scholarly journals Intra-Abdominal Pressure, a Prognostic Marker in the Evolution of Acute Pancreatitis

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 51-55
Author(s):  
Alina Simona Bereanu ◽  
Bogdan Vintilă ◽  
Mihai Sava
Keyword(s):  
Acute Pancreatitis ◽  
Prognostic Marker ◽  
Clinical Laboratory ◽  
Apache Ii ◽  
Prognostic Scores ◽  
Apache Ii Score ◽  
Abdominal Pressure ◽  
Operating Characteristics ◽  
Specificity And Sensitivity ◽  
Ranson Score

Abstract In acute pancreatitis some prognostic scores have been suggested, based on clinical, laboratory and radiological criteria. The most popular are: Ranson score, APACHE II score and CT severity index (CTSI). The trend is to find a prognostic marker that is easy to use, cheap, and reproductible. Recently, the increase of the intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) has drawn attention. Material and Methods: From January 2012 to April 2014, a group of 64 patients, admitted to the Clinical Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care and the Surgical Departments of the SCJU Sibiu, with the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis, were included in this observational prospective study. The cut-off values, the specificity and sensitivity of the prognostic scores were calculated using the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis curves. Results: At a cut-off value of 12 mm Hg IAP max has a sensitivity of 0,75, similar to Ranson score at 48 h (0.72 at a cut-off value 3) and CTSI (0,73 at a cut-off value 4). Better results are just for APACHE II score at 24 h (0,88 at a cut-off value 8). IAP max has a specificity of 0,88, simillary to CTSI (0,83) and APACHE II score (0,82). Conclusions: In our study maximum IAP could be correlated with prognostic markers for severe evolution in acute pancreatitis.

Role of Intra-Abdominal Pressure as a Prognostic Marker and Its Correlation with APACHE II and SOFA Scores in Patients of Acute Pancreatitis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arun Kumar Gupta ◽  
Ekta Yadav ◽  
Nikhil Gupta ◽  
Raghav Yelamanchi ◽  
Lalit Kumar Bansal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Pancreatitis ◽  
Prognostic Marker ◽  
Apache Ii ◽  
Abdominal Pressure

scholarly journals Soluble B7-H5 Is a Novel Diagnostic, Severity, and Prognosis Marker in Acute Pancreatitis

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Ruoxin Xu ◽  
Ju Gong ◽  
Wei Chen ◽  
Yakang Jin ◽  
Jian Huang
Keyword(s):  
Acute Pancreatitis ◽  
Abdominal Pain ◽  
Severe Acute Pancreatitis ◽  
Apache Ii ◽  
Apache Ii Score ◽  
Prognosis Marker ◽  
Score Apache ◽  
Marshall Score ◽  
Pain Patients ◽  
Ranson Score

As an important ligand in T lymphocyte costimulatory pathways, B7-H5 is involved deeply in the immune response in various diseases. However, its clinical usefulness as an early indicator in acute pancreatitis (AP) remains unclear. In this study, the levels of sB7-H5 and cytokines in plasma samples of 75 AP patients, 20 abdominal pain patients without AP, and 20 healthy volunteers were determined. Then, the correlation of sB7-H5 and clinical features, cytokines, the Ranson score, APACHE II score, Marshall score, and BISAP score was analysed, and the value of sB7-H5 for diagnostic, severity, and prognosis of AP was evaluated. We found that the levels of sB7-H5 were specifically upregulated in AP patients. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed that sB7-H5 can identify AP patients from healthy or abdominal pain patients with 78.9% or 86.4% sensitivity and 93.3% or 90.0% specificity. Further analysis showed that the levels of sB7-H5 were significantly correlated with WBC ( p = 0.004 ), GLU ( p = 0.008 ), LDH ( p < 0.001 ), Ca2+ ( p = 0.006 ), AST ( p = 0.009 ), PLT ( p = 0.041 ), IL-6 ( p < 0.001 ), IL-10 ( p < 0.001 ), and TNF-α ( p < 0.001 ). And levels of sB7-H5 were gradually increased among patients with mildly acute pancreatitis (MAP), moderately severe acute pancreatitis (MSAP), and severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). It can distinguish the severity of AP with good sensitivity and specificity. Moreover, when dividing the patients into two groups according to the median level of sB7-H5, the local complication and length of stay of low levels of the sB7-H5 group were significantly less than those in high levels of the sB7-H5 group. And the levels of sB7-H5 in AP patients were significantly correlated with the Ranson score ( p < 0.001 ), APACHE II score ( p < 0.001 ), Marshall score ( p < 0.001 ), and BISAP score ( p < 0.001 ). The AUCs of assessing local complications of sB7-H5 at day 1 and day 3 were 0.704 ( p = 0.0024 ) and 0.727 ( p = 0.0373 ). These results showed the potential value of sB7-H5 as a diagnostic, severity, and prognosis marker of AP.

