scholarly journals A comparative study between laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy in cases of cholecystitis with cholelithiasis: one year experience in tertiary care center

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 903 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashutosh Shukla ◽  
Sharad Seth ◽  
Alok Ranjan
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Gall Stone ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Group I ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Group Ii

Background: Gall stones are a major cause of morbidity all over the world. Until the end of 1980’s, open cholecystectomy was the gold standard for treatment of stones in the gall bladder. Laparoscopy has revolutionized surgery causing a re-evaluation of treatment strategies including cholecystectomy, however, it is not completely devoid of pitfalls. This study was undertaken to determine whether laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be recommended over open cholecystectomy as the procedure of choice for the treatment of cholecystitis with cholelithiasis.Methods: This study included a total of 100 patients in the age group 20-70 years diagnosed as calculous cholecystitis on ultrasonography and admitted to the surgical wards of Rohilkhand Medical College and Hospital, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India between November 2014 to October 2015. They were divided into two groups. Group I (n = 50) who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy and Group II (n = 50) who underwent open cholecystectomy.Results: A comparison of the two groups showed that the duration of surgery was significantly more in Group I (mean 52.32 minutes) as compared to Group II (mean 37.66 minutes) (p <0.001). There was <100 ml blood loss in the majority of Group I cases (94%), however, in Group II, majority had blood loss ≥100 ml (96%) (p <0.001). Mean duration of post-operative pain was 14.68 hours in group I and 27.92 hours in group II (p <0.001). Time taken to restoration of oral feeds, was less in group I (mean 11.68 hours) as compared to group II (mean 17.24 hours). Post-operative hospital stay was a mean of 1.18±0.52 days in Group I and a mean of 4.78±1.42 days in Group II (p<0.001). The time taken for resumption of normal activity was two days and three days (p <0.001) in group I and II respectively. In Group I, average cost of treatment was rupees 10870, but in Group II it was significantly more at rupees 12152 (p = 0.007).Conclusions: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a surgical procedure can be recommended over open cholecystectomy in carefully selected patients of gall stone disease.

scholarly journals Transport Factors Affecting the Outcome of Referred Neonates Admitted in A Tertiary Care Hospital

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 159-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Madhabi Baidya ◽  
Mahfuza Shirin ◽  
Liton Chandra Saha
Keyword(s):  
Perinatal Asphyxia ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Preterm Neonates ◽  
P Value ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Neonatal Transport ◽  
Group I ◽  
Group Ii

Background: Adequate neonatal transport is a key component of care of the sick newborns who require referral to tertiary care center. Poor transportation is one of the iatrogenic factors associated with greater neonatal mortality. Neonatal transport is the greatest challenge faced today in our country. The purpose of this study was to find out characteristics of transport of referred neonates and to idention the factors that contribute to mortality.Methodology: This cross sectional study was conducted in Dhaka Shishu (Children) Hospital from June 2013 to November 2013. Both term and preterm neonates who were referred within first seven days of life were included and those with gross congenital abnormalities and left against medical advice were excluded from the study. After enrollment, data were collected using a structured questionnaire including birth details, interventions before transportation, reasons for referral, and details of transportation. Outcome & duration of hospital stay were also recorded. Neonates who were expired considered as group I and who were survived considered as group II. The study variables were analyzed for their association with immediate outcome by applying chi square test and t test. P value <0.05 was considered significant.Results: This study found that out of 332 neonates 181 were expired with 54.5% mortality rate. One eighty one neonates who were expired, considered as group I and one fifty one neonate were survived, considered as group II. The mortality was significantly high in male neonates [RR 0.80 (0.66-0.97)] and neonates those delivered at home [RR 1.34(1.10-1.64)] (p<0.05). Perinatal asphyxia, pre-term low birth weight, neonatal sepsis were the main causes of referral. It was found that transportation without any referral note [RR 1.40 (1.14- 1.71)], no advice regarding maintenance of airway[RR 1.50(1.17- 1.92)]and keeping warm [RR 1.51(1.17-1.950], resuscitation on admission [RR 1.63(1.23-2.17)] and transportation required > 3hours [RR 1.36(1.09-1.69)] were associated with significantly higher mortality among referred transported neonates(p<0.05).Conclusions: This study found that male neonates, home delivery, transportation without any referral note, no advice regarding maintenance of airway and keeping warm, resuscitation needed on admission and prolonged transportation time were significantly associated with mortality of referred transported neonates.Bangladesh J Child Health 2017; VOL 41 (3) :159-164

scholarly journals Single- and multistage surgical treatment of patients with degenerative sagittal imbalance

