scholarly journals HAK CIPTA SEBAGAI SUATU OBJEK JAMINAN FIDUSIA

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Luh Inggita Dharmapatni

Copyright is the exclusive right of the creator that arise automatically based on the principle of declarative after an invention is embodied in a tangible form without prejudice to the restrictions in accordance with the provisions of the legislation. Copyright can be used as the object of fiduciary cause it has an economic value. Creditors are willing to give the debt to the debtor, if debtor can provide wealth to ensure smooth payment of debts. The object of fiduciary is not controlled by the creditor, but remains dominated by the debtor. There is no physical delivery of goods, only the economic rights of copyright can be transferred. Copyright may be encumbered by fiduciary guarantee provided that the encumbrance be put not over the copyrighted work, but on its economic value. In order to be secured under fiduciary claim, copyright must be registered with the Cirectorate General of Intellectual Property Rights

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-87
Author(s):  
Billy Handiwiyanto ◽  
Wisnu Aryo Dewanto

Intellectual Property Rights consist of various types, one of which is Copyright, Copyright is one of the Intellectual Property Rights that has a broad scope of scope of objects, to the Copyright that is owned, the Author and / or the Copyright Holder get an Exclusive Right on the Work , in which this Exclusive Right consists of 2 (two) types, namely the Moral Right to the Work, and also the Economic Right to the Work. The right to exploit the Work rests with the Author and/or the Copyright Holder of the Work, but there are often violations of the Exclusive Rights in this case the Economic Right which is the Right of the Author and/or the Copyright Holder to obtain economic benefits from the utilization of the Copyright, in which a Work is commercialized without Rights by other Parties who do not have the Right to Commercialize the Work. This study aims to determine the basis of the Liability of those commercializing a Work without Rights, which violates the Exclusive Rights of the Author and/or the Copyright Holder to utilize the Work in order to obtain economic benefits from the Work. This research was conducted using the Normative Jurisdiction research method which examines a problem on the basis of applicable laws and regulations, as well as from views and doctrines in the science of law. The results of this study state that other parties who without the right to commercialize a Work must be held accountable for violating the Exclusive Rights in this case the Exclusive Rights to the Economic Rights of the Author and/or the Copyright Holder.Hak Kekayaan Intelektual terdiri dari berbagai macam jenis, salah satunya Hak Cipta, Hak Cipta merupakan salah satu Hak Kekayaan Intelektual yang memiliki ruang lingkup cakupan obyek yang luas, terhadap Hak Cipta yang dimiliki, Pencipta dan/atau Pemegang Hak Cipta mendapatkan Hak Eksklusif atas Ciptaan tersebut, yang mana Hak Eksklusif ini terdiri dari 2 (dua) macam, yaitu Hak Moral atas Ciptaannya, dan juga Hak Ekonomi atas Ciptaan. Hak untuk mengeksploitasi Ciptaan tersebut terletak pada Pencipta dan/atau Pemegang Hak Cipta dari Ciptaan tersebut, namun seringkali terjadi pelanggaran terhadap Hak Eksklusif yang dalam hal ini ialah Hak Ekonomi yang merupaan Hak dari si Pencipta dan/atau Pemegang Hak Cipta untuk mendapatkan manfaat ekonomi dari pemanfaatan terhadap Hak Cipta tersebut, yang mana suatu Ciptaan dikomersialkan tanpa Hak oleh Pihak lain yang tidak punya Hak untuk Mengkomersialkan Ciptaan tersebut. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dasar Tanggung Gugat dari pihak yang mengkomersialkan suatu Ciptaan tanpa Hak, yang melanggar Hak Eksklusif Pencipta dan/atau Pemegang Hak Cipta untuk memanfaatkan Ciptaan tersebut guna mendapatkan manfaat ekonomi dari Ciptaan tersebut. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan dengan metode penelitian Yuridis Normatif yang mana meneliti suatu masalah dengan dasar peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku, juga dari pandangan-pandangan dan doktrin-doktrin dalam ilmu hukum. Hasil penelitian ini menyatakan bahwa pihak lain yang dengan tanpa hak mengkomersialkan suatu Ciptaan harus bertanggung gugat karena melanggar Hak Eksklusif dalam hal ini Hak Eksklusif terhadap Hak Ekonomi dari Pencipta dan/atau Pemegang Hak Cipta.


to-ra ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 111
Author(s):  
Hulman Panjaitan

Abstract   Copyrightis avery important part of Intellectual Property Rights, especially inthe field of creative works of musicandsong;the infringement is very alarming and serious in Indonesia.Copyright is an exclusive right    or special right which means that other people cannot take advantage of economic rights of creators on his creations without prior approval of the legal creators or copyright holders.The consequence is in each use  of music for commercial businesses and or interests related to business activities/commercial purposessuch ascafes, hotels, restaurant sands of orthmust firstask approval from thecreators or copy right holders on the use of the music creation.   Kata Kunci: Pengggunaan Karya Cipta Tanpa Izin


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Inggrit Fernandes

Batik artwork is one of the treasures of the nation's cultural heritage. Batik artwork is currently experiencing rapid growth. The amount of interest and market demand for this art resulted batik artwork became one of the commodities in the country and abroad. Thus, if the batik artwork is not protected then the future can be assured of a new conflict arises in the realm of intellectual property law. Act No. 28 of 2014 on Copyright has accommodated artwork batik as one of the creations that are protected by law. So that this work of art than as a cultural heritage also have economic value for its creator. Then how the legal protection of the batik artwork yaang not registered? Does this also can be protected? While in the registration of intellectual property rights is a necessity so that it has the force of law to the work produced


2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 155-160
Author(s):  
Ciprian Raul Romiţan

The moral rights represent the legal expression of the relationship between the workand its creator; they precede, survive and exert a permanent influence on the economic rights.Moral rights are independent of economic rights, the author of a work preserving these rightseven after the transfer of its property rights.The right to claim recognition as the author of the work, called in the doctrine as the"right of paternity of the work" is enshrined in art. 10 lit. b) of the law and it is based on theneed to respect the natural connection between the author and his work. The right toauthorship is the most important prerogative that constitutes intellectual property rights ingeneral and consists of recognizing the true author of a scientific, literary or artistic work.


