IS THERE TIMELY INTERVENTION OF PALLIATIVE CARE IN GYNAECOLOGICAL CANCER PATIENTS AT THE END OF LIFE?

Background: To date, little is known about the characteristics of patients who are admitted to a palliative care bed for end-of-life care. Previous data suggest that there are disparities in access to palliative care services based on age, sex, diagnosis, and socioeconomic status, but it is unclear whether these differences impact access to a palliative care bed. Aim: To better identify patient factors associated with the likelihood/rate of admission to a palliative care bed. Design: A retrospective chart review of all initiated palliative care bed applications through an electronic referral program was conducted over a 24-month period. Setting/participants: Patients who apply and are admitted to a palliative care bed in a Canadian metropolitan city. Results: A total of 2743 patients made a total of 5202 bed applications to 9 hospice/palliative care units in 2015–2016. Referred and admitted cancer patients were younger, male, and more functional than compared to non-cancer patients (all p < 0.001). Referred and admitted patients without cancer were more advanced in their illness trajectory, with an anticipated prognosis <1 month and Palliative Performance Status of 10%–20% (all p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, a diagnosis of cancer and a prognosis of <3 months were associated with increased likelihood and/or rate of admission to a bed, whereas the presence of care needs, a longer prognosis and a PPS of 30%–40% were associated with decreased rates and/or likelihood of admission. Conclusion: Patients without cancer have reduced access to palliative care facilities at end-of-life compared to patients with cancer; at the time of their application and admission, they are “sicker” with very low performance status and poorer prognoses. Further studies investigating disease-specific clinical variables and support requirements may provide more insights into these observed disparities.

Download Full-text

Outcomes of Embedded Palliative Care Outpatients Initial Consults on Timing of Palliative Care Access, Symptoms, and End-of-Life Quality Care Indicators among Advanced Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer Patients

Journal of Palliative Medicine ◽

10.1089/jpm.2018.0134 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 21 (12) ◽

pp. 1690-1697 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Sriram Yennurajalingam ◽

Bernard Prado ◽

Zhanni Lu ◽

Syed Naqvi ◽

Janet L. Williams ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Lung Cancer ◽

Palliative Care ◽

End Of Life ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Cell Lung Cancer ◽

Quality Care ◽

Life Quality ◽

Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer ◽

Lung Cancer Patients ◽

Care Access

Download Full-text

Shifting Palliative Care Paradigm in Primary Care From Better Death to Better End-of-Life : A Swiss Pilot Study

10.21203/rs.3.rs-153919/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Johanna Sommer ◽

Christopher Chung ◽

Dagmar M. Haller ◽

Sophie Pautex

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Primary Care ◽

Palliative Care ◽

Pilot Study ◽

End Of Life ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Advanced Cancer ◽

Communication Skills ◽

Advanced Cancer Patients

Abstract Background: Patients suffering from advanced cancer often loose contact with their primary care physician (PCP) during oncologic treatment and palliative care is introduced very late.The aim of this pilot study was to test the feasibility and procedures for a randomized trial of an intervention to teach PCPs a palliative care approach and communication skills to improve advanced cancer patients’ quality of life. Methods: Observational pilot study in 5 steps. 1) Recruitment of PCPs. 2) Intervention: training on palliative care competencies and communication skills addressing end-of-life issues.3) Recruitment of advanced cancer patients by PCPs. 4) Patients follow-up by PCPs, and assessment of their quality of life by a research assistant 5) Feedback from PCPs using a semi-structured focus group and three individual interviews with qualitative deductive theme analysis.Results: 8 PCPs were trained. PCPs failed to recruit patients for fear of imposing additional loads on their patients. PCPs changed their approach of advanced cancer patients. They became more conscious of their role and responsibility during oncologic treatments and felt empowered to take a more active role picking up patient’s cues and addressing advance directives. They developed interprofessional collaborations for advance care planning. Overall, they discovered the role to help patients to make decisions for a better end-of-life.Conclusions: PCPs failed to recruit advanced cancer patients, but reported a change in paradigm about palliative care. They moved from a focus on helping patients to die better, to a new role helping patients to define the conditions for a better end-of-life.Trial registration : The ethics committee of the canton of Geneva approved the study (2018-00077 Pilot Study) in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki

Download Full-text

Chemotherapy use at the end of life in Brazil.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.e24003 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e24003-e24003

Author(s):

Munir Murad Junior ◽

Thiago Henrique Mascarenhas Nébias ◽

Marcos Antonio da Cunha Santos ◽

Mariangela Cherchiglia

Keyword(s):

Palliative Care ◽

Cancer Treatment ◽

End Of Life ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Stage Iv ◽

Breast Cancers ◽

Early Palliative Care ◽

Study Population ◽

One Year

e24003 Background: Chemotherapy in the last days of life is not associated with a survival benefit, and recent data suggest it may cause harm by decreasing quality of life and increasing costs. Both ESMO and ASCO have published position statements encouraging discussions about the appropriate cessation of chemotherapy. End-of-life chemotherapy rates vary worldwide but in summary, up to a fifth of cancer patients are treated with chemotherapy in the last month of life with no clear benefits. The aim of this study is to describe the rate of chemotherapy use in the last month of life in patients who are candidates for palliative care in Brazil. Methods: It is a prospective non-concurrent cohort carried out from a database developed through probabilistic and deterministic linkage of data from information systems of the Brazilian Public Health System. The study population is composed of all patients who started cancer treatment between 2009 and 2014 and who was hospitalized at least 1 time after starting treatment. To address the indication for palliative care, patients whose death occurred within one year after the first hospitalization were selected. Results: A total of 299,202 patients started cancer treatment in that period and 62,249 died 1year after hospitalization. Among the deceased patients, the median age was 62 years, 50.9% of them were in stage IV and 34.1% in stage III and 46% lived in the southeastern region of the country. The most common cancers were lung (n = 17805; 28.6%) colorectal (n = 12273; 19.7%) and gastric (n = 10248; 16.5%). The average number of hospitalizations was 2.7 and 89% of these patients required emergency hospitalization. About half (45,4%; n=28,250) of the patients underwent chemotherapy at the last 30 days of life. The rates of use of chemotherapy in the last month was 44% for lung cancer, 74,4% for colon, 50.2% for gastric and 51.8% breast cancers. Conclusions: Despite international recommendations on the use of chemotherapy at the end of life, this seems to be a common practice unfortunately. Measures to implement early palliative care should be a priority for the care of cancer patients in Brazil.

