scholarly journals Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Patients Receiving Antithrombotic Therapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 134-139
Author(s):  
Supriadi Supriadi ◽  
Titong Sugihartono
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Antithrombotic Therapy ◽  
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Thromboembolic Events ◽  
Antithrombotic Agents ◽  
Therapeutic Tool ◽  
Minimum Duration ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding ◽  
Risk For Bleeding

Gastrointestinal endoscopy is used as a diagnostic and therapeutic tool. Patients receiving antithrombotic agents are at higher risk for bleeding in this procedure. Regarding its thromboembolic versus bleeding risk, physicians should consider to adjust antithrombotic therapy in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy. Some important factors including the urgency of the procedure, bleeding risk from the procedure and antithrombotic itself, and the risk of thromboembolic events during endoscopy if antithrombotic is to be stopped need to be considered wisely. Based on recommendations of ASGE, ESGE, and BSG, endoscopic procedures were divided based on the level of emergency, namely elective and urgent. In elective endoscopy with high risk of bleeding and thromboembolism, antithrombotic therapy is given in the minimum duration required and then discontinued before the procedure. In elective endoscopy with low risk of bleeding and thromboembolism, antithrombotic can be continued as usual. In urgent endoscopy due to gastrointestinal bleeding, all antithrombotic should be discontinued. Antithrombotic can be restarted within 48 hours after the procedure if no bleeding is evident

Abstract 14763: Patients With a Perceived High-bleeding Risk in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Alert-based Computerized Decision Support for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: An Af-Alert Substudy

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory Piazza ◽  
Shelley Hurwitz ◽  
Brett Carroll ◽  
Samuel Z Goldhaber
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Stroke Prevention ◽  
Antithrombotic Therapy ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Computerized Decision Support ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Risk For Bleeding

Introduction: A perceived increased risk of bleeding is one of the most frequent reasons for failure to prescribe anticoagulation for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). We previously conducted a randomized controlled trial of alert-based computerized decision support (CDS) to increase prescription of antithrombotic therapy in 458 high-risk hospitalized patients with AF who were not being anticoagulated. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that patients with a perceived high risk for bleeding would have a similar HAS-BLED score and rate of major and clinically-relevant non-major bleeding. Methods: To determine the clinical characteristics and outcomes of these patients determined to be high-risk for bleeding, we analyzed the 248 patients in the alert group. Results: A perceived high risk of bleeding was the most common reason (77%) for omitting antithrombotic therapy. Median HAS-BLED scores were similar in these patients compared with those who were not deemed to have an increased bleeding risk (3 vs. 3, p=0.44). Despite being categorized as too high-risk for bleeding to receive antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention at the time of the alert, nearly 12% of these patients were ultimately prescribed anticoagulation over the ensuing 90 days. The frequency of major and clinically-relevant non-major bleeding was similar between the two groups. Conclusions: In conclusion, a perceived high risk of bleeding was the most common reason for failure to prescribe antithrombotic therapy after the CDS alert. History of a prior bleeding event or underlying bleeding disorder was not reflected in a higher HAS-BLED score. Implementation of an alert-based CDS with specific attention to assessment of bleeding risk and mitigation warrants further study to encourage adherence to evidence-based clinical practice guideline recommendations for stroke prevention in AF.

scholarly journals Does second-look endoscopy reduce the bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection for patients receiving antithrombotic therapy?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takeshi Uozumi ◽  
Tetsuya Sumiyoshi ◽  
Yusuke Tomita ◽  
Kaho Tokuchi ◽  
Hiroya Sakano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Antithrombotic Therapy ◽  
Average Risk ◽  
Antithrombotic Agents ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Second Look ◽  
Epithelial Neoplasms ◽  
Multiple Therapy

Abstract Background: In patients with average risk of bleeding, second-look endoscopy does not reportedly reduce bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection. However, effectiveness of second-look endoscopy for patients with high risk of bleeding such as those who are taking antithrombotic agents remains controversial. Hence, this study aims to clarify the effectiveness of second-look endoscopy for patients with antithrombotic therapy.Methods: We studied 142 consecutive patients with 173 gastric epithelial neoplasms who were routinely taking antithrombotic agents and were treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection at Tonan Hospital between November 2013 and December 2019. They were classified into two groups: those with second-look endoscopy (SLE group, 69 patients with 85 lesions) and those without second-look endoscopy (non-SLE group, 73 patients with 88 lesions). The incidence of post-endoscopic submucosal dissection bleeding was compared between the SLE and non-SLE groups.Results: There were no statistical differences in the rate of patients undergoing single antiplatelet therapy, single anticoagulant therapy, and multiple therapy between the SLE and non-SLE groups (SLE group vs. non-SLE group; 32 [46.4%], 16 [23.2%], and 21 [30.4%] patients vs. 37 [50.7%], 20 [27.4%], and 16 [21.9%] patients, respectively; p = 0.50). Post-endoscopic submucosal dissection bleeding incidence was 21.7% (15/69) and 21.9% (16/73) in the SLE and non-SLE groups, respectively, and did not significantly differ between the two groups (p = 0.98).Conclusions: For patients taking antithrombotic agents, the incidence of post-endoscopic submucosal dissection bleeding was not reduced by second-look endoscopy.

