scholarly journals The comparative analysis of lexical-semantic field “Politics” within socio-political lexis of non-related languages

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (36) ◽  
pp. 108-113
Author(s):  
Yana SNISARENKO ◽  
Olesya MINENKO
Author(s):  
Shorasulova Arofat Ibroxim Qizi ◽  

This scientific work analyzes the objective, subjective signs of time and their ways of expression: lexical and phraseological units in the temporal space, their place, scope, lexical units of time in the Uzbek language. There has been a great deal of research in the field of lexical semantics in linguistics, and scholars differ on this point. It is well known that in linguistics, the theory of the lexical-semantic field has been studied within one language, two languages, and based on comparative analysis.


2020 ◽  
Vol 0 (42) ◽  
pp. 133-145
Author(s):  
Mahmood Mosleh Mohammed ◽  

Установление системного характера лексики, ее взаимосвязи с другими языковыми системами, их взаимозависимость создают возможность всестороннего научного изучения и описания лексической системы каждого языка, а также контрастивно-сопоставительного изучения нескольких языков, в том числе их фразеологического состава. Известно, что не все слова-компоненты фразеологизмов равнозначны по своей роли в формировании семантического содержания фразеологизмов. В связи с этим необходимо ввести понятие лексической доминанты. К ним мы относим слова, являющиеся своеобразными центрами, вокруг которых формируется весь семантический комплекс фразеологизмов, весь набор его слов-компонентов. Abstract Establishing the systemic character of vocabulary, its relationship with other language systems, their interdependence creates the possibility of a comprehensive scientific study and description of the lexical system of each language, as well as contrastive comparative studies of several languages, including their phraseological composition. It is known that not all words-components of phraseological units are equivalent in their role in the formation of the semantic content of phraseological units. In this regard, it is necessary to introduce the concept of a lexical dominant. To this we include words, which are kind of centers around which the entire semantic complex of phraseological units, the entire set of its words-components are formed


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elvira Ya. Sokolova ◽  
Yuriy V. Kobenko ◽  
Olga V. Solodovnikova ◽  
Natalia V. Polyakova ◽  
Elena S. Riabova

2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (03) ◽  
pp. 4-9
Author(s):  
Саодат Мухамедова ◽  

Key words: of functional semantic field of petting, comparative analysis, phonetic, lexical, phraseological and syntactic lingual and speech


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 269-278
Author(s):  
Xenia Zeiler ◽  
Judith Stander-Dulisch

The term “sacred” has a long history, but this introduction demonstrates that the concept of a contrast between the sacred or holy and the profane or trivial arose only at the beginning of the 20th century. A shared characteristic of definitions of the sacred or holy is that they are something special which is separated from the profane or trivial world. In the research discourse, sacred is not just a critical but also a controversial term.In our two case studies, we set out to analyze how meaning is ascribed to the semantic field “sacred”. Building on Laclau’s concept of empty signifiers (Laclau 1996) and the understanding that sacred and related terms of the lexical/semantic field are not stable but have ever-changing meanings, we explore how the semantic field is filled in academic and contemporary journalistic contexts.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document