A randomized, double-blind phase II study of the oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) axitinib (AG-013736) in combination with docetaxel (DOC) compared to DOC plus placebo (PL) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1003-1003 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. S. Rugo ◽  
A. Stopeck ◽  
A. A. Joy ◽  
S. Chan ◽  
S. Verma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Grade 3

1003 Background: Single-agent DOC is commonly used to treat MBC. Axitinib (AG) is a potent TKI of VEGFRs. A phase I lead-in study identified 80 mg/m2 q3wks of DOC in combination with 5 mg BID of AG as the recommended phase 2 dose. The primary objective was to determine whether the time to progression (TTP) of AG+DOC arm is superior to DOC+PL. Methods: Pts with no prior chemotherapy for MBC and =12 mos from adjuvant chemotherapy (aCT), measurable disease, ECOG performance status (PS) of 0–2, and no uncontrolled brain metastases were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive treatment with either DOC+AG or DOC+PL without prophylactic growth factor in cycle 1. Tumor measurements were performed q9wks. Pts were stratified according to estrogen receptor (ER) status, prior aCT and PS (0–1 or 2). Results: A total of 168 pts were randomized. 92 pts had received prior aCT, 27 of whom received a prior taxane. Treatment arms were well balanced for prior adjuvant and taxane therapy. A median of 7 cycles of AG+DOC (range: 1–18) and 7 cycles of DOC+PL (range: 1–23) were administered. The most common non-hematologic adverse events observed in the AG+DOC arm included diarrhea (60%), nausea (53%), alopecia (51%), fatigue (49%), stomatitis (44%) and vomiting (40%). Grade 3/4 adverse events that were increased with AG+DOC vs DOC included febrile neutropenia (16 vs 7%), fatigue (13 vs 5%), stomatitis (13 vs 2%), diarrhea (11 vs 0%) and hypertension (5 vs 2%). Other grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities were similar in both arms. The median TTP (by RECIST) was 8.2 mo with AG+DOC arm and 7 mo with DOC+PL arm with a hazard ratio of 0.73 (prespecified, one-sided p=0.052). The overall response rate (ORR) was 40% for AG+DOC arm and 23% for DOC+PL arm (p=0.038). In a hypothesis-generating subgroup analysis, the median TTP in patients receiving prior aCT was 9.0 mo with AG+DOC arm and 6.3 mo with DOC+PL arm with a hazard ratio of 0.54 (p=0.012). Within this stratum, ORR was 45% for AG+DOC arm and 13% for DOC+PL arm (p=0.003). Conclusions: The anti-angiogenic TKI AG combined with DOC (80 mg/m2 q3wks) as first line therapy for MBC has an acceptable safety profile and promising anti-tumor activity. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Phase III Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Docetaxel With or Without Gefitinib in Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer: An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (11) ◽  
pp. 1405-1414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Athanassios Argiris ◽  
Musie Ghebremichael ◽  
Jill Gilbert ◽  
Ju-Whei Lee ◽  
Kamakshi Sachidanandam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Oncology Group ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose We hypothesized that the addition of gefitinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, to docetaxel would enhance therapeutic efficacy in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Patients and Methods Patients with recurrent or metastatic SCCHN with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 2, or patients with ECOG performance status of 0 to 2 but were previously treated with chemotherapy, were randomly assigned to receive weekly docetaxel plus either placebo (arm A) or gefitinib 250 mg/d, orally (arm B) until disease progression. At the time of progression, patients in the placebo arm could receive single-agent gefitinib. EGFR, c-MET, and KRAS mutations and polymorphisms in drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters were evaluated by pyrosequencing. Results Two hundred seventy patients were enrolled before the study was closed early at interim analysis (arm A, n = 136; arm B, n = 134). Median overall survival was 6.0 months in arm A versus 7.3 months in arm B (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.21; P = .60). An unplanned subset analysis showed that gefitinib improved survival in patients younger than 65 years (median 7.6 v 5.2 months; P = .04). Also, there was a trend for improved survival in patients with c-MET wild-type (5.7 v 3.6 months; P = .09) regardless of treatment. Grade 3/4 toxicities were comparable between the two arms except that grade 3/4 diarrhea was more common with docetaxel/gefitinib. Of 18 eligible patients who received gefitinib after disease progression in arm A, one patient had a partial response. Conclusion The addition of gefitinib to docetaxel was well tolerated but did not improve outcomes in poor prognosis but otherwise unselected patients with SCCHN.

