Validity of the Eysenck Extraversion Scale: Replication and Extension

1968 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 706-708 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank J. Vingoe

66 female college students rated themselves and their peers on extraversion and filled out the Eysenck Personality Inventory (EPI) and the California Psychological Inventory (CPI). The group was dichotomized into Introverts and Extraverts on the basis of their self-ratings and their extraversion scores. Self-rated Introvert and Extravert criterion groups were significantly different from each other and from the total group on Extraversion score and Introvert and Extravert groups as determined by Extraversion score were significantly different from each other and from the total group on the basis of self-ratings, thus supporting the validity of the extraversion scale. Correlations of scores on the EPI and the CPI support the validity of the extraversion and neuroticism scales.

1977 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 697-698 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles E. Joubert

Scores of 11 male and 21 female college students on the Hostility and Social Acquiescence subscales of the Famous Sayings Test correlated significantly and positively with Eysenck's Neuroticism factor.


1971 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 407-412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marilyn L. Wilson ◽  
Roger L. Greene

Several writers have suggested that female homosexuals have personality profiles that differ from those of female heterosexuals, but these profiles are not pathological in nature. This hypothesis was tested on 46 “normal” female homosexuals using the California Psychological Inventory, Eysenck Personality Inventory, and Edwards Personal Preference Schedule. There was only a slight personality pattern difference between the groups and neither group showed a pathological personality patttern.


1971 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 727-733 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin E. Morf ◽  
Robert D. Kavanaugh ◽  
Marc Mc Conville

Portable Rod-and-frame Test (RFT) scores and the Jackson Personality Inventory (JPI) scale scores were obtained for 41 male and 41 female college students. Two partial RFT scores were computed: the summed deviations of RFT Trials 1 to 8 and RFT Trials 9 to 16. The results suggest that RFT performance of men and women is a function of different determinants and that, at least for men, performance on Trials 1 to 8 is a function of different determinants than performance on Trials 9 to 16. To explain a major portion of the variance of RFT performance an arousal interpretation appears useful for men and an interpretation in terms of energy level for women.


1993 ◽  
Vol 72 (3) ◽  
pp. 755-763 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie L. Deaner ◽  
Jasmin T. McConatha

The present study focused on an assessment of humor, depression, and personality. 38 male and 91 female college students responded to five self-report questionnaires, i.e., Martin and Lefcourt's Situational Humor Response Questionnaire and Coping Humor Scale, Svebak's Sense of Humor Questionnaire, Zimmerman's Inventory to Diagnose Depression, and the Eysenck Personality Inventory. Analysis indicated that individuals who scored lower on the depression scale tended to score higher on the Coping Humor Scale, Extraversion, and Neuroticism. Also, individuals scoring higher on the humor scales tended to score higher on Extraversion and Emotional Stability. These personality factors appear to be strongly related to the sense of humor construct and depression. Perhaps the personality factors of introversion and neuroticism may be employed to identify a predisposition toward depression.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document