Effect of Coblation Polypectomy on Estimated Blood Loss in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

2009 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 535-539 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Anderson Eloy ◽  
Thomas J. Walker ◽  
Roy R. Casiano ◽  
Jose W. Ruiz
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Nasal Polyposis ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
New Device ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
University Of Miami

Background We conducted a pilot study comparing estimated blood loss (EBL) using coblation-assisted endoscopic sinus surgery (CAESS) where coblation is used to debulk nasal polyps before microdebridement with a traditional microdebrider technique in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) patients with sinonasal polyps undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). Methods A retrospective analysis was performed at a tertiary care center on patients with nasal polyposis undergoing ESS between January 2008 and July 2008. The University of Miami CT staging system was used preoperatively to evaluate the extent of sinonasal disease. The duration of surgery, blood loss per minute, total EBL, and demographic data were collected. Results Twenty-one patients underwent nasal polypectomy/ESS using CAESS and 16 patients underwent nasal polypectomy/ESS using microdebridement. The two groups had comparable University of Miami CT staging scores (p > 0.05). The average EBL was 307.1 ± 169.8 mL using coblation compared with 627.8 ± 424.2 mL using microdebridement (p < 0.05). The average duration of surgery using coblation was 116.2 ± 41.7 minutes, compared with 125.3 ± 48.4 minutes using microdebridement (p > 0.05). The average blood loss per minute was 2.8 ±1.7 mL in the coblation group compared with 4.8 ± 2.1 mL in the microdebridement group (p < 0.05). Subgroup analyses showed a significant decrease in average EBL and EBL/minute to be only significant for revision cases (p < 0.05) and not for primary cases (p > 0.05). Conclusion Coblation-assisted nasal polypectomy/ESS is associated with a statistically significant lower EBL and blood loss per minute when compared with traditional microdebridement technique. Coblation represents a new device that can reduce blood loss in patients with nasal polyposis undergoing traditional revision ESS. Further prospective randomized trials are needed to validate these findings.

scholarly journals Hypotensive Anesthesia with Propofol Infusion Pump: A Boon for Endoscopic Sinus and Nasal Polyps Surgery

2011 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-8
Author(s):  
Sudhir M Naik ◽  
Sarika S Naik
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Nasal Polyposis ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Successful Outcome ◽  
Anesthetic Techniques ◽  
Operative Field ◽  
Hypotensive Anesthesia ◽  
Duration Of Surgery

ABSTRACT Background Successful outcome of endoscopic sinus surgery depends on complete visualization of the operative field and intraoperative control of bleeding. Major disadvantage of general anesthesia is the increased bleeding encountered, which can interfere with optimum visualization of the intranasal anatomy unless hypotensive methods are used. Objectives To study the different anesthetic techniques in relation to their impact on blood loss and duration of surgery. The role of propofol was also evaluated. Design Department of Anesthesia and ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, KVG Medical College and Hospital, Sullia, Karnataka, India. Materials and methods 213 cases of endoscopic sinus surgeries done for nasal polyposis, sinusitis, dacryocystitis and septorhinoplasties under local and general anesthesia were evaluated between June 2009 and August 2010. Result A good operative field was seen with propofol anesthesia compared to halothane anesthesia. The problems of fogging and frequent suctioning were lesser with propofol hypotensive anesthesia. Conclusion Hypotensive anesthesia using propofol infusion is the anesthesia of choice for extensive nasal polyposis. Propofol when used both for induction as well as maintenance of general anesthesia in endoscopic sinus surgeries significantly reduces the blood loss, thereby improving the visibility of the endonasal structures and minimizes the chance of complications related to endoscopic sinus surgery.

scholarly journals Does pterygopalatine canal injection with local anaesthetic and adrenaline decrease bleeding during functional endoscopic sinus surgery?

