scholarly journals A Phase I Study to Evaluate the Safety of the Herbal Medicine SH003 in Patients With Solid Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. 153473542091144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunhoo Cheon ◽  
Seong-Gyu Ko

Background: Cancer is a major health problem worldwide and the leading cause of death in many countries. Preclinical studies have shown the therapeutic anticancer effects of SH003, a novel herbal medicine containing Astragalus membranaceus, Angelica gigas, and Trichosanthes kirilowii. The present study investigated the maximum tolerated dose of SH003 in patients with solid cancers. Methods: This open-label, dose-escalation trial used the traditional 3 + 3 dose-escalation design. Patients with solid cancers were recruited and administered 1 to 4 tablets of SH003 thrice daily for 3 weeks according to the dose level. Adverse events were evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were defined as Grade 3 or higher adverse events based on CTCAE. The maximum tolerated dose was defined as the highest dose at which no more than 1 of 6 patients experienced DLT. Results: The present study enrolled 11 patients. A total of 31 adverse events occurred. According to the CTCAE, all the observed adverse events were grade 2 or less and no adverse events of grade 3 or more corresponding to DLT occurred. Conclusion: The study results indicated that the maximum tolerated dose of SH003 was 4800 mg/day. A Phase 2 study is required to determine the efficacy of SH003 in patients with cancer at a dose of 4800 mg/day or less.

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. e019502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunhoo Cheon ◽  
Sohyeon Kang ◽  
Youme Ko ◽  
Mia Kim ◽  
Bo-Hyoung Jang ◽  
...  

IntroductionCancer is a major health problem worldwide and the leading cause of death in many countries. The number of patients with cancer and socioeconomic costs of cancer continues to increase. SH003 is a novel herbal medicine consisting ofAstragalus membranaceus,Angelica gigasandTrichosanthes Kirilowii Maximowicz. Preclinical studies have shown that SH003 has therapeutic anticancer effects. The aim of this study is to determine the maximum tolerated dose of SH003 in patients with solid cancers.Methods and analysisThis study is an open-label, dose-escalation trial evaluating the safety and tolerability of SH003. The traditional 3+3 dose-escalation design will be implemented. Patients with solid cancers will be recruited. According to dose level, the patients will receive one to four tablets of SH003, three times a day for 3 weeks. Toxicity will be evaluated using common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE). Dose-limiting toxicities are defined as grade 3 or higher adverse events based on CTCAE. The maximum tolerated dose will be determined by the highest dose at which no more than one of six patients experiences dose-limiting toxicity.Ethics and disseminationThis study has been approved by the institutional review board of the Ajou University Hospital (reference AJIRB-MED-CT1-16-311). The results of this study will be disseminated through a scientific journal and a conference.Trial registration numberNCT03081819; Pre-results.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14005-14005 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. J. Price ◽  
L. Lipton ◽  
J. Williams ◽  
J. McGreivy ◽  
S. McCoy ◽  
...  

14005 Background: AMG 706 is an oral, investigational multikinase inhibitor (MKI) with antiangiogenic and direct antitumor activity achieved by selectively targeting VEGF, PDGF and Kit receptors. Methods: This is a fully enrolled, phase 1b, open-label, dose- finding study. The objectives are to determine the maximum tolerated dose and to assess safety and PK of AMG 706 in pts with solid tumors receiving AMG 706 plus gemcitabine. Pts =18 years with ECOG 0–2 and no prior treatment with bevacizumab or VEGFr MKIs were assigned to cohorts receiving escalating doses of AMG 706 (50mg QD, 125mg QD or 75mg BID continuously from day 2 of cycle 1) plus gemcitabine (1000mg/m2 weekly for 7/8 wks, then 3/4 wks per cycle) for up to 11 cycles. Assessments include dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) (weeks 1–4) and tumor response (every 3 months). Results: 26 pts were enrolled and received at least 1 dose of AMG 706 (50mg QD n=11; 125mg QD n=6; 75mg BID n=9). All but 2 pts have completed the study. Median (range) age was 57 (25–77) yrs. 65% of pts received prior chemotherapy; 4 pts received prior gemcitabine (50mg QD n=2; 125mg QD n=1; 75mg BID n=1). There were 2 DLTs: grade 4 neutropenia (125mg QD), grade 3 deep vein thrombosis (75mg BID). Treatment-related adverse events (AE) occurring in = 10% of pts are shown in the table . The mean AMG 706 PK profiles were not markedly different when AMG 706 was dosed on the same day or 24 hours after gemcitabine administration. Objective tumor responses per RECIST for 26 evaluable pts were: 2 unconfirmed PR (50mg QD n=1; 125mg QD n=1), 7 SD (50mg QD n=3; 125mg QD n=1; 75mg BID n=3), 11 PD (50mg QD n=7; 125mg QD n=3; 75mg BID n=1), and 6 not available (125mg QD n=1; 75mg BID n=5). Conclusions: These preliminary data suggest that, in pts with solid tumors, AMG 706 combined with gemcitabine had an expected AE profile at the target once-daily dose of 125mg QD, with little effect on AMG 706 PK. The data provide a foundation for conducting further trials, potentially including biliary tumors. Final data will be presented. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13513-e13513
Author(s):  
B. Besse ◽  
S. Almokadem ◽  
D. Planchard ◽  
I. Chico ◽  
C. L. Tsao ◽  
...  