Safety and efficacy of capecitabine (C) plus bevacizumab (B) as first-line in metastatic breast cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1013-1013 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Sledge ◽  
K. Miller ◽  
C. Moisa ◽  
W. Gradishar
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
First Line ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Grade 3

1013 Background: C alone has good activity and tolerability in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and when combined with docetaxel improves response and survival. C combined with B in heavily pretreated MBC improved the response rate but not PFS. In untreated MBC, the addition of B to chemotherapy significantly improves progression-free survival (PFS) which suggests that B, is most effective in early disease. Methods: Primary objective of this single-arm, 2-phase study, is to evaluate PFS in MBC patients receiving first-line treatment with C 1,000 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1–15 (28 doses) and B 15 mg/kg on day 1. Treatment was repeated every 21 days until progression. Eligibility criteria included HER2-negative MBC previously untreated for metastatic disease; ECOG performance status =1; no prior anti-angiogenic or oral fluoropyrimidine therapy. A sample size of 109 patients (including dropouts) was required to give 90% power to test an improvement from 4 months median PFS to 5.6 months with the two-sided test (a 5%) Results: At data cut-off, 103 patients had received study medication. Present results are based on 103 patients (ITT population), except tumor response which is based on 91 patients who had response evaluation. The average # of cycles received in first phase is 6.8. 84 pts.are alive at this time. 38.5% (35/91) pts. have had a response: complete response 5.5%; partial response 33.0%. Stable disease is 42.9% with 81.4% clinical benefit. Planned dose received is 77.7 % for C and 99.0 % for B. The majority of adverse events (AEs) were mild or moderate. The most common grade 3 AEs were hand-foot syndrome (13%) and pain (10%); grade 4 pulmonary embolism occurred in 2% in the first phase of the study. Conclusions: Updated results with longer follow-up including toxicity, TTP and PFS will be presented at the meeting. It appears that in first-line C+B is active for MBC and is well tolerated, with few grade 3/4 toxicities. [Table: see text]

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study of crenolanib in advanced or metastatic GIST patients bearing a D842V mutation in PDGFRA: The CrenoGIST study.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS11080-TPS11080 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Yves Blay ◽  
Michael C. Heinrich ◽  
Peter Hohenberger ◽  
Paolo Giovanni Casali ◽  
Piotr Rutkowski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Dose Finding ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Metastatic Gist ◽  
Phase Iii Study

TPS11080 Background: Activating mutations in the kinase domain of PDGFRA account for 10-15% of GIST. The most common PDGFRA mutation reported is D842V, which is known to confer resistance to imatinib and sunitinib. Currently, there is no approved treatment for GIST patients carrying such mutation. Cassier PA et al. showed that patients with D842V mutated GIST had a short median progression free survival (PFS) of 2.8 months with first line imatinib and 2.1 months with second line (2012 Clin Cancer Res). Crenolanib is a highly selective PDGFRA and FLT3 inhibitor with nanomolar activity against PDGFRα D842V mutation. In a previous dose-finding study, crenolanib showed a 31% clinical benefit rate with 2 pts achieving PR and 3 pts maintaining SD (total evaluable: 16 pts) in heavily pretreated GIST patients harboring the PDGFRA D842V mutation. In this study, 35% patients stayed on study for at least 7 months despite 80% patients having progressed after prior imatinib (15 pts), sunitinib (7 pts), dasatinib (5 pts), sorafenib (4 pts), nilotinib (2 pts), and regorafenib (2 pts). Therefore, a phase III trial has been initiated to further confirm the clinical activity of crenolanib in patients with PDGFRA D842Vmutation. Methods: This randomized phase III study will enroll adult subjects with histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced or metastatic GIST with a PDGFRA D842V mutation. Prior treatment with TKI is allowed. Approximately 120 subjects will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive either crenolanib 100 mg or matching placebo orally 3 times daily in combination with best supportive care. Randomization will be stratified by prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor exposure and ECOG performance status. The primary objective is PFS; key secondary objectives include OS. A formal interim analysis is planned after approximately 50 subjects have met the primary outcome. This study is already opened in the US, France, Norway, and Poland, and will soon be opened in Germany, Italy, Spain, UK and Asia. NCT02847429; EudraCT: 2015-000287-34 Clinical trial information: NCT02847429.

