scholarly journals Recommandations de pratique de la Société internationale de dialyse péritonéale: prescrire une dialyse péritonéale de haute qualité dirigée par un objectif

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-18
Author(s):  
Max Dratwa ◽  
Christian Verger
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Open Access ◽  
International Society ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Creative Commons ◽  
Practice Recommendations

En Janvier 2020 la Société Internationale de Dialyse Péritonéale a publié en "open access" ses dernières recommandations pour prescrire une dialyse péritonéale de haute qualité dirigée par un objectif . Ces recommandations sont un guide important pour les équipes médicales, infirmières de tous les pays.  Elles sont d'emblée traduite en pluiseurs langus afin d'assurer la meilleure diffusion possible. Comme lors de précédents récommandations  le Registre de Dialyse Péritonéale de Langue Française  (RDPLF) a assuré la traduction de ce texte. Pour toute référence dans une publication, il est indispensable que seul le texte original soit cité :International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis practice recommendations: Prescribing high-quality goal-directed peritoneal dialysisEdwina A Brown, Peter G Blake, Neil Boudville et al. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0896860819895364Au nom de la communauté néphrologique francophone nous remercions chaleureusement l'ISPD de nous avoir accordé l'autorisation de réaliser cette traduction. Cette traduction adhère au copyright de la version originale anglaise. Ce(tte) œuvre est mise à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.

scholarly journals International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis practice recommendations: Prescribing high-quality goal-directed peritoneal dialysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 244-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edwina A Brown ◽  
Peter G Blake ◽  
Neil Boudville ◽  
Simon Davies ◽  
Javier de Arteaga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
International Society ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Practice Recommendations

scholarly journals KDOQI US Commentary on the 2020 ISPD Practice Recommendations for Prescribing High-Quality Goal-Directed Peritoneal Dialysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isaac Teitelbaum ◽  
Joel Glickman ◽  
Alicia Neu ◽  
Joanna Neumann ◽  
Matthew B. Rivara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Practice Recommendations

scholarly journals Créer et maintenir un accès péritonéal optimal chez les patients adultes : mise à jour 2019

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-116
Author(s):  
Max Dratwa ◽  
Christian Verger
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Open Access ◽  
Adult Patient ◽  
Dialysis Access ◽  
Creative Commons ◽  
Langue Maternelle

En avril 2019 la Société Internationale de Dialyse Péritonéale a publié en "open access" ses dernières recommandations pour créer et maintenir un abord péritonéal optimal chez les patients adultes. Ces recommandations sont un guide important pour les équipes médicales, infirmières et chirurgicales de tous les pays. Afin d'assurer la meilleure diffusion possible auprès des francophones qui se sentent plus à l'aise avec un texte dans leur langue maternelle, le Registre de Dialyse Péritonéale de Langue Française a assuré la traduction de ce texte. Pour toute référence dans une publication, il est indispensable que seul le texte original qui soit cité :ISPD Guidelines/recommendationsCreating and maintaining optimal peritoneal dialysis access in the adult patient : 2019 update.John H. Crabtree et al. Peritoneal Dialysis International. https://doi.org/10.3747/pdi.2018.00232Au nom de la communauté néphrologique francophone nous remercions chaleureusement l'ISPD de nous avoir accordé l'autorisation de réaliser cette traduction. Cette traduction adhère au copyright de la version originale anglaise. Ce(tte) œuvre est mise à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.

International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis Practice Recommendations: The view of the person who is doing or who has done peritoneal dialysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 349-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard W Corbett ◽  
George Goodlet ◽  
Brian MacLaren ◽  
Anne Jolliffe ◽  
Ann Joseph ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
International Society ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Practice Recommendations ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
The Voice ◽  
Medical Perspective ◽  
Selection Of