e13513 Background: Volociximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody that blocks fibronectin binding to α5β1 and induces apoptosis in proliferating endothelial cells. Its anti-angiogenic actions are independent of the VEGF pathway. This is the first clinical study of voloxicimab in patients with advanced NSCLC. Methods: This phase 1b multi-center open-label, dose-escalation study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose of V in combination with full doses of C (AUC=6mg/ml.min) P (200mg/m2) with cycles repeated every 3 wks for a maximum of 6 cycles followed by a maintenance treatment with V alone. Eligible pts had histologically confirmed untreated stage IIIb or IV NSCLC. In cohorts 1 and 2, pts received V at 10 mg/kg and 20mg/kg IV, respectively, on days 1 and 8, of the first 21 day cycle then every 21 days. In cohort 3, pts received V 30 mg/kg IV every 21 days from day 1. We present here the interim safety analysis and RECIST response data of the combination therapy. Results: A total of 22 patients (9, 6 and 7 in cohorts 1, 2 and 3 respectively) who received at least one dose of treatment constitute the safety population. Reported salient adverse events (any grade) were constipation (68%), asthenia (64%), nausea (59%), arthralgia (55%) and paresthesia (46%). Grade 3 bowel obstruction in one patient was considered a DLT in cohort 2. No DLT's were observed in cohort 3. Seven pts reported at least one serious adverse event (all Grade 3) including deep vein thrombosis (1), peripheral arterial occlusion (1), proteinuria (1), pneumonitis (1), small intestinal obstruction (1), pleural effusion (1), hypoxia (1), dehydration (1) and orthostatic hypotension (1). Partial response was seen in 6 pts and stable disease in 12 out of 18 pts who were evaluable for response by RECIST. Conclusions: The highest dose of V tested (30 mg/kg q3w) in combination with CP appears well tolerated and the regimen has promising clinical activity in advanced NSCLC. [Table: see text]


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3562-3562
Author(s):  
S. Nallapareddy ◽  
D. Gustafson ◽  
S. Leong ◽  
W. Messersmith ◽  
J. Arnott ◽  
...  

3562 Background: ENMD-1198 (2-methoxyestra-1, 3, 5, (10) 16-tetraene-3-carboxamide), an analog of 2-methoxyestradiol (2ME2), has both antiangiogenic and antiproliferative effects in various tumor types. ENMD-1198 inhibits MT polymerization by binding to β-tubulin at the colchicine-binding site and inhibits HIF-1alpha. This Phase 1 study is evaluating the safety of ENMD-1198 to determine the maximum tolerated dose. Methods: Eligible pts had advanced cancer for which no effective therapy exists that is either evaluable by RECIST criteria or tumor markers that could be monitored for clinical benefit. Phase 1 dose escalation in 3+3 design for first 5 cohorts; modified to 1 pt cohorts for subsequent cohorts until Grade 2 treatment related toxicity, and then standard 3+3 design. All pts treated with once daily oral ENMD-1198 in 28-day cycles (with post-treatment drug-free observation period of 7–14 days in Cycle 1 only). Pts are treated until the appearance of significant treatment-emergent toxicities or disease progression (PD) occurs. Results: To date, 27 pts have been enrolled in 12 dose cohorts (range 5 to 550 mg/m2/d). Median age/performance status is 61/1. Total # of treatment cycles to date is 68, with a median of 2 cycles (range <1 to 15 cycles). Most frequent toxicities (all grades, n=22) were pain (77%), fatigue (55%), constipation (36%), neuropathy and nausea (both 32%), and anemia (27%). 4 pts have experienced stable disease (SD) for more than 2 cycles. There have been no objective responses to date. 2 pts experienced dose limiting toxicity with Grade 4 neutropenia in the 550 mg/m2/d cohort. Following drug holiday, pts restarted at 425 mg/m2/d and continued for at least 1–2 more cycles before being removed from study for PD. One pt (neuroendocrine ca pancreas) is experiencing prolonged SD at 60 mg/m2/d >14 cycles and a 2nd pt (prostate ca) experienced SD at 30mg/m2/d for 10 cycles. ENMD-1198 was absorbed rapidly after oral administration. There was a linear relationship between dose and drug exposure as measured by AUC across all doses (5 - 550 mg/m2). The elimination half-life of ENMD- 1198 averaged more than 12 hours after a single dose. Conclusions: DLT was identified at 550 mg/m2/d. Cohort expansion at 425mg/m2/d is ongoing. [Table: see text]