scholarly journals Toxicity management of regorafenib in patients with gastro-intestinal stromal tumour (GIST) in a tertiary cancer centre

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Florence Chamberlain ◽  
Sheima Farag ◽  
Constance Williams-Sharkey ◽  
Cecilia Collingwood ◽  
Lucia Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Individual Risk ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Third Line ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Reductions

Abstract Background Regorafenib is a multi-kinase inhibitor approved as third line treatment for metastatic GIST. Dose limiting toxicities are frequently seen and many patients require dose reductions. This study aimed to evaluate regorafenib toxicities and their management in a real-world GIST population. Methods Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database identified 50 patients with GIST treated with regorafenib at our centre between March 2013 and September 2018. Results Median progression free survival (PFS) was 7.7 months [interquartile range (IQR) 2.8–14.4 months]. Median overall survival (OS) from start of regorafenib to death or last follow up was 15.7 months (IQR 9.2–28.4 months). Baseline median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status on starting regorafenib was 1. The main reason for discontinuing regorafenib was progressive disease (PD) (31/50 [62%]) rather than toxicity (10/50 [20%]). Grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) were seen in 23/50 (46%) patients; palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) was most frequently seen (9/50 (18%)). Two patients died whilst on treatment with regorafenib from multi-organ failure secondary to sepsis (4%). Dose reductions were required in 19/50 patients (38%) and 8/50 (16%) patients started regorafenib at a lower dose band than the recommended dose (160 mg) due to comorbidities or concern over a higher individual risk of toxicity. Conclusion Although PD was the main reason for discontinuing treatment, toxicity management and dosing of regorafenib remains critical. Median duration of treatment was longer compared to previous studies suggesting a durable clinical benefit with regorafenib with rigorous toxicity management.

A phase 1 study of daily oral perifosine (P) with every 3-week paclitaxel (T)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 13134-13134 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. F. Goggins ◽  
J. J. Nemunaitis ◽  
R. Shiffman ◽  
R. Birch ◽  
D. H. Berdeaux ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
State Level ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Full Dose ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Grade 3

13134 Background: Perifosine is a novel alkylphospholipid that has been shown to affect multiple signal transduction pathways including Akt, MAPK and JNK (Kondapaka, Mol. Canc. Ther 2: 1093–1103. 2003). Treatment with a taxane initially activates Akt, and persistent activation increases resistance to the drug (Vanderweele, Mol. Canc. Ther. 3: 1605–13, 2004). Methods: Twelve patients (pts) were enrolled on this study. T was given at a dose of 175 mg/m2 on day 8 (after 7 days of perifosine) of a 21 day cycle; this was to obtain a steady state level of P at the tumor before exposure to T. The intent of the protocol was to determine if full dose P could be delivered with 50 mg of perifosine given orally 1, 2 or 3 times a day on days 1–14 of each cycle. Results: Disease sites included lung 3, thyroid 3, breast 1, esophagus 1 and other 4, Median age was 66 (range 45 - 83); 6 pts were male and median ECOG performance status was 1 (range 0–2). All pts had received prior chemotherapy (median 2 regimens); 3 had prior treatment with a taxane. Three pts were entered at each dose level and the cohort expanded to 6 pts if 2 or more pts experienced a grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity (DLT) during cycle 1. A dose level was toxic if 4 or more pts experienced a DLT during cycle 1. A total of 30 cycles and a median of 2 cycles (range 1–11) per patient were delivered. There were no grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities. Full dose T was given in all treatment cycles. P dose reductions were required in 6% of cycles (50 mg - 7%, 100 mg - 0%, 150 mg - 7%). One patient missed one dose due to nausea and one pt was stopped due to diarrhea. The grade 3 toxicities for each cohort are given in the table below. The elevated glucose value was 321. Nine pts were evaluable for response; two pts with thyroid cancer had stable disease by the RECIST criteria for 9 and 10+ months. Conclusions: In this study the usual single agent doses of P (150 mg daily) & T (175 mg/m2 q 3 weeks) were given together without increasing the toxicities that would be expected from using each drug alone. Phase II studies are warranted to define activity of the combination. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