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 44-53
Author(s):  
E. S. Baikov ◽  
A. V. Peleganchuk ◽  
A. J. Sanginov ◽  
O. N. Leonova ◽  
A. V. Krutko
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Charlson Comorbidity Index ◽  
Sagittal Imbalance ◽  
Group I ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Comorbidity Index ◽  
Group Ii ◽  
Clinical And Radiological Results ◽  
High Charlson Comorbidity Index

Objective. To analyze the nearest clinical and radiological results of simultaneous and staged surgical treatment of patients with degenerative sagittal imbalance.Material and Methods. Retrospective monocentric cohort study included analysis of data from 54 patients who underwent simultaneous combination of surgical methods with obligatory corrective anterior fusion at the L4–L5 or at L4–L5 and L5–S1 levels (Group I, n = 27) or similar surgical intervention though divided into stages with an interval of 5 days or more (Group II, n = 27). A comparison of clinical, radiological, and operational data during inpatient treatment was carried out.Results. The duration of surgery was 410.93 ± 76.34 minutes in Group I and 594.63 ± 102.61 minutes in Group II (p = 0.000001); the  blood loss was 926.67 ± 378.63 ml versus 1345.19 ± 522.97 ml, respectively (p = 0.001575). Postoperative clinical and radiological parameters did not differ between groups: VAS back (p = 0.248647), VAS leg (p = 0.196140), PT (p = 0.115965), SVA (p = 0.208449), LL (p = 0.023654), LDI (p = 0.931646), PI-LL (p = 0.693045), GAP (p = 0.823504), and restoration of the ideal Russoly type (p = 0.111476). The incidence of perioperative complications in groups was comparable: 17 (62.96 %) in Group I and 15 (55.56 %) in Group II (p = 0.583171). Patients with a high Charlson comorbidity index had a significantly higher incidence of complications (p = 0.023471). The index of surgical invasiveness in Group I had a significant correlation with the total number of complications (r = 0.421332).Conclusion. Clinical and radiological results and the incidence of complications are comparable between single- and multistage approaches to correct sagittal balance disorders. In staged treatment, the total duration of surgery and the volume of blood loss are significantly higher. With a high Charlson comorbidity index and Mirza surgical invasiveness index, a multistage approach to the treatment of patients with sagittal imbalance is preferred.

scholarly journals A study of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in rural setup

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (9) ◽  
pp. 3111
Author(s):  
Avishkar K. Barase
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Dietary Habits ◽  
Financial Burden ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Adult Population ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Gall Stone ◽  
Health Sector ◽  
Analgesic Requirement ◽  
Duration Of Surgery

Background: Cholelithiasis is one of the major healthcare problems faced by the adult population all over the world. The disease prevalence is ever increasing because of the changing lifestyles and dietary habits. With emergence of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, it has become standard treatment modality for all kind of patients of gall stone disease. But still in India laparoscopic procedures are not routinely carried out in rural setup. So, we have decided to carry out this prospective study of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in rural setup mainly emphasizing on the cost benefit aspect and its impact on economical aspect of the rural government hospital as well as the patient’s financial burden.Methods: In this prospective randomized study, 60 patients of symptomatic cholelithiasis were grouped into open cholecystectomy (OC) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) groups randomly (30 each). The preoperative, intra operative and postoperative findings were noted and compared with each other and also with previous studies. The results are compared using paired t test and chi square test.Results: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was better than open cholecystectomy in terms of less analgesic requirement, postoperative hospital stay, surgical site infection with better cosmetic outcome. The results were comparable regarding intra operative complications. Only duration of surgery was comparatively more in laparoscopic group. Thus, overall laparoscopic cholecystectomy was cost effective alternative as compared to open cholecystectomy.Conclusions: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is better alternative to open cholecystectomy in term of less intra and postoperative complications as well as decreased financial burden on public health sector and patient point of view.