The 2019 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD) Practice Recommendations were prepared by a committee invited by the ISPD to develop new practice recommendations for prescribing high-quality, goal-directed peritoneal dialysis (PD). Further input was sought at the stage of the first draft of the proposed recommendations by circulating drafts of the recommendations and articles to an international selection of people who were either actively doing PD or who were previously treated with PD, as well as caregivers, to ask for their feedback. A diverse group of 22 people from 8 countries across 5 continents provided their feedback covering the main recommendations as well as the accompanying articles. Much of the feedback has been acted upon at the revision stages, however, the responses are published here in summary form to underscore the commitment to hearing the voice of those doing PD or caring for them. A key change that arose from the feedback has been the shift of language from “patient-centred” to “person-centered,” reflecting the desire of these recommendations to address the patient as a person with needs and preferences beyond just the medical perspective, along with the need for the person doing PD to be central to the process of shared decision-making. Notwithstanding the challenges of an international, multi-lingual population, with people doing PD in highly diverse geographic and economic environments, the next iteration of ISPD guidelines should consider the role of people doing PD and their carers in evidence-based coproduced guidelines, from the inception of the guidelines.

PEDAGOGY AND MODERN EDUCATION (ICPME) September 2019: сб.науч.тр./ RELF Group & OEAPS Inc.; редкол.: Каапо Кумпулайнен (отв.ред.) [и др.]. - Варшава, Польша : OEAPS Inc., 09. 2019. - 114 С. ISBN: 978-1697070392

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Гульдар Фанисовна Ибрагимова ◽  
Ольга Алексеевна Ковалевич ◽  
Раиса Николаевна Афонина ◽  
Елена Алексеевна Лесных ◽  
Яна Игоревна Ряполова ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Open Access Publishing ◽  
Impact Factors ◽  
Publication Ethics ◽  
European Academy ◽  
Creative Commons ◽  
Authorship Credit ◽  
Open Access Journals ◽  
Publishing Ethics ◽  
Article Processing Charges

Conference paper Covered by Leading Indexing DatabasesOpen European Academy of Public Sciences aims to have all of its journals covered by the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) and Scopus and Web of Science indexing systems. Several journals have already been covered by SCIE for several years and have received official Impact Factors. Some life sciencerelated journals are also covered by PubMed/MEDLINE and archived through PubMed Central (PMC). All of our journals are archived with the Spanish and Germany National Library.All Content is Open Access and Free for Readers Journals published by Open European Academy of Public Sciences are fully open access: research articles, reviews or any other content on this platform is available to everyone free of charge. To be able to provide open access journals, we finance publication through article processing charges (APC); these are usually covered by the authors’ institutes or research funding bodies. We offer access to science and the latest research to readers for free. All of our content is published in open access and distributed under a Creative Commons License, which means published articles can be freely shared and the content reused, upon proper attribution.Open European Academy of Public Sciences Publication Ethics StatementOpen European Academy of Public Sciences is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Open European Academy of Public Sciences takes the responsibility to enforce a rigorous peerreview together with strict ethical policies and standards to ensure to add high quality scientific works to the field of scholarly publication. Unfortunately, cases of plagiarism, data falsification, inappropriate authorship credit, and the like, do arise. Open European Academy of Public Sciences takes such publishing ethics issues very seriously and our editors are trained to proceed in such cases with a zero tolerance policy. To verify the originality of content submitted to our journals, we use iThenticate to check submissions against previous publications.Mission and ValuesAs a pioneer of academic open access publishing, we serve the scientific community since 2009. Our aim is to foster scientific exchange in all forms, across all disciplines. In addition to being at the root of Open European Academy of Public Sciences and a key theme in our journals, we support sustainability by ensuring the longterm preservation of published papers, and the future of science through partnerships, sponsorships and awards.

scholarly journals Erratum to: Voltage-gated Sodium Channels and Blockers: An Overview and Where Will They Go?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhi-mei Li ◽  
Li-xia Chen ◽  
Hua Li
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Sodium Channels ◽  
Voltage Gated ◽  
Internet Portal ◽  
Creative Commons ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Voltage Gated Sodium Channels