scholarly journals D-dimer levels in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (12) ◽  
pp. 3993
Author(s):  
Anil Kumar ◽  
Ranjith Kothagattu
Keyword(s):  
Acute Pancreatitis ◽  
Prognostic Marker ◽  
Clinical Parameter ◽  
Multiple Organ ◽  
Apache Ii ◽  
Apache Ii Score ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Failure Assessment ◽  
The Mean ◽  
D Dimer

Background:Coagulative disorder is known to occur in the early phase of acute pancreatitis. (AP) and D-dimer is a commonly used clinical parameter of haemostasis. The aim of this study was to assess the value of the plasma D-dimer level as a marker of severity in the 1.3.5 days after admission in patients with Acute pancreatitis.Methods: From September 2015 to September 2017, 60 patients admitted for AP were included in this observational study. The D-dimer level was measured during days 1,3,5 after admission and the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II score, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, and other clinical parameters were recorded at the same time. The maximum and the mean D-dimer values were used for analysis and compared with other prognostic factors of AP.Results:Both the maximum and mean levels of D-dimer were significantly different between patients with and without clinical variables such as multiple-organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), need for surgical intervention, and the mortality. Additionally, the D-dimer level correlated well with two usual markers of AP severity-the APACHE II score and the C-reactive protein level. Conclusion D-dimer measurement is a useful, easy, and inexpensive early prognostic marker of the evolution and complications of AP.Conclusions:D-dimer measurement is a useful, easy, and inexpensive early prognostic marker of the evolution and complications of SAP.

scholarly journals The role of Th2 cytokines interleukin-4 and interleukin-5 in assessing severity and prognosis of acute pancreatitis

2021 ◽  
pp. 82-82
Author(s):  
Krstina Doklestic ◽  
Nenad Ivancevic ◽  
Zlatibor Loncar ◽  
Dusan Micic ◽  
Milos Ristic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Pancreatitis ◽  
Clinical Laboratory ◽  
Diagnostic Procedures ◽  
Interleukin 4 ◽  
Apache Ii Score ◽  
Common Disease ◽  
Clinical Value ◽  
Interleukin 5 ◽  
Ranson Score

Introduction/Objective. Acute pancreatitis (AP) is relatively common disease which in most patients has favorable course. However, in approximately 20% patients, the course of the disease is more severe with high mortality (40-50%). The evaluation of disease severity is now primarily based on protocols that includes clinical, laboratory, and radiographic diagnostic procedures, APACHE II score, Ranson score, CT index, and CT necrosis score. Key cells in the immunopathogenesis of AP are T-lymphocytes, and recent studies indicate the role of Th2 and their effector cytokines: interleukin (IL) -4 and: interleukin (IL) -5. The purpose of our study was to determine the potential clinical value of IL-4 and IL-5 as biochemical markers for predicting development of severe, necrotizing form of acute pancreatitis with systemic complication such as systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). Methods. This prospective study included 240 patients hospitalized at The Clinic for Emergency Surgery of Clinical Center of Serbia as AP. Levels of IL-4 and IL-5 in serum were detected using commercial Bender Med Systems (BMS716FF) kits. Results. IL-4 and IL-5 were statistically significant increased on the second day of hospitalization with maximum values on the third day. In patients with severe AP complicated with necrosis and/or sepsis values were rising all through the seventh day. Conclusion. Levels of IL-4 and IL-5 in peripheral blood correlate with SIRS, Ranson score and clinical outcome in AP patients, therefore these cytokines are potential early biomarkers of disease progression and related complications.

scholarly journals Prognostic factors and outcome of adult allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients admitted to intensive care unit during transplant hospitalization

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian S. Michel ◽  
Daniel Teschner ◽  
Irene Schmidtmann ◽  
Matthias Theobald ◽  
Beate Hauptrock ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Apache Ii ◽  
Prognostic Scores ◽  
Apache Ii Score ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Short And Long Term

AbstractPatients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation have a high morbidity and mortality, especially after admission to intensive care unit (ICU) during peri-transplant period. The objective of this study was to identify new clinical and biological parameters and validate prognostic scores associated with ICU, short-and long-term survival. Significant differences between ICU survivors and ICU non-survivors for the clinical parameters invasive mechanical ventilation, urine output, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and amount of vasopressors have been measured. Among prognostic scores (SOFA, SAPSII, PICAT, APACHE II, APACHE IV) assessing severity of disease and predicting outcome of critically ill patients on ICU, the APACHE II score has shown most significant difference (p = 0.002) and the highest discriminative power (area under the ROC curve (AUC) 0.74). An elevated level of lactate at day of admission was associated with poor survival on ICU and the most significant independent parameter (p < 0.001). In our cohort kidney damage with low urine output has a highly relevant impact on ICU, short- and long-term overall survival. The APACHE II score was superior predicting ICU mortality compared to all other tested prognostic scores for patients on ICU during peri-transplant period.