2014 ◽  
Vol 128 (9) ◽  
pp. 814-817 ◽  
Author(s):  
C J Valdes ◽  
Y Al Badaai ◽  
M Bogado ◽  
M Samaha
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Chronic Rhinosinusitis ◽  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Pterygopalatine Fossa ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Surgical Field

AbstractObjective:To determine the effect of pterygopalatine fossa injection with xylocaine and adrenaline on: surgical field bleeding and blood loss during functional endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis, and the duration of the procedure.Methods:A prospective, single-blinded, controlled trial was performed in a tertiary care academic centre. A total of 45 patients undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis, whose disease was symmetrical based on computed tomography grading, were included. A unilateral pterygopalatine fossa injection with 1 per cent xylocaine and 1:100 000 adrenaline was performed after the induction of anaesthesia. The contralateral side served as the control. The operating surgeon, who was blinded to the injected side, assessed the surgical field using a validated six-item grading system. Blood loss, blood pressure, heart rate and end-tidal carbon dioxide were recorded every 15 minutes for each side separately, and duration of surgery was noted.Results:There was no statistically significant difference in the surgical field grade between the injected and non-injected sides (p = 0.161). There were no differences in blood loss or duration of surgery.Conclusion:Pterygopalatine fossa injection prior to functional endoscopic sinus surgery did not decrease intra-operative surgical field bleeding, blood loss or duration of surgery.

Routine histopathology in uncomplicated sinus surgery: Is it necessary?

2005 ◽  
Vol 132 (3) ◽  
pp. 407-412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander A. Romashko ◽  
James A. Stankiewicz
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Nasal Polyposis ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Potential Cost ◽  
Initial Surgery ◽  
Complicating Factors

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence of occult pathology in routine, uncomplicated endoscopic sinus surgery, and to suggest guidelines for when to send specimens for histopathologic exam. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective analysis of case records of 790 patients who underwent 868 endoscopic sinus surgeries at a tertiary care center from 1986 to 2003. Indications were chronic sinusitis, recurrent acute sinusitis, nasal polyposis, or combinations of these diagnoses. All cases were considered routine and did not involve preoperative suspicion of neoplasm or other complicating factors. Charts were reviewed for surgical indication, patient age, laterality of disease, history of prior sinus surgery, intraoperative suspicion of tumor, and final histopathology. RESULTS: In 868 cases of endoscopic sinus surgery, occult neoplasm was diagnosed in 2 patients (0.23%). In one patient, the initial surgery cured the lesion. Final histopathology of the remaining 866 (99.8%) specimens was consistent with inflammation and/or nasal polyposis. In 121 cases of unilateral sinusitis, none was positive for neoplasm. In 277 cases involving bilateral nasal polyposis and 13 involving unilateral polyposis, no neoplasms were found. Intraoperative suspicion of neoplasm occurred in 12 cases, with all specimens read as consistent with sinusitis and/or polyposis. CONCLUSIONS: Histopathologic review of every specimen obtained in routine sinus surgery for sinusitis and/or nasal polyposis is not indicated. Submission of specimen is indicated in routine cases when: 1) there is intraoperative suspicion of tumor, 2) unilateral nasal polyposis is present, 3) unilateral sinus opacification is present, and 4) additional diagnostic information is needed (eg, presence of eosinophils, fungal forms, etc.). SIGNIFICANCE: Establishes a safe and reasonable standard of care, with potential cost savings and medico-legal ramifications.

