scholarly journals Preclinical and randomized phase I studies of plitidepsin in adults hospitalized with COVID-19

2022 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. e202101200
Author(s):  
Jose F Varona ◽  
Pedro Landete ◽  
Jose A Lopez-Martin ◽  
Vicente Estrada ◽  
Roger Paredes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Viral Load ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cyclic Peptide ◽  
Elongation Factor ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Host Protein ◽  
Dose Selection ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Eukaryotic Translation ◽  
Grade 3

Plitidepsin, a marine-derived cyclic-peptide, inhibits SARS-CoV-2 replication at nanomolar concentrations by targeting the host protein eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1A. Here, we show that plitidepsin distributes preferentially to lung over plasma, with similar potency against across several SARS-CoV-2 variants in preclinical studies. Simultaneously, in this randomized, parallel, open-label, proof-of-concept study (NCT04382066) conducted in 10 Spanish hospitals between May and November 2020, 46 adult hospitalized patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection received either 1.5 mg (n = 15), 2.0 mg (n = 16), or 2.5 mg (n = 15) plitidepsin once daily for 3 d. The primary objective was safety; viral load kinetics, mortality, need for increased respiratory support, and dose selection were secondary end points. One patient withdrew consent before starting procedures; 45 initiated treatment; one withdrew because of hypersensitivity. Two Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events were observed (hypersensitivity and diarrhea). Treatment-related adverse events affecting more than 5% of patients were nausea (42.2%), vomiting (15.6%), and diarrhea (6.7%). Mean viral load reductions from baseline were 1.35, 2.35, 3.25, and 3.85 log10 at days 4, 7, 15, and 31. Nonmechanical invasive ventilation was required in 8 of 44 evaluable patients (16.0%); six patients required intensive care support (13.6%), and three patients (6.7%) died (COVID-19-related). Plitidepsin has a favorable safety profile in patients with COVID-19.

scholarly journals Plitidepsin has a positive therapeutic index in adult patients with COVID-19 requiring hospitalization.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose F. Varona ◽  
Pedro Landete ◽  
Jose A Lopez-Martin ◽  
Vicente Estrada ◽  
Roger Paredes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cyclic Peptide ◽  
Elongation Factor ◽  
Therapeutic Index ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Host Protein ◽  
Dose Effect ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Eukaryotic Translation ◽  
Discharge Rates ◽  
Grade 3

Plitidepsin is a marine-derived cyclic-peptide that inhibits SARS-CoV-2 replication at low nanomolar concentrations by the targeting of host protein eEF1A (eukaryotic translation-elongation-factor-1A). We evaluated a model of intervention with plitidepsin in hospitalized COVID-19 adult patients where three doses were assessed (1.5, 2 and 2.5 mg/day for 3 days, as a 90-minute intravenous infusion) in 45 patients (15 per dose-cohort). Treatment was well tolerated, with only two Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events observed (hypersensitivity and diarrhea). The discharge rates by Days 8 and 15 were 56.8% and 81.8%, respectively, with data sustaining dose-effect. A mean 4.2 log10 viral load reduction was attained by Day 15. Improvement in inflammation markers was also noted in a seemingly dose-dependent manner. These results suggest that plitidepsin impacts the outcome of patients with COVID-19.

Bortezomib With or Without Irinotecan in Relapsed or Refractory Colorectal Cancer: Results From a Randomized Phase II Study

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (14) ◽  
pp. 2320-2326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter S. Kozuch ◽  
Caio Max Rocha-Lima ◽  
Tomislav Dragovich ◽  
Howard Hochster ◽  
Bert H. O'Neil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Sensory Neuropathy ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Grade 3

