Complex antithrombotic therapy and bleeding risk in patients with peripheral arterial disease

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Tseng ◽  
S Bhatt ◽  
M Girardo ◽  
D Liedl ◽  
P Wennberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Arterial Disease ◽  
Triple Therapy ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Antithrombotic Therapy ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Arterial Disease ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Peripheral Arterial

Abstract Introduction Antiplatelet therapy is the cornerstone of treatment for many atherosclerotic vascular pathologies including peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Patients with PAD often have comorbid conditions that require complex antithrombotic therapy, i.e. combined antiplatelet and anticoagulation. Methods All adult patients undergoing ankle brachial index (ABI) measurements were included in the study. ABI values between 1.00 and 1.40 were considered normal, and values below 1.00 or above 1.40 were considered PAD. Demographic, comorbidity and outcome data were obtained using diagnostic codes from the electronic health record. Three medication classes were analyzed: aspirin, non-aspirin oral antiplatelets (e.g. P2Y12 inhibitors) and oral anticoagulants (warfarin and the direct oral anticoagulants). Medication use was determined for patients who had been on a medication for at least one year. Cox proportional hazard analysis for the time to first bleeding event was analyzed. Bleeding was defined as any bleeding requiring medical evaluation (including clinically-relevant non-major bleeding and major bleeding). Results In all, 40,144 patients were included in the analysis (mean age 66±15, 43% female). Patients with PAD were more likely to be on double therapy (one antiplatelet with anticoagulation) (28% vs 19%) and triple therapy (dual antiplatelet with anticoagulation) (10% vs 4%). Unadjusted hazard ratios for bleeding risk showed increased risk of bleeding for patients with PAD (1.18, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08–1.29), though the association is no longer present after adjustment for antithrombotic therapy. Adjusting for age, sex and PAD class, compared to no antithrombotic therapy, there was increased risk of bleeding for monotherapy (1.91, 95% CI: 1.61–2.26), double therapy (3.40, 95% CI: 2.89–4.00) and triple therapy (5.00, 95% CI: 4.21–5.96). Among medications, aspirin and anticoagulant use was independently associated with the greatest increase in risk of bleeding. Conclusion Patients in PAD are at increased risk of bleeding secondary to antithrombotic therapy. Complex antithrombotic therapy with double or triple therapy confer additional bleeding risk, particularly regimens containing aspirin and oral anticoagulants. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Antithrombotic therapy for postinterventional management of peripheral arterial disease

2020 ◽  
Vol 77 (4) ◽  
pp. 269-276
Author(s):  
Daria Zavgorodnyaya ◽  
Tamara B Knight ◽  
Mitchell J Daley ◽  
Pedro G Teixeira
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Arterial Disease ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Antithrombotic Therapy ◽  
Bypass Graft ◽  
Limb Ischemia ◽  
Arterial Disease ◽  
Acute Limb Ischemia ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Peripheral Arterial ◽  
Quality Evidence

Abstract Purpose Evidence on the use of antithrombotic pharmacotherapy in patients undergoing revascularization of lower extremities for symptomatic peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is reviewed. Summary Individuals with PAD can experience leg pain, intermittent claudication, critical limb ischemia, and acute limb ischemia. In such patients, revascularization may be indicated to improve the quality of life and to prevent amputations. Antithrombotic therapy is often intensified in the postrevascularization period to prevent restenosis of the index artery and to counteract the prothrombotic state induced by the intervention. Therapeutic modalities include dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), anticoagulation, a combination of antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy, and addition of cilostazol to single antiplatelet therapy. Subgroup analyses of data from randomized clinical trials provided low-quality evidence for the use of DAPT in patients with a below-knee prosthetic bypass graft and anticoagulation for those with a venous bypass graft. Cilostazol, when added to aspirin therapy, has been shown to prevent index vessel reocclusion after an endovascular intervention in patients at low risk for thrombosis in several small randomized trials. Conclusion There is a considerable paucity of high-quality evidence on the optimal antithrombotic regimen for patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization, with no particular therapy shown to consistently improve patient outcomes. The decision to initiate intensified antithrombotic therapy should include a close examination of its risk–benefit profile. The demonstrated benefit of such treatment is restricted to the prevention of index artery reocclusion, while an increased risk of bleeding may lead to significant morbidity and mortality.