Comparison of Endoscopic Sinus Surgery with and without Image Guidance

2002 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 193-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marvin P. Fried ◽  
Vik M. Moharir ◽  
Jennifer Shin ◽  
Marta Taylor-Becker ◽  
Paul Morrison ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Image Guidance ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Guidance System ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Repeat Surgery ◽  
Patient Profile ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss

Background Image guidance based on preacquired computed tomography scans of the patient is a technique used to assist the physician during endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). This study seeks to compare ESS with and without image guidance, analyzing a number of parameters that can impact on efficacy. Methods Retrospective chart review took place at a tertiary care referral center. The study group consisted of 97 consecutive patients confirmed to have undergone ESS using an electromagnetic intraoperative image guidance system (IGS). The control group consisted of 61 consecutive patients who underwent ESS, before the IGS was available at the study hospital. The main outcomes measured were analysis of patient profile, including coexisting conditions such as asthma and polyposis, assessment of which specific sinuses underwent surgical treatment; major and minor complications; estimated blood loss (EBL); operative time; and the need for repeat surgery. Results The IGS group had 74% of patients with polyposis; more sinuses, on average, which underwent surgical revision; one major and three minor complications; an average EBL of 134 cc, an average procedure time of 154 minutes; and one patient who needed repeat surgery in a 3-month follow-up period. The non-IGS group had 40% of patients with polyposis; seven major complications and one minor complication; an average EBL of 94 cc; and three patients who needed repeat surgery within 3 months. Conclusions The use of an IGS for endoscopic sinus surgery may reduce the complications associated with the procedure and allow for a more thorough operation. However, operative time and EBL may be increased.

Office-Based Sinus Surgery for Cystic Fibrosis Chronic Rhinosinusitis

ORL ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Daniel B. Spielman ◽  
David A. Gudis
Keyword(s):  
Cystic Fibrosis ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Chronic Rhinosinusitis ◽  
Local Anesthesia ◽  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Office Setting

<b><i>Objective:</i></b> Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is nearly ubiquitous in the cystic fibrosis (CF) population, and many patients require multiple endoscopic sinus surgeries throughout their lifetime. Recent studies have demonstrated the profound pulmonary and systemic health benefits of comprehensive CRS treatment. Both endotracheal intubation with mechanical ventilation and inpatient hospital care represent significant risks for CF patients. The goal of this study is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of performing revision endoscopic sinus surgery for CF patients in the outpatient office setting using only local anesthesia to decrease the need for mechanical ventilation and inpatient hospitalization. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This is a prospective cohort study conducted at a tertiary care academic medical center with a CF Foundation-accredited care center. Patients with CF and refractory CRS despite prior surgery and medical therapy were eligible for inclusion. Comprehensive revision ESS was performed in the office using only local anesthesia. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Five patients were enrolled and underwent revision endoscopic sinus surgery without complication. The average preoperative Sinonasal-Outcome Test-22 score was 52.0 ± 12.1 and the average preoperative Lund-Mackay score was 15.2 ± 3.8. No patients requested aborting the procedure early due to pain, discomfort, or any other reason. No subjects required prolonged observation or postoperative hospital admission. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> This prospective pilot study is the first to demonstrate the safety and feasibility of performing comprehensive revision endoscopic sinus surgery for CF patients in the outpatient office setting using only local anesthesia.

Endoscopic Sinus Surgery for Cystic Fibrosis: Variables Influencing Sinonasal and Pulmonary Outcomes

2021 ◽  
pp. 194589242110596
Author(s):  
Keven S. Y. Ji ◽  
Dennis Frank-Ito ◽  
Ralph Abi Hachem ◽  
Khalil Issa ◽  
Carrie Johnson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cystic Fibrosis ◽  
Pulmonary Function ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Stepwise Regression ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Forced Expiratory Volume ◽  
Older Age ◽  
Sinus Surgery