A phase I study of brostallicin (B) combined with either bevacizumab (BV) or irinotecan (I) in patients (pts) with advanced solid malignancies

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13531-e13531
Author(s):  
R. B. MacArthur ◽  
J. Singer ◽  
C. Becerra ◽  
S. Weitman ◽  
D. Von Hoff
Keyword(s):  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Additional Patient ◽  
Dna Minor Groove ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Group Grade

e13531 Background: B is a DNA minor groove binding (MGB) agent with single agent cytotoxic activity. B has shown synergy with BV and I. The combinations were studied using a “complete” phase I design. Methods: The primary objective was to determine the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) and dose limiting toxicities (DLT) of B+BV and B+I. For B+BV cohort 1 both drugs were infused on day 1 of a 21 day cycle. BV was dosed at 15mg/kg, B was dosed at 6 mg/m2. For cohort 2, the BV dose was unchanged, and B dose reduced to 4 mg/m2. For B+I cohort 1 both drugs were also infused on cycle day 1. I was dosed at 200 mg/m2 with B at 4 mg/m2. For cohort 2, I was reduced to 125 mg/m2 and B reduced to 2 mg/m2. Cycle 1 DLT was defined: grade 4 neutropenia lasting ≥ 5 days, grade 3 or higher febrile neutropenia, grade 4 thrombocytopenia or grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia with bleeding, grade 3 or higher diarrhea, nausea or vomiting despite optimal management, grade 3 or higher for all other non-hematologic toxicities. For pts receiving BV, grade 2 or higher proteinuria. Eligible pts had treatment refractory metastatic/unresectable solid tumors, acceptable performance status, and adequate hematologic parameters and organ function. Results: 19 pts were enrolled. 11 pts received B+BV and 8 received B+I. Median age was 58 years. For B+BV 5 patients were treated in cohort 1, 6 in cohort 2. For B+I, 2 patients were treated in cohort 1, 6 in cohort 2. The MTD has not been defined for either treatment combination. In the current preliminary dataset 18/19 pts (93.3%) experienced one or more adverse events (AEs). In the B+BV group, grade 4 neutropenia was reported in 2/11 patients, both in cohort 1, and grade 3 neutropenia in one additional patient, also in cohort 1. In the B+I group, grade 4 AEs included neutropenia (DLT), febrile neutropenia (DLT), severe abdominal pain, and thrombocytopenia. Of the evaluable pts, no complete or partial responses were seen. For B+BV 5/11 pts have received 4 or more cycles, and for B+I 2/8. Conclusions: The combination of B+BV and B+I show manageable toxicity in advanced solid tumors at the doses reached in cohort 2. Additional data will be provided at the time of presentation. [Table: see text]

A phase II study of GW786034 (pazopanib) in patients with recurrent or metastatic invasive breast carcinoma: Results after completion of stage I: A trial of the Princess Margaret Hospital Phase II Consortium

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1133-1133 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. K. Taylor ◽  
S. Chia ◽  
S. Dent ◽  
M. Clemons ◽  
P. Grenci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Lesion Size ◽  
Grade 3