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 532-532 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. D. Baron ◽  
C. L. O'Bryant ◽  
Y. Choi ◽  
S. Royer-Joo ◽  
C. C. Portera

532 Background: Drozitumab is a monoclonal antibody that triggers tumor cell apoptosis by selective agonistic interaction with the Apo2 ligand/TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand death receptor 5. This study assessed the safety of drozitumab combined with two standard IRI- containing regimens in previously treated mCRC pts. Methods: Multicenter, open-label, dose-escalation study with treatment until disease progression or treatment intolerance. For CET+IRI regimen (Cohorts 1-4), a 21-day cycle (cy) = drozitumab on Day 1 at escalating doses of 1, 4, 10, or 15mg/kg, IRI on Day 1, and CET on Days 1, 8, and 15. For FOLFIRI (Cohort 5), a 14-day cy = drozitumab on Day 1 given as a 10 mg/kg loading dose followed by 7 mg/kg in continuing cys, with FOLFIRI (plus BV in pts not previously treated with BV) on Day 1. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was assessed through 2 doses of drozitumab (29 days for CET+IRI; 28 days for FOLFIRI). Adverse events (AE) were recorded through all cys. Response was assessed by RECIST. Results: 14 pts received a median of 6.5 cys (range 2-21) of drozitumab with CET+IRI and 6 pts received a median of 12 cys (range 3-21) of drozitumab with FOLFIRI. No DLTs occurred at the time of dose escalation. The most frequent AEs were diarrhea (85%), fatigue (80%), nausea (80%), alopecia (70%), neutropenia (70%), and decreased appetite (50%). Most of the toxicities were grades 1-2. The most frequent grade ≥3 AEs were neutropenia (60%), diarrhea (15%), hypokalemia (15%), and leukopenia (15%). Two pts discontinued due to AEs: 1 grade 2 fatigue, 1 grade 3 pyrexia. Among the 20 total pts, best responses included 3 partial responses (2 confirmed, 1 unconfirmed), 12 stable disease and 5 progressive disease. The study enrollment was stopped early by the sponsor for reasons unrelated to safety or efficacy. Conclusions: The addition of drozitumab to two standard second-line IRI-containing regimens (CET+IRI or FOLFIRI ± BV) was well tolerated in mCRC pts. AEs were similar to those previously reported for the chemotherapy alone. Tumor responses suggest no adverse interactions between drozitumab and the chemotherapy evaluated in this study. [Table: see text]


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3003-3003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Bedard ◽  
Josep Tabernero ◽  
Razelle Kurzrock ◽  
Carolyn D. Britten ◽  
Anastasios Stathis ◽  
...  

