scholarly journals Validation of Caprini’s Saphenous Ablation Scores

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Fakhry A ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Varicose Vein Surgery ◽  
Moderate Risk ◽  
Vte Prophylaxis ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Deep Vein

Introduction: Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) after varicose vein surgery is well recognized. Less well documented is Endovenous Heat-Induced Thrombosis (EHIT), thrombus extension into a deep vein after superficial venous thermo ablation. There is no current agreement on the routine use of thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing varicose vein surgery. more data on the incidence of VTE, and the need for postoperative thromboprophylaxis are necessary to formulate evidence-based clinical guidelines. Aim of the study: Comparison of the use of Caprini's Saphenous Ablation Scores versus Standard Caprini’s Score for the prophylaxis of VTE in EVLA. Patients & Methods: 60 patients admitted to Royal Vascular Center, Alexandria - Egypt. From Jan. 1st, 2021, to June 30th 2021 divided in 3 groups. - Group A) Treated by ablation of Great saphenous vein and received VTE prophylaxis according to Caprini’s Saphenous Ablation Scores Fig 1-A & B -Group B) Treated by ablation of Great saphenous vein and received VTE prophylaxis according to Standard Caprini’s Risk Assessment Score for VTE Fig 2-A&B - C) Treated by ablation of Great saphenous vein without VTE prophylaxis Ablation was done using radial 1480 YAG laser fibers and Post-operative Duplex was done one day, 3 month and one-year. Results: Age: 35.6+0.2, 34.3+0.5 and 37.6+0.09 years in the 3 groups M/F: 6/14, 8/12 and 7/13. In group A) all patients showed absent reflux post operatively and in all follow up visits. Duplex examination revealed significant reflux in the great saphenous veins in all patients and ranged from 0.7:0.9 Sec. and mean duration 0.7+0.09 Sec. Vein diameter ranged from (0.6: 0.9,X+0.76 CM.) in group A), (0.6: 0.8,X+0.7 CM.) in group B) , (0.5: 0.8,X+0.65 CM.) in group C) According to Caprini’s saphenous score 14 patients 70% were classified as low risk, 4 patients 20% were of moderate risk and 2 patients 10% of high-risk in Group A, while applying standard Caprini’s Score in group B patients revealed: 6 patients 30% were of moderate risk and 14 patients 70% of high risk in Group B ) . 3 patients developed superficial thrombophlebitis 15% and one patient 5% developed left calf DVT in Group C, while no VTE events were shown in both A&B Groups Significant drop in CVSS in patients in the three groups. Conclusion: Risk assessment of patients undergoing varicose veins ablation should be done and applying Caprini’s saphenous score as a better alternative to Standard Caprini’s score for VTE prophylaxis and is considered a safe and cost-effective tool in VTE prevention in these patients.

The impact of direction of great saphenous vein total stripping on saphenous nerve injury

2012 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
J C Papakostas ◽  
E Douitsis ◽  
I Sarmas ◽  
S Avgos ◽  
A Kyritsis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Evaluation ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Clinical Signs ◽  
Saphenous Nerve ◽  
Electrophysiological Studies ◽  
Saphenous Nerve Injury ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
The Impact

Objectives To examine and compare the effects of downwards versus upwards total stripping of great saphenous vein (GSV) on saphenous nerve (SN) injury using clinical and electrophysiological studies. Methods Fifty patients with varicosities were equally and randomly assigned to undergo total, upwards stripping (group A) or downwards stripping (group B) of GSV during saphenectomy. SN function was measured with electroneurogram (ENG) before operation, two weeks and 12 weeks after, in order to record the incidence and type of SN injury. Clinical signs of SN injury were also recorded at the same time points. The results were statistically analysed. Results There were no statistical significant differences on the occurrence of SN injury between groups A and B at two and 12 weeks, respectively, as confirmed with ENG studies and clinical evaluation. There were no differences between the two techniques with regard to the type of SN injury. SN injury was significantly ameliorated from 34% to 6% during the first three months. Conclusion SN injury was equally observed after downwards or upwards total stripping of the GSV, as confirmed by ENG and clinical evaluation, with no differences in injury type. SN injury tends to be relieved through time in most patients.

