HAND HYGIENE: HEALTH PROFESSIONAL’S KNOWLEDGE AND ACCEPTANCE OF AN ACTIVE WAY OF PATIENT ISOLATION IN A TERTIARY HOSPITAL IN SPAIN

Author(s):  
Irene Lázaro Rodríguez
2012 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. e387
Author(s):  
A. Fernandes ◽  
E. Aires ◽  
P. Rodrigues ◽  
C. Vasconcelos

Author(s):  
Sommanas Naknual ◽  
Nanta Kliangkird ◽  
Tippawan Liabsuetrakul ◽  
Wit Wichaidit

Objective: To compare the level of hand hygiene behavioral drivers before and after installation of alcohol gel dispensers and behavioral nudges among outpatients and visitors at a tertiary hospital in Thailand during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.Material and Methods: A quasi-experimental study was conducted among outpatients and visitors in June 2020. We installed 12 alcohol gel dispensers with signs serving as behavioral nudges at a tertiary hospital in the Internal Medicine Outpatient Department (OPD), Surgery OPD, and the Pharmacy. We trained enumerators to interview outpatients and visitors regarding their behavioral drivers (beliefs about COVID-19 and hand hygiene based on the health belief model, plus handwashing social norms). We analyzed data using descriptive statistics.Results: Enumerators recruited 206 participants in the pre-intervention phase (refusal rate = 37.6%) and 219 participants in the post-intervention phase (refusal rate = 32.2%). There were significant differences between the pre-intervention and post-intervention phases with regard to self-efficacy for hand hygiene (92.0% vs. 100%, respectively), perceived lack of barriers to hand hygiene with alcohol (93.2% vs. 98.2%, respectively), and the proportion of participants who reported that hand hygiene had become a habit (7.5 vs. 18.8%, respectively). Reports of other domains of health beliefs (perceived severity of COVID-19, perceived benefits of handwashing) were homogeneous in both periods.Conclusion: We found differences in perceived lack of barriers and reported habit of hand hygiene but while self-efficacy was homogeneous in both periods. Issues regarding selection bias, construct validity, and generalizability may limit the usefulness of the study data. Caveats should be considered in the interpretation of the study findings.


2012 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 571 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olusegun Busari ◽  
Matthew Agboola ◽  
Oluwalana Oyekale ◽  
Olubunmi Ojo ◽  
Opeyemi Oje ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document