Secondary medical prevention in patients with peripheral arterial disease - Prescriptions of vascular surgeons and medical doctors (angiologists) in a multidisciplinary vascular centre

VASA ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klein-Weigel ◽  
Gutsche-Petrak ◽  
Wolbergs ◽  
Köning ◽  
Flessenkamper
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Arterial Disease ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Arterial Disease ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Channel Blockers ◽  
Medical Doctors ◽  
Vascular Surgeon ◽  
Medical Prevention ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Peripheral Arterial

Background: We compared medical secondary prevention in patients with peripheral arterial disease stage II (Fontaine) located in the femoro-popliteal artery managed by vascular surgeons and medical doctors / angiologists in our multidisciplinary vascular center. Patients and methods: We retrospectively analyzed demission protocols of in-hospital treatments between 01.01.2007 and 20.06.2008. Results: We surveyed 264 patients (54.2 % women; mean age 67.52 ± 8.98 yrs), 179 (67.8 %) primarily treated by medical doctors / angiologists and 85 (32.2 %) primarily managed by vascular surgeons. Medical doctors / angiologists treated more women (n = 109) than men (n = 34), (p = 0.002) and documented smoking and diabetes mellitus more often (p < 0.001) than vascular surgeons. Besides, patients had similar cardiovascular risk profiles and concomitant diseases, vascular surgeons prescribed 5.47 ± 2.26 drugs, medical doctors / angiologists 6.37 ± 2.67 (p = 0.005). Overall, 239 (90.5 %) patients were on aspirin, 180 (68.2 %) on clopidogrel, and 18 (6.9 %) on oral anticoagulants. Significantly more patients treated by medical doctors / angiologists received clopidogrel (169 versus 11; p < 0.001), significantly more surgical patients received oral anticoagulants (11 versus 7; p = 0.016). The number of patients without prescriptions for any antithrombotic therapy was 6 (6.9 %) in patients treated by vascular surgeons and 0 (0 %) in patients managed by medical doctors / angiologists (p = 0.001). Prescription-rates of β-blockers, ACE-inhibitors, Angiotensin II-antangonists, calcium channel blockers, and diuretics were statistically not different between the two disciplines, but statins were prescribed significantly more often by medical doctors / angiologists (139 versus 49; p < 0001). With the exceptions of Clopidogrel (women > men) and diuretics (men > women) we observed no gender-specific prescriptions. Conclusions: We observed high prescriptions rates of secondary medical prevention in patients primarily treated by medical doctors / angiologists and vascular surgeons. We believe that this result is highly influenced by our multidisciplinary approach. Nevertheless, efforts have to be made to raise vascular surgeon’s awareness of statin use and complete prescription of antithrombotic and antiplatelet drugs.

scholarly journals Extremely elevated lipoprotein (a) as an independent risk factor for peripheral arterial disease in large patient cohort

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M.R Poudel ◽  
S Kirana ◽  
D Stoyanova ◽  
K.P Mellwig ◽  
D Hinse ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Arterial Disease ◽  
Low Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Arterial Disease ◽  
P Value ◽  
Lipoprotein A ◽  
Large Patient ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Revascularization Therapy ◽  
Peripheral Arterial

