scholarly journals Sagittal and Frontal Plane Gait Initiation Kinetics in Healthy, Young Subjects

2019 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-100
Author(s):  
Andrew W. Smith ◽  
Del P. Wong
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Frontal Plane ◽  
Step Test ◽  
Gait Initiation ◽  
Joint Moments ◽  
Plane Component ◽  
Young Subjects

AbstractThe study purposes were to record the lower extremity sagittal and frontal joint moments and powers during gait initiation (GI); evaluate GI support moments in both planes; and analyze planar energy patterns in a group of 15 healthy, young adults. 3D motion and ground reaction force data were used to calculate support moments (SM) and joint moments and powers as well as center of mass (COM) kinematics. STEP1 had no visible SM. It appeared in STEP2 and, by STEP3, resembled that seen in steady-state gait. Joint moments demonstrated a similar development towards typical patterns over the three steps. Correlations of moment data between planes indicate that the frontal plane component of the SM acts to keep the COM centered. It is suggested that Winter’s 1980 SM definition be extended to include both a support (sagittal) component and a centering (frontal) component. Energy was calculated for individual bursts of joint powers in both planes and each step had characteristic patterns in each plane, with patterns resembling steady-state gait appearing in the third step. Test-retest reliability (ICC range: 0.796 – 0.945) was high with CV values in the sagittal plane (36.6 – 37.5%) being less variable than in the frontal plane (39.0 – 82.0%). COM kinematics revealed that acceleration peaked in STEP2 (ICC range: 0.950 – 0.980, CV < 20.0%). Data supported hypotheses regarding the dominance of the frontal plane power in STEP1, with substantial power coming from hip flexors. As well, powers in the sagittal plane were generally of larger magnitude than in the frontal plane.

scholarly journals Active foot placement control ensures stable gait: Effect of constraints on foot placement and ankle moments

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. e0242215
Author(s):  
A. M. van Leeuwen ◽  
J. H. van Dieën ◽  
A. Daffertshofer ◽  
S. M. Bruijn
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Stride Frequency ◽  
Tight Control ◽  
Foot Placement ◽  
Ankle Moment ◽  
Reaction Forces ◽  
Moment Control

Step-by-step foot placement control, relative to the center of mass (CoM) kinematic state, is generally considered a dominant mechanism for maintenance of gait stability. By adequate (mediolateral) positioning of the center of pressure with respect to the CoM, the ground reaction force generates a moment that prevents falling. In healthy individuals, foot placement is complemented mainly by ankle moment control ensuring stability. To evaluate possible compensatory relationships between step-by-step foot placement and complementary ankle moments, we investigated the degree of (active) foot placement control during steady-state walking, and under either foot placement-, or ankle moment constraints. Thirty healthy participants walked on a treadmill, while full-body kinematics, ground reaction forces and EMG activities were recorded. As a replication of earlier findings, we first showed step-by-step foot placement is associated with preceding CoM state and hip ab-/adductor activity during steady-state walking. Tight control of foot placement appears to be important at normal walking speed because there was a limited change in the degree of foot placement control despite the presence of a foot placement constraint. At slow speed, the degree of foot placement control decreased substantially, suggesting that tight control of foot placement is less essential when walking slowly. Step-by-step foot placement control was not tightened to compensate for constrained ankle moments. Instead compensation was achieved through increases in step width and stride frequency.

RUNNING PATTERN GENERATION OF HUMANOID BIPED WITH A FIXED POINT AND ITS REALIZATION

2009 ◽  
Vol 06 (04) ◽  
pp. 631-656 ◽  
Author(s):  
BAEK-KYU CHO ◽  
ILL-WOO PARK ◽  
JUN-HO OH
Keyword(s):  
Fixed Point ◽  
Angular Momentum ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Maximum Velocity ◽  
Frontal Plane ◽  
Numerical Approach ◽  
Pattern Generation ◽  
Upper Body ◽  
Running Pattern

This paper discusses the generation of a running pattern for a humanoid biped and verifies the validity of the proposed method of running pattern generation via experiments. Two running patterns are generated independently in the sagittal plane and in the frontal plane and the two patterns are then combined. When a running pattern is created with resolved momentum control in the sagittal plane, the angular momentum of the robot about the Center of Mass (COM) is set to zero, as the angular momentum causes the robot to rotate. However, this also induces unnatural motion of the upper body of the robot. To solve this problem, the biped was set as a virtual under-actuated robot with a free joint at its support ankle, and a fixed point for a virtual under-actuated system was determined. Following this, a periodic running pattern in the sagittal plane was formulated using the fixed point. The fixed point is easily determined in a numerical approach. In this way, a running pattern in the frontal plane was also generated. In an experiment, a humanoid biped known as KHR-2 ran forward using the proposed running pattern generation method. Its maximum velocity was 2.88 km/h.

