Individual limb work does not explain the greater metabolic cost of walking in elderly adults

2007 ◽  
Vol 102 (6) ◽  
pp. 2266-2273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justus D. Ortega ◽  
Claire T. Farley
Keyword(s):  
Young Adults ◽  
Mechanical Energy ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Metabolic Cost ◽  
Metabolic Energy ◽  
Elderly Subjects ◽  
Similar Amount ◽  
Elderly Adults ◽  
Young Subjects

Elderly adults consume more metabolic energy during walking than young adults. Our study tested the hypothesis that elderly adults consume more metabolic energy during walking than young adults because they perform more individual limb work on the center of mass. Thus we compared how much individual limb work young and elderly adults performed on the center of mass during walking. We measured metabolic rate and ground reaction force while 10 elderly and 10 young subjects walked at 5 speeds between 0.7 and 1.8 m/s. Compared with young subjects, elderly subjects consumed an average of 20% more metabolic energy ( P = 0.010), whereas they performed an average of 10% less individual limb work during walking over the range of speeds ( P = 0.028). During the single-support phase, elderly and young subjects both conserved ∼80% of the center of mass mechanical energy by inverted pendulum energy exchange and performed a similar amount of individual limb work ( P = 0.473). However, during double support, elderly subjects performed an average of 17% less individual limb work than young subjects ( P = 0.007) because their forward speed fluctuated less ( P = 0.006). We conclude that the greater metabolic cost of walking in elderly adults cannot be explained by a difference in individual limb work. Future studies should examine whether a greater metabolic cost of stabilization, reduced muscle efficiency, greater antagonist cocontraction, and/or a greater cost of generating muscle force cause the elevated metabolic cost of walking in elderly adults.

scholarly journals Walking in simulated reduced gravity: mechanical energy fluctuations and exchange

1999 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 383-390 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy M. Griffin ◽  
Neil A. Tolani ◽  
Rodger Kram
Keyword(s):  
Kinetic Energy ◽  
Potential Energy ◽  
Gravitational Potential ◽  
Inverted Pendulum ◽  
Mechanical Energy ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Metabolic Cost ◽  
Metabolic Energy ◽  
Gravitational Potential Energy ◽  
Reduced Gravity

Walking humans conserve mechanical and, presumably, metabolic energy with an inverted pendulum-like exchange of gravitational potential energy and horizontal kinetic energy. Walking in simulated reduced gravity involves a relatively high metabolic cost, suggesting that the inverted-pendulum mechanism is disrupted because of a mismatch of potential and kinetic energy. We tested this hypothesis by measuring the fluctuations and exchange of mechanical energy of the center of mass at different combinations of velocity and simulated reduced gravity. Subjects walked with smaller fluctuations in horizontal velocity in lower gravity, such that the ratio of horizontal kinetic to gravitational potential energy fluctuations remained constant over a fourfold change in gravity. The amount of exchange, or percent recovery, at 1.00 m/s was not significantly different at 1.00, 0.75, and 0.50 G (average 64.4%), although it decreased to 48% at 0.25 G. As a result, the amount of work performed on the center of mass does not explain the relatively high metabolic cost of walking in simulated reduced gravity.

Mechanics of a rapid running insect: two-, four- and six-legged locomotion

1991 ◽  
Vol 156 (1) ◽  
pp. 215-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. Full ◽  
M. S. Tu
Keyword(s):  
Periplaneta Americana ◽  
Mechanical Energy ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Metabolic Cost ◽  
Legged Locomotion ◽  
American Cockroach ◽  
Stride Frequency ◽  
Gravitational Potential Energy ◽  
Vertical Ground Reaction Force

To examine the effects of variation in body form on the mechanics of terrestrial locomotion, we used a miniature force platform to measure the ground reaction forces of the smallest and, relative to its mass, one of the fastest invertebrates ever studied, the American cockroach Periplaneta americana (mass = 0.83 g). From 0.44-1.0 ms-1, P. americana used an alternating tripod stepping pattern. Fluctuations in gravitational potential energy and horizontal kinetic energy of the center of mass were nearly in phase, characteristic of a running or bouncing gait. Aerial phases were observed as vertical ground reaction force approached zero at speeds above 1 ms-1. At the highest speeds (1.0-1.5 ms-1 or 50 body lengths per second), P. americana switched to quadrupedal and bipedal running. Stride frequency approached the wing beat frequencies used during flight (27 Hz). High speeds were attained by increasing stride length, whereas stride frequency showed little increase with speed. The mechanical power used to accelerate the center of mass increased curvilinearly with speed. The mass-specific mechanical energy used to move the center of mass a given distance was similar to that measured for animals five orders of magnitude larger in mass, but was only one-hundredth of the metabolic cost.