Background Endoscopic sinus surgery is a well-established treatment for chronic rhinosinusitis in patients with cystic fibrosis, though its benefits seem to be limited to improving sinonasal symptoms rather than affecting lung function. Objective This study aims to identify clinical and demographic factors that may influence sinonasal and pulmonary outcomes after surgery. Methods This is a six-year retrospective analysis of adult cystic fibrosis patients who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery at a tertiary care center. 22-Item Sino-Nasal Outcomes Test scores and mean forced expiratory volume data at baseline and three to six months after surgery were analyzed using t-test and stepwise regression with the following covariates: age, gender, lung transplant, revision surgery, and pseudomonas on sinus culture. Results 119 surgeries were performed on 88 patients, with 69% on patients with transplant. The overall mean (Standard Deviation) improvement in 22-Item Sino-Nasal Outcomes Test score was 9.42 (18.15) for the entire cohort ( P < .001). Pseudomonas on culture was associated with less improvement in sinonasal scores ( P = .002). There was no significant change in forced expiratory volume after surgery ( P = .94). Revision surgery ( P = .004) and older age ( P = .007) were associated with less favorable change of pulmonary function on stepwise regression ( P = .002). There was no correlation between change in sinonasal scores and pulmonary function. Conclusion Although surgery was associated with a clinically and statistically significant improvement in sinonasal scores in cystic fibrosis patients, patients with pseudomonas may experience less benefit. Revision surgery and older age may be associated with less favorable pulmonary outcomes. Awareness of such variables may help when deciding which cystic fibrosis patients should undergo surgery.

scholarly journals Assessment of Intraoperative Blood Loss during Oral and Maxillofacial Surgical Procedures in a Nigerian Tertiary Health Care Center

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Babatunde O. Akinbami ◽  
Bisola Onajin-Obembe
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Surgical Procedures ◽  
Significant Relationship ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Soft Tissues ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Health Care Center ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Duration Of Surgery

Background. Reports on estimated amount of blood loss in maxillofacial surgical procedures will guide clinicians through units of blood required for each procedure. The aim of the study was to assess the amount of blood loss and duration of surgery. Methods. All cases of maxillofacial surgical procedures done under GA in the MFU theatre, from January 2007 to December 2013, were included in the study. Pre- and postoperative haematocrit values, number of units of whole blood requested and used, amount of blood loss, and duration of surgery were recorded. Results. 139 patients were analyzed, of which 75 (54.0%) were males and 64 (46.0%) were females. Fifty-six (40.3%) cases involved soft tissues. Eighty-three cases involved hard tissues. Age range was 2 months to 78 years; mean ± (SD) was 21.3±(18.5) years. Isolated unilateral cleft lip had the lowest mean value of estimated blood loss of 10.4±10.8 mLs and also the lowest duration of surgery of 58 (76) minutes. There was no significant relationship between both parameters for cleft lip. Fractures of the mandible had mean blood loss of 352 mLs and duration was 175 min. Conclusion. In this study, there was significant relationship between estimated blood loss and duration of surgery for mandibular and zygomatic complex fractures.

scholarly journals Comparison between microdebrider assisted surgery and the conventional methods in the surgical treatment of nasal polyps

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 154
Author(s):  
Shama A. Bellad ◽  
N. Manjunath ◽  
Shilpa Ravi
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Nasal Polyps ◽  
Nasal Polyposis ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Surgery Group ◽  
Surgical Expertise ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Conventional Methods ◽  
Surgical Conditions

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Microdebrider is emerging as a convenient tool for various ENT surgeries that helps in easier disease clearance and reduced morbidity. Though it requires some surgical expertise initially to master the skill of handling it, it is worth procuring and using in endoscopic sinus surgery. The present study was conducted to compare the microdebrider assisted endoscopic surgery and conventional methods using sinus endoscopes in the surgical management of nasal polyps.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> 30 patients diagnosed with nasal polyposis between the age group of 5 to 60 were equally randomized into 2 surgical groups- powered endoscopic sinus surgery group and conventional endoscopic sinus surgery group with 15 patients in each group. The study aimed at comparing the intra operative (blood loss, duration of surgery) and post operative results (crusting, scarring, discharge, symptoms, recurrence) between the two groups using Lund–Mackay scoring system and visual analogue scale. The data was statistically analysed.  </p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> A significant statistical evidence for a shorter operative time, dryness of the field, better surgical conditions and improved VAS scoring at 3 and 6 months postoperatively was observed in the powered endoscopy group than using conventional techniques.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> The use of microdebrider in endoscopic sinus surgery has the advantage of complete clearance of disease, smoother intra operative course and better post operative healing when compared to conventional instruments in the treatment of nasal polyps.</p><p> </p>

scholarly journals A comparative study between laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy in cases of cholecystitis with cholelithiasis: one year experience in tertiary care center