3003 Background: MAPK and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways regulate proliferation, differentiation and cell death in human cancers. Known interaction between the 2 pathways provides the rationale for combining both inhibitors in a phase I study. Methods: The objective is to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended phase II dose (RP2D) for oral, daily administered, BKM120 + GSK1120212, mainly in pts with tumors with RAS/RAF mutations (mt). A Bayesian logistic regression model with overdose control guides the dose escalation of the treatment. Secondary objectives include safety, tolerability, PK and efficacy. Results: As of 22.09.11, 49 pts were treated with BKM120 + GSK1120212 as follows: 30mg + 0.5mg, 60mg + 0.5mg, 60mg + 1.0mg, 60mg + 1.5mg, 60mg + 2.0mg, 70mg + 1.5mg, 80mg + 1.0mg, 80mg + 1.5mg. 6 pts had dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs); all were reversible. Grade 3 DLTs were: 3 x stomatitis, 1 x dysphagia, 1 x LVEF decrease, 1 x CK increase, 1 x nausea, 1 x anorexia, 1 x decreased oral intake. MTD and/or RP2D for the combination have not been reached. Most common adverse events (AEs) (>25%), all grades and causality, were dermatitis acneiform, diarrhea (51% each); nausea (41%); vomiting (37%); rash (33%); asthenia (31%); CK increase, decreased appetite, pyrexia or stomatitis (29% each) and hyperglycemia (27%). There were 4 on-treatment deaths unrelated to treatment. AEs led to treatment discontinuation, 17 pts (35%) and interruptions/dose reductions, 25 pts (51%). Apparent steady-states of BKM120 and GSK1120212 were reached by day 28. Plasma concentrations of BKM120 in combination with GSK1120212 were lower than for monotherapy. Exposure to GSK1120212 with BKM120 was similar to that observed in monotherapy studies. 3 confirmed partial responses have been observed in pts with KRAS mt ovarian cancer; 2 lasting >9 months. 2 patients with BRAF mt melanoma, who had previously progressed on BRAF inhibitors, had stable disease, for 1 of whom treatment is still ongoing in cycle 6. Conclusions: BKM120 and GSK1120212 can be safely combined. Signs of clinical activity have been seen in pts with RAS/RAF mt tumors.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3004-3004
Author(s):  
Jason J. Luke ◽  
Manish R. Patel ◽  
Erika Paige Hamilton ◽  
Bartosz Chmielowski ◽  
Susanna Varkey Ulahannan ◽  
...  

3004 Background: MGD013 is an investigational, first-in-class, Fc-bearing bispecific tetravalent DART molecule designed to bind PD-1 and LAG-3 and sustain/restore the function of exhausted T cells. MGD013 demonstrates ligand blocking properties consistent with anti-PD-1 and anti-LAG-3 benchmark molecules, and improves T cell responses beyond that observed with benchmark or component antibodies alone or in combination. Methods: This study characterizes the safety, tolerability, dose-limiting toxicities, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), PK/PD, and antitumor activity of MGD013 in patients (pts) with advanced solid and hematologic malignancies. Sequential single-pt cohorts were treated with escalating flat doses of MGD013 (1-1200 mg IV every 2 weeks), followed by a 3+3 design. Tumor-specific expansion cohorts are being treated at the recommended Phase 2 dose of 600 mg. Results: At data-cutoff, 50 pts (46% checkpoint-experienced) were treated in Dose Escalation, and 157 pts (32% checkpoint-experienced) in Cohort Expansion. No MTD was defined. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 146/207 (70.5%) pts, most commonly fatigue (19%) and nausea (11%). The rate of Grade ≥ 3 TRAEs was 23.2%. Immune-related AEs were consistent with events observed with anti-PD-1 antibodies. Mean half-life was 11 days; peripheral blood flow cytometry analyses confirmed full and sustained on-target binding during treatment at doses ≥ 120 mg. Among 41 response-evaluable [RE] dose escalation pts, 3 confirmed partial responses [cPRs] (triple negative breast cancer [TNBC], mesothelioma, gastric cancer) per RECIST 1.1 were observed, while 21 pts had stable disease [SD]. Among select expansion cohorts, PRs have been observed in epithelial ovarian cancer (n=2; both cPRs, and 7 with SD among 15 RE pts) and TNBC (n=2; 1 cPR, 1 unconfirmed PR [uPR], and 5 with SD among 14 RE pts). In a cohort of pts with HER2+ tumors treated with MGD013 in combination with margetuximab (investigational anti-HER-2 antibody), 3 PRs have been observed (breast [n=2], colorectal [n=1]; 1 cPR, 2 uPRs) and 2 pts with SD among 6 RE pts. Objective responses have been observed in several pts after prior anti-PD-1 therapy. Investigations into potential correlative biomarkers including LAG-3 and PD-1 are ongoing. Conclusions: MGD013, a novel molecule designed to coordinately block PD-1 and LAG-3, has demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and encouraging early evidence of anti-tumor activity. Clinical trial information: NCT03219268 .


