Management of large cell neuroendocrine cancer of the cervix with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical vaginal trachelectomy for fertility preservation

Author(s):  
Robin Crawford
2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (9) ◽  
pp. 4431-4438
Author(s):  
GIUSEPPE CARUSO ◽  
INNOCENZA PALAIA ◽  
VIOLANTE DI DONATO ◽  
ANGELINA PERNAZZA ◽  
ROBERTA GALLO ◽  
...  

CHEST Journal ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 154 (4) ◽  
pp. 603A
Author(s):  
SNIGDHA NUTALAPATI ◽  
AARTI DUGGAL ◽  
MARILYN FOREMAN ◽  
ERIC FLENAUGH

2017 ◽  
Vol 108 (3) ◽  
pp. e31-e32 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Letourneau ◽  
N. Sinha ◽  
P. Xiong ◽  
E. Harris ◽  
E. Gomes ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
I Sellami ◽  
M Grynberg ◽  
A Benoit ◽  
C Sifer ◽  
A Mayeur ◽  
...  

Abstract Study question Does oocyte vitrification for fertility preservation (FP) delay the initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer? Summary answer The indication of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer should not be considered as an impediment to urgent oocyte vitrification for FP. What is known already FP is considered as one of the most important issues to address for young breast cancer patients. Cryopreservation of oocytes or embryos may be considered after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) or in vitro maturation (IVM). Pregnancies have been reported after reutilization of oocytes frozen following both procedures. Although oocyte competence is better after COH, this strategy requires on average 13 days to be achieved. In addition, the safety of ovarian stimulation before tumor removal is currently not formally established. In case of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the risk-benefit balance of COH is not well known. Study design, size, duration Retrospective cohort study including all breast cancer patients eligible for oocyte vitrification following COH or IVM before initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy between January 2016 and December 2020. Participants/materials, setting, methods Inclusion criteria were: female patients with confirmed non metastatic breast cancer, 18 to 40 years of age, with indication of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, who have had oocyte retrieval for FP after COH or IVM +/- cryopreservation of ovarian tissue. Various time-points related to cancer diagnosis, FP or chemotherapy were obtained from medical record review. Main results and the role of chance A total of 198 patients with confirmed breast cancer who had oocyte retrieval following COH (n = 57) or IVM +/- cryopreservation of ovarian tissue (n = 141) for FP prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy were included. Although women in IVM group were significantly younger as compared to patients who underwent COH (31.7 ± 4.2 vs. 33.3 ± 4.0 years, p = 0.019), ovarian reserve parameters, BMI and cancer stage did not differ between the two groups. Overall, the average time from cancer diagnosis to chemotherapy start was similar between patients having undergone COH or IVM before oocyte vitrification (37.3 ± 13.8 vs. 36.9 ±13.5 days in COH and IVM groups respectively, p=0.857). Limitations, reasons for caution The time from referral to FP consultation may have influenced the type of FP. In addition, the retrospective nature of the present analysis may constitute a limitation. Moreover, the efficiency and security of the different FP strategies used has not been analysed. Wider implications of the findings Oocyte vitrification following COH or IVM was not associated with delayed breast cancer treatment in the neoadjuvant setting, so long as there was a prompt FP referral. Young patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy should be informed of these findings to avoid unnecessary anxiety due to concern for delays. Trial registration number Not applicable


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21154-e21154
Author(s):  
Margaret Pruitt ◽  
Rajesh Naidu Janapala ◽  
Faysal Haroun