Effects of eccentric compression by a crossed-tape technique after endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein: a randomized study

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 151-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Lugli ◽  
A Cogo ◽  
S Guerzoni ◽  
A Petti ◽  
O Maleti
Keyword(s):  
Laser Ablation ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Endovenous Laser Ablation ◽  
Eccentric Compression ◽  
Experienced Pain ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Objectives To evaluate the effect of eccentric compression applied by a new crossed-tape technique on procedure-related pain occurrence after endovenous laser ablation (ELA) of the great saphenous vein (GSV). Methods From April 2005 to June 2006, 200 consecutive ELA procedures were randomized to receive (group A: 100) or not (group B: 100) an eccentric compression applied in the medial aspect of the thigh. Patients were scheduled for a seven-day examination to assess the level of pain experienced. Pain intensity was measured using a visual analogue scale giving a numerical grade from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain ever). Results The intensity of postoperative pain was significantly reduced ( P < 0.001) in the eccentric compression group as compared with the non-compression one. Conclusions This technique of eccentric compression greatly reduces the intensity of postoperative pain after ELA of the GSV.

scholarly journals Altered velocity gradient in lower limb chronic venous disease

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-24
Author(s):  
Sergio Gianesini ◽  
Francesco Sisini ◽  
Erica Menegatti ◽  
Giovanni Di Domenico ◽  
Mauro Gambaccini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Velocity Gradient ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Venous Drainage ◽  
Chronic Venous Disease ◽  
Velocity Variation ◽  
Venous Disease ◽  
Group A ◽  
The One ◽  
Group B

Background In physiology, velocity of the deep venous compartment is higher than the one in the saphenous compartment which is higher than the one in the tributaries. Considering that velocity variation is associated with changes in the pressure gradient, aim of the present study is to assess changes in venous kinetics in case of superficial chronic venous disease, so to provide further clues in venous drainage direction determination. Methods Venous ultrasound scanning was performed on 40 lower limbs of 28 chronic venous disease patients (C2-6Ep,As,Pr). Velocities were measured in three different venous segments: great saphenous vein at 2 cm above the origin of the incompetent tributary (Group-A). great saphenous vein at 2 cm below the origin of tributary (Group-B). tributary at 2 cm from its origin from the great saphenous vein (Group-C.) Results Diastolic time average velocity was higher in group-C (−21.3 ± 8.5 cm/s) than in group-A (−15.7 ± 5.2 cm/s; p = .0001) and group-B (−11.1 ± 2.9 cm/s; p = .0001), thus indicating an inversion of the physiological velocity gradient in chronic venous disease patients. Discussion Chronic venous disease presents a subverted velocity gradient. These data introduce objective hemodynamics data, paving the way for further investigation in venous drainage direction determination.

scholarly journals The outcome of the Trendelenburg procedure with stripping vs. no stripping in the management of varicose veins

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (03) ◽  
pp. 110-113
Author(s):  
Jibran Mohsin ◽  
Muhammad Haris Janjua ◽  
Jumana Fatima ◽  
Muhammad Usman Siddique ◽  
Muhammad Yasir Naseem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
P Value ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Varicose veins is a common problem in Pakistan with multiple treatment options. One of its recommended and commonly performed surgical treatment includes the flush ligation of Saphenofemoral junction (Trendelenburg procedure) with stripping of great saphenous vein and avulsion of varicosities which is a cumbersome process. This study aims to evaluate the effect of stripping of great saphenous vein on the recurrence rate. Patients and methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted in the Surgical Unit I, Services Hospital, Lahore over a period of 22 months from 20-09-2016 to 20-07-2018. Seventy patients were divided equally into two groups of 35 patients each i.e. Trendelenbrug procedure and avulsion of varicosities with stripping down to the knee, (Group A) versus Trendelenbrug procedure and avulsion of varicosities without stripping (Group B). Recurrence at 12 weeks was noted. SPSS version 17.0 was used to analyze data. Comparison of recurrence and stratified confounding factors such as age, gender, and BMI were assessed by the chi-square test (significant p-valve ≤0.05). Results: In group A, 32 out of 35 patients were male (91.43%) and 3 (8.57%) were female. While in group B, 31 out of 35 patients were male (88.87%) and 4 (11.43%) were female. Four out of 35 (11.43%) patients in group A whereas 6 (17.14%) group B patients (p-value=0.494) had a recurrence in the perforators below the knee at 12 weeks. Stratification (p-values) of recurrence rate with respect to age (<40 years: 0.41 versus ≥ 40 years:0.905), gender (female: p-value not applicable versus male: 0.96) and BMI was done (<25 kg/m2: 0.36 versus ≥ 25 kg/m2: 0.901) Conclusions: Stripping does not significantly affect the outcome of varicose vein surgery in relation to the recurrence rate at 12 weeks and recurrence was independent of age, gender, and BMI of patients.