scholarly journals The effect of walking speed on the foot inter-segment kinematics, ground reaction forces and lower limb joint moments

PeerJ ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. e5517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong Sun ◽  
Gusztáv Fekete ◽  
Qichang Mei ◽  
Yaodong Gu
Keyword(s):  
Lower Limb ◽  
Walking Speed ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Ground Reaction Forces ◽  
Joint Moments ◽  
Angle Variation ◽  
Foot Kinematics ◽  
Reaction Forces

Background Normative foot kinematic and kinetic data with different walking speeds will benefit rehabilitation programs and improving gait performance. The purpose of this study was to analyze foot kinematics and kinetics differences between slow walking (SW), normal walking (NW) and fast walking (FW) of healthy subjects. Methods A total of 10 healthy male subjects participated in this study; they were asked to carry out walks at a self-selected speed. After measuring and averaging the results of NW, the subjects were asked to perform a 25% slower and 25% faster walk, respectively. Temporal-spatial parameters, kinematics of the tibia (TB), hindfoot (HF), forefoot (FF) and hallux (HX), and ground reaction forces (GRFs) were recorded while the subjects walked at averaged speeds of 1.01 m/s (SW), 1.34 m/s (NW), and 1.68 m/s (FW). Results Hindfoot relative to tibia (HF/TB) and forefoot relative to hindfoot (FF/HF) dorsiflexion (DF) increased in FW, while hallux relative to forefoot (HX/FF) DF decreased. Increased peak eversion (EV) and peak external rotation (ER) in HF/TB were observed in FW with decreased peak supination (SP) in FF/HF. GRFs were increased significantly with walking speed. The peak values of the knee and ankle moments in the sagittal and frontal planes significantly increased during FW compared with SW and NW. Discussion Limited HF/TB and FF/HF motion of SW was likely compensated for increased HX/FF DF. Although small angle variation in HF/TB EV and FF/HF SP during FW may have profound effects for foot kinetics. Higher HF/TB ER contributed to the FF push-off the ground while the center of mass (COM) progresses forward in FW, therefore accompanied by higher FF/HF abduction in FW. Increased peak vertical GRF in FW may affected by decreased stance duration time, the biomechanical mechanism maybe the change in vertical COM height and increase leg stiffness. Walking speed changes accompanied with modulated sagittal plane ankle moments to alter the braking GRF during loading response. The findings of foot kinematics, GRFs, and lower limb joint moments among healthy males may set a reference to distinguish abnormal and pathological gait patterns.

Regulation of Angular Impulse during Two Forward Translating Tasks

2007 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Witaya Mathiyakom ◽  
Jill L. McNitt-Gray ◽  
Rand R. Wilcox
Keyword(s):  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Impulse Generation ◽  
Biarticular Muscles ◽  
Leg Coordination ◽  
Body Center ◽  
Total Body ◽  
Angular Impulse

Angular impulse generation is dependent on the position of the total body center of mass (CoM) relative to the ground reaction force (GRF) vector during contact with the environment. The purpose of this study was to determine how backward angular impulse was regulated during two forward translating tasks. Control of the relative angle between the CoM and the GRF was hypothesized to be mediated by altering trunk–leg coordination. Eight highly skilled athletes performed a series of standing reverse somersaults and reverse timers. Sagittal plane kinematics, GRF, and electromyograms of lower extremity muscles were acquired during the take-off phase of both tasks. The magnitude of the backward angular impulse generated during the push interval of both tasks was mediated by redirecting the GRF relative to the CoM. During the reverse timer, backward angular impulse generated during the early part of the take-off phase was negated by limiting backward trunk rotation and redirecting the GRF during the push interval. Biarticular muscles crossing the knee and hip coordinated the control of GRF direction and CoM trajectory via modulation of trunk–leg coordination.

Interpretation of Ankle Joint Moments during the Stance Phase of Walking: A Comparison of Two Orthogonal Axes Systems

2001 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 173-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrienne E. Hunt ◽  
Richard M. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Coordinate System ◽  
Ankle Joint ◽  
Stance Phase ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Frontal Plane ◽  
Transverse Plane ◽  
The Body ◽  
Global Coordinate System ◽  
Coordinate Systems ◽  
Joint Moments

Three-dimensional ankle joint moments were calculated in two separate coordinate systems, from 18 healthy men during the stance phase of walking, and were then compared. The objective was to determine the extent of differences in the calculated moments between these two commonly used systems and their impact on interpretation. Video motion data were obtained using skin surface markers, and ground reaction force data were recorded from a force platform. Moments acting on the foot were calculated about three orthogonal axes, in a global coordinate system (GCS) and also in a segmental coordinate system (SCS). No differences were found for the sagittal moments. However, compared to the SCS, the GCS significantly (p < .001) overestimated the predominant invertor moment at midstance and until after heel rise. It also significantly (p < .05) underestimated the late stance evertor moment. This frontal plane discrepancy was attributed to sensitivity of the GCS to the degree of abduction of the foot. For the transverse plane, the abductor moment peaked earlier (p < .01) and was relatively smaller (p < .01) in the GCS. Variability in the transverse plane was greater for the SCS, and attributed to its sensitivity to the degree of rearfoot inversion. We conclude that the two coordinate systems result in different calculations of nonsagittal moments at the ankle joint during walking. We propose that the body-based SCS provides a more meaningful interpretation of function than the GCS and would be the preferred method in clinical research, for example where there is marked abduction of the foot.