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4763-4763
Author(s):  
Rajshekhar Chakraborty ◽  
Ying Yan ◽  
Mike Royal

Abstract Background: With the advent of several new agents in the treatment of multiple myeloma, including proteasome inhibitors (PIs), immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAb), the overall survival (OS) has significantly improved in the past two decades. However, most patients become refractory to currently available therapies along the disease trajectory. The median OS in triple-class-refractory patients (i.e., anti-CD 38 mAb, PIs, and IMiDs) is 6 months (Gandhi et al. Leukemia. 2019). Although BCMA-targeted therapies are a major advance in such patients, none of them are curative thus far, with the median progression-free survival (PFS) ranging from 3 months in BCMA-antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) to approximately 1 year in BCMA chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T-cell) therapies. Furthermore, unique toxicities of BCMA-targeted agents such as ocular toxicity (ADCs), cytokine release syndrome, or neurotoxicity (CAR Ts and BiTEs) may preclude their use in many patients. Hence, there is a critical unmet need in patients with triple-class-refractory myeloma. The STI-6129 ADC is produced by conjugating STI-5171, a fully human anti-CD38 mAb, with a covalently bound tubulin inhibitor, duostatin 5.2 (DUO-5.2), using a proprietary linker technology with a 3:1 drug-antibody ratio. STI-6129 binds to different CD38 epitopes than daratumumab. Upon binding to CD38, STI-6129 ADC is internalized by the cancer cell and undergoes lysosomal degradation, releasing DUO-5.2. This in turn leads to G2-phase cell cycle arrest, followed by caspase 3/7-dependent apoptosis and cell death. In studies on cynomolgus monkeys, the serum level of DUO-5.2 remained undetectable at all doses except at the highest dose of 4.5 mg/kg, indicating low likelihood of off-target toxicity. In vitro studies of primary human plasma cells, human tumor models, and animal xenograft models have demonstrated target elimination of CD38-positive human plasma cells by STI-6129. Importantly, STI-6129 has demonstrated cytotoxic activity in human multiple myeloma cells isolated from daratumumab-refractory patients (Figure 1). Hence, further investigation on clinical activity of STI-6129 is warranted. Study Design: The 38-ADC-RRMM-101 study is a two-stage, multicenter, open-label, dose-finding phase 1/2 trial. The phase 1 trial is designed to identify the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of STI-6129 by assessing safety, preliminary efficacy, and pharmacokinetics in patients with relapsed/refractory (RR) myeloma. The phase 2a stage of the trial will be a single-arm study to investigate the efficacy of STI-6129 in an expansion cohort of RR myeloma patients. Up to 25 patients will be enrolled in the phase 1 stage and 30 in the phase 2 stage of the study. The key inclusion criteria are the following: (a) RR myeloma with at least 3 prior lines of therapy in addition to being refractory to at least 1 PI, 1 IMiD, and 1 anti-CD 38 mAb; (b) measurable disease. The key exclusion criteria are: (a) receipt of the last dose of any anti-CD mAb within 90 days; (b) grade ≥3 neuropathy or grade 2 neuropathy with pain; (c) current history of CTCAE grade 3 muscle paresis, eyelid conditions, glaucoma, or any other ocular disorder that is CTCAE grade 2; (d) estimated creatinine clearance &lt;60 ml/min; (e) left ventricular ejection fraction&lt;40%. The primary endpoint of phase 1 stage of the study is safety, particularly any dose limiting toxicities. The primary endpoint of the phase 2 part of the study is overall response rate as per IMWG criteria. The dosing cohorts in the dose escalation phase will range from 0.25 mg/kg to 3.68 mg/kg. Given the potential for on-target off-tumor toxicity due to expression of CD38 on non-clonal plasma cells and other hematopoietic cells, blood counts and immunoglobulin levels will be closely monitored. While neurotoxicity or ocular toxicity were not observed with STI-6129 in animal models, including non-human primates, such event will be considered as adverse events of special interest (AESI) and comprehensive neurology and ocular (including slit lamp) examinations will be performed at baseline and study completion, and at any AESI. STI-6129 will be administered intravenously once in a 4-week cycle, with the intention being to treat patients until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Yan: Sorrento Therapeutics: Current Employment. Royal: Sorrento Therapeutics: Current Employment.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2581-2581 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. T. Lim ◽  
S. S. Leong ◽  
C. K. Toh ◽  
C. S. Ang ◽  
N. S. Wong ◽  
...  

