Impact of treatment decisions and significance of cultural beliefs in predicting quality of life of Chinese infertile women

Author(s):  
Michelle Yi Jun Tam
2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 238-244
Author(s):  
Cristina Zarbo ◽  
Agostino Brugnera ◽  
Rita Secomandi ◽  
Ilario Candeloro ◽  
Chiara Malandrino ◽  
...  

Objective: Infertility has a severe impact on quality of life and mental health. This condition could be exacerbated by the existence of comorbid medical disease, like endometriosis. The aim of this critical narrative review is the examination of the state of the art about the quality of life and mental health in infertile women with endometriosis. Methods: We performed a rigorous and systematic search for studies on multiple electronic databases. A total of 6 papers were included in the review and were subjected to interpretative and critical narrative synthesis. Results and Discussion: Major findings are resumed in the following points: (a) infertile women with endometriosis when compared to infertile ones without endometriosis show higher depression, stress perception, and anxiety, and lower general quality of life; (b) quality of life specifically related to infertility is similar among women with and without endometriosis and seems to be related to personality and beliefs factors; (c) giving birth to a child is related to better mental quality of life; (d) during assisted reproductive treatment (ART) stimulation, infertile women with endometriosis have a decrease of dysmenorrhea and dyspareunia; (e) satisfaction of ART is related to the number of attempts, treatment accomplishment and pregnancy test outcomes. Clinical implications of these findings and suggestions for future researches were discussed. Conclusion: Concluding, it is crucial to assess the psychological factors related to endometriosis and infertility to reduce the impact of these diseases on quality of life and mental health, provide adequate support to these patients, improve their satisfaction and increase the change to get pregnant.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (23) ◽  
Author(s):  
Siddharth R ◽  
Dr. Nisha B ◽  
Dr. Timsi Jain ◽  
Dr. Anantha Eashwar ◽  
Dr Ruma Dutta

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Jisha M. ◽  
Dr Assuma Beevi.T. M.

Introduction: Psychological and social effects of infertility may cause decline in the quality of life of infertile couples. A cross sectional study was conducted among 100 infertile couples, to find out the association between level of stress, anxiety and depression with their quality of life. Materials and methods: Data was collected using demographic and fertility information questionnaire, depression anxiety and stress scale (DASS-42) and fertility quality of life (fertiQol-malayalam). Results: Infertile couples experiences higher levels of depression, anxiety and stress and it is more among women,(depression-(15.36 +_ 9.23), stress(16.3+-7.52) anxiety (9.36+_6.33) than men (depression(12.52+_10.30 )(P=0.030), stress(12.84+_ 7.94 )(P=0-002 ) anxiety(7.50+_5-55). Levels of depression, anxiety and stress have significant negative relation with their quality of life. Infertile women has significantly lower quality of life (P= 0.002) than men. Conclusion: Interventions, to reduce depression, anxiety and stress among infertile couples may be helpful to improve their quality of life.


2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
N Uriart. Beitia ◽  
P Guerr. Mora ◽  
M Penad. Abilleira

Abstract Study question Are there any differences relating to the perceived quality of life (QoL) and sexual satisfaction among infertile women? Summary answer There were no differences between women who already had a baby and those who did not relating to the perceived QoL and sexual satisfaction. What is known already Infertility is a medical disease with a high social component with a 16% prevalence. There have been many investigations regarding to the physical part of the infertility but the sexual and marital satisfaction has not been as intensively investigated. The importance of the psychological counseling in fertility treatments has already been proven, but the significance of sexual satisfaction on individual’s perception on QoL has not been as deeply studied. Study design, size, duration A transversal descriptive study was done. 313 heterosexual married women with fertility problems were recruited in collaboration with the Spanish patient association “Red Nacional de Infértiles”. The Fertility quality of life tool (FertiQoL) was selected to measure the perceived QoL and the Index of Sexual Satisfaction (ISS) was chosen to study the degree of sexual satisfaction. The data collection was made between January and February 2020 and all the information was gathered online. Participants/materials, setting, methods 313 women filled the questionnaire which had 4 different modules: A sociodemographic module (sex, age, studies, time trying to conceive, moment of treatment and offspring), two modules for each measurement instrument and a last module in which they could write their personal experiences regarding to the infertility journey. ANOVA and t-Student statistical analyses were done to compare the different independent variables. To see if FertiQoL could explain the sexual satisfaction a regression analysis was made. Main results and the role of chance To achieve 95% power (α = 0.05) and an effect size of 0.25, a minimum sample size of 210 was needed and a sample of 313 women was recruited. There were no statistical differences between women with previous offspring and those who did not in neither of the FertiQoL subscales (Emotional: 7,4 ± 3,884 vs. 7,34 ± 4,235; Mind/Body: 9,65 ± 5,098 vs. 8,66 ± 4,979; Relational: 16,88 ± 4,807 vs. 16,3 ± 4,956; Social: 10,52 ± 5,02 vs. 10,1 ± 4,801; Tolerability: 5,91 ± 4,114 vs. 6,65 ± 3,357; Environment: 12,71 ± 5,02 vs. 11,42 ± 4,963) nor in the ISS questionnaire (47,48 ± 6,488 vs. 47,22 ± 7,35). Regarding to the power of the FertiQoL instrument and the perceived QoL to predict the sexual satisfaction, the regression model showed that the sexual satisfaction could be explained in 26,3% of the cases by the relational and mind/body subscales of the FertiQol tool. This model showed the inherent relationship between marital and personal wellbeing in order to obtain a better sexual satisfaction. Limitations, reasons for caution As the study had a transversal design, no cause-effect relationships could be done. It would be desirable to establish a longitudinal study in order to determine a more accurate relationship between the studied variables. Wider implications of the findings: This study showed that the impact of infertility in women with secondary infertility diagnose could be at least as high as in women with primary infertility diagnose. FertiQoL would be a reasonable instrument to estimate the sexual satisfaction of infertile women. Sexology should be part of the infertility counselling programs. Trial registration number Not applicable


BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. e026595 ◽  
Author(s):  
Billingsley Kaambwa ◽  
Hailay Gesesew ◽  
Matthew Horsfall ◽  
Derek P Chew

IntroductionPercutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) and coronary angiography are two of the treatments administered to acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. However, whether and how patients’ health-related quality of life (HRQoL) influences treatment decisions and subsequent risk benefit analyses is unclear. In this study, we will review the available evidence on the impact of patients’ HRQoL on physicians’ prescribing or treatment decisions and on the estimation of mortality and bleeding risk in ACS patients.Methods and analysisWe will undertake a systematic review of all quantitative and qualitative studies. The search will include studies that describe the impact of HRQoL on prescribing PCIs or angiography, and impact of HRQoL on perceived risks in terms of mortality and bleeding events. We will conduct an initial search on Google scholar and MEDLINE to build the searching terms followed by a full search strategy using all identified keywords and index terms across the five databases, namely MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, SCOPUS and Web of Sciences. We will use the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for protocol guidelines to present the protocol. Only English language articles will be included for the review. We will use a standardised Joanna Briggs Institute data extraction tool to synthesise the information extracted from the selected studies into themes with summary findings presented in a table.Ethics and disseminationWe will not require a formal ethical approval as we will not be collecting primary data. Review findings will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication, workshops, conference presentations and a media release.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018108438.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S54-S54
Author(s):  
Amy R Lipson ◽  
Sara Douglas

Abstract Cancer is considered a family disease as the caregivers (CG’s) role extends beyond providing care as they can also help facilitate treatment decisions. While much has been reported in the literature about patient (PT) goals of care (GoC), little is known about discordance between PT and CG GoC and the impact of PT age. The variables of interest were PT and CG identified GoC using a 100-point visual analog scale (VAS) with anchors of quality of life (0) and survival (100). Discordance was defined as a > 40 point difference on the VAS. The GoC data reported here were those obtained at enrollment and prior to subject’s death. A sample of 235 PTs and CGs of PTs diagnosed with advanced cancers were included in the study. Mean age for the PTs was 64.7 (SD=10.5, range =21-88) with 54% being > 65. At enrollment, 28.7% of the PT-CG pairs of those PTs 65 years (X2 (1)=1.06, p=.304). At death, 61.8% (X2 (1)=31.04 <.001, Φ=.49) with discord at enrollment had discord at death. For patients who were older, 66.7% who had discord at enrollment also had discord at death and for patients


2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 1056-1062 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. B. Detmar ◽  
M. J. Muller ◽  
J. H. Schornagel ◽  
L. D.V. Wever ◽  
N. K. Aaronson

PURPOSE: To determine the frequency with which health-related quality-of-life (HRQL) considerations lead to modification or discontinuation of palliative chemotherapy, and the association between physicians’ ratings of patients’ HRQL and such treatment decisions. METHODS: Four consecutive medical consultations of 203 patients receiving outpatient palliative chemotherapy were tape-recorded and the content was analyzed to determine the frequency of and reasons for treatment alterations. Physicians rated their patients’ HRQL by using the COOP/WONCA health assessment charts. Data on tumor response and treatment toxicity were obtained from the audiotapes and, when necessary, were confirmed by medical chart audits. RESULTS: Treatment was modified in 54 cases (26%) and discontinued in 40 (20%). The primary reasons for modifying treatment were toxicity (n = 22), HRQL considerations (n = 18), and tumor progression (n = 14). The primary reasons for discontinuation of treatment were tumor progression (n = 23), HRQL considerations (n = 6), and toxicity (n = 3). For eight patients, a combination of tumor progression and HRQL issues resulted in discontinuation of treatment. Treatment decisions were associated significantly with physicians’ global ratings of patients’ HRQL but not with more specific HRQL domains. In the presence of tumor progression or serious toxicity, HRQL considerations played little or no role in treatment decisions. Furthermore, approximately 70% of patients without evidence of tumor progression or toxicity, but with seriously impaired HRQL, continued to receive their treatment as planned. CONCLUSION: Contrary to previous findings based on physicians’ self-report data, HRQL considerations seem to play a relatively minor role in decisions regarding modification or discontinuation of palliative chemotherapy.


Author(s):  
Meng-Hsing Wu ◽  
Pei-Fang Su ◽  
Wei-Ying Chu ◽  
Chih-Wei Lin ◽  
New Geok Huey ◽  
...  

Breast Cancer ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 720-729 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Mercieca-Bebber ◽  
Madeleine T. King ◽  
Miriam M. Boxer ◽  
Andrew Spillane ◽  
Zoë E. Winters ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document