While the Treaty does not affect the existence of intellectual property rights, there are nonetheless circumstances in which the exercise of such rights may be restricted by the prohibitions laid down in the treaty. 2. Article 36 permits exceptions to the free movement of goods only to the extent to which such exceptions are necessary for the purpose of safeguarding the rights that constitute the specific subject-matter of the type of intellectual property in question. Perhaps the main advantage of this formula, apart from the fact that it narrows the scope of the exceptions permitted by Article 36, is that it allows subtle distinctions to be made depending on the type of intellectual property in issue. 3. The exclusive right conferred on the owner of intellectual property is exhausted in relation to the products in question when he puts them into circulation anywhere within the Common Market. Spelt out more fully, ‘the proprietor of an industrial or commercial property right protected by the legislation of a Member State may not rely on that legislation in order to oppose the importation of a product which has lawfully been marketed in another Member State by, or with the consent of, the proprietor of the right himself or person legally or economically dependent on him’. The expression ‘industrial and commercial property’ clearly embraces patents and trademarks. It also extends to such specialised areas as plant breeders’ rights. The court has held that copyright can also be a form of industrial or commercial property because it ‘includes the protection conferred by copyright, especially when exploited commercially in the form of licences capable of affecting distribution in the various Member States of goods incorporating the protected literary or artistic work’. The principle that the Treaty does not affect the existence of industrial and commercial property rights is derived from Article 222 of the treaty. This provides that ‘the treaty shall in no way prejudice the rules in Member States governing the system of property ownership’. Consequently intellectual property rights are unaffected by the provisions of the treaty unless they hinder free movement or offend the rules of competition. In Keurkoop v Nancy Kean (see below) the design of a handbag which was manufactured in Taiwan was registered in the Benelux countries but without the authority of the actual author. In Case 78/70, Deutsche Grammophon v Metro-SB Grossmärkte [1971] ECR 487, [1971] CMLR 631, the European Court stated:


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 193-208
Author(s):  
Darwance Darwance ◽  
Yokotani Yokotani ◽  
Wenni Anggita

Basically, humans are born with different intellectual abilities in processing their thougths and produce somethingfrom that thought. Therefore, it is important to provide protection for the results of thought through the intellectual property rights regime. However, in practice there are still many cases where the intellectual property of a person or agroup or a legal entity is used without prior permission.  This juridical normative research examines fundamental thoughts for the protection of the results of one's thinking which is called intellectual property rights. There are several thoughts which become form the basis for protecting intellectual property rights; they are the natural right protection to reputation that has been built over a long time and quite high cost and also as a form of compensation and encouragement for people to create or find something.With the basic ideas behind the protection of IPR, the protection provided will be maximized, and the results of one's thinking will be more respected, both moral rights and economic rights


SASI ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muchtar Anshary Hamid Labetubun

Intellectual Property Rights basically have economic value. Therefore it is not excessive if the results of human intellectual work are given adequate legal protection. Through this way Intellectual Property Rights will get a decent place as one form of rights that has economic value. E-Book is included as a protected work because it is an adaptation of the initial creation in the form of a book that each has its own copyright after being realized in a real form.


2006 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 153-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ioannis Lianos

The intersection between competition law and intellectual property has been a contentious issue since the very beginnings of European Communities (EC) competition law. Both intellectual property and competition law pursue the aim of enhancing economic welfare and innovation, but their direct objectives seem to be in conflict. Whereas intellectual property focuses on the reward of inventive effort and the inventor’s incentives to innovate by conferring an exclusive right on the use of the invention, competition law emphasises the dissemination of innovation by ensuring diffusion and access.


2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Erman Rajagukguk

Abstract: Intellectual Property Rights and Court Verdicts. Imitating Property rights of others, without his approval is forbidden, because the act is equal to stealing. Adherents of Utilitarianism, Jeremy Bentham stated that the Intellectual Property Rights has economic value. The owner has spent effort and money to find or create something. It is inappropriate to use it without consent of the owner, because it may cause due to people no longer willing to try to find or create something. Keywords: Intellectual Property Rights, Courts Verdicts Abstrak: Hak Milik Intelektual dan Putusan-Putusan Pengadilan. Meniru Hak Milik Intelektual orang lain tanpa persetujuannya adalah perbuatan terlarang, karena perbuatan tersebut sama dengan mencuri. Penganut ajaran Utilitarianism, Jeremy Bentham menyatakan bahwa Hak Milik Intelektual memiliki nilai ekonomi. Pemiliknya telah mengeluarkan tenaga dan biaya untuk menemukan atau mencipta sesuatu. Adalah tidak pantas untuk memakainya tanpa persetujuan pemiliknya, karena hal itu dapat menimbulkan akibat orang tidak mau lagi berusaha menemukan atau menciptakan sesuatu. Kata Kunci: Hak Milik Intelektual, Putusan-Putusan, PengadilanDOI: 10.15408/sjsbs.v1i1.1520


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document