PurposeTo evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of bortezomib with or without irinotecan, in patients with relapsed or refractory colorectal cancer (CRC).Patients and MethodsPatients were randomly assigned in a 3:4 ratio to bortezomib 1.5 mg/m2(arm A) or bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2plus irinotecan 125 mg/m2(arm B). A treatment cycle of 21 days consisted of four bortezomib doses on days 1, 4, 8, and 11, plus, in arm B, irinotecan on days 1 and 8. The primary objective of this randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase II study was to determine tumor response to treatment. Secondary objectives were safety and tolerability.ResultsA preplanned interim analysis to assess efficacy revealed inadequate activity, resulting in early termination of this study. A total of 102 patients were treated, 45 in arm A and 57 in arm B. Baseline characteristics were comparable. The investigator-assessed response rate was 0 in arm A and 3.5% in arm B (all partial responses). Adverse events in both treatment arms were as expected, with no significant additive toxicity. The most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events reported, per patient, during the study were fatigue (27%), vomiting (13%), nausea (11%), and peripheral sensory neuropathy (11%) in arm A, and diarrhea (33%), fatigue (25%), neutropenia (23%), thrombocytopenia (18%), dyspnea (12%), abdominal pain (12%), dehydration (12%), and anemia (11%) in arm B.ConclusionBortezomib alone or in combination with irinotecan was not effective in patients with relapsed or refractory CRC.

scholarly journals Carfilzomib Thalidomide and Dexamethasone Is Safe and Effective in the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: An Open Label Phase II Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group (ALLG) MM 018/ Asian Myeloma Network (AMN) 002 Study

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 39-40
Author(s):  
Hang Quach ◽  
Simon J Harrison ◽  
Je-Jung Lee ◽  
Nichloas Murphy ◽  
Jae Hoon Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Grade 3

Background: The combination of carfilzomib with immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) and dexamethasone is active in multiple myeloma (MM). Carfilzomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (KTd) has been studied in upfront MM treatment but has not been studied in the setting of relapsed/refractory myeloma (RRMM). The ALLG MM018/ AMN002 is an open-label phase II study of KTd in patients with RRMM. This study was conducted across 16 sites across Australia, New-Zealand, Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan. Method: Patients with RRMM with 1-3 prior lines of treatment were given carfilzomib [K: 20mg/m2 IV cycle 1 days 1 and 2, 56mg/m2 (36mg/m2 for patients age ≥75 years) from cycle 1 day 8 onwards], thalidomide (T: 100mg po nocte) and dexamethasone [dex: 40mg (20mg for patients age ≥75 years) po weekly], in a 28-day cycle. After 12 cycles, T was omitted, and K was given on days 1,2,15,16 and dex days 1,15 every 28-day cycles for a further six cycles. The primary endpoint was PFS. Secondary endpoints were ORR, overall survival, adverse events, and quality of life (QoL). The study had an 80% power to detect a ≥70% PFS at 6.5 months compared to historical ≤50% PFS at 6.5 months expected with Td (Kropff, M. et al. Haematologica 2012), at a significance level of 0.05. Results: This study has completed accrual. Eighty-three patients [median age of 66 years (42-85)] were enrolled with a median follow up of 15.9 (0.9-26) months. ORR rates were 86.4% (≥VGPR 70.2%). Median PFS was 20m (95% CI 15.9-26m). PFS at 6.5 months was 76.2% (95% CI 73.6-84.9%). Median OS has not been reached, and was 75% at 20 months. The most common grade ≥3/4 AEs were peripheral neuropathy (16%), upper respiratory tract infections (12%), dyspnoea (14%), and hypertension (10%). Grade ≥3/4 cardiac AEs occurred in 6%. The median carfilzomib dose that was delivered was 70.7% (32.8-92.6%) of the target dose. Thus far, 41% of patients have completed the intended 18 cycles of treatment. 21% of patients ceased therapy early. The most common reason for early treatment cessation was disease progression (30%) and adverse events (15%). Fifteen patients (18%) have died, 11 were due to MM, two from infection, one from an ischaemic cardiac event, and one from a traffic accident. QoL, as measured by the EQ-5D-5L instrument, remained stable throughout treatment. Conclusion: The ALLG MM018/AMN 002 study has met its primary endpoint. The KTd schedule as outlined in this study is efficacious in patients with RRMM, resulting in a prolonged PFS and a safety profile in line with previous reports for each of carfilzomib and thalidomide. KTd is an active option in jurisdictions where the cost of other IMiDs prohibits regulatory funding. Comparisons of efficacy and adverse events between the Caucasian and Asian populations will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures Quach: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Glaxo Kline Smith: Consultancy, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding. Harrison:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; CRISPR Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Patents & Royalties: wrt panobinostat; Haemalogix: Consultancy. Augustson:Roche: Other: Support of parent study and funding of editorial support. Campbell:Amgen, Novartis, Roche, Janssen, Celgene (BMS): Research Funding; AstraZeneca, Janssen, Roche, Amgen, CSL Behring, Novartis: Consultancy. Soo:Hanmi: Research Funding. Durie:Amgen, Celgene, Johnson & Johnson, and Takeda: Consultancy.