Abstract Background Elevated lipoprotein (a) [LP (a)] levels are an independent, genetic, and causal factor for cardiovascular disease and associated with myocardial infarction (MI). Although the association between circulating levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) is well established, its role in risk of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) remains unclear. PAD affects over 236 million individuals and follows ischaemic heart disease (IHD) and cerebrovascular disease (CVD) as the third leading cause of atherosclerotic cardiovascular morbidity worldwide. LP (a) is genetically determined, stable throughout life and yet refractory to drug therapy. While 30 mg/dl is considered the upper normal value for LP (a) in central Europe, extremely high LP (a) levels (&gt;150mg/dl) are rare in the general population. The aim of our study was to analyse the correlation between lipoprotein (a) [LP (a)] levels and an incidence of PAD in high-risk patients. Patients and methods We reviewed the LP (a) concentrations of 52.898 consecutive patients admitted to our cardiovascular center between January 2004 and December 2014. Of these, 579 patients had LP (a) levels above 150 mg/dl (mean 181.45±33.1mg/dl). In the control collective LP (a) was &lt;30mg/dl (n=350). Other atherogenic risk factors in this group were HbA1c 6.58±1.65%, low density lipoprotein (LDL) 141.99±43.76 mg/dl, and body mass index 27.81±5.61. 54.40% were male, 26.07% were smokers, 93.2% had hypertension, and 24% had a family history of cardiovascular diseases. More than 82.6% were under statins. The mean glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was 69.13±24.8 ml/min [MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease)]. Results 45.00% (n=261) of the patients with LP (a) &gt;150mg/dl had PAD. The prevalence of PAD in patients with LP (a) &lt;30mg/dl in our control collective was 15.8%. (P- Value 0.001). Patients with LP (a) &gt;150mg/dl had a significantly increased risk for PAD (Odds ratio 4.36, 95% CI 2.94–6.72, p: 0.001). 19.1% of patients were re-vascularized by percutaneous angioplasty (PTA) and 7.09% of patients had to undergo peripheral vascular bypass (PVB). Mean LP (a) level in patients with PAD was 182.6±31.61. Conclusion Elevated LP (a) levels above 150 mg/dl are associated with a significantly increased risk of PAD in our collective and it confirms our hypothesis. Over one fourth of these patients had severe PAD and requiring revascularization therapy. We need more prospective studies to confirm our findings. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Increased risk of peripheral arterial disease in polymyalgia rheumatica: a population-based cohort study

2009 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. R50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth J Warrington ◽  
Elena P Jarpa ◽  
Cynthia S Crowson ◽  
Leslie T Cooper ◽  
Gene G Hunder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Peripheral Arterial Disease ◽  
Polymyalgia Rheumatica ◽  
Arterial Disease ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Peripheral Arterial

Abstract P081: Markers of Endothelial Function and Peripheral Arterial Disease among Women

Circulation ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 127 (suppl_12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sona Rivas-Tumanyan ◽  
Kenneth J Mukamal ◽  
Jennifer K Pai ◽  
Kaumudi J Joshipura
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Peripheral Arterial Disease ◽  
Endothelial Function ◽  
Conditional Logistic Regression ◽  
Relative Weight ◽  
Serum Levels ◽  
Arterial Disease ◽  
Blood Draw ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Peripheral Arterial

Introduction: Markers of endothelial function may be associated with increased risk for cardiovascular disease; however, prospective data for peripheral arterial disease (PAD) are limited. We evaluated the hypothesis that serum markers of endothelial dysfunction are associated with an increased risk of PAD among women. Methods: We conducted a nested case-control study within an ongoing prospective cohort of U.S. female nurses (Nurses’ Health Study). Among 32,826 NHS participants who provided blood samples in 1989-1990, after excluding those who had myocardial infarction, coronary heart disease, stroke, or carotid artery surgery prior to the PAD diagnosis, we included all incident PAD cases that occurred between 1990 and 2008 and were confirmed by medical records. Each case was individually matched with three eligible controls using risk-set sampling, by age, smoking, date of blood draw, and fasting status. We evaluated the association between serum levels of soluble intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM-1), E-selectin, and the risk of PAD, using conditional logistic regression analysis. Results: Complete biomarker data from 1990 was available for 144 cases and 431 controls. After accounting for matching factors, baseline ICAM-1 levels were associated with higher risk of PAD (RR for highest (T3) vs. lowest (T1) tertile=1.75, 95% CI: 1.05-2.90). The association was attenuated and no longer significant (RR T3 vs. T1=1.37, 95% CI: 0.75-2.49) after adjusting for serum levels of HDL and LDL-cholesterol, family history of myocardial infarction, relative weight, reported aspirin and cholesterol-lowering medication use, hypertension and diabetes diagnoses, physical activity, and pack-years of smoking. Additional adjustment for CRP levels further attenuated the relative risk (RR T3 vs. T1= 1.24, 95% CI: 0.67-2.29). We did not observe any significant association between baseline E-selectin levels and the risk of PAD (multivariate- and CRP-adjusted RR T3 vs. T1=0.93, 95% CI: 0.54-1.59). Conclusions: There was no association between ICAM-1 and E-selectin and subsequent PAD in this cohort of U.S women.