e21154 Background: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death and the most common non-acquired immune deficiency syndrome defining malignancy in people living with HIV (PLWH). Disparities in outcomes have been observed despite lung cancer mortality reportedly decreasing in the general population over the last decade due to lower rates of smoking and the advent of novel therapies. To better understand the current trend in lung cancer in PLWH, we explored demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and lung cancer pathology and molecular data in this population. Methods: A retrospective search of patient charts was conducted from 2004 to January 2021 using billing codes for HIV and primary lung cancer. Patients who had incorrect HIV or primary lung cancer diagnoses were excluded. Results: The search yielded 45 patients, of which 11 were excluded as described above: 66% were males, 82% African American, and 18% Caucasian. About two-thirds of patients were living in zip codes with predominantly low to medium household incomes. The median pack years of patients diagnosed with Stage I or II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was 40, Stage III or IV NSCLC was 20, early stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) was 30, and late stage SCLC was 60. The median time between HIV and lung cancer diagnoses was 21.7 years for Stage I or II NSCLC, 17.1 years for Stage III or IV NSCLC, 15.2 for early stage SCLC, and 13.3 for late stage SCLC. Of 26 patients with viral load (VL) data, 21 (80.7%) had VL less than 500 when lung cancer was diagnosed. Of the 33 charts with available pathology data, there were 16 adenocarcinomas, 6 squamous carcinomas, 3 adenosquamous carcinomas, 1 large cell neuroendocrine cancer, 4 SCLCs, 1 mesothelioma, and 2 unspecified NSCLCs. Of 19 patients with a histologic grade, 11 had a high-grade tumor (57.9%). For the NSCLCs, 8 were Stage I (28.5%), 2 Stage II (7.1%), 8 Stage III (28.5%), 9 Stage IV (32.1%), and 1 with an unspecified stage. One SCLC was early stage and the remaining 3 were late stage. Five patients had brain metastasis. Molecular data or PDL-1 expression was available for 10 adenocarcinomas (62.5%), 1 adenosquamous (33%), 3 squamous carcinomas (50%), and the large cell neuroendocrine cancer. An EGFR mutation was detected in 2 cancers. ALK rearrangement was found in 1. Other mutations were detected. Two cancers were in each PDL1 expression category: < 1%, 1-50%, and > 50%. Conclusions: Our study suggests that PLWH with lung cancer continue to have high rates of smoking. Viral load was well controlled. A range in stages of lung cancer was observed including earlier stages. Although molecular data was limited, available EGFR and ALK gene alterations, and PD-L1 expression prevalence were on par with that of the general population. With advancements in lung cancer treatment, additional research is needed in the PLWH population to better understand and mitigate disparities.


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 52-55
Author(s):  
Daria V Abbasova ◽  
Svetlana B Polikarpova ◽  
Nikolai A Kozlov ◽  
Madina P Baranova ◽  
Irina P Kovalenko ◽  
...  

Neuroendocrine neoplasia (NEC) of the prostate gland is a rather rare extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma and makes up only 0.5 to 1% of all malignant neoplasms of this localization. NEC of the prostate gland is a tumor of epithelial origin, histologically and immunohistochemically identical to analogues in the lungs and digestive system. When stained with hemotoxylin-eosin, neuroendocrine cells cannot always be visualized; they are best recognized by the immunohistochemical method of investigation using specific markers. Currently, a number of neuroendocrine markers are used, the expression of which may indicate a neuroendocrine nature. Androgen neuroendocrine cells themselves are independent and do not cause an increase in the concentration of prostate-specific antigen. Prostate NECs are represented by some histological forms according to WHO classification (2015): 1. Adenocarcinoma with focal neuroendocrine differentiation. 2. Well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor. 3. Small cell neuroendocrine cancer is a high - grade tumor with high malignant potential. 4. Large cell neuroendocrine cancer is a high - grade tumor. Due to the rarity of NEC of the prostate, a specific algorithm for diagnosis and treatment has not been developed, as a rule, they are similar to methods of other malignant forms of prostate cancer and neuroendocrine tumors.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 (11) ◽  
pp. 473-475
Author(s):  
Arika Kobayashi ◽  
Ryoichi Matsunuma ◽  
Kei Yamaguchi ◽  
Ryosuke Hayami ◽  
Michiko Tsuneizumi ◽  
...  

Abstract Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is now a widely accepted treatment modality for operable breast cancer and therefore fertility preservation is an important component of care for young patients with breast cancer. It is critical that oocyte retrieval is completed without delays in the initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Here we report the case of a 34-year-old woman who was diagnosed with Stage IIA triple-negative breast cancer and underwent ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation prior to the initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Oocytes were retrieved and in vitro fertilization was conducted before neoadjuvant chemotherapy was started. Upon completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the patient underwent breast surgery. Subsequently, a pathological complete response was achieved. She received a frozen embryo transfer 10 months after breast surgery. The patient became pregnant and delivered a healthy baby.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document