Authoritarianism and Candidate Preference in the 1988 Presidential Election

1989 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 914-914 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Hanson
Author(s):  
Stella Amara Aririguzoh

Television is popularly used to offer information to viewers during elections. There will always be citizens who register to participate in an election and then refuse to take further steps, like casting their votes. This study sought to find out if television broadcasts made citizens like these experience the crystallization effect. This effect causes uninterested citizens to make crystal clear choices on particular contestants. This study sought to find out about the crystallization effect on voters in Ado Odo/Ota communities in Ogun State of Nigeria during the 2007 Nigerian presidential election. The survey method was used to get required data from 782 respondents who were not members of any political party, had no candidate preference, and were yet to decide on who to vote for in this election. It seems plain from this study that television broadcasts sharpened these citizens' decisions to make specific choices. These undecided, indifferent, or neutral voters had their ideas crystallized or decisively formed to vote for specific candidates after exposure to television broadcasts.


1976 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 457-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harold de Bock

In a one-sided presidential election, in-state election poll reports may cause the underdog to suffer a loss in preference intensity and turnout motivation.


1965 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 603-604 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerry Higgins

20 male, Caucasian undergraduates were administered the California F scale of authoritarianism and subsequently asked for their preference between the two major candidates in the 1964 United States presidential election. Splitting the sample at the median F-scale score, it was found that the higher scorers preferred Goldwater over Johnson, while the lower scorers preferred Johnson over Goldwater.


1973 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1158-1158 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Hanson ◽  
Bruce J. White

1970 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 629-630 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary Schwendiman ◽  
Knud S. Larsen ◽  
Stephen C. Cope

The literature on the relationship of authoritarianism and political behavior is complex. This study investigated the relation of candidate preference during the 1968 presidential election to scores on 4 measures of authoritarianism. A survey was administered to a random sample of 141 male and 141 female undergraduates. Significant differences between Wallace supporters and supporters of other candidates on 3 of the 4 measures indicate that general authoritarianism, in addition to right-wing authoritarianism, is predictive of candidate preference. Sex differences were reported on only one of the 4 assessments, and age correlated inversely with all measures.


1978 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 313-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
William D. Brant ◽  
Knud S. Larsen ◽  
Don Langenberg

Responses of 39 males and 41 females to a questionnaire containing items from the dogmatism and F scales showed Wallace/Reagan supporters were higher on authoritarianism than Ford/Carter adherents and left-liberal supporters were lowest. Data do not support Rokeach's theory.


1955 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 364-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heinz Eulau

Political differences among people are not a matter of chance; they are significantly related to such interdependent variables as party identification, issue orientation, and candidate preference. The national sample survey of 1,614 respondents conducted by the Survey Research Center during the 1952 presidential election gives us a sound basis for investigating this phenomenon: 1,200 of the respondents were classified as “middle class” or “working class.” Of the 389 middle class people, 69 per cent said they preferred the Republican candidate, but only 43 per cent of the 811 working class people expressed this preference (Table I).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document