Plasma ADAMTS13 activity parallels the APACHE II score, reflecting an early prognostic indicator for patients with severe acute pancreatitis

2008 ◽  
Vol 43 (11) ◽  
pp. 1387-1396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chie Morioka ◽  
Masahito Uemura ◽  
Tomomi Matsuyama ◽  
Masanori Matsumoto ◽  
Seiji Kato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Pancreatitis ◽  
Severe Acute Pancreatitis ◽  
Prognostic Indicator ◽  
Apache Ii ◽  
Apache Ii Score ◽  
Adamts13 Activity

scholarly journals Prognostic Indicator in Severe Acute Pancreatitis

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (05) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dr. Ajay Khanolkar ◽  
Dr. Manish Khare
Keyword(s):  
Acute Pancreatitis ◽  
Severe Acute Pancreatitis ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Financial Burden ◽  
Fluid Collection ◽  
Prognostic Indicator ◽  
Apache Ii ◽  
Management Decision ◽  
Apache Ii Score ◽  
Local Complication

Aim of study: - To assess the utility of each as prognostic indicator in Severe Acute Pancreatitis. Material and Methods: This prospective study entitled “To assess the utility of each as prognostic indicator in Severe Acute Pancreatitis” was carried out on patients hospitalized for acute pancreatitis in the surgery department at Chandulal Chandrakar Memorial Medical College and CM Hospital, Bhilai from March 2015 to October 2017.50 patients with the diagnosis of first attack of acute pancreatitis of both sexes and all age groups were selected for the study. Conclusion:- On the basis of observation and result of the study, it can be safely stated that APACHE II Scoring is quick, safe, reproducible, ongoing and cost effective. It can be done by resident or intelligent nursing staff. Give an idea regarding improving or worsening of patients. APACHE II Scoring system when complimented by high quality CECT abdomen can further refine the results and give an idea of likelihood of patients developing local complication. Thus it can also be used along with CECT abdomen for Risk Stratification of subset of patients who are likely to develop local complication who might need surgical intervention. CECT on 3rd day adds nothing to management. It has a tendency to over predict the regional complication, which are in anyway apart of natural course of history of disease (acute fluid collection). Management decision could not be based on CECT abdomen on 3rd day alone, since it is not needed to make a diagnosis of acute pancreatitis it should be abundant, thus reducing the financial burden of patients and institute. CECT abdomen done after 2nd week in the course of illness along with APACHE II Score and clinical finding are better guide for management and surgical intervention.

scholarly journals A study of interventions and their outcome in the management of acute pancreatitis

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (9) ◽  
pp. 3128
Author(s):  
Muppa Viswanath ◽  
Rakesh R. ◽  
Supreeth Kumar Reddy Kunnuru ◽  
Raghu Sri Charan Perubhotla ◽  
Mayank Kumar Gurjar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Pancreatitis ◽  
Necrotizing Pancreatitis ◽  
Severity Index ◽  
Apache Ii ◽  
Special Treatment ◽  
Apache Ii Score ◽  
Severe Pancreatitis ◽  
Common Causes ◽  
Edematous Pancreatitis ◽  
Overall Mortality

Background: Acute pancreatitis is the most terrible of all the calamities that occur in connection with the abdominal viscera. The suddenness of its onset, the illimitable agony which accompanies it, and the mortality attendant upon it, all render it the most formidable of catastrophes. Aim of the study is to evaluate the treatment outcome in acute pancreatitis.Methods: All the patients who underwent surgery for chronic pancreatitis were included in the study. initial APACHE II score at admission and CT severity index was evaluated.Results: Edematous pancreatitis accounts for 80–90% of acute pancreatitis and remission can be achieved in most of the patients without receiving any special treatment. Necrotizing pancreatitis occupies 10–20% of acute pancreatitis and the mortality rate is reported to be 14-25%. Alcohol (45.8%) was the most common causes of acute severe pancreatitis in this study. Males were predominately affected (Male: Female = 29:5). Complication rate or morbidity is 50%. The initial APACHE II score at admission and CT severity index in the first scan were high in patients who underwent necrosectomy and the patients who died. The overall mortality in this study was 30.6%.Conclusions: In conclusion, one reason attributed to high mortality was due to the subgroup of patients who underwent PCD alone and failed to show any change in the recovery nor deterioration and lead to gross nutritional depletion and death, secondly those patients who underwent step up approach and ultimately needed surgery have more aggressive disease evidenced by high APACHE II score, CT severity index and % of necrosis.