scholarly journals Free radial artery as an alternate conduit in CABG

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdul Waheed ◽  
Ahmed Shabaz ◽  
Junaid Fayyaz Khan ◽  
Zafar Tufail
Keyword(s):  
Radial Artery ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Saphenous Vein Graft ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Suitable Alternative ◽  
Graft Stenosis ◽  
Group A ◽  
Obtuse Marginal ◽  
Group B

Objective: This study was under taken to explore the potential of the Free Radial Graft as a safe efficient and suitable alternative conduit in coronary artery bypass grafting incase of in availability of the more established conduits like the IMA and Great Saphenous Vein graft especially in redo surgery. Method: This prospective randomized single center trial was conducted on three groups of patients under going CABG. The study was conducted from 1st January 1999 to December 2002.The first group A (n=15 with mean age of 47.05±8.35years) Radial artery was used for grafting in Right and Left sided grafts except the LAD. In the second group B (n=15 with a mean age of 54.80±11.14 years) Great Saphenous Vein was used for grafting in Right and Left sided grafts except the LAD. In the third group C (n=20 with a mean age of 55.93± 11.14 years) IMA was only grafted to LAD. Proximal ends of both the GSV and the Radial Artery were anastomosed to the Aorta. All patients were male . Follow up was done in these patien ts both by non invasive and invasive methods such as ETT , Thallium scan , Angiography. Comparison was mainly done between the Radial artery and the Great Saphenous Vein taking as granted that the IMA g the best graft for the LAD in all cases. Results: IMA was always applied to LAD in all patients in the three groups. In group (A) Radial Artery was grafted to RCA in 5 (33.3%) pts. Diagonal in 4 (26.7%)pts. Obtuse Marginal 12(80%) pts. And PDA 3 (20%) pts. In group (B) Great Saphenous Vein was grafted to RCA in 6(40%)pts. Circumflex 1(6.7%)pts. Diagonals 2 (13.3%) pts. Obtuse marginals 6 (40%) pts. And on PDA 4(20%) pts. All patients were regularly followed up for 18 months to 24 months. Post operative angina was reported in 2 (13.3%)pts. in group A and 5(33.3%) pts. In group B (p=0549). ETT was done in all these pts. Was positive in 1(6.7%) in group A and 2 (13.3%) in group B (p=0.309). Thallium scan was done in all the study population and was found positive in 4 (26.7%) in group A and 5 (33.3%) in group B Patients(p=0.265). Coronary angiograms were done on 10 patients out of each group. In group A the grafts were patent in 9 patients (90%). In the group B the grafts were found patent in 8 (86%) patients.(p=0.543). Moderate Graft stenosis was found in 01 patient in group B and none in group A (p=0.35). Totally blocked grafts were found in 01 patients in each group (p=1.00).

P–671 Dual Trigger(low adjuvant HCG4h after GnRHagonist trigger)have positive impact of overall embryo’s quality, implantation ,clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in high-risk patients for OHSS