Biweekly Raltitrexed in Combination with Irinotecan (RIR) as Second-Line Therapy for Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Non-Randomized, Open-Label Phase II Trial.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ke Cheng ◽  
Yu-Wen Zhou ◽  
Ye Chen ◽  
Zhi-Ping Li ◽  
Meng Qiu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background Irinotecan-based doublet chemotherapy strategy was standard second-line backbone treatment for patients with oxaliplatin‑refractory metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC). The aim of this study was to evaluate tolerability and efficacy of raltitrexed combined with irinotecan biweekly administered as the second-line therapy for mCRC patients.Methods The study was a single-center, non-randomized, open-label phase II trial. Patients with mCRC after failure with first-line treatment of oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidine or its derivatives were enrolled. Irinotecan (180 mg/m2) and raltitrexed (2.5 mg/m2) were given intravenously on day 1. Cycles were repeated every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, and the secondary endpoints included overall response rate, disease control rate, overall survival and treatment related adverse events. Results Between December 2012 and October 2016, 35 patients were enrolled. 33 and 35 patients were assessed for response and safety, respectively. The overall response rate (ORR) was 8.6 %, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 71.4%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.5 months (95% CI 3.8–5.2). The median overall survival was 12.0 months (95% CI 8.5–15.5). Four patients received conversion therapy to no evidence of disease (NED), and 2 patients were still alive with beyond 24 months survival. The most common grade 3/4 hematological adverse events were leukopenia (8.6%), neutropenia (5.7%). The most common grade 3/4 nonhematological adverse events were anorexia (14.3%), vomiting (14.3%), nausea (11.4%) and fatigue (8.6%). Two patients discontinued the protocol treatment because of treatment-related gastrointestinal adverse events. No one died from treatment-related events. The incidence and severity of toxicity was irrelevant to UGT1A1 status.Conclusions The combination of irinotecan with raltitrexed is an active, convenient and acceptable toxic regimen for second-line treatment for mCRC patients, which needs further study as a chemotherapy backbone to be combined with targeted agents in mCRC.Trial registration No. ChiCTR-ONC-12002767. The study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry at 29 Octorber 2012, http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx.

scholarly journals A Phase I Study to Evaluate the Safety of the Herbal Medicine SH003 in Patients With Solid Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. 153473542091144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunhoo Cheon ◽  
Seong-Gyu Ko
Keyword(s):  
Herbal Medicine ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Solid Cancer ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Major Health Problem ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Label Dose ◽  
Grade 3