scholarly journals Elastic energy savings and active energy cost in a simple model of running

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan T. Schroeder ◽  
Arthur D. Kuo
Keyword(s):  
Elastic Energy ◽  
Energy Cost ◽  
Energy Savings ◽  
Mechanical Energy ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Metabolic Cost ◽  
The Body ◽  
Metabolic Energy ◽  
Energetic Cost ◽  
Mass Model

The energetic economy of running benefits from tendon and other tissues that store and return elastic energy, thus saving muscles from costly mechanical work. The classic Spring-mass computational model successfully explains the forces, displacements and mechanical power of running, as the outcome of dynamical interactions between the body center of mass and a purely elastic spring for the leg. Conversely, the Spring-mass model does not include active muscles and cannot explain the metabolic energy cost of running. Here we add explicit actuation and dissipation to the Spring-mass model, resulting in substantial active (and thus costly) work for running on level ground and up or down slopes. Dissipation is modeled as modest energy losses (5% of total mechanical energy for running at 3 m/s) from hysteresis and foot-ground collisions, that must be restored by active work each step. Even with substantial elastic energy return (59% of positive work, comparable to empirical observations), the active work could account for most of the metabolic cost of human running (about 68%, assuming human-like muscle efficiency). We also introduce a previously unappreciated energetic cost for rapid production of force, that helps explain the relatively smooth ground reaction forces of running, and why muscles might also actively perform negative work. Although elastic return is key to energy savings, there are still losses that require restorative muscle work, which can cost substantial energy during running.

scholarly journals Using a simple rope-pulley system that mechanically couples the arms, legs, and treadmill reduces the metabolic cost of walking

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daisey Vega ◽  
Christopher J. Arellano
Keyword(s):  
Metabolic Cost ◽  
Metabolic Energy ◽  
Metabolic Effects ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Walking Ability ◽  
Arm Swing ◽  
Pulley System ◽  
Young Subjects ◽  
Walking Recovery ◽  
Set Up

Abstract Background Emphasizing the active use of the arms and coordinating them with the stepping motion of the legs may promote walking recovery in patients with impaired lower limb function. Yet, most approaches use seated devices to allow coupled arm and leg movements. To provide an option during treadmill walking, we designed a rope-pulley system that physically links the arms and legs. This arm-leg pulley system was grounded to the floor and made of commercially available slotted square tubing, solid strut channels, and low-friction pulleys that allowed us to use a rope to connect the subject’s wrist to the ipsilateral foot. This set-up was based on our idea that during walking the arm could generate an assistive force during arm swing retraction and, therefore, aid in leg swing. Methods To test this idea, we compared the mechanical, muscular, and metabolic effects between normal walking and walking with the arm-leg pulley system. We measured rope and ground reaction forces, electromyographic signals of key arm and leg muscles, and rates of metabolic energy consumption while healthy, young subjects walked at 1.25 m/s on a dual-belt instrumented treadmill (n = 8). Results With our arm-leg pulley system, we found that an assistive force could be generated, reaching peak values of 7% body weight on average. Contrary to our expectation, the force mainly coincided with the propulsive phase of walking and not leg swing. Our findings suggest that subjects actively used their arms to harness the energy from the moving treadmill belt, which helped to propel the whole body via the arm-leg rope linkage. This effectively decreased the muscular and mechanical demands placed on the legs, reducing the propulsive impulse by 43% (p < 0.001), which led to a 17% net reduction in the metabolic power required for walking (p = 0.001). Conclusions These findings provide the biomechanical and energetic basis for how we might reimagine the use of the arms in gait rehabilitation, opening the opportunity to explore if such a method could help patients regain their walking ability. Trial registration: Study registered on 09/29/2018 in ClinicalTrials.gov (ID—NCT03689647).

scholarly journals Elastic energy savings and active energy cost in a simple model of running

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (11) ◽  
pp. e1009608
Author(s):  
Ryan T. Schroeder ◽  
Arthur D. Kuo
Keyword(s):  
Elastic Energy ◽  
Energy Cost ◽  
Energy Savings ◽  
Mechanical Energy ◽  
Metabolic Cost ◽  
The Body ◽  
Metabolic Energy ◽  
Energetic Cost ◽  
Mass Model ◽  
Human Running