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Petanovsk. Kostova
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Birth Rates ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Live Birth Rates ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Abstract Study question Study aim is to compare implantation,clinical pregnancy and livebirth rates between giving1500IU of hCG4hours after GnRHagonist,on trigger day or GnRHagonist as alone trigger with luteal support withHCG1500IU.35h later on OPUday. Summary answer Adjuvant doze of1500IUhCG4h after bolus of GnRHagonist on trigger day significantly improve quality of blastocyst,implantation,clinical pregnancy and live birth rates without increasing the risk ofOHSS. What is known already The use of GnRHagonist for final oocyte maturation in antagonist cycle significantly decrease the incidence of OHSS,but there have been studies showing lower pregnancy rates in patients triggered with GnRHagonist compared with hCG in autologous cycles,attributed to a defective luteal phase, especially in high–risk patients despite intensive luteal phase support.To improve the results of IVF,an alternative approach is adding a small bolus dose of hCG(1500IU)35h later,on the OPU day after GnRHagonist trigger which provides more sustained support for the corpus luteum.The question is does low doses of hCGgiven on the same day with GnRHagonist trigger is making better quality oocytes. Study design, size, duration Single center prospective longitudinal cohort study fromJanuary2017 to Decembar2019.The initial inclusion criteria were:women age≥18and≤39years,AMH≥3,3ng/ml and ≥12 antral follicles on basal ultrasound.Patients with history of OHSS and PCO are also included in the study.Patients with applied “freeze-all” technique with peak estradiol≥4000pg/ml on trigger day&gt;18oocytes on the OPU day,and recognized significant risk for developing OHSS were also included.The cumulative implantation,clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were analyzed,only in embryos from the same COS protocol in every patient. Participants/materials, setting, methods A total of 231 patients were entered for final analysis,who underwent a flexible antagonist protocol,ICSI and fresh or thawed ET on 3th(38.53%) or 5th( 61.47%)day in women’s autologous cycles.Patients were randomized in one of two groups: GroupA-Dual trigger group 1500IUof hCG 4h after GnRH agonist application on trigger day and GroupB –1500IU of HCG 35h later,on the OPU day.We used nonparametric and parametric statistical tests.Significant differences were considered all values ​​of p &lt; 0.05 Main results and the role of chance Both groups are homogenous regarding several variables:age,BMI,type of sterility,smoking status,AMH,PCO, spermogram.There is no significant difference between the two(AvsB)groups according to average number of retrieved oocytes(13.6 vs 14.6 p &gt; 0,05),M II oocytes(11.03 vs 11.99 p &gt; 0.05).The dual trigger group(A)had a higher fertility rate(69.99% vs 64.11% p &lt; 0,05)compared with GnRHagonist trigger group(B).There are no significant difference between groups(AvsB)according to cumulative average number of:transferred embryos(2.4vs2.5 p &gt; 0.05)TQE transfered on 3th day(1.5.vs 1.3.p&gt;0.05);transferred blastocyst(2.6 vs2.7 &gt;0.05);cryo embryos(2.5vs1.9 p &gt; 0.05),but there are significant difference according to cumulative implantation rate of transferred blastocyst in favor of group A(48.18% vs 33.89%p&lt;0.05).Analyzes of morphological characteristics of transferred blastocyst depicted in the order of degree of blastocyst expansion,inner cellular mass(ICM)and trofoectoderm(TE) and ranking overall blastocysts quality from“excellent”,“good”,“average” and “pore” ,shows that there are significantly more percentage of patient with embryo transfer of “excellent” or even one “excellent” blastocyst in group A (30.56%,31.94% vs 21.54%,23.08% p &lt; 0.05) in opposite of percentage of patients with embryo transfer with “poore “” blastocyst in group B (37.5% vs 46.15.%p&lt;0.05). Clinical pregnanacy rate (71.68% vs 50.84% p &lt; 0.05) , and live birth rate (60,18% vs 42,58% ), were significantly higher in group A. There were no cases of moderate or severe OHSS in both groups. Limitations, reasons for caution Dual trigger in GnRH antagonist protocols should be advocated as a safe approach but undetected high risk patients are reasons for caution for developing clinically significant OHSS. Wider implications of the findings: Adjuvant low dose of hCG on GnRHagonist trigger day improve clinical pregnancy and live birth rates without increasing the risk of clinically significant OHSS.Protocol of dual trigger and freezing all oocytes or embryos in patients with high risk of developing OHSS is promising technique in everyday practice. Trial registration number 8698

scholarly journals Fetomaternal outcome in high-risk parturients receiving epidural analgesia using fentanyl with ropivacaine versus iv tramadol: a comparative study

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (7) ◽  
pp. 2836
Author(s):  
Ashima Taneja ◽  
Kamaldeep Arora ◽  
Isha Chopra ◽  
Anju Grewal ◽  
Sushree Samiksha Naik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Epidural Analgesia ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Satisfaction Score ◽  
Epidural Group ◽  
Patient Satisfaction Score ◽  
Vaginal Deliveries ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Labour analgesia has been recommended but sufficient data on use of labour epidural analgesia with ropivacaine and fentanyl combination during labour is not available.Methods: A comparative study was conducted on 40 high risk labouring partuirents, randomly allocated to group A (iv tramadol) and group B (epidural analgesia with ropivacaine plus fentanyl). Assessments were done for fetal heart rate abnormality, mode of delivery, duration of labour, and Apgar score. The VAS score, patient satisfaction score, and complications were recorded.Results: Group A had more number of instrumental deliveries compared to group B, the later had higher number of caesarean sections. No difference was observed in vaginal deliveries in both the groups. Pain relief was significant in patients of epidural group. The neonatal outcome was same in both the groups. Significant number of patients had a higher degree of satisfaction score in group B compared to group A.Conclusions: Tramadol and epidural analgesia in labour are safe and effective. Patient satisfaction is significantly higher in epidural group as compared to the tramadol group.

