An Inventory to Measure Contact with Medical Health Care Professionals

1991 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph J. Koman
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Kuka ◽  
Jan P. Ehlers ◽  
Michaela Zupanic

Abstract Background In Germany academic degree programs for non-medical health care professions (nursing, physical, occupational and speech language therapy, midwifery) have been established only recently, even if they play a key role in today´s complex patient-centered health care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the development and current state of German education research in these professions as well as to conduct a comparison to international research activities in this field.Method To achieve these objectives a bibliometric and content-related publication analysis was performed from 2008 to 2017 in four international high-impact journals. Based on appropriate inclusion criteria (bibliographical and biographical criteria, focus on first and last author, original study) and their development into a coding scheme, articles were recorded systematically and results analyzed quantitatively and content-wise. Group comparisons between German and international health care professions as well as interdisciplinary comparisons between the individual professions were performed.Results On the whole, 11.891 articles were analyzed for participation of the respective target groups, either as first or as last author. Of these, 164 original studies met the inclusion criteria with 157 publications pertaining to international and only seven to German health care professionals. The majority of authors belonged to the discipline of nursing science (n=138). North America (36.63%), Australia (18.32%) and Asia (14.85%) rank among the regions that publish most frequently. Publications by German health care professionals are rare but showed an overall high level of quality.Conclusion International publication activities by non-medical health care professionals have been on the rise in recent years. Specific funding measures as well as transnational and interdisciplinary collaborations may be potential ways of strengthening and expanding education research in countries with only young academic experiences.


2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 17 ◽  
Author(s):  
SamiA Al Nassar ◽  
Ghadeer Al Shaikh ◽  
Nojud Alhejin ◽  
Ahlam Almaawi ◽  
Amna Baljoun ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 252-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron K. Sibley ◽  
John M. Tallon ◽  
Arla L. Day ◽  
Stacy Ackroyd-Stolarz

Author(s):  
Sallie Han

The aim of this chapter is to demonstrate the importance and necessity of bringing together the considerations of language and reproduction. While other topics of sexuality have aroused interest in sociolinguistics and linguistic anthropology, the ideas, practices, and experiences of human reproduction, notably pregnancy, remain understudied. At the same time, a discussion of language has been largely absent from the anthropology of reproduction, which has emerged in the last twenty years as an especially vibrant area of cultural and social study. The chapter examines the metaphors and discourses or the “talk about” reproduction; the interactions and “talk between” people, like pregnant women and medical health care providers, which shapes the ordinary experiences of reproduction; the “talk to” parties (specifically, fetuses and imagined children) who themselves become constituted through talk; and reproduction as literacy event or one that is mediated and experienced in relation to texts. It is asserted that language is a practice of reproduction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document