REQUIREMENTS FOR INCOMPATIBILITY OF A JUDGE POSITION WITH OTHER TYPES OF ACTIVITY: COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL ASPECT

Author(s):  
Mariana Khmyz ◽  

The article reveals the requirements for the incompatibility of the position of a judge with other activities in the comparative constitutional and legal aspect. It is determined that the requirements for incompatibility of a judge's position with other activities in Ukraine are regulated by the Constitution of Ukraine, the Law of Ukraine «On the Judiciary and the Status of Judges», the Law of Ukraine «On Purification of Power», the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Rules of Court adopted by the Council of Europe and the European Court of Human Rights, the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, the General (Universal) Charter of Judges. It is established that the legislative and constitutional requirements for judges stipulate that judges must meet high moral, ethical and professional standards. It has been established that persons may not engage in administrative, political or professional activities during their tenure as judges, which is incompatible with their impartiality, independence or the requirements for permanent performance of their duties. It is determined that while in the position of a judge, it is not allowed to engage in other activities, in particular, to carry out activities in other public authorities, local governments or activities related to the representative mandate. It has been proved that a judge cannot combine the activities defined by the position of a judge with advocacy and business activities. It was found that judges are prohibited by law from holding paid positions and performing paid work, except for teaching, research or creative work. It is established that a judge has no right to be a member of the governing of the body or supervisory board of an enterprise or organization whose main purpose is to make a profit. It is determined that a judge has no right to belong to a political party or trade union, as well as to show support for such a party or union. It has been proven that judges are prohibited from participating in election campaigns, political rallies, rallies or strikes. It was found that the judge is obliged to comply with the requirements for incompatibility established by the legislation of Ukraine in the direction of preventing and combating corruption. It is determined that a judge has the right to activities related to the administration of justice, to participate in judicial self-government, to membership in national or international associations, as well as in other organizations that operate to protect the interests of judges, increase the authority of the judiciary, in society or for the development of legal science and profession, for the formation of public associations, as well as for participation in the activities of such associations in order to protect their rights and interests, as well as to improve the level of professionalism and skills. It is proposed, in the future of the following studies, to reveal the grounds for dismissing a judge from office in a comparative constitutional and legal aspect.

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 271
Author(s):  
LL.M. Egzonis Hajdari

The right to inheritance represents one of the basic human rights. As such this right is regulated by the law. The Law on Inheritance in Kosovo regulates substantially, all the issues related to inheritance. In this context, this Law contains numerous rules that proclaim full equality of women with men to inheritance.Regardless of equality proclaimed by law practical reality of life indicates a different situation. This reality proves that women participation to inheritance nevertheless is very small. The reasons for this situation are numerous and diverse, but mostly they have to deal with the still existence in people's conscience of many customary rules, which constantly treated women as a subject of second hand. In this article a modest attempt is made to reflect besides legal aspect also the practical situation indicating the degree of women participation to inheritance in Kosovo, in all grades that she may appear as heir.


Author(s):  
Oleh Kyrychenko ◽  
Hanna Davlyetova

The article examines the constitutional practice of normative regulation of the right to appeal to public authorities and local governments, enshrined in Art. 40 of the Constitution of Ukraine and in similar norms of the constitutions of European states. The necessity of stating the specified norm in the new edition is substantiated. The right to appeal to public authorities and local governments, their officials and officials occupies a special place in the human rights system and is one of the most important organizational and legal forms of public participation in the socio-political life of the country and providing citizens of Ukraine with opportunities to defend their rights. legitimate interests, restoring them in case of violation. The study of the essence of this right gives grounds to state that the appeal by its nature has a dual meaning: first, it is one of the means of protecting human rights and legitimate interests violated by the actions or inaction of public authorities and local governments; secondly, the appeal is a signal of shortcomings in the work of public authorities and local governments. From the content of Art. 40 of the Constitution of Ukraine, it follows that both citizens of Ukraine and persons who are not citizens of Ukraine, but are legally on the territory of Ukraine, and who are marked in the text by the term "all" have constitutional legal personality. By the way, the term "all" is used only in Art. 40 of the Constitution of Ukraine, and therefore it is not clear whether it belongs to the category of subjects of "all people", as enshrined in Art. 21, or to the category of subjects of "all citizens". At the same time, in similar norms of the constitutions of European states, various impersonal terms are used to denote the subject of this right - "everyone", "citizens", "every citizen", "all citizens" and "every person". In connection with the above and in order to unify legal terminology, we believe that in Art. 40 of the Constitution of Ukraine, it would be more appropriate to use, instead of the term «all», the term «eve-ryone», which, in our opinion, covers all categories of subjects of the right to appeal regardless of their legal status and is more in line with European experience in constitutional regulation of the studied law. It should be emphasized that the necessary guarantee of realization of the investigated right is the duty of obligated subjects, ie public authorities, local governments and their officials and officials, to timely and objectively consider the appeal and provide a reasoned response to the merits of the appeal. the term established by the law. A similar provision is enshrined in the constitutions of Azerbaijan, Albania, Belarus, Armenia, Greece, Liechtenstein, Macedonia, Poland, Serbia, Turkey, Croatia, and Montenegro. In this regard, we propose a phrase that is enshrined in Art. 40 of the Constitution of Ukraine: "are obliged to consider the appeal and give a reasoned response within the period prescribed by law" to state in an updated version. In addition, we believe that this article should specify the obligation of these bodies and their officials and officials to take the necessary measures to exercise this right, which will give the subjects of appeal grounds to appeal, including in court , actions or inaction of officials and officials of state bodies and local governments. Therefore, in view of the above and taking into account the European experience in regulating the constitutional right to appeal, we propose Art. 40 of the Constitution of Ukraine to state in new edition: "Everyone has the right to submit individual or collective appeals or to personally address state authorities, local governments and their officials and officials, who are obliged to take the necessary measures and provide a reasoned written response within the period prescribed by law."


