scholarly journals Perbedaan Massa Lemak Antara Pengukuran Skinfold Caliper dengan Bioelectrical Impedance analysis (BIA) pada Atle

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 267-271
Author(s):  
Yanti Ernalia ◽  
Miftah Azrin ◽  
Jessy Latni G
Keyword(s):  
Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis ◽  
Bioelectrical Impedance ◽  
Impedance Analysis ◽  
T Test ◽  
Paired T Test ◽  
Skinfold Caliper

Penelitian mengenai pengukuran massa lemak menggunakan alat Skinfold Caliper (SKF) dan Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) pada atlet sudah banyak dilakukan. Keakuratan metode skinfold caliper tergantung pada teknik pengukuran, keahlian, dan pengalaman dari pengukur, sedangkan metode BIA lebih ringkas, hemat waktu, dan mudah digunakan. Tujuan Penelitian adalah untuk menganalisis perbedaan rata-rata persentase massa lemak tubuh antara menggunakan metode SKF dengan BIA pada atlet binaraga, angkat berat, dan angkat besi.  Desain penelitian crossectional. Data dikumpulkan secara langsung terhadap 30 atlet (21 laki-laki dan 9 orang perempuan). Pengukuran dilakukan dengan mengukur berat badan, tinggi badan, persen lemak tubuh menggunakan BIA, dan SKF. Perbedaan rata-rata persentase lemak tubuh dianalisis menggunakan uji multiple paired t-test. Hasil penelitian menujukkan adanya perbedaan rata- rata persentase lemak tubuh pada atlet menggunakan metode SKF dan BIA. Secara umum dan berdasarkan jenis kelamin, jenis olahraga, dan IMT terdapat perbedaan yang bermakna (p<0,05). Rata- rata persentase massa lemak tubuh menggunakan kaliper skinfold adalah 18,91 sedangkan menggunakan BIA adalah 24, 27. Berurutan persentase lemak tubuh menggunakan metode SKF  pada atlet binaraga, angkat berat, angkat besi, laki-laki, perempuan, status gizi normal, gizi lebih, moderate obes, dan severe obes yaitu : 12,05; 21,77; 17,67;17,31; 22,67;11,75; 17,83; 23,05; dan 34,99. Persentase rata-rata massa lemak tubuh menggunakan metode BIA yaitu 15,34; 28,58; 21,59; 21,99; 29,60; 16,47; 23,69; 29,32; dan 36,00. Kesimpulan penelitian terdapat perbedaan rata- rata persentase lemak tubuh pada atlet menggunakan metode SKF dan BIA secara umum dan berdasarkan jenis kelamin, jenis olahraga, dan IMT, kecuali pada kelompok severe obese Kata Kunci: Atlet, biolelectrical impendance analysis (BIA), gizi, kaliper skinfold, massa lemak tubuh

scholarly journals PENGARUH DIET INDEKS GLIKEMIK TINGGI DAN RENDAH TERHADAP KADAR GLUKOSA DARAH ATLET LARI

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 565-572
Author(s):  
Sarah Djuned ◽  
Fillah Fithra Dieny
Keyword(s):  
Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis ◽  
Bioelectrical Impedance ◽  
Impedance Analysis ◽  
T Test ◽  
Purposive Sampling

Latar Belakang : Salah satu kontributor utama terjadinya kelelahan pada atlet adalah penurunan kadar glukosa darah selama latihan. Diet indeks glikemik dapat memberikan respon yang berbeda terhadap kadar glukosa darah. Tujuan penelitian untuk mengetahui pengaruh diet indeks glikemik tinggi dan rendah terhadap kadar glukosa darah atlet lariMetode : Studi eksperimental pada 18 atlet lari laki-laki usia 15-18 tahun di Persatuan Atletik Purbalingga. Dilakukan skrining VO2max sebelum pengambilan sampel, pengambilan sampel dilakukan secara purposive sampling. Subjek dibagi menjadi dua kelompok : kelompok IG-tinggi dan kelompok IG-rendah. Data yang dikumpulkan meliputi kadar glukosa darah 1 jam sebelum di beri diet IG (KGD 1), kadar glukosa darah 2 jam sebelum diberi diet IG (KGD 2) dan kadar glukosa sesaat setelah latihan (KGD setelah) pengambilan darah melalui vena dan persen lemak tubuh dengan Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis. Subjek menjalankan puasa 10-12 jam, sebelum diberikan intervensi berupa makanan IG tinggi (IG=75), makanan IG rendah (IG=35) dan latihan lari selama 15 menit. Analisis bivariat menggunakan pair t-test dan independent t-testHasil : Rerata usia pada kelompok IG tinggi 15,33 tahun ± 0,50 sedangkan pada IG rendah 15,56 tahun ± 0,72. Rerata persen lemak tubuh pada kelompok IG tinggi 14,98% ± 2,38, sedangkan pada IG rendah 14,76% ± 2,63 . Rerata KGD 1 pada kelompok diet IG tinggi 130,56 mg/dl ± 14,22 dan IG rendah 112,78 mg/dl ± 10,24. Rerata KGD 2  pada kelompok diet IG tinggi 101,2 mg/dl ± 9,40 dan IG rendah 105,78 mg/dl ± 10,20. Rerata KGD setelah pada kelompok diet IG tinggi 83,78 mg/dl ± 10,83 dan IG rendah 97,33 mg/dl ±5,83. Ada pengaruh diet IG terhadap KGD 1 (p < 0,05). Tidak ada pengaruh diet IG terhadap KGD 2 (p > 0,05), dan ada pengaruh diet IG terhadap KGD setelah latihan (p < 0,05). Rerata selisih penurunan KGD 1 dan KGD 2 pada kelompok IG tinggi 29,33 mg/dl + 9,34 dan IG rendah 7 mg/dl + 5,92. Rerata selisih penurunan KGD 2 dan KGD setelah pada kelompok IG tinggi 17,44 mg/dl + 7,61 dan IG rendah 8,44 mg/dl + 5,22.Simpulan : Ada pengaruh diet IG terhadap KGD 1 dan KGD setelah latihan. Penurunan kadar glukosa darah pada kelompok IG rendah lebih kecil dari pada kelompok IG tinggi.