Background: Cancer is a major health problem worldwide and the leading cause of death in many countries. Preclinical studies have shown the therapeutic anticancer effects of SH003, a novel herbal medicine containing Astragalus membranaceus, Angelica gigas, and Trichosanthes kirilowii. The present study investigated the maximum tolerated dose of SH003 in patients with solid cancers. Methods: This open-label, dose-escalation trial used the traditional 3 + 3 dose-escalation design. Patients with solid cancers were recruited and administered 1 to 4 tablets of SH003 thrice daily for 3 weeks according to the dose level. Adverse events were evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were defined as Grade 3 or higher adverse events based on CTCAE. The maximum tolerated dose was defined as the highest dose at which no more than 1 of 6 patients experienced DLT. Results: The present study enrolled 11 patients. A total of 31 adverse events occurred. According to the CTCAE, all the observed adverse events were grade 2 or less and no adverse events of grade 3 or more corresponding to DLT occurred. Conclusion: The study results indicated that the maximum tolerated dose of SH003 was 4800 mg/day. A Phase 2 study is required to determine the efficacy of SH003 in patients with cancer at a dose of 4800 mg/day or less.

An Open-Label Phase I Pharmacokinetic Study of [14c] Bendamustine in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Malignancy

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2476-2476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne-Charlotte Dubbelman ◽  
Hilde Rosing ◽  
Mona Darwish ◽  
Denise D'Andrea ◽  
Mary Bond ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Half Life ◽  
Plasma Concentrations ◽  
Volume Of Distribution ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Refractory Malignancy

Abstract Abstract 2476 Background: Bendamustine is a unique alkylating agent which combines a nitrogen mustard moiety of mechlorethamine with a benzimidazole. This study was conducted to characterize the distribution, metabolism, and elimination of [14C] bendamustine and its metabolites (M3, M4, and dihydroxy bendamustine [HP2]) and to assess the roles of renal and hepatic pathways in the drug's metabolism and excretion. A secondary objective was to further characterize the safety profile of single-agent bendamustine. Methods: This open-label, phase I study enrolled 6 patients, age ≥18 years, with confirmed relapsed or refractory malignancy. The study was divided into 2 assessment periods: period A, during which the mass balance and pharmacokinetics of [14C] bendamustine were investigated, and period B, an extended-use period of up to 6 cycles with non-labeled bendamustine, during which safety continued to be assessed. Patients received intravenous (IV) bendamustine (120 mg/m2), containing 80–95 μCi of [14C] bendamustine, on day 1 of cycle 1 and non-labeled IV bendamustine (120 mg/m2) on day 2 of cycle 1 (period A). Pharmacokinetic parameters of bendamustine and metabolites M3, M4, and HP2 were calculated through plasma and urine concentrations, which were determined through 24 hours following administration of bendamustine on day 1. Total radioactivity (TRA) levels were measured in plasma, urine, and feces collected prior to drug administration and at time points through 168 hours after patients received [14C] bendamustine. Collection of excreta could continue (after the 7-day period) on an outpatient basis: if radiolabeled bendamustine ≥1% of dose was measurable in the 144- to 168-hour urine or feces collection, collection continued until the recovery in each 24-hour urine or feces collection was <1% of dose. Results: Six patients (3 males; 3 females) with a median age of 66 (48–75) years were enrolled and completed the pharmacokinetic portion of the study. For bendamustine, the decline from peak plasma concentration was characterized by an initial rapid distribution phase, followed by a somewhat slower intermediate phase. The pharmacologically relevant half-life (t½) was approximately 40 minutes. The plasma concentrations of M3, M4, and HP2 were very low relative to the bendamustine concentrations. Of the TRA dose administered, approximately half of the dose was recovered in the urine and approximately a quarter of the dose was recovered in the feces. Less than 5% of TRA dose was recovered in the urine as unchanged bendamustine. Mean recovery of TRA in excreta was approximately 76% of the radiochemical dose. Total recovery was incomplete due to continued slow excretion of TRA at the end of the collection period. The sustained levels of radioactivity in the plasma as compared with plasma concentrations of bendamustine suggest that, despite the rapid clearance of bendamustine, 1 or more longer-lived [14C] bendamustine-derived materials remain in the plasma. These longer-lived materials likely include by-products of alkylation. As previously noted, bendamustine volume of distribution was small (Vss∼20 L). The steady-state volume of distribution for TRA was ∼50 L. These results confirm previous data and provide evidence that neither bendamustine nor TRA are extensively distributed into the tissues. All 6 patients withdrew prior to completion of period B due to disease progression (n = 4), an adverse event (n = 1), or refusal to continue treatment (n=1). Bendamustine was well tolerated when administered at a dosage of 120 mg/m2 for 2 to 3 cycles. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events were fatigue (50%) and vomiting (50%). A grade 3/4 absolute lymphocyte count decrease occurred in all patients at some point during the study. There were no other grade 3/4 hematologic adverse events. Conclusions: Bendamustine was extensively metabolized via multiple metabolic pathways, with subsequent excretion in both urine and feces. Bendamustine accumulation is not anticipated in cancer patients with renal or hepatic impairment due to the dose administration schedule and short intermediate half-life. Adverse events and hematologic changes were consistent with the known safety profile of bendamustine. This research was sponsored by and conducted by Cephalon, Inc., Frazer, PA. Disclosures: Darwish: Cephalon, Inc.: Employment. D'Andrea:Cephalon, Inc.: Employment. Bond:Cephalon, Inc.: Employment. Hellriegel:Cephalon, Inc.: Employment.

