scholarly journals Morphological and histological kidney structure in diabetic rats model treated with ethanol extracts of jengkol fruit peel (Archidendron pauciflorum)

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 208
Author(s):  
Desak Made Malini ◽  
Nurullia Fitriani ◽  
Adnin Laila ◽  
Nining Ratningsih ◽  
Tia Setiawati

In a long term, diabetes mellitus (DM) leads to nephropathy due to glomerular hyperfiltration. One of the plant used as a diabetic drug by the community in Karangwangi Village, Cianjur Regency, West Java is the fruit peel of jengkol. Therefore, this study aims to determine the effect of the ethanolic extract of Jengkol fruit peel (EEJFP) toward the morphological and histological structure on the kidney of the diabetic rat model. The method adopted was the Randomized Design (CRD) with 6 treatments namely NC (Carboxyl Methyl Cellulose (CMC) 0.5%), PC (CMC 0.5%), Pb (Glibenclamide 5 mg/kg BW), P1, P2, and P3 (EEJFP 385; 770; and 1,540 mg/kg BW) with 4 replications for 14 consecutive days. Furthermore, the induction of diabetes with streptozotocin dose of 60 mg/Kg BW was performed intravenously in experimental animals except for the NC group. The parameters observed include relative weight, morphological, and histological structure of kidney which include glomerular diameter, Bowman space distance, and percentage of proximal tubular cell necrosis. The non-parametric and parametric data were tested by Kruskal Wallis and ANOVA test as well as Duncan's follow-up test, respectively. The results showed that there was no significant difference in the morphological structure of the kidney between treatment groups.  Furthermore, the relative weights of kidney in the PC, Pb, P1, and P3 groups were larger and significantly different compared to NC and P2 also, the histological structure showed that the glomerular diameter (65.43 ± 0.7 m), Bowman space distance (4.19 ± 1.7 µm), and the percentage of proximal tubular cell necrosis (24.6 ± 5.5%) at P2 were not significantly different from NC. Based on this results, it was concluded that EEJFP has no effect on the kidney’s morphological structure, however, it decreases its relative weight and repair the kidney’s histological damage of the diabetic rat model with the optimum dose of 770 mg/kg BW.

1997 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 160-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan D. Kharasch ◽  
David Thorning ◽  
Kyle Garton ◽  
Douglas C. Hankins ◽  
Cormac G. Kilty

Background The sevoflurane degradation product compound A is nephrotoxic in rats, in which it undergoes extensive metabolism to glutathione and cysteine S-conjugates. The mechanism of compound A nephrotoxicity in rats is unknown. Compound A nephrotoxicity has not been observed in humans. The authors tested the hypothesis that renal uptake of compound A S-conjugates and metabolism by renal cysteine conjugate beta-lyase mediate compound A nephrotoxicity in rats. Methods Compound A (0-0.3 mmol/kg in initial dose-response experiments and 0.2 mmol/kg in subsequent inhibitor experiments) was administered to Fischer 344 rats by intraperitoneal injection. Inhibitor experiments consisted of three groups: inhibitor (control), compound A, or inhibitor plus compound A. The inhibitors were probenecid (0.5 mmol/kg, repeated 10 h later), an inhibitor of renal organic anion transport and S-conjugate uptake; acivicin (10 mg/kg and 5 mg/kg 10 h later), an inhibitor of gamma-glutamyl transferase, an enzyme that cleaves glutathione conjugates to cysteine conjugates; and aminooxyacetic acid (0.5 mmol/kg and 0.25 mmol/kg 10 h later), an inhibitor of renal cysteine conjugate beta-lyase. Urine was collected for 24 h and then the animals were killed. Nephrotoxicity was assessed by light microscopic examination and biochemical markers (serum urea nitrogen and creatinine concentration, urine volume and urine excretion of protein, glucose, and alpha-glutathione-S-transferase [alpha GST], a marker of tubular necrosis). Results Compound A caused dose-related nephrotoxicity, as shown by selective proximal tubular cell necrosis at the corticomedullary junction, diuresis, proteinuria, glucosuria, and increased alpha GST excretion. Probenecid pretreatment significantly (P < 0.05) diminished compound A-induced increases (mean +/- SE) in urine excretion of protein (45.5 +/- 3.8 mg/24 h vs. 25.9 +/- 1.7 mg/24 h), glucose (28.8 +/- 6.2 mg/24 h vs. 10.9 +/- 3.2 mg/24 h), and alpha GST (6.3 +/- 0.8 micrograms/24 h vs. 1.0 +/- 0.2 microgram/24 h) and completely prevented proximal tubular cell necrosis. Aminooxyacetic acid pretreatment significantly diminished compound A-induced increases in urine volume (19.7 +/- 3.5 ml/24 h vs. 9.8 +/- 0.8 ml/24 h), protein excretion (37.2 +/- 2.7 mg/24 h vs. 22.2 +/- 1.8 mg/24 h), and alpha GST excretion (5.8 +/- 1.5 vs. 2.3 micrograms/24 h +/- 0.8 microgram/24 h) but did not significantly alter the histologic pattern of injury. In contrast, acivicin pretreatment increased the compound A-induced histologic and biochemical markers of injury. Compound A-related increases in urine fluoride excretion, reflecting compound A metabolism, were not substantially altered by any of the inhibitor treatments. Conclusions Intraperitoneal compound A administration provides a satisfactory model of nephrotoxicity. Aminooxyacetic acid and probenecid significantly diminished histologic and biochemical evidence of compound A nephrotoxicity, whereas acivicin potentiated toxicity. These results suggest that renal uptake of compound A-glutathione or compound A-cysteine conjugates and cysteine conjugates metabolism by renal beta-lyase mediate, in part, compound A nephrotoxicity in rats.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 622-631 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ya Liu ◽  
Jian Kang ◽  
Hong Gao ◽  
Xiyu Zhang ◽  
Jun Chao ◽  
...  