scholarly journals Does second-look endoscopy reduce the bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection for patients receiving antithrombotic therapy?

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Takeshi Uozumi ◽  
Tetsuya Sumiyoshi ◽  
Yusuke Tomita ◽  
Kaho Tokuchi ◽  
Hiroya Sakano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Antithrombotic Therapy ◽  
Average Risk ◽  
Antithrombotic Agents ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Second Look ◽  
Epithelial Neoplasms ◽  
Multiple Therapy

Abstract Background In patients with average risk of bleeding, second-look endoscopy does not reportedly reduce bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection. However, effectiveness of second-look endoscopy for patients with a high risk of bleeding, such as those who are taking antithrombotic agents, is unclear. Hence, this study aims to clarify the effectiveness of second-look endoscopy for patients with antithrombotic therapy. Methods We studied 142 consecutive patients with 173 gastric epithelial neoplasms who were routinely taking antithrombotic agents and were treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection at Tonan Hospital between November 2013 and December 2019. They were classified into two groups: those with second-look endoscopy (SLE group, 69 patients with 85 lesions) and those without second-look endoscopy (non-SLE group, 73 patients with 88 lesions). The incidence of post-endoscopic submucosal dissection bleeding was compared between the SLE and non-SLE groups. Results There were no statistical differences in the rate of patients undergoing single antiplatelet therapy, single anticoagulant therapy, and multiple therapy between the SLE and non-SLE groups (SLE group vs. non-SLE group; 32 [46.4%], 16 [23.2%], and 21 [30.4%] patients vs. 37 [50.7%], 20 [27.4%], and 16 [21.9%] patients, respectively; p = 0.50). Post-endoscopic submucosal dissection bleeding incidence was 21.7% (15/69) and 21.9% (16/73) in the SLE and non-SLE groups, respectively, and did not significantly differ between the two groups (p = 0.98). Conclusions For patients taking antithrombotic agents, the incidence of post-endoscopic submucosal dissection bleeding was not reduced by second-look endoscopy.

Complex antithrombotic therapy and bleeding risk in patients with peripheral arterial disease

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Tseng ◽  
S Bhatt ◽  
M Girardo ◽  
D Liedl ◽  
P Wennberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Arterial Disease ◽  
Triple Therapy ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Antithrombotic Therapy ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Arterial Disease ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Peripheral Arterial

Abstract Introduction Antiplatelet therapy is the cornerstone of treatment for many atherosclerotic vascular pathologies including peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Patients with PAD often have comorbid conditions that require complex antithrombotic therapy, i.e. combined antiplatelet and anticoagulation. Methods All adult patients undergoing ankle brachial index (ABI) measurements were included in the study. ABI values between 1.00 and 1.40 were considered normal, and values below 1.00 or above 1.40 were considered PAD. Demographic, comorbidity and outcome data were obtained using diagnostic codes from the electronic health record. Three medication classes were analyzed: aspirin, non-aspirin oral antiplatelets (e.g. P2Y12 inhibitors) and oral anticoagulants (warfarin and the direct oral anticoagulants). Medication use was determined for patients who had been on a medication for at least one year. Cox proportional hazard analysis for the time to first bleeding event was analyzed. Bleeding was defined as any bleeding requiring medical evaluation (including clinically-relevant non-major bleeding and major bleeding). Results In all, 40,144 patients were included in the analysis (mean age 66±15, 43% female). Patients with PAD were more likely to be on double therapy (one antiplatelet with anticoagulation) (28% vs 19%) and triple therapy (dual antiplatelet with anticoagulation) (10% vs 4%). Unadjusted hazard ratios for bleeding risk showed increased risk of bleeding for patients with PAD (1.18, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08–1.29), though the association is no longer present after adjustment for antithrombotic therapy. Adjusting for age, sex and PAD class, compared to no antithrombotic therapy, there was increased risk of bleeding for monotherapy (1.91, 95% CI: 1.61–2.26), double therapy (3.40, 95% CI: 2.89–4.00) and triple therapy (5.00, 95% CI: 4.21–5.96). Among medications, aspirin and anticoagulant use was independently associated with the greatest increase in risk of bleeding. Conclusion Patients in PAD are at increased risk of bleeding secondary to antithrombotic therapy. Complex antithrombotic therapy with double or triple therapy confer additional bleeding risk, particularly regimens containing aspirin and oral anticoagulants. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Changes in Antithrombotic Therapy of Atrial Fibrillation in the Hospital in 2011-2012 and 2016-2017 (Pharmacoepidemiological Analysis)