Download Full-text

OP456 Encouraging Shared Decision-Making Of Goals Of Care Discussions In Lung Cancer Patients Using A Smartphone Application

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care ◽

10.1017/s0266462321001070 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 37 (S1) ◽

pp. 17-17

Author(s):

Amanda Lovato ◽

Nisha Almeida

Keyword(s):

Lung Cancer ◽

Palliative Care ◽

Focus Groups ◽

End Of Life ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Smartphone Application ◽

Quality Improvement Initiative ◽

Care Hospital ◽

Goals Of Care ◽

Lung Cancer Patients

IntroductionAn important reason for receiving non-beneficial treatment at end-of life is the lack of timely discussions on goals of care and end-of-life preferences. A recent randomized clinical trial demonstrated that patients primed with a questionnaire on their end-of-life preferences were more likely to initiate such conversations with their doctors. Our objective is to integrate the questionnaire into a smartphone application to facilitate early goals of care discussions. To achieve this goal, we first plan to undertake a feasibility study to understand stakeholder preferences.MethodsAs part of a quality improvement initiative at our Canadian quaternary-care hospital, we conducted focus groups with oncology and palliative care physicians and patients to understand barriers to early conversations on end-of-life preferences, and to assess feasibility of using smartphone technology in facilitating these conversations. The app would integrate a questionnaire to patients and send prompts to physicians on patient readiness and timing of conversations.ResultsWe conducted separate focus groups with lung cancer patients (n = 6) and clinicians in oncology (n = 6) and palliative care (n = 6). Clinical teams expressed enthusiasm about early conversations but raised several barriers including system (lack of electronic documentation and access to data; multiple physicians), clinician (lack of time) and patient (stigma associated with end-of-life) barriers. Clinicians agreed that an app could overcome some of these barriers such as access to patient and electronic data by making patients the repository of all their data and empowering them to initiate discussions. However, they raised concerns about universal accessibility of such technology, especially among the elderly. Patient focus groups will take place in March 2021 and inform us on feasibility in this population.ConclusionsThere is a consensus among physicians at our hospital that early end-of-life conversations have the potential to mitigate adverse events and that use of a smart phone app could facilitate such conversations.

Download Full-text

Serious illness conversation and end of life care utilization at an academic medical center.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2020.39.28_suppl.29 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 39 (28_suppl) ◽

pp. 29-29

Author(s):

William P. Tompkins ◽

Christine Agnes Ciunci ◽

Suzanne Walker ◽

Kelly Patton ◽

Amy Schwartz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Palliative Care ◽

End Of Life ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Median Time ◽

Medical Center ◽

Time Interval ◽

Inpatient Setting ◽

Serious Illness ◽

Life Planning ◽

End Of Life Planning

29 Background: Hospice has been associated with improved quality of life for patients, cost savings, and reduction in caregiver-grief-related depression. While cancer patients make up a plurality of hospice utilizers nationally, many patients are only on hospice for a limited period (in Medicare patients, a median of 18 days). Studies suggest engaging cancer patients to discuss goals and priorities using the Serious Illness Conversation (SIC) Guide has a positive impact on prognostic understanding and end-of-life planning. More frequent utilization of SICs may prompt earlier enrollment of oncology patients in hospice when appropriate. Methods: We identified cancer patients enrolled in hospice at the Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Presbyterian Medical Center from 2019-2020 after all providers received SIC training. Patient demographics, cancer diagnosis, type of hospice (home versus inpatient), SIC usage, palliative care referral patterns and time on hospice were abstracted. Results: 104 patients were enrolled in hospice during the study period. The majority of patients were female (51%). 45% were Caucasian, and 31% were African American. The most common cancer diagnoses were thoracic (52%) and gastrointestinal (32%) malignancies. 85 patients (82%) were enrolled on home hospice and 19 patients (18%) inpatient hospice. Palliative care usage included 50 inpatient and 24 outpatient consultations; 30 patients (29%) in the cohort never utilized palliative care. 52 (50%) of patients did not have a SIC. 47% (40 patients) enrolled in home hospice had an SIC while 63% (12 patients) on inpatient hospice had an SIC. The median time interval between a patient’s SIC conversation and hospice enrollment was longer in home hospice patients (74 days) compared to inpatient hospice (33 days). Patients on home hospice spent an average of 44 days on hospice versus 2 days in the inpatient setting. Conclusions: Half of the patients at Penn Presbyterian Medical Center enrolled in hospice during the study period did not have an SIC, and 29% did not see palliative care prior to starting hospice. The median time from SIC initiation to hospice enrollment was significantly longer for patients on home hospice compared to inpatient hospice suggesting a need for earlier SIC interventions. Patients enrolled in inpatient hospice spent a considerably shorter period of time on hospice also underscoring the importance of earlier end of life planning. Our findings indicate a need for additional interventions to facilitate earlier SIC conversations in the outpatient setting and a demand for increased palliative care access.

Download Full-text