scholarly journals Early same-admission laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute mild biliary pancreatitis: a retrospective study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
yunxiao lyu ◽  
Yunxiao Cheng ◽  
Bin Wang
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Optimal Time ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Biliary Pancreatitis ◽  
Group I ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Conversion To Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Group Ii

Abstract Background As the standard procedure for the surgical treatment for gallbladder stones, we investigated the controversy surrounding the optimal time for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for acute mild biliary pancreatitis.Methods This retrospective study included medical records of all patients who were admitted with a diagnosis of acute mild biliary pancreatitis at Dongyang People’s Hospital from July 2011 to June 2018. Main outcomes included perioperative characteristics, length of hospital stay, complications, morbidity, and mortality.Results A total of 119 patients were divided into an early LC group (Group I; 52 patients) and a control group (Group II; 67 patients). The mean age was 60.5 years (range, 30–79 years). Conversion to open cholecystectomy (COC) was performed in 17 patients (6 patients in Group I and 11 patients in Group II, P=0.62). There were no significant differences in terms of estimated blood loss and duration of surgery (P=0.08 and P=0.64, respectively). Bile duct injury (BDI) occurred in one patient from each group. The overall hospital stays in Group I were significantly less than in Group II (10.86±3.21 vs 13.29±4.51, P=0.001). Compared with postoperative bile leakage (P=0.72) and postoperative morbidity (P=0.97) and mortality, there were no significant differences between the groups.Conclusions Early LC during the same admission is safe for acute mild biliary pancreatitis and has the advantage of shortening overall hospital stay. There was no significant increase in COC, BDI, and complications.

The Significance of Uvula After Palatoplasty

2017 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 451-455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Elsherbiny ◽  
Ahmed S. Mazeed ◽  
Samia Saied ◽  
John H. Grant
Keyword(s):  
Care Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
New Technique ◽  
Aesthetic Outcome ◽  
Group I ◽  
Aesthetic Results ◽  
Palate Repair ◽  
Group Ii ◽  
A New Technique ◽  
The Aesthetic

Objective: This study aims to examine the importance of the uvula as a part of palatoplasty outcome and to assess the aesthetic results of the conventional versus a new technique for uvuloplasty. Design/Participants: The study included 2 groups of patients undergoing palatoplasty. Group I consisted of 20 cleft palate patients repaired with the conventional uvula repair, combining the 2 hemi-uvulae. Group II consisted of 20 patients repaired with our new technique, sacrificing one hemi-uvula and centralizing the remaining one. The aesthetic outcome was assessed in both groups. A questionnaire was distributed to the families of both groups to assess their concern about the uvula after palate repair. Setting: Cleft unit at a tertiary care center. Results: Sixty-five percent of parents considered the uvula as important functionally and aesthetically after palate repair whereas 35% either did not care or were not sure about its importance. Results of the aesthetic outcome of the 2 techniques for uvula reconstruction showed that uvula was absent in 4 cases in group I versus 1 in group II ( P > .05), small in 8 cases of group I versus 4 in group II ( P > .05), bifid in 5 cases of group I versus none in group II ( P < .05), became deviated in no case of group I versus 4 in group II ( P > .05), and was satisfactory in 3 cases of group I versus 11 in group II ( P < .05). Conclusions: Among the respondents, the uvula was a significant concern to the parents of cleft patients and should be given more attention during repair. The described technique had better aesthetic outcome over the conventional one of combining the 2 hemi-uvulae.

scholarly journals Role of scoring system in prediction of difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 257
Author(s):  
Delie Rhezhii ◽  
Vikas Goyal ◽  
Nitin Nagpal ◽  
Shobhit Kumar Nemma ◽  
Monica Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Bladder Wall ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Gall Stones ◽  
Group I ◽  
Conversion To Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Group Ii