Individual limb work does not explain the greater metabolic cost of walking in elderly adults

2007 ◽  
Vol 102 (6) ◽  
pp. 2266-2273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justus D. Ortega ◽  
Claire T. Farley
Keyword(s):  
Young Adults ◽  
Mechanical Energy ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Metabolic Cost ◽  
Metabolic Energy ◽  
Elderly Subjects ◽  
Similar Amount ◽  
Elderly Adults ◽  
Young Subjects

Elderly adults consume more metabolic energy during walking than young adults. Our study tested the hypothesis that elderly adults consume more metabolic energy during walking than young adults because they perform more individual limb work on the center of mass. Thus we compared how much individual limb work young and elderly adults performed on the center of mass during walking. We measured metabolic rate and ground reaction force while 10 elderly and 10 young subjects walked at 5 speeds between 0.7 and 1.8 m/s. Compared with young subjects, elderly subjects consumed an average of 20% more metabolic energy ( P = 0.010), whereas they performed an average of 10% less individual limb work during walking over the range of speeds ( P = 0.028). During the single-support phase, elderly and young subjects both conserved ∼80% of the center of mass mechanical energy by inverted pendulum energy exchange and performed a similar amount of individual limb work ( P = 0.473). However, during double support, elderly subjects performed an average of 17% less individual limb work than young subjects ( P = 0.007) because their forward speed fluctuated less ( P = 0.006). We conclude that the greater metabolic cost of walking in elderly adults cannot be explained by a difference in individual limb work. Future studies should examine whether a greater metabolic cost of stabilization, reduced muscle efficiency, greater antagonist cocontraction, and/or a greater cost of generating muscle force cause the elevated metabolic cost of walking in elderly adults.

scholarly journals Active foot placement control ensures stable gait: Effect of constraints on foot placement and ankle moments

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.M. van Leeuwen ◽  
J.H. van Dieën ◽  
A. Daffertshofer ◽  
S.M. Bruijn
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Stride Frequency ◽  
Tight Control ◽  
Foot Placement ◽  
Ankle Moment ◽  
Reaction Forces ◽  
Moment Control

AbstractStep-by-step foot placement control, relative to the center of mass (CoM) kinematic state, is generally considered a dominant mechanism for maintenance of gait stability. By adequate (mediolateral) positioning of the center of pressure with respect to the CoM, the ground reaction force generates a moment that prevents falling. In healthy individuals, foot placement is complemented mainly by ankle moment control ensuring stability. To evaluate possible compensatory relationships between step-by-step foot placement and complementary ankle moments, we investigated the degree of (active) foot placement control during steady-state walking, and under either foot placement-, or ankle moment constraints. Thirty healthy participants walked on a treadmill, while full-body kinematics, ground reaction forces and EMG activities were recorded. As a replication of earlier findings, we first showed step-by-step foot placement is associated with preceding CoM state and hip ab-/adductor activity during steady-state walking. Tight control of foot placement appears to be important at normal walking speed because there was a limited change in the degree of foot placement control despite the presence of a foot placement constraint. At slow speed, the degree of foot placement control decreased substantially, suggesting that tight control of foot placement is less essential when walking slowly. Step-by-step foot placement control was not tightened to compensate for constrained ankle moments. Instead compensation was achieved through increases in step width and stride frequency.

scholarly journals Segmental contributions to the ground reaction force in the single support phase of gait

2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 37-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. S. Mohan Varma ◽  
S. Sujatha
Keyword(s):  
Ground Reaction Force ◽  
Degrees Of Freedom ◽  
Inverse Dynamics ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Experimental Studies ◽  
Vertical Component ◽  
Frontal Plane ◽  
Mathematical Form ◽  
Dynamics Models