1133 Background: Pazopanib, an oral small molecule inhibitor of VEGFR, PDGFR, and KIT, has demonstrated activity in phase I, with a recommended phase II dose of 800 mg/d (Hurwitz H et al, J Clin Oncol. 2005;23[16 suppl]:3012.1). We evaluated the activity of single agent pazopanib in recurrent or metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods: In this 2-stage design, patients with recurrent or MBC received pazopanib 800 mg/d. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) of 20%. Response in 3 out of 18 patients was required to go to stage 2. Treatment was continued until progression. Results: 21 patients entered stage 1; 67% were ER positive and all were HER-2-negative. Prior lines of chemotherapy were 1 in 76% and 2 in 14%. Of the 19 evaluable patients, 2 patients remain on treatment. 14 (74%) stopped due to progressive disease, 2 (10%) due to adverse events, and 1 (5%) due to patient request. Best response was partial response (PR) in 1 (5%), stable disease (SD) in 11 (58%), and progressive disease in 7 (37%). Clinical benefit rate (CR, PR, or SD for ≥ 6 months) was 26%. Median time to progression (TTP) was 3.7 months (95% C.I. 1.7 months - not reached). 9 out of 18 patients (50%) with measurable target lesions had some decrease in target lesion size. Estimated progression-free survival at 3 months was 55%, and 28% at 6 months. Adverse events were grade 3/4 elevations in AST (14%) and ALT (10%), and grade 3 hypertension and neutropenia (14% each). Other common events were grade 1/2 lymphopenia, neutropenia, diarrhea, fatigue, skin hypopigmentation, hypertension, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, and headache. Conclusions: Pazopanib is well tolerated and demonstrates activity in pretreated breast cancer. While the target ORR of 20% has not been met, rates of SD and TTP are comparable to other active agents in this setting, and therefore pazopanib may be an interesting agent for future studies in breast cancer. [Table: see text]

Baby-step chemotherapy as a way to deliver chemotherapy in poor PS small cell lung cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17500-e17500
Author(s):  
Vanita Noronha ◽  
Vijay Patil ◽  
Amit Joshi ◽  
Vamshi Muddu ◽  
Kumar Prabhash
Keyword(s):  
Low Dose ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Full Dose ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Low Dose Chemotherapy

e17500 Background: Majority of patients with SCLC present with advanced stage and poor ECOG performance status. Hence delivery of adequate dose of chemotherapy is compromised. We hypothesized that initial low-dose chemotherapy might improve PS and enable administration of standard-dose chemotherapy, thus extending benefit of chemotherapy to otherwise ineligible patients. Methods: 30 patients with ECOG performance status 2-4 received low-dose chemotherapy consisting of either single agent carboplatin at AUC 2 or an abbreviated course of platinum-etoposide. Patients whose PS improved got full-dose chemotherapy with the standard regimen of platinum-etoposide. Demographic details, toxicity, time to progression and overall survival were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to determine factors associated with TTP and OS. Results: Median age was 58 years with male predominance. The PS was IV in 9, III in 20 and II in 1 patient. Extensive-stage and limited-stage disease was seen in 24 and 6 patients respectively.15 patients received single-agent carboplatin, 10 patients abbreviated cisplatin-etoposide, 1 patient each cyclophosphamide and cisplatin-etoposide and 3 patients refused chemotherapy. Major grade 3-4 toxicity was mucositis in 1, loose motions in 1 and hyponatremia in 4 patients. There was no grade 3- 4 haematological toxicity. The median number of dose-reduced cycles was 1 and 3 patients received more than 2 cycles. 22 patients were eligible and willing for full-dose chemotherapy. The median time to start of full-dose chemotherapy was 11.5 days (4-26 days). The median number of cycles of standard-dose chemotherapy was 5 (1-6) with 16 completing planned schedule. Grade 3-4 toxicity was neutropenia in 50%, febrile neutropenia in 25%, loose motions in 25% and hyponatremia in 40%. The overall TTP and OS was 182 days and 263 days respectively. Presence of SIADH (p = 0.02) and completion of standard treatment (p = 0.001) had a positive impact on TTP while completion of treatment (p = 0.01) and normal LDH (p = 0.03) had a positive impact on OS. Conclusions: Low-dose chemotherapy is well-tolerated and might help in extending the benefit of standard-dose chemotherapy to otherwise ineligible patients.