Background: One of the most common reasons for admission to hospital is cholecystectomy and it has a mortality rate of 0.45% to 6%. Many risk factors have been found to be associated laparoscopic cholecystectomy that make it difficult like advance age, male gender, fever, obesity, previous abdominal surgeries, thick gall bladder lining, distention of bladder, presence of gall stones. There have been different scoring systems in literature that determine the risk of conversion to open cholecystectomy. The aim of present study is to determine the role of scoring system in predicting difficult laparoscopic surgery.Methods: The present prospective study was conducted for a period of 1 year in the Department of Surgery at Guru Gobind Singh Medical College, Faridkot, Punjab. The study included all the patients with symptomatic gall stones reporting to the OPD of the hospital. Patients were categorized into two groups after the surgery. Group I included patients who underwent successfully laparoscopic cholecystectomy and group II included those who were converted into an open case. In this study all the entities were provided with a score. Patients with score less than 4 were grouped as difficult. At the end of the study all the data were analyzed to see how scoring system can predict which patients will have easy or difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy based on postoperative scoring. All the data was recorded in a tabulated form and analyzed using SPSS software.Results: The present prospective analytical study involved 112 subjects; out of these 94 were males and 18 females. The mean age of subjects was 48.2±3.7 years. There were 98 patients in Group I and 8 patients in group II who had didn’t show presence of peri cholecystic fluid. There was 1 patient in Group I and 5 patients in group II who had peri cholecystic fluid on ultrasound. There were 104 subjects with gall was thickness less than 4 mm. There were 95 patients in Group I and 9 patients in group II who had who had who had bladder wall thickness of less than 4 mm.Conclusions: The scoring tool evaluated in our study is useful in evaluating the risk of conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy into open cholecystectomy.

scholarly journals Optimal timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (10) ◽  
pp. 3504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rasmiranjan Sahoo ◽  
Debasish Samal ◽  
A. Pradhan ◽  
Rima Sultana ◽  
Nabakishore Nayak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Conversion Rate ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Optimal Timing ◽  
Endoscopic Retrograde ◽  
Early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group Ii

Background: Nowadays in patients with cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis, the ideal treatment is endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographic (ERCP) removal of duct stone and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. But when to do and whether we can do it simultaneously or one after another and what interval should be there, that is always controversial. The purpose was an optimal gap for cholecystectomy after ERCP.Methods: We have done a comparison study in 60 patients within a duration of 2 year who had already done ERCP. Group 1, those patients who had laparoscopic cholecystectomy within 72 hours compared with group 2 who had laparoscopic cholecystectomy after an interval of 6 week. Primary outcome was the conversion rate from lap to open cholecystectomy. Secondary outcome was duration of operation, intra-operative difficulties, postoperative morbidity and hospital stay.Results: Of 60 consecutive patients 30 were in group I and 30 were in group II. There is no difference in demographics, laboratory or ultrasonographic findings. The hospital stays in group I is significantly shorter than group II and conversion rate; operative time is higher in group II. No statistically significant difference in post-operative morbidity between both groups.Conclusions: Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy within 72 hr is better than interval (6 week) cholecystectomy after ERCP with shorter hospital stay and less intraoperative difficulties.

scholarly journals Role of dinoprostone gel in induction of labour

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 1017
Author(s):  
Meet S. Patel ◽  
Shashwat K. Jani ◽  
Babulal S. Patel ◽  
Akshay C. Shah
Keyword(s):  
Care Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Neonatal Morbidity ◽  
Induction Of Labour ◽  
Labour Induction ◽  
Western India ◽  
Group I ◽  
First Choice ◽  
Acceptable Method ◽  
Group Ii