A randomized, double-blind phase II study of the oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) axitinib (AG-013736) in combination with docetaxel (DOC) compared to DOC plus placebo (PL) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1003-1003 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. S. Rugo ◽  
A. Stopeck ◽  
A. A. Joy ◽  
S. Chan ◽  
S. Verma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Grade 3

1003 Background: Single-agent DOC is commonly used to treat MBC. Axitinib (AG) is a potent TKI of VEGFRs. A phase I lead-in study identified 80 mg/m2 q3wks of DOC in combination with 5 mg BID of AG as the recommended phase 2 dose. The primary objective was to determine whether the time to progression (TTP) of AG+DOC arm is superior to DOC+PL. Methods: Pts with no prior chemotherapy for MBC and =12 mos from adjuvant chemotherapy (aCT), measurable disease, ECOG performance status (PS) of 0–2, and no uncontrolled brain metastases were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive treatment with either DOC+AG or DOC+PL without prophylactic growth factor in cycle 1. Tumor measurements were performed q9wks. Pts were stratified according to estrogen receptor (ER) status, prior aCT and PS (0–1 or 2). Results: A total of 168 pts were randomized. 92 pts had received prior aCT, 27 of whom received a prior taxane. Treatment arms were well balanced for prior adjuvant and taxane therapy. A median of 7 cycles of AG+DOC (range: 1–18) and 7 cycles of DOC+PL (range: 1–23) were administered. The most common non-hematologic adverse events observed in the AG+DOC arm included diarrhea (60%), nausea (53%), alopecia (51%), fatigue (49%), stomatitis (44%) and vomiting (40%). Grade 3/4 adverse events that were increased with AG+DOC vs DOC included febrile neutropenia (16 vs 7%), fatigue (13 vs 5%), stomatitis (13 vs 2%), diarrhea (11 vs 0%) and hypertension (5 vs 2%). Other grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities were similar in both arms. The median TTP (by RECIST) was 8.2 mo with AG+DOC arm and 7 mo with DOC+PL arm with a hazard ratio of 0.73 (prespecified, one-sided p=0.052). The overall response rate (ORR) was 40% for AG+DOC arm and 23% for DOC+PL arm (p=0.038). In a hypothesis-generating subgroup analysis, the median TTP in patients receiving prior aCT was 9.0 mo with AG+DOC arm and 6.3 mo with DOC+PL arm with a hazard ratio of 0.54 (p=0.012). Within this stratum, ORR was 45% for AG+DOC arm and 13% for DOC+PL arm (p=0.003). Conclusions: The anti-angiogenic TKI AG combined with DOC (80 mg/m2 q3wks) as first line therapy for MBC has an acceptable safety profile and promising anti-tumor activity. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Vandetanib with FOLFIRI in patients with advanced colorectal adenocarcinoma: an open-label, multicenter Phase I study

