When Does Technology Use Enable Network Change in Organizations? A Comparative Study of Feature Use and Shared Affordances

MIS Quarterly ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 749-775 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul M. Leonardi ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (04) ◽  
pp. 1210-1235
Author(s):  
Bert-Jaap Koops ◽  
Bryce Clayton Newell ◽  
Andrew Roberts ◽  
Ivan Škorvánek ◽  
Maša Galič

The criminalization of offensive, privacy-intrusive behavior is an important form of privacy protection. However, few studies exist of visual observation in criminal law. We address this gap by researching when nonconsensual visual observation is deemed harmful enough to trigger criminal sanctions, and on what basis the law construes the “reasonableness of remaining unobserved,” through a nine-country comparative study. We distinguish between voyeurism-centric approaches (focusing largely on nudity and sex) and broader, intrusion-centric approaches (such as observation inside closed spaces). Both approaches explicitly or implicitly reflect “reasonable” privacy expectations, listing criteria for situations in which people can reasonably expect to remain unobserved or unrecorded. We present a framework for criminalizing nonconsensual visual observation, encompassing factors of technology use, place, subject matter, and surreptitiousness, supplemented by factors of intent, identifiability, and counter-indicators to prevent over-criminalization. This framework is relevant for protecting visual aspects of privacy in view of individuals' underlying autonomy interests.


2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 446-456 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camilla Malinowsky ◽  
Louise Nygård ◽  
Rumi Tanemura ◽  
Toru Nagao ◽  
Kazue Noda ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ling Zhang ◽  
Ding Ding ◽  
Lis Neubeck ◽  
Patrick Gallagher ◽  
Glenn Paull ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Barriers to attending cardiac rehabilitation (CR), including cultural and linguistic differences, may be addressed by recent technological developments. However, the feasibility of using these approaches in culturally and linguistically diverse patients is yet to be determined. OBJECTIVE This study aims to assess the use of mobile technologies and features, as well as confidence in utilization across patients speaking different languages at home (ie, English, Mandarin Chinese, and a language other than English and Mandarin [other]) and are both eligible and physically suitable for CR. In addition, the study aims to determine the sociodemographic correlates of the mobile technology/feature use, including language spoken at home in the three groups mentioned above. METHODS This is a descriptive, case matched, comparative study. Age and gender-matched patients speaking English, Mandarin and other languages (n=30/group) eligible for CR were surveyed for their mobile technology and mobile feature use. RESULTS ‘Participants had a mean age of 66.7 years (SD 13, n=90, range 46-95), with 53.3% (48/90) male. The majority (82/90, 91.1%) used at least one technology device, with 87.8% (79/90) using mobile devices, the most common being smartphones (57/90, 63.3%), tablets (28/90, 31.1%), and text/voice-only phones (24/90, 26.7%). More English-speaking participants used computers than Mandarin or “other” language speaking participants (P=.003 and .02) and were more confident in doing so compared to Mandarin-speaking participants (P=.003). More Mandarin-speaking participants used smartphones compared with “other” language speaking participants (P=.03). Most commonly used mobile features were voice calls (77/82, 93.9%), text message (54/82, 65.9%), the internet (39/82, 47.6%), email (36/82, 43.9%), and videoconferencing (Skype or FaceTime [WeChat or QQ] 35/82, 42.7%). Less Mandarin-speaking participants used emails (P=.001) and social media (P=.007) than English-speaking participants. Speaking Mandarin was independently associated with using smartphone, emails, and accessing the web-based medication information (OR 7.238, 95% CI 1.262-41.522; P=.03, OR 0.089, 95% CI 0.016-0.490; P=.006 and OR 0.191, 95% CI 0.037-0.984; P=.05). CONCLUSIONS This study reveals a high usage of mobile technology among CR patients and provides further insights into differences in the technology use across CALD patients in Australia. The findings of this study may inform the design and implementation of future technology-based CR.


Author(s):  
Pramen P. Shrestha ◽  
David R. Shields ◽  
Dozie A. Oparaugo ◽  
Nipesh Pradhananga

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Oliveira Ferreira de Souza ◽  
Éve‐Marie Frigon ◽  
Robert Tremblay‐Laliberté ◽  
Christian Casanova ◽  
Denis Boire

2001 ◽  
Vol 268 (6) ◽  
pp. 1739-1748
Author(s):  
Aitor Hierro ◽  
Jesus M. Arizmendi ◽  
Javier De Las Rivas ◽  
M. Angeles Urbaneja ◽  
Adelina Prado ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Martin ◽  
A. Arjona ◽  
I. Soto ◽  
N. Barquero ◽  
M. Viana ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document