scholarly journals Differentiation of body fat composition between skinfold caliper and bioelectrical impedance analysis methods among professors

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-16
Author(s):  
Leonardo Lubis ◽  
Nicole Ngo Zhe Yiin ◽  
Dimas Erlangga Luftimas
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Body Fat ◽  
Physical Activity Level ◽  
Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis ◽  
Bioelectrical Impedance ◽  
Impedance Analysis ◽  
Activity Level ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Fat Composition ◽  
Skinfold Caliper

Background: Body fat composition which is reflected by body fat percentage (BF%) is one of the important components in disease risk evaluation. Among the methods available to measure BF%, skinfold calipers (SKF) and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) are the most common used. The study is conducted to observe the difference in body fat composition measurement between skinfold caliper and bioelectrical impedance analysis methods among Professors.Method: This study involved 72 UNPAD Professors (50 ♂, 22 ♀) after fitted into criterias. BF% was measured among UNPAD Professors using SKF and BIA. After obtaining agreement by Bland-Altman Plot, the data was analyzed by muliple paired-t test according to gender, physical activity level and BMI categories. Results: The study showed no significant difference in BF% between SKF and BIA in overall population, between gender and physical activity level (p>0.05). For BMI, the only category that showed significant difference in BF% between the 2 methods is obese I group (p=0.001, p>.05).Conclusions: There is no significant difference between SKF and BIA methods according to gender, physical activity levels and BMI categories except for obese I group.

scholarly journals POS-129 BIOELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE ANALYSIS IN DETERMINING BODY COMPOSITION IN SRI LANKAN PATIENTS WITH LUPUS NEPHRITIS

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. S52
Author(s):  
D. BASNAYAKE ◽  
A. Nayanamali ◽  
H. Amarathunga ◽  
N. Erandika ◽  
J. Pathiraja ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Composition ◽  
Lupus Nephritis ◽  
Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis ◽  
Bioelectrical Impedance ◽  
Impedance Analysis ◽  
Sri Lankan

Multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis to assess human body composition

1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (8) ◽  
pp. 1179-1188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sufia Islam ◽  
Iqbal Kabir ◽  
Mohammad A. Wahed ◽  
Michael I. Goran ◽  
Dilip Mahalanabis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Composition ◽  
Human Body ◽  
Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis ◽  
Bioelectrical Impedance ◽  
Impedance Analysis ◽  
Human Body Composition

Relationship between trunk muscle strength and trunk muscle mass and thickness using bioelectrical impedance analysis and ultrasound imaging

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Ryo Miyachi ◽  
Nana Koike ◽  
Suzu Kodama ◽  
Junya Miyazaki
Keyword(s):  
Muscle Strength ◽  
Muscle Mass ◽  
Ultrasound Imaging ◽  
Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis ◽  
Muscle Thickness ◽  
Bioelectrical Impedance ◽  
Impedance Analysis ◽  
Trunk Muscle ◽  
Trunk Muscles ◽  
Trunk Muscle Strength

BACKGROUND: Although trunk muscles are involved in many important functions, evaluating trunk muscle strength is not an easy task. If trunk muscle mass and thickness could be used as indicators of trunk muscle strength, the burden of measurement would be reduced, but the relationship between trunk muscle strength and trunk muscle mass and thickness has not been clarified. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to clarify the relationship between trunk muscle strength and trunk muscle mass by bioelectrical impedance analysis and trunk muscle thickness by ultrasound imaging in healthy adults. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-one healthy university students were included in this study. Trunk flexion/extension muscle strength and trunk muscle mass by bioelectrical impedance analysis, and trunk muscle thickness by ultrasound imaging were measured. RESULTS: Both trunk flexion strength and trunk extension strength were significantly correlated with trunk muscle mass and oblique and rectus abdominis muscle thickness. Multiple regression analysis showed that trunk extension muscle strength had an independent relationship with trunk muscle mass. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that trunk muscle mass or trunk muscle thickness can be used as an alternative means for evaluating trunk muscle strength, making the evaluation of trunk muscles less burdensome.

scholarly journals "Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis in Managing Sarcopenic Obesity in NAFLD"

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Hanna ◽  
Scott T. Jamieson ◽  
Christine S. Lee ◽  
Christopher A. Pluskota ◽  
Nicole J. Bressler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis ◽  
Bioelectrical Impedance ◽  
Impedance Analysis ◽  
Sarcopenic Obesity
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document