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4085-4085
Author(s):  
M. Saunders ◽  
E. Van Cutsem ◽  
R. Wilson ◽  
M. Peeters ◽  
R. Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tyrosine Kinases ◽  
Colorectal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Day Treatment ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Preliminary Evaluation ◽  
Related Complication ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Grade 3

4085 Background: Vandetanib (ZD6474) is a once-daily oral agent in Phase III development that selectively targets key signaling pathways in cancer by inhibiting VEGF, EGF and RET receptor tyrosine kinases. Methods: Patients with metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma who were eligible for 1st- or 2nd-line chemotherapy received once-daily oral doses of vandetanib (100 mg) in combination with standard 14-day treatment cycles of FOLFIRI (irinotecan 180 mg/m2 1.5-hr and leucovorin 400 mg/m2 2-hr i.v. infusions, followed by 5-fluorouracil [5-FU] 400 mg/mg2 i.v. bolus and 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 46–48-hr i.v. infusion). If <2 of 6 evaluable patients (i.e., having completed 6 weeks of treatment) experienced a vandetanib- related dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), an additional cohort received vandetanib 300 mg + FOLFIRI. The primary objective of the study was to establish the safety and tolerability of vandetanib + FOLFIRI. Secondary objectives included an assessment of any pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction between vandetanib, irinotecan (SN-38) and 5-FU, and preliminary evaluation of efficacy (RECIST). Results: Twenty- one patients (12 male/9 female; mean age 53 years, range 33–72) received vandetanib 100 mg (n=11) or 300 mg (n=10) + FOLFIRI. Combination therapy was well tolerated at both vandetanib dose levels. There were no DLTs in the vandetanib 100 mg cohort, with one DLT of hypertension (CTC grade 3) with QTc prolongation in the 300 mg cohort. The most common adverse events (AEs; all grade 1/2) were diarrhea (n=20), nausea (n=12), fatigue (n=10) and alopecia (n=9); AEs =grade 3 reported in more than one patient were neutropenia (n=4, all grade 3), hypertension (n=3, all grade 3), catheter-related complication (n=2, both grade 3) and pulmonary embolism (n=2, both grade 4). There was no apparent PK interaction between vandetanib and irintotecan (SN-38) or 5-FU. Best overall responses in the 14 patients evaluable for efficacy were partial response (n=2), stable disease =8 weeks (n=9), and progressive disease (n=3). Conclusions: In patients with advanced colorectal adenocarcinoma, combining once-daily vandetanib (100 or 300 mg) with a standard FOLFIRI regimen was generally well tolerated. ZACTIMA is a trademark of the AstraZeneca group of companies. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Safety and efficacy of everolimus in Asian patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) who failed previous vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGFr-TKI) therapy: A subanalysis of REACT.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15064-e15064
Author(s):  
Sun Young Rha ◽  
Se-Hoon Lee ◽  
Yen-Chuan Ou ◽  
Jin-Hee Ahn ◽  
Yen-Hwa Chang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Population ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Asian Population ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Total Study Population ◽  
Expanded Access ◽  
Asian Patients ◽  
Grade 3