The energetic economy of running benefits from tendon and other tissues that store and return elastic energy, thus saving muscles from costly mechanical work. The classic “Spring-mass” computational model successfully explains the forces, displacements and mechanical power of running, as the outcome of dynamical interactions between the body center of mass and a purely elastic spring for the leg. However, the Spring-mass model does not include active muscles and cannot explain the metabolic energy cost of running, whether on level ground or on a slope. Here we add explicit actuation and dissipation to the Spring-mass model, and show how they explain substantial active (and thus costly) work during human running, and much of the associated energetic cost. Dissipation is modeled as modest energy losses (5% of total mechanical energy for running at 3 m s-1) from hysteresis and foot-ground collisions, that must be restored by active work each step. Even with substantial elastic energy return (59% of positive work, comparable to empirical observations), the active work could account for most of the metabolic cost of human running (about 68%, assuming human-like muscle efficiency). We also introduce a previously unappreciated energetic cost for rapid production of force, that helps explain the relatively smooth ground reaction forces of running, and why muscles might also actively perform negative work. With both work and rapid force costs, the model reproduces the energetics of human running at a range of speeds on level ground and on slopes. Although elastic return is key to energy savings, there are still losses that require restorative muscle work, which can cost substantial energy during running.

scholarly journals Muscle Metabolic Energy Costs While Modifying Propulsive Force Generation During Walking

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard E. Pimentel ◽  
Noah L. Pieper ◽  
William H. Clark ◽  
Jason R. Franz
Keyword(s):  
Young Adults ◽  
Metabolic Cost ◽  
Metabolic Energy ◽  
Energy Costs ◽  
Joint Power ◽  
Lower Limb Muscles ◽  
Age Related ◽  
Musculoskeletal Models ◽  
Metabolic Costs ◽  
Related Increase

AbstractWe pose that an age-related increase in the metabolic cost of walking arises in part from a redistribution of joint power where muscles spanning the hip compensate for insufficient ankle push-off and smaller peak propulsive forces (FP). Young adults elicit a similar redistribution when walking with smaller FP via biofeedback. We used targeted FP biofeedback and musculoskeletal models to estimate the metabolic costs of operating lower limb muscles in young adults walking across a range of FP. Our simulations support the theory of distal-to-proximal redistribution of joint power as a determinant of increased metabolic cost in older adults during walking.

scholarly journals Collision-based mechanics of bipedal hopping

2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 20130418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne K. Gutmann ◽  
David V. Lee ◽  
Craig P. McGowan
Keyword(s):  
Mass Velocity ◽  
Mechanical Energy ◽  
Large Fraction ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Centre Of Mass ◽  
Cost Of Transport ◽  
Kangaroo Rats ◽  
Muscle Work ◽  
Collision Angle

The muscle work required to sustain steady-speed locomotion depends largely upon the mechanical energy needed to redirect the centre of mass and the degree to which this energy can be stored and returned elastically. Previous studies have found that large bipedal hoppers can elastically store and return a large fraction of the energy required to hop, whereas small bipedal hoppers can only elastically store and return a relatively small fraction. Here, we consider the extent to which large and small bipedal hoppers (tammar wallabies, approx. 7 kg, and desert kangaroo rats, approx. 0.1 kg) reduce the mechanical energy needed to redirect the centre of mass by reducing collisions. We hypothesize that kangaroo rats will reduce collisions to a greater extent than wallabies since kangaroo rats cannot elastically store and return as high a fraction of the mechanical energy of hopping as wallabies. We find that kangaroo rats use a significantly smaller collision angle than wallabies by employing ground reaction force vectors that are more vertical and center of mass velocity vectors that are more horizontal and thereby reduce their mechanical cost of transport. A collision-based approach paired with tendon morphometry may reveal this effect more generally among bipedal runners and quadrupedal trotters.