2581 Background: Genexol-PM is a sterile, lyophilized polymeric micellar formulation of paclitaxel which is devoid of Cremophor EL and hence is more tolerable and less toxic. This phase 1 study sought to determine the maximum tolerated dose and the pharmacokinetic profile of Genexol-PM in Asian cancer patients with solid malignancies. Methods: Patients (N=35) refractory to previous chemotherapy were enrolled in a phase 1, open-label, dose-escalating study to assess safety, tolerability ad pharmacokinetics of Genexol-PM administered as a 1h infusion on a weekly basis for 3 weeks followed by a resting week. The starting dose was 80mg/m2. Cohorts of 1–6 patients were treated at 100, 120, 140, 160, 180 and the maximum administered dose was 200 mg/m2. Results: The median age was 56 years (range: 39 - 67 years) and two thirds of the enrolled patients were male (67%). Twenty-three patients (96%) had received prior chemotherapy, including eleven patients (46%) who had previously received taxane-based chemotherapy. The majority of patients had lung, nasopharyngeal and breast cancers. DLT was reached at 200 mg/m2. The MTD was 180 mg/m2. Grade 3 granulocytopenia was common in patients receiving Genexol-PM at doses of 120 mg/m2 or higher in the first cycle. The most common grade 3 non-haematologic adverse events in cycle 1 were fatigue, myalgia and neuropathy and occurred mainly at dose level 7 (200 mg/m2) in 4%, 4% and 8% of the patients. Five (21%) patients had partial response, 9 (38%) had stable disease and seven (29%) patients had disease progression. The pharmacokinetics of Genexol-PM displayed dose-proportionality, with both Cmax and AUC0-∞ values increasing by approximately 4- and 3-fold as the dose of Genexol-PM was increased from 80mg/m2 to 200mg/m2 with no significant change in clearance. The median total-body clearance of Genexol-PM for all patients was 43.9 L/hr. Conclusions: The weekly regimen of Genexol-PM was found to be well-tolerated and responses were observed in patients with refractory tumours, including patients who had failed taxane-based chemotherapy previously. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13604-e13604 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muralidhar Beeram ◽  
Amita Patnaik ◽  
Ravi K. Amaravadi ◽  
Naomi B. Haas ◽  
Kyriakos P. Papadopoulos ◽  
...  

e13604 Background: MGCD265 is a multi-target oral tyrosine kinase receptor inhibitor that targets Met, VEGFRs 1, 2, 3, Tie and Ron. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of MGCD265 in combination with docetaxel was initially determined using micronized tablets. MGCD265 formulation was improved and the MTD of MGCD265 in combination with docetaxel using the updated formulation was re-evaluated. Methods: Patients (pts) with metastatic or advanced solid tumors were enrolled in this Phase I, open-label, dose-escalating study to assess safety, pharmacodynamics (PD) and pharmacokinetics (PK) as well as anti-tumor activity of the combination. MGCD265 was administered every day over a 3-week cycle and docetaxel (50 then 75 mg/m2) was given intravenously once every 3 weeks (q3w). Results: As of January 11, 2012, 34 pts were enrolled (M/F: 19/15; ECOG 0/1: 19/15; median age: 64 years old). The MTD of the combination was initially defined as MGCD265 (72 mg/m2 BID)+docetaxel (75 mg/m2 q3w) based on the occurrence of dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) in 2 pts who were treated with MGCD265 at 96 mg/m2 BID (fatigue in 1 pt and diarrhea & lipase elevation in the other pt). The updated formulation of MGCD265 was introduced at 48 mg/m2 BID (n=3) with dose escalation to 72 mg/m2 BID (n=3) and 96 mg/m2 (n=4) with no observed DLTs, though the exposure of the two formulations were generally comparable. Overall, objective partial responses (per RECIST 1.1) were observed in 2/9 pts with NSCLC, 1/3 pts with prostate cancer and 1/1 pt with endometrial cancer. Stable disease for 6 cycles or more was observed in 6 pts. Treatment-related ≥ grade 3 toxicity reported in ≥ 2 pts were neutropenia, leukopenia, diarrhea and elevated lipase. The PD profile indicated an increase in the plasma level of VEGF and a decrease in plasma level of HGF at Cycle 1 Day 8 compared to baseline in some patients. Conclusions: MGCD265 was found to be well tolerated using the updated formulation in combination with full-dose docetaxel. Anti-cancer activity, supporting Phase II development of the combination, was observed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document