basis for organising adequate activities compliant with the progress of a disease of a terminal patient without disturbing the process of dying. 3. Modern physiotherapy in terminal care should limit the range of physiotherapeutic procedures and physical therapy while increasing psychological care in this population.


Author(s):  
Markus W Haun ◽  
Stephanie Estel ◽  
Gerta Rücker ◽  
Hans-Christoph Friederich ◽  
Michael Thomas ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19524-e19524 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. D. Saad ◽  
G. N. Marta ◽  
L. G. Del Nero ◽  
G. N. Marta ◽  
A. Mangabeira ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (35) ◽  
pp. 4145-4150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wilson Roa ◽  
Lucyna Kepka ◽  
Narendra Kumar ◽  
Valery Sinaika ◽  
Juliana Matiello ◽  
...  

Purpose The optimal radiotherapy regimen for elderly and/or frail patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma remains to be established. This study compared two radiotherapy regimens on the outcome of these patients. Patients and Methods Between 2010 and 2013, 98 patients (frail = age ≥ 50 years and Karnofsky performance status [KPS] of 50% to 70%; elderly and frail = age ≥ 65 years and KPS of 50% to 70%; elderly = age ≥ 65 years and KPS of 80% to 100%) were prospectively randomly assigned to two arms in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by age (< and ≥ 65 years old), KPS, and extent of surgical resection. Arm 1 received short-course radiotherapy (25 Gy in five daily fractions over 1 week), and arm 2 received commonly used radiotherapy (40 Gy in 15 daily fractions over 3 weeks). Results The short-course radiotherapy was noninferior to commonly used radiotherapy. The median overall survival time was 7.9 months (95% CI, 6.3 to 9.6 months) in arm 1 and 6.4 months (95% CI, 5.1 to 7.6 months) in arm 2 (P = .988). Median progression-free survival time was 4.2 months (95% CI, 2.5 to 5.9) in arm 1 and 4.2 months (95% CI, 2.6 to 5.7) in arm B (P = .716). With a median follow-up time of 6.3 months, the quality of life between both arms at 4 weeks after treatment and 8 weeks after treatment was not different. Conclusion There were no differences in overall survival time, progression-free survival time, and quality of life between patients receiving the two radiotherapy regimens. In view of the reduced treatment time, the short 1-week radiotherapy regimen may be recommended as a treatment option for elderly and/or frail patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document