Varicose Vein Surgery

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jovan N. Markovic ◽  
Cynthia K. Shortell
Keyword(s):  
Laser Ablation ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Varicose Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
The United States ◽  
Clinical Severity ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Venous Disease ◽  
Varicose Vein Surgery

Chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) is a common vascular disorder that affects a significant proportion of the population in the United States and other developed countries. In its advanced stages, CVI significantly reduces patients’ quality of life and imposes a high economic burden on society due to increased direct health care costs and reduced productivity. Favorable clinical results associated with endovascular ablation techniques and patient preference for minimally invasive procedures has led to a shift in which treatment of vein disease is moving from the hospital to the office, allowing a more diverse group of physicians to enter a field that had typically been the domain of surgeons. This chapter reviews the terminology associated with venous disease, indications for varicose vein surgery, preoperative evaluation, procedural planning, endovenous procedures (endovenous laser ablation, radiofrequency ablation), surgical vein stripping techniques, and foam sclerotherapy. Tables include Clinical severity, Etiology or Cause, Anatomy, Pathophysiology classification; summary of nomenclature changes for the lower extremity venous system; indications for varicose vein surgery; interrogation points in the venous reflux examination; complications associated with treatment modalities used in the management of CVI; and methods of variceal ablation. Figures show an ultrasonographic image of a saphenous eye, placement of a quartz fiber for laser ablation of the great saphenous vein, a typical saphenofemoral junction, surgical stripping  of the great saphenous vein, and microfoam sclerotherapy. This review contains 9 figures, 6 tables and 73 references.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis

2018 ◽  
pp. 121-126
Author(s):  
Abdullah Jibawi ◽  
Mohamed Baguneid ◽  
Arnab Bhowmick
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Low Molecular Weight Heparin ◽  
Surgical Patients ◽  
Related Factors ◽  
Vte Prophylaxis ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
Preventable Complication ◽  
Fatal Complications

Venous thromboembolism is a common but largely preventable complication following surgery. However, fatal complications can occur as a result of pulmonary embolism following deep vein thrombosis. A structured risk assessment should be performed preoperatively in all surgical patients and thromboprophylaxis measures should be tailored according to patient- and procedure-related factors. These measures include anticoagulation with low molecular weight heparin and the use of mechanical compression devices.

scholarly journals Successful Model for Guideline Implementation to Prevent Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in the Ambulatory Cancer Clinic

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. e868-e874 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris E. Holmes ◽  
Steven Ades ◽  
Susan Gilchrist ◽  
Daniel Douce ◽  
Karen Libby ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Guideline Implementation ◽  
Vte Prophylaxis ◽  
Successful Model ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism Prevention ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Cancer Associated Thrombosis

PURPOSE: Guidelines recommend venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk assessment in outpatients with cancer and pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in selected patients at high risk for VTE. Although validated risk stratification tools are available, < 10% of oncologists use a risk assessment tool, and rates of VTE prophylaxis in high-risk patients are low in practice. We hypothesized that implementation of a systems-based program that uses the electronic health record (EHR) and offers personalized VTE prophylaxis recommendations would increase VTE risk assessment rates in patients initiating outpatient chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in the Ambulatory Cancer Clinic (VTEPACC) was a multidisciplinary program implemented by nurses, oncologists, pharmacists, hematologists, advanced practice providers, and quality partners. We prospectively identified high-risk patients using the Khorana and Protecht scores (≥ 3 points) via an EHR-based risk assessment tool. Patients with a predicted high risk of VTE during treatment were offered a hematology consultation to consider VTE prophylaxis. Results of the consultation were communicated to the treating oncologist, and clinical outcomes were tracked. RESULTS: A total of 918 outpatients with cancer initiating cancer-directed therapy were evaluated. VTE monthly education rates increased from < 5% before VTEPACC to 81.6% (standard deviation [SD], 11.9; range, 63.6%-97.7%) during the implementation phase and 94.7% (SD, 4.9; range, 82.1%-100%) for the full 2-year postimplementation phase. In the postimplementation phase, 213 patients (23.2%) were identified as being at high risk for developing a VTE. Referrals to hematology were offered to 151 patients (71%), with 141 patients (93%) being assessed and 93.8% receiving VTE prophylaxis. CONCLUSION: VTEPACC is a successful model for guideline implementation to provide VTE risk assessment and prophylaxis to prevent cancer-associated thrombosis in outpatients. Methods applied can readily translate into practice and overcome the current implementation gaps between guidelines and clinical practice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document