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 686-692
Author(s):  
O. V. Reshetko ◽  
A. V. Sokolov ◽  
N. V. Furman ◽  
V. V. Agapov
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Antithrombotic Therapy ◽  
Heart Defects ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Prosthetic Heart Valve ◽  
Saratov Region ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding

Aim. To study the changes that have occurred in the pharmacotherapy of atrial fibrillation (AF) in the Saratov Region for 5 years by analyzing the antithrombotic therapy of patients who were admitted in a specialized department of the multidisciplinary hospital in Saratov in 2011-2012 and in 2016-2017.Material and methods. A pharmacoepidemiological retrospective study was conducted. The object of the study was the medical records of inpatients (Form 003/y) with the diagnosis “Atrial fibrillation” (ICD-X code I48), that consecutively admitted to the cardiology department of the multidisciplinary hospital in Saratov from January 1, 2011 to December, 31, 2012 (n=211) and from January 1, 2016 to December, 31, 2017 (n=227). Criteria for inclusion in the study: patients over 18 years of age, established diagnosis of non-valvular AF of ischemic genesis. Exclusion criteria from the study: non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, thyrotoxicosis, congenital heart defects, rheumatic heart damage, acute coronary syndrome, endocarditis, myocarditis, pericarditis, pulmonary thromboembolism, the presence of prosthetic heart valve. Pharmacoepidemiological analysis was carried out for the drugs prescribed during hospitalization and given by doctors at discharge of patients from the hospital. The risk of ischemic stroke was assessed using the CHA2DS2-VASc score, and the risk of bleeding – according to the HAS-BLED score.Results. When analyzing the risk of ischemic stroke, it was found that 100% of patients in 2011-2012 years and 98.2% in 2016-2017 years had indications for the prescription of oral anticoagulants (OAСs). In 2011-2012 there were no patients with a low risk of stroke (CHA2DS2-VASc=0). High risk of bleeding (HAS-BLED≥3) occurred in 4.7% of patients in 2011-2012 and in 10.6% in 2016-2017, however, due to the high risk of stroke, the refusal to prescribe OAC in these patients was inappropriate in accordance with the recommendations for the treatment of AF. In the group of patients with CHA2DS2-VASc=0 in 2016-2017 antiplatelet therapy was prescribed in 100% at the hospital stage and at discharge, which contradicts the guidelines, according to which antithrombotic therapy is not recommended to patients with CHA2DS2-VASc=0. In patients with CHA2DS2-VASc=1, a low percentage of anticoagulants prescription was noted. In 2016-2017 OACs were prescribed only in 12.5% of patients at all stages of observation. In 2011-2012 OAC alone was prescribed only to 1 person (20%) at the hospital stage, which does not comply with modern guidelines for the treatment of patients with AF, according to which patients with a risk score CHA2DS2-VASc=1 are recommended to receive OACs in the absence of contraindications. OACs prescription in group CHA2DS2-VASc≥2 occurred only in 15% of patients in 2011-2012 and in a third of patients in 2016-2017 (p<0.05). The frequency of isolated use of OACs significantly increased in 2016-2017 compared to 2011-2012 mainly due to the increase in the spectrum of direct OACs (DOACs) (p<0.05).Conclusion. For 5 years there have been significant changes in the antithrombotic therapy of AF in the Saratov Region. The frequency of prescribing OACs according to indications has increased mainly due to the introduction of the DOACs into clinical practice. However, prevention of stroke remains insufficient.

scholarly journals Modified regional citrate anticoagulation is optimal for hemodialysis in patients at high risk of bleeding: a prospective randomized study of three anticoagulation strategies

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ting Lin ◽  
Li Song ◽  
Renwei Huang ◽  
Ying Huang ◽  
Shuifu Tang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Saline Group ◽  
Regional Citrate Anticoagulation ◽  
Expansion Chamber ◽  
Citrate Anticoagulation ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding ◽  
Group 4 ◽  
High Bleeding Risk