The article “Voltage-gated Sodium Channels and Blockers: An Overview and Where Will They Go?”, written by Zhi-mei LI, Li-xia CHEN, Hua LI, was originally published electronically on the publisher’s internet portal on December 2019 without open access. With the author(s)’ decision to opt for Open Choice, the copyright of the article is changed to © The Author(s) 2020 and the article is forthwith distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The original article has been corrected.Corresponding authors: Li-xia CHEN, Hua LI

scholarly journals Correction to: One-dimensional drift-flux correlations for two-phase flow in medium-size channels

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Hibiki
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Two Phase Flow ◽  
Medium Size ◽  
Phase Flow ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
One Dimensional ◽  
Open Access Publication ◽  
Internet Portal ◽  
Creative Commons ◽  
Drift Flux

The article “One-dimensional drift-flux correlations for two-phase flow in medium-size channels” written by Takashi Hibiki, was originally published electronically on the publisher’s internet portal (currently SpringerLink) on 17 April 2019 without open access. After publication in Volume 1, Issue 2, page 85–100, the author(s) decided to opt for Open Choice and to make the article an open access publication. Therefore, the copyright of the article has been changed to © The Author(s) 2020 and the article is forthwith distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

scholarly journals Presenter: Werner Paulus, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster. Publishing A High-quality, Non-commercial Neuropathology Journal Without a Publisher: The First Nine Months

2021 ◽  
Vol 48 (s2) ◽  
pp. S11-S11
Author(s):  
Marta Margeta ◽  
Peter Gould ◽  
Lili-Naz Hazrati ◽  
Veronica Hirsch-Reinshagen ◽  
Werner Paulus
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Driving Forces ◽  
Scholarly Communication ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Website Design ◽  
Final Decision ◽  
List Type ◽  
Ethical Challenges ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Commercial Publishing

Scholarly communication faces increasing economical and ethical challenges, including pricing policies and overbearing behavior of commercial publishing houses. Based on the hypothesis that a diamond open access neuropathology journal of a high scientific and technical quality can be run entirely by neuropathologists, we launched Free Neuropathology (FNP; freeneuropathology.org) in January 2020. Classical publisher activities, such as copyediting, layout, website maintenance, and journal promotion, are undertaken by neuropathologists and neuroscientists using free open access software. The journal is free for both readers and authors, and papers are published under a Creative Commons BY SA licence, where copyright remains with the authors. Based on 26 articles published by August 2020, it takes FNP 11.1 days from submission to first, and 19.9 days to final, decision. High-quality copyediting, layout, and online publishing in the final format is accomplished in only 8 days. Absence of a commercial publisher enables prioritization of democratic and scientifically-driven decisions on editorial structure, website design, journal promotion, paper formatting, special article series, and number of accepted papers. This new model of journal publishing, which returns the control of scholarly communication to scientists, will be of interest to neuropathologists and wider scientific community alike.Learning ObjectivesSummarize the current state and driving forces behind commercial and non-commercial scientific publishing in neuropathology.Describe the advantages and challenges of a non-commercial publishing platform for neuropathology.

scholarly journals Is Access Enough? Interrogating the Influence of Money and Power in Shaping Information

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-38
Author(s):  
Heather Brodie Perry
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Critical Evaluation ◽  
Access To Information ◽  
Power Structures ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Information Power ◽  
Complex Information ◽  
Community Information ◽  
Truth Claims ◽  
Information Consumers

AbstractAccess to information encourages innovation and leads to participation in society of individuals. The emergence of Open Access supports the inclusion of all, including the voices of the traditionally marginalized, yet access alone is insufficient to enable consumers to effectively use information. Power structures can influence the information available and silence opposing viewpoints. Industry disinformation can influence viewpoints and shape policy in ways that can be detrimental to individuals and the community. Information consumers may not possess the competence required to navigate the complex information ecosystem to find the accurate, high-quality, resources required to meet their need. Libraries have a role in assisting consumers develop the critical evaluation capabilities essential to the exercise of informed skepticism when evaluating truth claims. Access is essential; however, without the knowledge to determine the quality and validity of information, a consumer can be misled in ways that can cause harm to themselves and society.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document