Abstract. An inverse dynamics model for the single support (SS) phase of gait is developed to study segmental contributions to the ground reaction force (GRF). With segmental orientations as the generalized degrees of freedom (DOF), the acceleration of the body's center-of-mass is expressed analytically as the summation of the weighted kinematics of individual segments. The weighting functions are constants that are functions of the segment masses and center-of-mass distances. Using kinematic and anthropometric data from literature as inputs, and using the roll-over-shape (ROS) to model the foot-ground interaction, GRF obtained from the inverse model are compared with measured GRF data from literature. The choice of the generalized coordinates and mathematical form of the model provides a means to weigh individual segment contributions, simplify models and choose more kinetically accurate inverse dynamics models. For the kinematic data used, an anthropomorphic model that includes the frontal plane rotation of the pelvis in addition to the sagittal DOF of the thigh and shank most accurately captures the vertical component of the GRF in the SS phase of walking. Of the two ROS used, the ankle-foot roll-over shape provides a better approximation of the kinetics in the SS phase. The method presented here can be used with additional experimental studies to confirm these results.

scholarly journals CHARACTERISTICS OF THE GAIT INITIATION PHASE IN OLDER ADULTS WITH DIABETIC PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHY

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S474-S474
Author(s):  
Gu Eon Kang ◽  
Hung Nguyen ◽  
Mohsen Zahiri ◽  
He Zhou ◽  
Changhong Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Steady State ◽  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Wearable Sensors ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Gait Initiation ◽  
Initiation Phase ◽  
Upright Standing ◽  
Risk Of Falls

Abstract Impairment in steady-state gait in older adults with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (OADPN) is well-known, however little attention has been paid to the gait initiation phase in which postural transitions occur from upright standing to steady-state gait. Given the risk of falls in the gait initiation phase in older adults, knowing its characteristics may be as important as steady-state gait. The aim of this study was to investigate kinematic characteristics of the gait initiation phase in OADPN compared to healthy older adults (HOA). Thirteen OADPN (72.9±6.1 years; 33.0±4.8 kg/m2), and 11 HOA (71.8±2.7 years; 26.5±4.3 kg/m2; no cardiovascular, neurological or orthopedic condition, no history of falling) performed gait on level ground for minimum 10 meters at self-selected comfortable speed. We collected kinematic data using five wearable sensors (LEGSysTM, BioSensics LLC, Watertown, MA) attached on the shanks, thighs and lower back. We used previously validated algorithm to analyze kinematic parameters for the gait initiation phase. Our statistical model showed that the number of steps, stride velocity, gait cycle time, double limb support and mediolateral center-of-mass sway during the gait initiation phase is significantly different between HOA (2.4±0.7 steps; 1.16±0.15 m/s; 1.12±0.10 seconds; 20.3±4.8%; 4.0±1.5°, respectively) and OADPN (4.0±2.1 steps; 0.92±0.29 m/s; 1.23±0.12 seconds; 29.2±10.3%; 7.0±2.9°, respectively) (all p&lt;0.05). The results suggest that OADPN take more, slower and more unstable steps to reach steady-state gait from upright standing compared to HOA. The results also provide implications for needs to develop new interventions targeting the gait initiation phase in OADPN.

Symmetry function as a new tool for evaluating the symmetry of gait in transfemoral amputees

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Slawomir Winiarski ◽  
Alicja Rutkowska-Kucharska ◽  
Mateusz Kowal
Keyword(s):  
Time Series ◽  
Gait Cycle ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Frontal Plane ◽  
Symmetry Function ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Force Components ◽  
Analysis System ◽  
And Shifts

Abstract Background: Numerous studies have demonstrated significant asymmetries in unilateral amputee gait. The underlying dissimilarities between prosthetic and intact limbs have not yet been widely examined. To gain more insight into the functionality of asymmetries, we propose a new tool, the symmetry function (SF), to evaluate the symmetry of walking in terms of kinematic and dynamic variables of patients after unilateral transfemoral amputation and to identify areas with the largest side deviations in the movement cycle. Methods: An instrumented motion analysis system was used to register the gait of fourteen patients after unilateral trans-femoral amputation (TFA). Measurements involved evaluating the time series of gait variables characterizing a range of motion and the time series of the ground reaction force components. Comparison of the involved limb with the uninvolved limb in TFA patients was carried out on the basis of the SF values.Results: The symmetry function proved to be an excellent tool to localize the regions of asymmetry and their positive or negative directions in the full gait cycle. The difference between sides revealed by the symmetry function was the highest for the pelvis and the hip. In the sagittal plane, the pelvis was asymmetrically tilted, reaching the highest SF value of more than 25% at 60% cycle time. In the transverse plane, the pelvis was even more asymmetrically positioned throughout the entire gait cycle (50% difference on average). The hip in the frontal plane reached a 60% difference in SF throughout the single support phase for the prosthetic and then for the intact limb. Conclusions: The symmetry function allows for the detection of gait asymmetries and shifts in the center of gravity and may assess the precise in time adaptation of prostheses and rehabilitation monitoring, especially in unilateral impairments.Trial registration: The trial registration number (TRN): 379991 issued by the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) on 07.05.2020 (retrospectively registered).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document