Abstract Background Recommended regular saline flushing presents clinical ineffectiveness for hemodialysis (HD) patients at high risk of bleeding with heparin contraindication. Regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) has previously been used with a Ca2+ containing dialysate with prefiltered citrate in one arm (RCA-one). However, anticoagulation is not always achievable and up to 40% results in serious clotting in the venous expansion chamber. In this study, we have transferred one-quarter of the TSC from the prefiltered to the post filter based on RCA-one, which we have called RCA-two. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of RCA-two with either saline flushing or RCA-one in HD patients with a high bleeding risk. Method In this investigator-initiated, multicenter, controlled, prospective, randomized clinical trial, 52 HD patients (77 sessions) were randomized to the RCA-2 and RCA-one group in part one of the trial, and 45 patients (64 sessions) were randomized to the RCA-2 and saline group in part two of the trial. Serious clotting events, adverse events and blood analyses were recorded. Results Serious clotting events in the RCA-two group were significantly lower compared with the RCA-one and saline group (7.89% vs. 30.77%, P = 0.011; 3.03% vs. 54.84%, P < 0.001, respectively). The median circuit survival time was 240 min (IQR 240 to 240) in the RCA-two group, was significantly longer than 230 min (IQR 155 to 240, P < 0.001) in the RCA-one group and 210 min (IQR 135 to 240, P = 0.003) in the saline group. The majority of the AEs were hypotension, hypoglycemia and chest tightness, most of which were mild in intensity. Eight patients (20.51%) in the RCA-one group, 4 patients (12.90%) in the saline group and 10 patients (26.31%) in the RCA-two group, P > 0.05. Conclusions Our data demonstrated that the modified anticoagulation protocol was more effective and feasible during hemodialysis therapy for patients at high risk of bleeding. Trial registration GDREC, GDREC2017250H. Registered February 2, 2018; retrospectively registered.

P1558Clinical utility of the PRECISE-DAPT score in the prediction of hemorrhagic events in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Rioboo ◽  
E Abuassi Alnakeeb ◽  
S Raposeiras Roubin ◽  
I Munoz Pousa ◽  
M Cespon Fernandez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Bleeding Event ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding ◽  
Risk Patients

Abstract Introduction The clinical utility and validity of the PRECISE-DAPT bleeding risk score for elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is unknown. We investigated the previous aspect in a contemporary population treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) at discharge. Methods Retrospectively, from 2010 to 2016, we studied 3,814 consecutive patients with the diagnosis of ACS. All patients were treated with in-hospital PCI and DAPT at discharge. Elderly was defined if patients aged ≥75 years. Patients were categorized into three risk strata according to their PRECISE-DAPT score (very low-low: <17 points, moderate: 18–24 points, and high risk: ≥25 points). We included the first bleeding event occurred during the first year after discharge. Bleeding events were defined according to the BARC classification system, and divided into two subgroups: BARC 2–5 and BARC 3–5. The ability to separate high bleeding risk patients from lower bleeding risk patients was checked by the cumulative incidence function curves and compared using the Fine-Gray test, thus adjusting for death (non-bleeding related) as a competing risk. Discrimination (C statistic) and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test) were used to test the predictive capacity of the score in pts aged ≥75 years and <75 years. Results 25.2% (n=961/3814) were ≥75 years old, 38.4% of them were women. DAPT duration was 11.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 2.5–13.7) vs. 12.0 (RIQ 8.2–14.1) months in the elderly vs. younger; (p<0.001). 92.5% (n=889) of the elderly were at high risk of bleeding (PRECISE-DAPT≥25 points), compared to 21.3% (n=607) of the youngest. The incidence of BARC 2–5 and BARC 3–5 was 7.4% and 2.7% in the elderly compared to 5.1% and 1.4% among the younger patients (p<0.001). The figure shows the ability of the PRECISE-DAPT score at capturing the risk of BARC 2–5 bleeding (panel A and B), in both age groups. Using the cut-off point ≥25, the effect in the prediction of BARC 2–5 bleeding and BARC 3–5 did not differ significantly between the elderly and those <75 years: sHR = 1.9 (95% CI: 1.2–6.00) in the elderly vs. 1.8 (95% CI: 1.3–2.5) in the other group (p=0.99) and sHR = 3.3 (95% CI: 1.9–6.0) vs. 3.6 (95% CI: 1.9–6.7) (p=0.83), respectively. There were no significant differences between the elderly and those under 75 years in terms of statistical C values either for BARC 2–5 bleeding (0.60 vs. 0.58) or BARC 3–5 bleeding (0.64 vs. 0.67). The score performed well in term of calibration in both groups (all p-values >0.3). Conclusion Although the use of PRECISE-DAPT resulted in classifying the majority of elderly patients at high risk of bleeding and despite exhibiting modest discriminative power, it performed well at classifying patients according to their risk of 1-year out-of-hospital bleeding in both age groups. PRECISE-DAPT appears to identify the truly low risk patients among the elderly, as compared to the younger group.

