Relationship between Severity of Illness and Overinclusive Thinking in Schizophrenia

1970 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 251-254
Author(s):  
Robert J. Craig

40 chronic schizophrenics were tested on 3 measures of overinclusive thinking, i.e., Epstein's test, proverbs and the Object Sorting Test, and then were rated for severity of illness with the Psychotic Reaction Profile. The results showed that severity of illness can be a significant source of variance in assessing schizophrenic thought disorder. Overinclusive thinking is not merely a trait evinced by schizophrenics irregardless of subject variable or stimulus elements. Failure to consider these factors in research designs may obscure the results of potentially meaningful research.

1968 ◽  
Vol 114 (514) ◽  
pp. 1079-1087 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. McConaghy ◽  
M. Clancy

Rapaport (1945) was the first worker to advance evidence that at least two types of formal thought disorder contributed to the disturbance of thinking found in schizophrenia; and furthermore that neither of these types of thinking was specific to schizophrenia. Rapaport administered the Bolles Goldstein Object Sorting Test to 217 psychiatric patients and to a control group of 54 patrolmen. He found that schizophrenics showed a tendency to function more at a concrete level and less at an abstract conceptual level, as described first by Vigotsky (1934). This tendency was also shown by depressives and by persons who were not mentally ill but had a poor cultural background.


2020 ◽  
pp. 025371762094119
Author(s):  
BR Sahithya ◽  
Shweta Rai ◽  
Rishikesh V. Behere

Background: Thought disorder is considered to be central to the core disturbances in schizophrenia and was described by Goldstein as aberrant “concept formation.” Executive dysfunction is another core deficit in schizophrenia. With a greater emphasis on psychopathology in nosological systems, the classical thought disorder receives less prominence. The present study aimed to understand the association between classical thought disorder (aberrant concept formation and concrete abstraction) and executive dysfunction. Methods: Thirty patients with schizophrenia and thirty healthy subjects, matched on age, gender, education, and socioeconomic status, were screened using MINI 5.0, following which they were assessed on object sorting test (OST) and selected tests for executive functions (EFs). Results: Individuals with schizophrenia were found to have significantly decreased performance on all domains of EFs and OST. Total peculiar scores on OST were significantly associated with mental speed, focused attention, and divided attention. Total impoverished scores on OST was significantly associated with focused attention, sustained attention, planning, set shifting, perseveration, and concept formation. Conclusion: Several correlations, among performance on OST and neuropsychological tests, suggest that patterns of responses on OST can point to underlying executive dysfunction. Both thought disorder and executive dysfunction mirror similar constructs. This similarity represents a conceptual bridge between the classical and contemporary descriptions of the core deficits in schizophrenia.


Author(s):  
Maurice Lorr ◽  
James P. O'Connor ◽  
John W. Stafford

2000 ◽  
Vol 34 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. A22-A25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathaniel McConaghy

Objective The objective was to outline the development of the concept of allusive thinking as a genetic marker of predisposition to schizophrenia and relate this to other cognitive markers of this predisposition. Method Publications were reviewed which were considered relevant to the objective. Results Allusive thinking as detected clinically could be measured objectively from subjects' performance on an Object Sorting Test. Using this test it was shown that parents, both of patients with schizophrenia and of university students with allusive thinking, themselves showed allusive thinking, indicating it was familially transmitted. Subjects with allusive thinking showed reduced cortical evoked brain P300 potentials, suggesting the transmission was genetic. The hypothesis that allusive thinking was associated with weaker cortical inhibitory processes was supported by the finding that subjects with such thinking chose more remote word associations. It was suggested that reasons allusive thinking has not been used as a marker in intervention studies is that as a dimension of abstract thinking, marked allusive thinking is not associated with a high risk of developing schizophrenia, and that administration of the Object Sorting Test is time-consuming. Other dimensional cognitive factors, such as psychoticism and perceptual anhedonia and aberration, are independent of allusive thinking and are also associated with a low risk of developing schizophrenia. Genetic transmission of schizophrenia would appear to involve a number of predisposing factors distributed dimensionally in the population with the contribution of each factor being small. Conclusions As they are associated with only a low risk of predisposition to schizophrenia, cognitive markers may not be of immediate value in the prevention of schizophrenia when compared with the less specific markers used for this purpose. However, it would seem that their study will be necessary if the nature of the genetic transmission of the illness is to be understood. This understanding could be expected to ultimately lead to more effective prevention.


1971 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 711-717 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth C. Thomas

This study examined conceptualization in 60 white advantaged (a) and disadvantaged ( da) kindergarten children as demonstrated by their performance on an object-sorting test. The two tasks in this test, varying in degree of structure, were referred to as spontaneous and structured sorting. Ss were equally divided as to sex. The two groups were significantly different on the following variables: mental age, educational level of father, educational level of mother, occupation of father, restriction of home environment, stimulating opportunities provided by games in the home, availability of record player, and attendance of movies. A significant difference was found in the performance of the two groups with the advantaged performing at a higher level. Sex and task differences were not significant. The failure to find a discrepancy between spontaneous and structured sorting was considered to be growth from egocentric thinking to an acquisition of greater flexibility in change of focus. The postulated five-level hierarchy in conceptual development, useful in early childhood curriculum planning, was supported by the distribution of responses.


1962 ◽  
Vol 64 (5) ◽  
pp. 381-385 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. H. Silverman ◽  
Doris K. Silverman

1978 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 401-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald M. Quinlan ◽  
K. David Schultz ◽  
Robert K. Davies ◽  
Martin Harrow
Keyword(s):  

1982 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 835-841 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter K. Tucker ◽  
Sharon J. Rothwell ◽  
Michael S. Armstrong ◽  
Neil McConaghy

SynopsisVisual artists of acknowledged creativity but not students with divergent thinking showed allusive (loose) thinking on an Object Sorting Test. It was concluded that high but not low level creativity in some fields may be associated with a predisposition to schizophrenia.


1999 ◽  
Vol 31 (8) ◽  
pp. 687-698
Author(s):  
Christiane Spiel ◽  
Günther Böhm ◽  
Alexander von Eye

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document