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 903 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashutosh Shukla ◽  
Sharad Seth ◽  
Alok Ranjan
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Gall Stone ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Group I ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Group Ii

Background: Gall stones are a major cause of morbidity all over the world. Until the end of 1980’s, open cholecystectomy was the gold standard for treatment of stones in the gall bladder. Laparoscopy has revolutionized surgery causing a re-evaluation of treatment strategies including cholecystectomy, however, it is not completely devoid of pitfalls. This study was undertaken to determine whether laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be recommended over open cholecystectomy as the procedure of choice for the treatment of cholecystitis with cholelithiasis.Methods: This study included a total of 100 patients in the age group 20-70 years diagnosed as calculous cholecystitis on ultrasonography and admitted to the surgical wards of Rohilkhand Medical College and Hospital, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India between November 2014 to October 2015. They were divided into two groups. Group I (n = 50) who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy and Group II (n = 50) who underwent open cholecystectomy.Results: A comparison of the two groups showed that the duration of surgery was significantly more in Group I (mean 52.32 minutes) as compared to Group II (mean 37.66 minutes) (p <0.001). There was <100 ml blood loss in the majority of Group I cases (94%), however, in Group II, majority had blood loss ≥100 ml (96%) (p <0.001). Mean duration of post-operative pain was 14.68 hours in group I and 27.92 hours in group II (p <0.001). Time taken to restoration of oral feeds, was less in group I (mean 11.68 hours) as compared to group II (mean 17.24 hours). Post-operative hospital stay was a mean of 1.18±0.52 days in Group I and a mean of 4.78±1.42 days in Group II (p<0.001). The time taken for resumption of normal activity was two days and three days (p <0.001) in group I and II respectively. In Group I, average cost of treatment was rupees 10870, but in Group II it was significantly more at rupees 12152 (p = 0.007).Conclusions: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a surgical procedure can be recommended over open cholecystectomy in carefully selected patients of gall stone disease.

Effect of Endoscopic Sinus Surgery on Olfaction: A Prospective Analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 115-119 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Olfactory Dysfunction ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Prospective Analysis ◽  
Realistic Assessment ◽  
Olfactory Impairment ◽  
The Impact

ABSTRACT Objective To examine the impact of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) on olfactory impairment in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and nasal polyposis over intermediate- to long-term follow-up. Study design Prospective, cohort study. Conducted in a tertiary care center over a period of 2 years (August 2014-July 2016). Materials and methods A total of 42 patients presenting for ESS were examined preoperatively and at 1st, 3rd, 6th, and 12th week postoperatively. Demographic, comorbidity, and olfactory scores were collected at each point of time. Sniffin Sticks test was used to assess the olfaction of the patients. Results Olfactory scores in anosmic patients significantly improved after ESS at 3-month follow-up. Only few hyposmic patients improved after surgery and others did not show any change. Among normosmic patients, 80% showed no change after surgery, whereas 20% became hyposmic postoperatively. None of the normosmics became anosmic after surgery. Conclusion Patients with severe olfactory dysfunction significantly improved after ESS, whereas patients with mild olfactory dysfunction did not. A realistic assessment of effects of ESS on olfaction could be derived. This will help in counseling the patients undergoing ESS in future. Olfactory impairment is an important patient safety and quality-of-life issue for patients with CRS and one that requires continued research. How to cite this article Mohanty S. Effect of Endoscopic Sinus Surgery on Olfaction: A Prospective Analysis. Clin Rhinol An Int J 2016;9(3):115-119.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document