Background: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is a world-wide metabolic disease with no cure from drugs and treatment. In China, The Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) herbal formulations have been used to treat T2DM for centuries. Methods: In this study, we proposed a formula called ShenQi Compound (SQC), which has been used in clinical therapeutics in China for several years. We evaluated the effect of SQC in a spontaneous diabetic rat model (GK rats) by detecting a series of blood indicators and performing histological observations. Meanwhile, the gene microarray and RT-qPCR experiments were used to explore the molecular mechanism of SQC treatment. In addition, western medicine, sitagliptin was employed as a comparison. Results: The results indicated that SQC and sitagliptin could effectively improve the serum lipid (blood Total Cholesterol (TC) and blood Triglycerides (TG)), hormone levels (serum insulin (INS), Glucagon (GC) and Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1)), alleviated the inflammatory response (hypersensitive C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP)), blood glucose fluctuation (Mean Blood Glucose (MBG), standard deviation of blood glucose (SDBG) and Largest Amplitude of plasma Glucose Excursions (LAGE)), pancreatic tissue damage and vascular injury for T2DM. Compared with sitagliptin, SQC achieved a better effect on blood glucose fluctuation (p<0.01). Meanwhile, the gene microarray and RT-qPCR experiments indicated that SQC and sitagliptin may improve the T2DM through affecting the biological functions related to apoptosis and circadian rhythm. Moreover, SQC might be able to influence the mTOR signaling pathway by regulating Pik3r1, Ddit4 expression. Conclusion: All these results indicate that SQC is an effective therapeutic drug on T2DM. Notably, SQC presents an obvious blood glucose fluctuation-preventing ability, which might be derived from the regulation of the mTOR signaling pathway.


2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 778-786 ◽  
Author(s):  
DE-HAI YIN ◽  
XIAO-CHUN LIANG ◽  
LI ZHAO ◽  
HONG ZHANG ◽  
QING SUN ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (10) ◽  
pp. 3051-3062 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Seppi ◽  
Sinikka Prajczer ◽  
Maria-Magdalena Dörler ◽  
Oliver Eiter ◽  
Daniel Hekl ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 725 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sun-Ouck Kim ◽  
Hyun-Suk Lee ◽  
Kyuyoun Ahn ◽  
Kwangsung Park

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. e1800365
Author(s):  
Regiane C. Duarte ◽  
Silvia H. Taleb-Contini ◽  
Paulo S. Pereira ◽  
Camila F. Oliveira ◽  
Carlos Eduardo S. Miranda ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document