scholarly journals Increased Risk of Peripheral Arterial Disease After Hip Replacement

Medicine ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 94 (19) ◽  
pp. e870 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tzu-Yi Chou ◽  
Ta-Wei Su ◽  
Herng-Jeng Jou ◽  
Pei-Yu Yang ◽  
Hsuan-Ju Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Arterial Disease ◽  
Hip Replacement ◽  
Arterial Disease ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Peripheral Arterial

scholarly journals Bleeding Risk in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients Receiving Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3672-3672 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yimin Pearl Wang ◽  
Rohan Kehar ◽  
Alla Iansavitchene ◽  
Alejandro Lazo-Langner
Keyword(s):  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Factor Xa ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding ◽  
Significant Difference

Introduction: The standard oral anticoagulant therapy administered to non-valvular AF patients has typically been Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA) particularly warfarin. In recent years, Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) including Direct Thrombin Inhibitors (DTI) and Direct Factor Xa inhibitors (FXa inhibitors) have become an alternative to warfarin. Randomized trials comparing warfarin and DOACs showed comparable effectiveness without significant additional major bleeding risk. However, bleeding events in RCTs may differ from those in daily use due to the routine exclusion of patients with a higher risk of bleeding from many studies. We aimed to assess bleeding risk between DOACs and warfarin in AF patients in observational studies and we also sought to determine differences between patients that were experienced or naïve to oral anticoagulants. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in the OVID MEDLINE® and EMBASE® electronic databases. Observational studies and randomized control trials (RCT) from 1990 to January 2019 were retrieved and examined by two independent reviewers. A pooled effect hazard ratio (HR) was calculated using a random effects model using the generic inverse variance method. Subgroup analyses according to previous exposure to anticoagulants, study type, funding type and DOAC type were conducted. The primary outcome was major bleeding risk. The secondary outcome was clinically relevant non-major bleeding. All studies must have used an established or validated definition of major bleeding. Results: The initial literature search identified 3359 potentially eligible citations. After primary screening, 150 articles were eligible for full text review and there were 35 studies including 2,356,201 patients that met the inclusion criteria. Overall, patients on DOACs were less likely to experience a bleeding event compared to warfarin (HR 0.78, 95%CI 0.71, 0.85, P&lt;0.001). The results were consistent when analyzing patients receiving DTIs or FXa inhibitors (DTI: HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.67,0.87; FXa inhibitors: HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69,0.89). However, among patients receiving factor Xa inhibitors, there was a significant difference in the risk of bleeding according to individual drug. Among patients receiving rivaroxaban the risk of bleeding was similar to warfarin (HR 0.98, 95%CI 0.91,1.06, p=0.60) whereas in those receiving apixaban there was a 40% reduction in the risk of bleeding compared to warfarin (HR 0.60, 95%CI 0.50,0.71, p&lt;0.001) (Figure 1). Three studies reported information according to previous anticoagulant exposure. The overall pooled hazard ratio was 0.68 (95% CI 0.55, 0.82 p&lt;0.001) in favor of patients on DOACs. In the subgroup analysis of previous anticoagulant use, the risk of bleeding was lower for DOACs compared to warfarin in both the experienced population (HR 0.70, 95%CI 0.51, 0.96) and the naïve population (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.47,0.87). However, heterogeneity was moderate to high among both subgroups. Conclusion: This review and meta-analysis of observational studies including over 2.3 million patients showed that overall DOACs have a lower risk of major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major bleeding compared to warfarin. Most importantly, although the pooled effect estimate did not differ between DTIs and FXa inhibitors, among patients receiving FXa inhibitors there was a significant difference between individual agents. Patients on apixaban had a significantly lower risk of bleeding compared to warfarin in contrast to patients on rivaroxaban who had a similar risk. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals The Association Between Pleural Empyema and Peripheral Arterial Disease in Younger Patients: A Retrospective National Population-Based Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tzu-Yuan Wang ◽  
Hsin-Hung Chen ◽  
Chun-Hung Su ◽  
Sheng-Pang Hsu ◽  
Chun-Wei Ho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Peripheral Arterial Disease ◽  
Pleural Empyema ◽  
Arterial Disease ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Research Database ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Peripheral Arterial