Olfactory Adaptation and Recovery in Old Age

Perception ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 265-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph C Stevens ◽  
William S Cain ◽  
Franc T Schiet ◽  
Michael W Oatley
Keyword(s):  
Young Adults ◽  
Test Chamber ◽  
Threshold Level ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Odor Intensity ◽  
Elderly Adults ◽  
Repeated Presentation ◽  
Olfactory Adaptation ◽  
Young Subjects ◽  
Fourth Experiment

Four experiments are reported in which it is shown that elderly adults are more prone than young adults to olfactory adaptation and are slower to recover threshold sensitivity. The first three experiments differed in detail, but had in common an initial threshold determination for 1-butanol, a 30 s exposure to a concentration twenty-seven times threshold, followed by repeated presentation of the initial threshold level at various intervals after adaptation. In three experiments accuracy of forced-choice discrimination was poor immediately after adaptation but tended to improve with time, and considerably faster in the young than in the elderly. In the fourth experiment, groups of twenty-three elderly and twenty-five young subjects threshold-matched for pyridine were compared. The subjects participated in three sessions in which pyridine was infused into a test chamber at either 2.5, 1.25, or 0 L min−1 (sham session). At 2.5 L min−1 both groups were able to track the buildup of odor intensity during infusion and its decline after infusion. In contrast, at 1.25 L min−1 only the young were able to track odor intensity, even though the concentration rose above initial threshold levels.

Do mechanical gait parameters explain the higher metabolic cost of walking in obese adolescents?

2009 ◽  
Vol 106 (6) ◽  
pp. 1763-1770 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Peyrot ◽  
David Thivel ◽  
Laurie Isacco ◽  
Jean-Benoît Morin ◽  
Pascale Duche ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Fat ◽  
Mechanical Energy ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Metabolic Cost ◽  
Normal Weight ◽  
Mechanical Work ◽  
Percent Body Fat ◽  
External Work ◽  
Obese Subjects

Net metabolic cost of walking normalized by body mass ( CW·BM−1; in J·kg−1·m−1) is greater in obese than in normal-weight individuals, and biomechanical differences could be responsible for this greater net metabolic cost. We hypothesized that, in obese individuals, greater mediolateral body center of mass (COM) displacement and lower recovery of mechanical energy could induce an increase in the external mechanical work required to lift and accelerate the COM and thus in net CW·BM−1. Body composition and standing metabolic rate were measured in 23 obese and 10 normal-weight adolescents. Metabolic and mechanical energy costs were assessed while walking along an outdoor track at four speeds (0.75–1.50 m/s). Three-dimensional COM accelerations were measured by means of a tri-axial accelerometer and gyroscope and integrated twice to obtain COM velocities, displacements, and fluctuations in potential and kinetic energies. Last, external mechanical work (J·kg−1·m−1), mediolateral COM displacement, and the mechanical energy recovery of the inverted pendulum were calculated. Net CW·BM−1 was 25% higher in obese than in normal-weight subjects on average across speeds, and net CW·BM−67 (J·kg−0.67·m−1) was significantly related to percent body fat ( r2 = 0.46). However, recovery of mechanical energy and the external work performed (J·kg−1·m−1) were similar in the two groups. The mediolateral displacement was greater in obese subjects and significantly related to percent body fat ( r2 = 0.64). The mediolateral COM displacement, likely due to greater step width, was significantly related to net CW·BM−67 ( r2 = 0.49). In conclusion, we speculate that the greater net CW·BM−67 in obese subjects may be partially explained by the greater step-to-step transition costs associated with wide gait during walking.

Running With an Elastic Lower Limb Exoskeleton

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 269-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael S. Cherry ◽  
Sridhar Kota ◽  
Aaron Young ◽  
Daniel P. Ferris
Keyword(s):  
Lower Limb ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Metabolic Cost ◽  
Vertical Ground Reaction Force ◽  
Lower Limb Exoskeleton ◽  
Leg Stiffness ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Young Subjects ◽  
Electrical Motors ◽  
Human Running

Although there have been many lower limb robotic exoskeletons that have been tested for human walking, few devices have been tested for assisting running. It is possible that a pseudo-passive elastic exoskeleton could benefit human running without the addition of electrical motors due to the spring-like behavior of the human leg. We developed an elastic lower limb exoskeleton that added stiffness in parallel with the entire lower limb. Six healthy, young subjects ran on a treadmill at 2.3 m/s with and without the exoskeleton. Although the exoskeleton was designed to provide ~50% of normal leg stiffness during running, it only provided 24% of leg stiffness during testing. The difference in added leg stiffness was primarily due to soft tissue compression and harness compliance decreasing exoskeleton displacement during stance. As a result, the exoskeleton only supported about 7% of the peak vertical ground reaction force. There was a significant increase in metabolic cost when running with the exoskeleton compared with running without the exoskeleton (ANOVA, P < .01). We conclude that 2 major roadblocks to designing successful lower limb robotic exoskeletons for human running are human-machine interface compliance and the extra lower limb inertia from the exoskeleton.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document