scholarly journals BIAYA TRANSAKSI PADA SISTEM AGRIBISNIS DAN PENGARUHNYA TERHADAP PENDAPATAN USAHATANI UBI KAYU

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-183
Author(s):  
Zulkarnain Zulkarnain ◽  
Wan Abbas Zakaria ◽  
Ktut Murniati ◽  
Rakhmiati Rakhmiati ◽  
Etik Puji Handayani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Tujuan penelitian adalah menganalisis bsarnya biaya transaksi pada sistem agribisnis ubi kayu dan menganalisis pengaruh biaya transaksi terhadap pendapatan ubi kayu di Kabupaten Lampung Tengah. Tempat penelitian di Kecamatan Rumbia Kabupaten Lampung Tengah. Penelitian menggunakan metode survei kepada 141 petani ubi kayu di Kecamatan Rumbia Kabupaten Lampung Tengah yang diambil secara purposive. Analisis menggunakan metode analisis kuantitatif pada Transaction Cost (TrC); Analisis pendapatan; dan Analisis regresi linear berganda. Hasil penelitian (1) biaya transaksi pada sistem agribisnis ubi kayu Rp. 732.725,17/ha/petani/musim (2) pendapatan usahatani ubi kayu sebesar Rp. 10.666.036,03/ha yang artinya usahatani ubi kayu layak untuk terus dikembangkan di Kabupaten Lampung Tengah dan biaya transaksi berpengaruh nyata terhadap pendapatan usahatani ubi kayu

2020 ◽  
pp. 51-81
Author(s):  
D. P. Frolov

The transaction cost economics has accumulated a mass of dogmatic concepts and assertions that have acquired high stability under the influence of path dependence. These include the dogma about transaction costs as frictions, the dogma about the unproductiveness of transactions as a generator of losses, “Stigler—Coase” theorem and the logic of transaction cost minimization, and also the dogma about the priority of institutions providing low-cost transactions. The listed dogmas underlie the prevailing tradition of transactional analysis the frictional paradigm — which, in turn, is the foundation of neo-institutional theory. Therefore, the community of new institutionalists implicitly blocks attempts of a serious revision of this dogmatics. The purpose of the article is to substantiate a post-institutional (alternative to the dominant neo-institutional discourse) value-oriented perspective for the development of transactional studies based on rethinking and combining forgotten theoretical alternatives. Those are Commons’s theory of transactions, Wallis—North’s theory of transaction sector, theory of transaction benefits (T. Sandler, N. Komesar, T. Eggertsson) and Zajac—Olsen’s theory of transaction value. The article provides arguments and examples in favor of broader explanatory possibilities of value-oriented transactional analysis.


2007 ◽  
Vol 158 (12) ◽  
pp. 406-416
Author(s):  
Jon Bingen Sande

The forest industry is riddled with exchange relationships. The parties to exchanges may have diverging goals and interests, but still depend upon each other due to non-redeployable specific assets. Formal and relational contracts may be used to deal with the resulting cooperation problems. This paper proposes a framework based on transaction cost economics and relational exchange theory, and examines to what extent empirical research has found formal and relational contracts to deal with three different governance problems. To that end, I review the results from 32 studies in a range of settings. These studies generally support the view that exchanges characterized by high degrees of specific assets should be supported by formal and relational contracts.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document