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 12-17
Author(s):  
Vladyslav Buryi

This article presents a comparative analysis of the provisions of the Constitution of Ukraine and the Law of Ukraine “On Court Fees”.The author emphasizes that the Constitution of Ukraine establishes an axiological basis for the legal regulation of the court fees and, at the same time, defines the relevant categories of cases, access to judicial protection in which should not be the subject to significant restrictions or should not be limited at all, namely in the cases of: challenging the decisions, actions or omissions of public authorities, local governments and officials; protection of the right to own property; protection of honour and dignity and business reputation; free access to the information about the state of the environment, the quality of food and household items, and others. The court fee in the constitutional justice is also singled out, which is substantiated by the special procedural and essential nature of the constitutional complaint. The author disputes the possibility of implementation of the court fee for filing a constitutional complaint, the doubtfulness of which is explained by the normative form of the constitutional complaint that does not provide a direct review of the court decision. Emphasis is placed on the provisions of the Constitution, which support the need to reform the existing concept of regulation of court fees, in particular the change in access to appeals and cassation appeals from progressive to the regressive court fee rate. It is emphasized that the Law of Ukraine “On Court Fees” does not fully comply with the Constitution of Ukraine. It is concluded that the Constitution of Ukraine provides the individualization of the amount of court fees that should depend on the stage of the proceedings, the category of the case, and the relevant range of entities that should be exempt from the court fees.


Author(s):  
Yaroslav Skoromnyy ◽  

The article presents the conceptual foundations of bringing judges to civil and legal liability. It was found that the civil and legal liability of judges is one of the types of legal liability of judges. It is determined that the legislation of Ukraine provides for a clearly delineated list of the main cases (grounds) for which the state is liable for damages for damage caused to a legal entity and an individual by illegal actions of a judge as a result of the administration of justice. It has been proved that bringing judges to civil and legal liability, in particular on the basis of the right of recourse, provides for the payment of just compensation in accordance with the decision of the European Court of Human Rights. It was established that the bringing of judges to civil and legal liability in Ukraine is regulated by such legislative documents as the Constitution of Ukraine, the Civil Code of Ukraine, the Explanatory Note to the European Charter on the Status of Judges (Model Code), the Law of Ukraine «On the Judicial System and the Status of Judges», the Law of Ukraine «On the procedure for compensation for harm caused to a citizen by illegal actions of bodies carrying out operational-search activities, pre-trial investigation bodies, prosecutors and courts», Decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine in the case on the constitutional submission of the Supreme Court of Ukraine regarding the compliance of the Constitution of Ukraine (constitutionality) of certain provisions of Article 2, paragraph two of clause II «Final and transitional provisions» of the Law of Ukraine «On measures to legislatively ensure the reform of the pension system», Article 138 of the Law of Ukraine «On the judicial system and the status of judges» (the case on changes in the conditions for the payment of pensions and monthly living known salaries of judges lagging behind in these), the Law of Ukraine «On the implementation of decisions and the application of the practice of the European Court of Human Rights».