Camrelizumab plus apatinib in patients with advanced cervical cancer: A multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II trial.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6021-6021
Author(s):  
Chunyan Lan ◽  
Xin Huang ◽  
Jing-Xian Shen ◽  
Yin Wang ◽  
Ying Xiong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Previous Treatment ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Advanced Cervical Cancer ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Grade 3

6021 Background: Camrelizumab is a fully humanized, monoclonal antibody against PD-1. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab plus apatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting VEGFR2, in patients with advanced cervical cancer. Methods: In this open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study done at four centres in China, eligible patients were aged 18–70 years, had an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1, progressed after at least one line of systemic chemotherapy for metastatic, recurrent or persistent cervical cancer, and had measurable disease. Patients received camrelizumab 200 mg every 2 weeks and apatinib 250 mg once daily. Treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, and withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) assessed by RECIST version 1.1. An optimal Simon two-stage design was employed to test the null hypothesis of a 17% ORR versus 35% alternative (1-sided alpha 0.10, 80% power), if > 3 responses out of the first 16 patients were observed, then the study would continue to enroll a total of 44 patients. Results: Between Jan 21st, 2019, and Aug 1st, 2019, 45 patients were enrolled and received study treatment (safety population). The median age was 51 (range, 33–67) years. Median previous treatment lines were 2 (range, 1–4). As of Jan 22, 2020, median follow-up was 9.2 months (range, 2.4–12.2). 25 (59.5%; 95%: CI 44.7–74.4) of 42 patients who had at least one post-baseline tumor assessment (efficacy evaluable population) achieved an objective response, including two (4.8%) complete response, and 23 (54.8%) partial response. Median duration of response was not reached. The disease control rate was 88.1% (37/42). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.6 months (95% CI: 5.8–not reached). 31 (68.9%) patients had grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Grade ≥ 3 TRAEs occurring in ≥ 5% of patients were hypertension (24.4%), anemia (20.0%), fatigue (15.6%), γ-glutamyltransferase increased (13.3%), neutropenia (6.7%), and thrombocytopenia (6.7%). In post-hoc analyses, objective response was noted in 20 (69%) of 29 patients with PD-L1-positive tumors, and in 5 (50.0%) of 10 patients with PD-L1-negative tumors (Chi-square test, P = 0.281). PFS was longer in patients with PD-L1-positive tumors than patients with PD-L1-negative tumors (median PFS: 9.6 versus 5.3 months; log-rank test, P = 0.017). Conclusions: Camrelizumab plus apatinib showed promising antitumor activity and tolerable toxicities in patients with advanced cervical cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT03816553.

Comparative trial of BBR 2778 (pixantrone) + rituximab vs single agent rituximab in the treatment of relapsed/refractory indolent non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7578-7578 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Santoro ◽  
J. Voglova ◽  
N. Gabrail ◽  
T. Ciuleanu ◽  
M. Liberati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
International Workshop ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Serious Adverse Events

7578 Background: BBR 2778 is a novel aza-anthracenedione that shows structural similarities to the anthracyclines, demonstrates single agent activity in patients with NHL, and does not exhibit cardiotoxic effects in animal models. This phase III open-label study was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of combination rituximab and BBR 2778, with that of single agent rituximab, in patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory indolent NHL. Methods: Pts were randomly assigned to receive both rituximab and BBR 2778 (experimental arm), or rituximab alone (control arm). In the experimental arm, pts received 375 mg/m2 rituximab IV on days 1 and 8 of cycles 1 and 2 only, and 90 mg/m2 BBR 2778 IV on days 2 and 8 of cycle 1, and on days 1 and 8 of all subsequent cycles. Pts could receive six 21-day cycles of BBR 2778. In the control arm, pts received 375 mg/m2 rituximab IV on days 1, 8 and 15 of cycle 1 and day 1 of cycle 2 only. Disease response was assessed every other cycle according to International Workshop to Standardize Response Criteria for NHL. Toxicities were assessed throughout the study using NCI-CTC criteria. Study was closed early due to poor enrollment. Results: 38 pts (20 experimental, 18 control) were enrolled. Mean age was 66 and 59 years in the experimental and control arm, respectively. Most patients were males and most had ECOG performance status 0 or 1. Efficacy is summarized in the table. Response rate (75 vs 33%) and time to progression (13.2 vs 8.1 months) were better in the BBR 2778 arm. Only pts in the experimental arm had study drug related serious adverse events (2 febrile neutropenia, 1 pneumonia, 1 neutropenia) and adverse events resulting in withdrawal (6 vs 0). Conclusions: Combination of BBR 2778 and rituximab is superior to rituximab alone with regard to time to progression and overall response rate. BBR 2778 combined with rituximab appeared to be a generally well tolerated regimen in patients with relapsed/refractory indolent NHL. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document