Background: Labour induction is one of the most common intervention in obstetric practice. A simple application of PGE2 intracervical gel can ripen the cervix effectively and improve Bishop’s score there by helping in successful vaginal delivery. Considering its good performance, the dinoprostone slow-release vaginal insert is the first choice for elective induction of labour in postdate pregnancy and in patients with term pregnancy of premature rupture of membranes.Methods: This was a single year retrospective study conducted in a tertiary care center of western India from May 2019 to May 2020.Results: In group I women who delivered within 24 hours were included, in group II women who required re-instillation were included. The most common indication for induction in both the groups was past dates (accounting for 36.1% in group I and 47.3% in group II). The success rate in group I was 68.1% while in group II was 36.8%.  The rate of cesarean delivery in group I was 25.9%, while in Group II, it was 60.1%. Negligible maternal and neonatal complications were seen in both the groups.  Conclusions: The study showed that intracervical application of prostaglandin E2 is an effective, safe and acceptable method for induction of labor in women with unfavorable cervix and indications for induction. All these effects were achieved without increasing maternal and neonatal morbidity 

scholarly journals Comparison of Two Protocols for Management of Placenta Accreta at a Tertiary Care Center in Pakistan

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-24
Author(s):  
Rubina Izhar ◽  
Samia Husain ◽  
Suhaima Tahir ◽  
Sonia Husain
Keyword(s):  
Placenta Accreta ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Massive Hemorrhage ◽  
Tertiary Care Center ◽  
Group I ◽  
Key Factor ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group Ii ◽  
Placenta Accrete

ABSTRACT Objectives To evaluate the morbidity of placenta accreta when managed by two different protocols. Materials and methods All women with placenta accreta coming to Abbasi Shaheed Hospital were included and divided in two groups. Group I included all women with accreta who were managed by lower segment transverse incision in the year 2013. Group II included all women whose accreta was dealt with classical incision in the year 2014. Morbidity from placenta accreta in all these cases was assessed. Results A total of 4220 deliveries took place during study. Placenta accrete was diagnosed in 24 cases (incidence = 0.0056%). Mean age of patients in group II was 28.58 ± 3.28 years and in group I was 29.75 ± 2.18 years. Blood products were received by 9(75%) patients in group I, and by 1(8.33%) in group II (p = 0.002). Intensive care unit admissions in group I were 75% and 25% in group II (p = 0.014). Renal sequelae occurred in 7 women in group I (58.3%) whereas none were observed in group II (p = 0.002). The mean duration of hospital stay was 9.83 ± 2.95 days in group I and 2.75 ± 1.215 days in group II. Conclusion Prevention of massive hemorrhage is the key factor in reducing maternal morbidity in placenta accreta cases. Clinical significance Dealing with accreta via midline incision in low resource settings leads to reduced morbidity. How to cite this article Izhar R, Husain S, Tahir S, Husain S. Comparison of Two Protocols for Management of Placenta Accreta at a Tertiary Care Center in Pakistan. J South Asian Feder Obst Gynae 2017;9(1):18-24.

scholarly journals Three-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative study at a tertiary care centre in North India

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 426
Author(s):  
Peeyush Kumar ◽  
Anil K. S. Rana
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Return To Work ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Gall Stone ◽  
North India ◽  
Duration Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Conversion Rates ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Duration Of Surgery

Background: Improvement of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC) technique in terms of reduction in size and number of ports is being tried to improve patient satisfaction and outcome. Present study was conducted to evaluate and compare the safety outcome and advantages of three-port and four-port LC. Methods: This prospective study included 90 patients presenting with symptomatic gall stone disease or gall bladder polyp more than 1cm at base. Patients with jaundice and choledocholithiasis were excluded. Patients were divided into two groups: A and B, who underwent three-port and four-port LC respectively. Outcomes of the two groups were assessed and compared in terms of duration of surgery, intra-operative and post-operative variables including rate and nature of complications, conversion rates, post-operative pain, duration of hospital stay, return to work and cosmetic outcome.Results: Statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of Visual Analogue Score for pain at 6 and 24 hours, analgesic requirement, duration of hospital stay and return to work; all being less in the three- port LC group. Cosmetic outcome as perceived by patients was also better in the three-port group. Results of other variables were comparable in the two groups. Conclusions: Three-port procedure is safe and appears to be more cost effective than four-port LC. If LC is performed by an experienced surgeon, it can be started with three ports, if required, a fourth port can be inserted. 

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document