Author(s):  
Carla Ferstman

This chapter considers the consequences of breaches of human rights and international humanitarian law for the responsible international organizations. It concentrates on the obligations owed to injured individuals. The obligation to make reparation arises automatically from a finding of responsibility and is an obligation of result. I analyse who has this obligation, to whom it is owed, and what it entails. I also consider the right of individuals to procedures by which they may vindicate their right to a remedy and the right of access to a court that may be implied from certain human rights treaties. In tandem, I consider the relationship between those obligations and individuals’ rights under international law. An overarching issue is how the law of responsibility intersects with the specialized regimes of human rights and international humanitarian law and particularly, their application to individuals.


2003 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 297-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Voyiakis

This comment discusses three recent judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in the cases of McElhinney v Ireland, Al-Adsani v UK, and Fogarty v UK. All three applications concerned the dismissal by the courts of the respondent States of claims against a third State on the ground of that State's immunity from suit. They thus raised important questions about the relation the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention)—especially the right to a fair trial and access to court enshrined in Arcticle 6(1)—and the law of State immunity.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ewan McGaughey

Will the internet, robotics and artificial intelligence mean a ‘jobless future’? A recent narrative, endorsed by prominent tech-billionaires, says we face mass unemployment, and we need a basic income. In contrast, this article shows why the law can achieve full employment with fair incomes, and holidays with pay. Universal human rights, including the right to ‘share in scientific advancement and its benefits’, set the proper guiding principles. Three distinct views of the causes of unemployment are that it is a ‘natural’ phenomenon, that technology may propel it, or that it is social and legal choice: to let capital owners restrict investment in jobs. Only the third view has any credible evidence to support it. Technology may create redundancies, but unemployment is an entirely social phenomenon. After World War Two, 42% of UK jobs were redundant but social policy maintained full employment, and it can be done again. This said, transition to new technology, when markets are left alone, can be exceedingly slow: a staggering 88% of American horses lost their jobs after the Model T Ford, but only over 45 years. Taking lessons from history, it is clear that unemployment is driven by inequality of wealth and of votes in the economy. To uphold human rights, governments should reprogramme the law, for full employment, fair incomes and reduced working time, on a living planet. Robot owners will not automate your job away, if we defend economic democracy.


Author(s):  
Ion Tutuianu

By its age and principles, Babylonian law has drawn attention of all epochs, laying at the basis of scientific development of modern law. The regulation, more than 4000 years ago, of property, family, obligations, public administration, succession, probation principle, represents the proof that the institutions which today regulate these aspects, have been a preoccupation for mankind ever since its beginning. Even if penalties were distributed depending on social status, a progressive element is represented by the fact that the act could only be punished if it met the condition of intent. The legal monument of this system of law, Hammurabi Code, has an important signification by the fact that upon that date, the law and the judges aimed at ensuring life to citizens and to guarantee them certain rights, considerably more than other countries in the epoch. It is striking that in antiquity, the right of succession lies all the children regardless of the number of marriages and criminal aspect beyond class character, crimes regulation retained the substance, the changes incurred on penalties take into account the evolution of human rights, as how malpractice mutilation was replaced by pecuniary or administrative penalty.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (IV) ◽  
pp. 34-42
Author(s):  
Dr. Ram Charan Meena,

Persons with disabilities have the right to enjoy the human rights to life, liberty, equality, security and dignity as human beings. However, due to social apathy, psychological barriers, a limited definition of “disability” entitled to the protection of the law and lack of proper data, persons with disabilities in India remain an invisible category. Although many laws set out to ensure their full and effective participation in society, they remain inadequate as they are based primarily on the discretion of the government. Also, the judiciary acts as the real protector of persons with disabilities whenever an opportunity arises, but it is not possible to approach the judiciary for every request. Unless the foundation of the law is strengthened, persons with disabilities cannot fully exercise their rights. The present research paper mentions the contemporary situation of people with disabilities with the current laws and concepts, and also the researcher believes that it is not only the law that will provide a solution to this problem, it is the change in the outlook of the society which may provide a solution to this problem. Thus, the horizons of the law should be expanded to provide a “human friendly environment” for all persons with disabilities to remove the barriers that impede their development. With timely implementation the time has come for effective legislation to protect their interests and empower their capabilities which are based on “rights–based approach” rather than charity, medical or social approach.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 29-31
Author(s):  
Andrey Yu. Klyuchnikov ◽  
◽  
Vladimir S. Kruzhilin ◽  

The article is devoted to the study of the right to effective management recognized by the international justice as a complex interdisciplinary institution affecting the functioning of public authorities and local self-government, officials and courts. The authors study the principles of the right to effective management, the powers granted to persons in connection with the action of the Institute, taking into account the practice of the ECHR.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document