e15064 Background: Some targeted agents have shown variable safety profiles in Asian vs non-Asian patients with mRCC. A retrospective analysis of sunitinib in Korean patients with mRCC found increased incidence and severity of certain adverse events (AEs) compared with previous global trials (Hong et al. Cancer Res Treat. 2009;41:67-72). The open-label, expanded-access program REACT (RAD001 Expanded Access Clinical Trial in RCC; NCT00655252) provided everolimus, a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, before its regulatory approval to 1367 patients with VEGFr-TKI refractory mRCC from 34 countries. Final results of REACT were recently published (Grünwald et al. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48:324-332). This analysis compared study end points in Asian patients with those in the total REACT population. Methods: The primary objective of REACT was to assess the safety of everolimus 10 mg/day, as determined by the overall occurrence of grade 3/4 AEs. Best overall tumor response was evaluated based on RECIST 1.0. Results: Baseline characteristics of Asian patients (n = 109; from South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, and Singapore) were similar to those of the total study population. Median duration of everolimus exposure was longer in Asian patients than in the total population: 24.1 (range, 2.0-72.7) vs 14.0 (0.1-83.7) weeks. Overall incidence of grade 3/4 AEs was slightly higher in Asian patients than in the total population (70.6% vs 61.6%); common grade 3/4 AEs in Asian patients and the total population, respectively, included anemia (26.6% vs 13.4%), hyperglycemia (11.9% vs 5.5%), pneumonia (10.1% vs 4.2%), stomatitis (6.4% vs 5.4%), thrombocytopenia (3.7% vs 1.0%), and pneumonitis (3.7% vs 2.7%). More patients in the Asian population than in the total population had achieved disease control: partial response, 3.7% vs 1.7%; stable disease, 67.0% vs 51.6%. Conclusions: In this subanalysis of REACT, Asian patients treated with everolimus experienced a greater clinical benefit with a slightly higher incidence of AEs. These results are supportive of the use of everolimus in the Asian population.

Investigation of the HDAC inhibitor resminostat in patients with sorafenib-resistant hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): Clinical data from the phase I/II SHELTER study.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 262-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Bitzer ◽  
Marius Horger ◽  
Tom M Ganten ◽  
Jens T Siveke ◽  
Marcus A Woerns ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Data ◽  
Hdac Inhibitor ◽  
Rest Period ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Open Label ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Parallel Group ◽  
Term Tolerability ◽  
Grade 3

262 Background: Resminostat (4SC-201), an oral pan-HDAC inhibitor, is in clinical development in a variety of cancer indications. The SHELTER study aims to evaluate safety, tolerability and efficacy in HCC patients (pts) exhibiting progressive disease under sorafenib first-line therapy. Methods: Pts with advanced HCC, (BCLC B or C) are included in a multi-center, open-label, two-arm parallel group trial. Radiologic progression under sorafenib is determined acc. to RECIST by central review prior to study entry. For Arm A, dose escalation of resminostat and sorafenib is performed to determine the MTD. Resminostat is administered orally once-daily in a “5+9” schedule, consisting of 5 consecutive treatment days followed by a 9-day rest period resulting in 14 day cycles on dose levels of 200 (DL1), 400 (DL2) and 600 mg (DL3+4), either combined with continuously taken sorafenib at 400 (DL1-3) or 800 mg (DL4) (Arm A), or as resminostat monotherapy (600 mg, Arm B). Primary objective is to determine progression-free survival after 12 weeks (w) (6 cycles). Secondary objectives include safety, tolerability, tumor response, TTP, OS, PK, biomarkers. Results: To date, 39 pts were treated with 600 mg resminostat alone or on DL1-4 in combination with sorafenib. Up to now, no DLT occurred in 5 pts treated on DL4. Most frequently AE observed include CTC grade 1-2 gastrointestinal complaints such as nausea and vomiting and skin disorders like rash, pruritus and HFSR. CTC Grade 3-4 toxicity documented in SAE reports consisted mainly of no-hematological events and was mostly related to the tumor disease. Interim results revealed that 15 out of 27 pts (56%) assessed after 6 w of treatment, and 11 out of 24 pts after 12 w displayed SD. In one patient treated on DL2, SD persisted for more than 1 year along with good long-term tolerability. Conclusions: Preliminary clinical data show a favorable drug profile of resminostat either in mono or in combination treatment with sorafenib. No DLT was observed on the highest DL of the combination therapy up to now. Initial data on toxicity and therapeutic activity to overcome resistance to sorafenib are promising and will be updated for the meeting.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document