External validation of the VTE-BLEED score for predicting major bleeding in stable anticoagulated patients with venous thromboembolism

2017 ◽  
Vol 117 (06) ◽  
pp. 1164-1170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederikus A. Klok ◽  
Stefano Barco ◽  
Stavros V. Konstantinides
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
External Validation ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Study Population

SummaryOne of the main determinants of establishing the optimal treatment duration of patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the risk of major bleeding during long-term anticoagulant therapy. The 6-variable VTE-BLEED score was recently developed to enable estimation of this bleeding risk. This study aimed at externally validating VTE-BLEED. This was a post-hoc study of the randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, Hokusai-VTE study that compared edoxaban versus warfarin for treatment of VTE. VTE-BLEED was calculated in all 8,240 study patients. The numbers of adjudicated major bleeding events during ‘stable anticoagulation’, i. e. occurring after day 30, in patients with low (total score <2 points) and high risk of bleeding (total score ≥2 points) were compared for the overall study population, patients randomised to edoxaban or warfarin, and for important patient subcategories. During ‘stable’ anticoagulation, major bleeding occurred in 1.02% (40/3,903) and 0.82% (32/3,899) of patients treated with warfarin and edoxaban, respectively. For the overall study population, the risks of bleeding in the low and high risk groups were 0.51% and 2.03%, respectively, for an odds ratio (OR) of 4.04 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.51–6.48). ORs were 5.04 (95%CI: 2.62–9.69) and 3.09 (95%CI: 1.54–6.22) for warfarin and edoxaban, respectively. VTE-BLEED was consistently able to identify patients at a 2.5- to 11-fold higher bleeding risk across all the predefined subcategories, as well as for the treatment period between day 30 to day 180, and beyond day 180. In conclusion, patients identified as high risk by VTE-BLEED had a four-fold increased risk of bleeding during the chronic phase of treatment.Supplementary Material to this article is available online at www.thrombosis-online.com.

Use of an Extended Working Channel in High-Risk Transbronchial Biopsy: An Innovative Use of an Existing Modality to Minimize Bleeding and Hypoxia

2020 ◽  
pp. 155698452096810
Author(s):  
Ravindra M. Mehta ◽  
Pavankumar Biraris ◽  
Rohan Aurangabadwalla ◽  
Hariprasad Kalpakam ◽  
Rajani Bhat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Diagnostic Yield ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Continuous Variables ◽  
Multicenter Trials ◽  
Adequate Sampling ◽  
Risk For Bleeding ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Adequate Tissue ◽  
Tamponade Effect

Objective Bleeding is one of the main complications of transbronchial lung biopsy (TBBx) more so with conditions such as azotaemia and coagulopathy. Baseline hypoxia worsens the consequences of TBBx bleeding and can lead to escalation of care. In our experience, TBBx performed through a guide sheath (GS) using it as an extended working channel (EWC) helps minimize bleeding risk. We hypothesized that the EWC produces a tamponade effect in the close vicinity of the biopsy site, both reducing bleeding risk and restricting bleeding to a smaller segment. In this study, we assessed the impact of an additional EWC in high-risk (HR) patients undergoing TBBx, to reduce bleeding and enhance safety. Methods Retrospective study between January 2014 and December 2018 looking at the risk of bleeding following TBBx performed through a GS (EWC) in patients at high risk for bleeding-related complications. Bleeding incidence and consequent hypoxic events requiring escalation of care were noted. The specimen diagnostic yield was also analyzed. SPSS statistics were used—data are reported as mean and standard deviation for continuous variables, and number and percentage for discrete variables. Results Eight hundred four TBBxs were performed during the study period, and 105 (13.1%) procedures were done in the HR individuals using a GS as an EWC. No significant bleeding requiring escalation of care was seen with the use of EWC-GS. Histopathology revealed adequate sampling in all cases. Conclusions A GS as an EWC was used to reduce the bleeding risk, consequent hypoxia, and prevent escalation of care in TBBx in HR patients. Adequate tissue was obtained without any complications. Though prospective, randomized, multicenter trials using an EWC in HR-TBBx are important, they are challenging to do due to the HR population under study.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document