Background: To investigate the relationship between pleural empyema (PE) and peripheral arterial disease (PAD).Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the National Health Institute Research Database. Univariable and multivariable Cox's proportional hazard regressions were performed to investigate the association between PE and the risk of PAD. Kaplan–Meier method and the differences were assessed using a log-rank test.Results: The overall incidence of PAD was higher in the PE cohort than in the non-PE cohort (2.76 vs. 1.72 per 1,000 person-years) with a crude hazard ratio (HR) of 1.61 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.41–1.83]. After adjustment for age, gender, and comorbidities, patients with PE were noted to be associated with an increased risk of PAD compared with those without PE [adjusted HR (aHR) = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.03–1.35]. Regarding the age-specific comparison between the PE and non-PE cohorts, PAD was noted to be significantly high in the ≤ 49 years age group (aHR = 5.34, 95% CI = 2.34–10.1). The incidence of PAD was higher in the first 2 years, with an aHR of 1.35 (95% CI = 1.09–1.68) for patients with PE compared with those without PE.Conclusion: The risk of PAD was higher if patients with PE were younger than 49 years and within the 2-year diagnosis of PE.

Relation between Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Peripheral Arterial Disease among Construction Workers

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. 3473-3475
Author(s):  
U. Sivakumar ◽  
Rinku Garg ◽  
Sunita Nighute
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Peripheral Arterial Disease ◽  
Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Arterial Disease ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Peripheral Arterial

Introduction: PAD was asymptomatic in a large proportion of COPD patients and was associated with more severe lung disease than in COPD subjects without PAD. Materials and Methods: This was a Cross-sectional study conducted at Department of Physiology, Santosh Medical College diagnosed with COPD using Spirometry was recruited for the study with a Sample size of 130 patients. Results: The characteristics of the population for follow-up (n=130) are presented in table 1. The mean Mean±SD was 51.73±6.1 years. The prevalence of never smokers was 21.5%, former smokers were 51.5% and current smokers were 26.9%. In total, 41 out of 130 individuals (31.5%) had PAD based on an ABI of less than 0.6. A statistically significant association was found between COPD and newly diagnosed PAD during follow-up. The association between COPD and incident PAD was stronger (adjusted OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.14–3.21). Stratified analysis by smoking status revealed that the overall association between COPD and newly developed PAD was driven by the ever smoker group. Conclusion: Subjects with COPD have a higher risk of developing PAD. People with both COPD and PAD have a substantially increased risk of death. Consequently, early detection of PAD and preventive actions in people with COPD should receive more attention in clinical respiratory care. Keywords: Peripheral Arterial Disease, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Ankle-brachial index.

scholarly journals Lead, Cadmium, Smoking, and Increased Risk of Peripheral Arterial Disease

Circulation ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 109 (25) ◽  
pp. 3196-3201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Navas-Acien ◽  
Elizabeth Selvin ◽  
A. Richey Sharrett ◽  
Emma Calderon-Aranda ◽  
Ellen Silbergeld ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Arterial Disease ◽  
Arterial Disease ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Peripheral Arterial
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document