Assimilative Capacity Modeling Using Integrated Watershed And Lake Models In Support Of The Georgia Comprehensive Statewide Water Management Plan

2012 ◽  
pp. 41-51
Author(s):  
B.J. Watson ◽  
J. Wyss ◽  
E.A. Booth ◽  
G. Sousa
Keyword(s):  
Water Management ◽  
Management Plan ◽  
Assimilative Capacity ◽  
Capacity Modeling

scholarly journals Statewide Water Planning: The Georgia Experience

2011 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 357-366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey D. Mullen
Keyword(s):  
Water Management ◽  
Water Use ◽  
Planning Process ◽  
Management Plan ◽  
The State ◽  
Water Planning ◽  
The Past ◽  
Extensive Effort ◽  
Recommended Practices ◽  
Regional Water

Several states in the southeast have acknowledged the need for statewide water planning but have yet to act. In contrast, Georgia is on the cusp of completing the Georgia Comprehensive Statewide Water Management Plan (SWMP). The SWMP provides for resource assessments, forecasts, and regional water planning. Over the past three years, an extensive effort has been made to implement the SWMP. This article describes the planning process undertaken in Georgia. Several of the recommended practices are also highlighted and critiqued with respect to their potential to affect aggregate water use in the state.

Integrated and Sustainable Water Management Plan for a Growing City

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce A. Lytle ◽  
Chris M. D. Fehn ◽  
Ron Redd ◽  
Rebecca Tejada ◽  
Marina Kopytkovskiy
Keyword(s):  
Water Management ◽  
Management Plan ◽  
Sustainable Water Management

Integrated water management plan for Shimla City in India using geospatial techniques

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 641-652 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sham Kumar Sharma ◽  
M. L. Kansal ◽  
Aditya Tyagi
Keyword(s):  
Water Management ◽  
Rainwater Harvesting ◽  
Resource Assessment ◽  
Management Plan ◽  
System Capacity ◽  
Integrated Water Management ◽  
Actual Measurement ◽  
Model Average ◽  
Validation Criteria ◽  
Remote Sensing Techniques

This study focuses on evolving an integrated water management plan (IWMP) for Shimla City (erstwhile summer capital of British India). Presently it is the state capital of Himachal Pradesh. Total water demand (2014) is 58.46 million litres per day (MLD) against system capacity of 54.54 MLD. The present deficit of 3.92 MLD (2014) may amplify to 59.01 MLD in 2051. Resource assessment in the related watersheds namely, Ashwani, Nauti, Giri and Pabbar accomplished using remote sensing techniques and geographic information system (GIS) based Arc-SWAT hydrological model. Average annual precipitation in all watersheds for 26 years (1984–2010) is about 1,005 mm, out of which about 34% flows as runoff, 8% as groundwater and about 58% as evapotranspiration. Being ungauged watersheds, water balance equation considered as the validation criteria, coefficient of correlation ‘R’ between observed rainfall and simulated runoff varies from 0.94–0.96. Results further validated through actual measurement of inflow in lean period in one of the major sources, i.e. Giri River, which has shown very good correlation (R = 0.95) between simulated and observed stream flow. The study establishes that existing sources are not sustainable. IWMP suggests, source augmentation coupled with rainwater harvesting and reuse of wastewater as long-term strategic measures.

scholarly journals Stakeholders Reach Consensus in Troubled Waters

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen Rugel
Keyword(s):  
Water Management ◽  
United States ◽  
Environmental Protection ◽  
Southeastern United States ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Management Plan ◽  
Freshwater Biodiversity ◽  
Transboundary Waters ◽  
Water Users ◽  
Basin Water

Surface water and groundwater catchments rarely align with the boundaries of cities, states, or nations. More often, water runs through, over, and under man-made sociopolitical divisions, making the governance of transboundary waters a formidable task. Although much of the public conversation regarding the availability and management of shared waters may appear to be dire (e.g., reports of “water wars”), there are transboundary basin water management strategies across the globe which offer hope. These include the efforts of the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint Stakeholders (ACFS) in the southeastern United States, which may serve as a useful template for future conversations around the water sharing table. The Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint Basin (ACF Basin) is a vital economic engine in the southeastern United States. The waters of the ACF are shared between three states—Alabama, Florida, and Georgia—and harbor some of the richest freshwater biodiversity in North America, including sturgeon, rock bass, madtom, sculpin, bass, darters, and the highest densities of freshwater mussels in the world. Many of these are species of concern or threatened or endangered species; therefore, water management strategies in multiple portions of the ACF must comply with habitat protection plans under the U.S. Environmental Protection Act of 1970 (https://www.enr.gov.nt.ca/en/environmental-protection-act). The ACFS was organized in 2009 in the hopes of overcoming a decades-long stalemate between Alabama, Florida, and Georgia, regarding the use of shared waters in the ACF Basin. Despite years of litigious relationships among these three states, the ACFS managed to bring a diverse and previously contentious set of water users to the table and build consensus on a shared water management plan for the entire ACF Basin. While the ACFS holds no regulatory power, they made more progress in breaking through existing distrust and deadlock than any previous efforts in this basin to date. In the end, they developed cooperation, respect, and a sustainable and adaptive water management plan which included input and buy-in from all identified water sectors in the ACF Basin. It is, therefore, a valuable exercise to examine the ACFS model and contemplate whether it contains exportable methodologies for other catchments challenged with managing transboundary waters.

scholarly journals Хот суурин газрын усны нөөцийн нэгдсэн менежментийн үнэлгээ: Чиг хандлага ба нөлөөллийн тогтолцоо

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-18
Author(s):  
Б. Тайванбат ◽  
О. Алтансүх ◽  
М. Энх-Үүр ◽  
K. Van Leeuwen ◽  
Steven H. A. Koop
Keyword(s):  
Water Management ◽  
Water Resources ◽  
Urban Areas ◽  
Water Cycle ◽  
Integrated Water Resources Management ◽  
Management Plan ◽  
Living Environment ◽  
Integrated Water Management ◽  
Current State ◽  
State Of Water

The large number of people living together in urban areas requires a comprehensive solutions for issues such as the reasonable allocation and adequate use of natural resources, urban planning, and efficient waste management to meet the city's needs.  One of the main factors influencing the health and comfort of urban residents is the supply of clean water and sewerage systems. Therefore, in order to rationally allocate and use water resources to meet urban needs, and to create a healthy and comfortable living environment for city residents, it is necessary to develop an integrated water resources management plan at the national and basin levels, as well as an integrated water management plan and assessment for city level. In addition to assessing the current state of water management, it is important to identify factors and trends that may further strain water resources to prevent future risks. To address the pressures on water management in Ulaanbaatar and Darkhan, representing Mongolia's urban areas, the City Blueprint Approach, developed by the EU Water   Innovation Partnership and the Dutch Institute of Water Cycle, was used in this study. Currently, this approach is used in about 80 cities in more than 40 countries, it is a relatively new and innovative method among Asian cities. As a result, water management in Ulaanbaatar and Darkhan is hampered by both social, economic, and environmental factors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document