scholarly journals Clinical Profile and Outcome of Patients with Severe Acute Pancreatitis

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 8-11
Author(s):  
Rishabh Sehgal ◽  
Inder Pal Singh ◽  
Jyotisterna Mittal
Keyword(s):  
Acute Pancreatitis ◽  
Alcohol Consumption ◽  
Severe Acute Pancreatitis ◽  
Sofa Score ◽  
Clinical Profile ◽  
Etiological Factor ◽  
Clinical Severity ◽  
Apache Ii ◽  
Apache Ii Score ◽  
Marshall Score

Background: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is an acute inflammatory condition of the pancreas leading to pancreatic autodigestion. The present study was conducted to study the clinical profile and outcome of patients with severe acute pancreatitis. Subjects & Methods: The study was conducted on 40 patients of acute pancreatitis. Clinical profile including history, examination findings, etiology of pancreatitis, clinical severity (according to Modified Marshall Score, BISAP score, APACHE II, HAPS score, SOFA score) was recorded. Results: Severe Acute Pancreatitis (SAP) among patients. Majority of the patients i.e. 22 (55%) had alcohol consumption as etiological factor causing SAP followed by biliary 10 (25%) & idiopathic 5 (12.5%). Hypertriglyceridemia and drug-induced (herbal medication) pancreatitis was present in 1 (2.5%) patient each. Out of all 1 (2.5%), patients had a history of both alcohol consumption and the presence of gallstone as an etiological factor. 22 patients (55%) out of 40 patients only conservative management was used while 18(45%) patients underwent USG guided percutaneous drainage was done. Out of these 18 patients, 3(7.5%) patients required Laparoscopic Necrosectomy & 2(5%) patients required open necrosectomy in addition to ultrasound-guided PCD. Patients who improved had a mean BISAP SCORE of 2.15   0.54, Modified Marshall score of 3.65    1.44, APACHE II score of 9.77  4.45, SOFA score 5.54  2.49, RANSON’s score 3.85   1.80 and HAP score of 0.65   0.63. Conclusion: Most common   etiology of severe acute pancreatitis is alcohol followed by biliary etiology. Out of severity scores (BISAP, APACHE-II, SOFA, HAPS), only BISAP score ≥3 is predictive of poor outcome in patients with severe acute pancreatitis.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Different Scoring Systems in Predicting the Severity of Acute Pancreatitis

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (45) ◽  
pp. 2604-2610
Author(s):  
Rohan J. Harsoda ◽  
Sharma Vipin Jaishree ◽  
Krishna Prasad G.V
Keyword(s):  
Acute Pancreatitis ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Apache Ii ◽  
Prediction Of Outcome ◽  
Poor Outcome ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Highly Sensitive ◽  
Poor Outcomes ◽  
Ranson Score

BACKGROUND Accurate prediction of the severity of acute pancreatitis will help in identifying patients at increased risk for morbidity and mortality. We wanted to evaluate the different scoring systems in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis. METHODS This cross-sectional study was undertaken in the Department of Surgery at a zonal hospital between April 2013 and December 2014. RESULTS 40 patients were selected and enrolled in the study as per the selection criteria. 20 (50 %) patients had fair outcome and 20 (50 %) had a poor outcome. Accuracy of different scoring systems in predicting patient outcome ranged from 45 % (48-hr APACHE II) to 62.5 % (Goris MOF at baseline and 48 hr). Baseline Goris MOF was 70 % sensitive and 55 % specific in prediction of poor outcome. It had an accuracy of 62.5 % in prediction of outcome. 48-hr Goris MOF was 80 % sensitive and 45 % specific in predicting the outcome. Baseline APACHE II scores were below the cut-off level in all the patients. 48-hr APACHE II scores were 5 % sensitive and 100% specific for prediction of outcome. Ranson score > 3 was 25 % sensitive and 90 % specific in the prediction of outcome. Balthazar score > 6 was 65 % sensitive and 55 % specific in prediction of outcome. Ranson score was found to have a limited sensitivity for different outcomes (ranging from 21.1 % to 50 %) but was found to have a high specificity (83.8 % to 90 %). CONCLUSIONS Goris scoring system (at 48 hrs) was found to be highly sensitive to different poor outcomes as well as duration of hospital stay. It also correlated with Balthazar scoring system, which was also highly sensitive to different poor outcomes studied. KEYWORDS Acute Pancreatitis, Prediction, Scoring System, APACHE II, Goris MOF, Ranson’s Score, Balthazar Score

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document