Pengaruh Opini Going Concern, Pergantian Manajemen, Kesulitan Keuangan, Dan Reputasi Auditor Pada Auditor Switching

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 82-95
Author(s):  
Cokorda Krisna Yudha ◽  
Komang Adi Kurniawan Saputra

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh opini going concern, pergantian manajemen, kesulitan keuangan dan reputasi auditor pada auditor switching serta menguji perbedaan pengaruh opini going concern, pergantian manajemen, kesulitan keuangan dan reputasi auditor pada auditor switching antara perusahaan berukuran besar, sedang dan kecil. Data penelitian dikumpulkan dari perusahaan manufaktur terbuka (Tbk) yang terdaftar di BEI. Jumlah pengamatan sejumlah 368 observasi dari tahun 2017-2017. Metode analisis menggunakan uji regresi logistik dan uji beda koefisien regresi. Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa terdapat pengaruh kesulitan keuangan dan reputasi auditor terhadap auditor switching. Namun opini going concern dan pergantian manajemen tidak berpengaruh terhadap auditor switching.

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-43
Author(s):  
I Ketut Sunarwijaya ◽  
I Putu Edy Arizona

Going concern audit opinion is an opinion issued by the auditor because there are several factors in maintaining going concern of the company. Opinion audit going concern be one example for users of financial statements to be used in decision making. This study aims to determine the effect of cash, liquidity, leverage, audit lag, auditor switching, company growth, and company size on audit audits. This research was conducted on companies that produce on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2014-2017. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling technique with the number of research samples as much as 117. The data analysis techniques were logistic regression techniques. The results showed that the variables of cash, liquidity, leverage, audit leg, switching auditors, company growth, and size did not affect the audit.


Author(s):  
Cok Krisna Yudha ◽  
Ni Ketut Rasmini ◽  
Made Gede Wirakusuma

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh opini going concern, pergantian manajemen, kesulitan keuangan dan reputasi auditor pada auditor switching serta menguji perbedaan pengaruh opini going concern, pergantian manajemen, kesulitan keuangan dan reputasi auditor pada auditor switching antara perusahaan berukuran besar, sedang dan kecil. Data penelitian dikumpulkan dari perusahaan manufaktur terbuka (Tbk) yang terdaftar di BEI. Jumlah pengamatan sejumlah 368 observasi dari tahun 2013-2015. Metode analisis menggunakan uji regresi logistik dan uji beda koefisien regresi. Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa terdapat pengaruh kesulitan keuangan dan reputasi auditor terhadap auditorswitching. Namun opini going concern dan pergantian manajemen tidak berpengaruh terhadap auditor switching. Hasil penelitian juga menyimpulkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan pengaruh opini going concern, pergantian manajemen, kesulitan keuangan dan reputasi auditor pada auditor switching antara perusahaan besar dan kecil.


2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 197-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Svanberg ◽  
Peter Öhman

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the costs to audit firms in terms of lost revenues of losing small clients due to auditor switching or client bankruptcy after issuing first-time going concern modified opinions. Design/methodology/approach – A population of small Swedish companies receiving first-time going concern modified opinions in 2009 was examined to determine the effects two years later compared with a matched sample of financially stressed companies that had not received going concern modified opinions. Findings – The results indicate that both auditor switching and client bankruptcy are positively related to receipt of going concern modified opinions. Furthermore, the authors find empirical evidence that auditors issuing first-time going concern modified opinions lose proportionately more fees through auditor switching and client bankruptcy than do auditors not issuing such opinions to financially stressed clients. Finally, the authors found that the going concern modified opinions issued by Big 4 firms are no more harmful to clients than are those issued by other audit firms. Research limitations/implications – The authors recognize a limitation of this study regarding the choice of control companies. Although the authors attempted to find similarly sized and similarly financially stressed companies from the same industries as those companies in the test group, the authors may have missed other variables relevant to auditor switching or client bankruptcy. Practical implications – A practical implication for the audit profession is the increased awareness of the fact that the financial dependence issues reported in this study extend to auditors with small client companies. Originality/value – This is the first study to examine fees lost due to auditor switching and client bankruptcy caused by going concern modified opinions in a population of small companies. It contributes to the mixed evidence presented in previous research as to the extent to which going concern modified audit opinions are self-fulfilling prophecies.


Sebatik ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Martini Martini ◽  
Priska Syabaniar

Tindakan pergantian auditor maupun kantor akuntan publik biasa disebut dengan auditor switching seringkali dilakukan oleh perusahaan. Pergantian auditor ini dapat dilakukan secara wajib (mandatory) atau juga secara sukarela (voluntary). Pergantian dilakukan secara wajib disebabkan karena adanya aturan yang syah dari pemerintah, sedangkan pergantian yang dilakukan secara sukarela dapat disebabkan oleh kondisi tertentu yang dialami oleh perusahaan dan menyebabkan mereka berfikir untuk mengganti auditornya. Tujuan dilakukan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis ukuran kantor akuntan publik, pergantian manajemen,  financial distress, opini audit going concern terhadap auditor switching. Populasi yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini menggunakan data sekunder yang berupa laporan keuangan dari perusahaan manufaktur subsektor makanan dan minuman yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) pada periode 2016-2019. Dalam penelitian untuk penentuan sampel menggunakan metode purposive sampling dan diperoleh sebanyak 20 perusahaan yang dapat dijadikan sampel. Alat analisis yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini untuk menguji pengaruh ukuran kantor akuntan publik, pergantian manajemen, financial distress, opini audit going concern terhadap auditor switching menggunakan regresi logistik. Hasil pengujian ini menunjukkan bahwa variabel ukuran kantor akuntan publik memiliki pengaruh dengan arah negatif terhadap auditor switchig, pergantian manajemen tidak berpengaruh terhadap auditor switching, financial distress tidak berpengaruh terhadap auditor switching, sedangkan opini audit going concern memiliki pengaruh dengan arah positif terhadap auditor switching.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dedi Heru Prihandoko ◽  
Supriyati Supriyati

The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect of company growth and financial distress on auditor switching with going concern audit opinion as a moderating variable. The data used in this research are secondary data obtained from Indonesia Stock Exchange. The sample used in this study is 25 infrastructure, utilities and transportation companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). The study period is 5 years (2013-2017). Sampling in this study is conducted using purposive sampling method. The analysis techniques used are descriptive analysis, logistic regression, and moderated regression analysis. The dependent variable used is auditor switching, while the independent variables are company growth and financial distress, with going concern  audit opinion as the moderating variable.  The results show that company growth has no effect on auditor switching, financial distress has an effect on Auditor switching, going concern audit opinion has no affect and cannot moderate the effect of company growth on auditor switching, going concern audit opinion has an effect but cannot moderate the effect of financial distress on auditor switching.


2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dwi Anjani ◽  
Sigit Hermawan ◽  
Sarwenda Biduri

This research aims to verify and provide empirical evidences about: The effect of Auditor Switching, Going Concern Opinion, Profit or Loss of current year and Company Size to the Audit Report Lag at companies LQ-45 that are listed on Indonesian Stock Exchange during the period 2011-2015.The population of this research are the LQ-45 companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange during the period 2011-2015. Sampling method using purposive sampling and obtain 15 companies. Data collection method used is the documentation. The analysis used is multiple linear regression analysis to test the hypothesis. The results shows that Auditor Switching and Opini Going Concern does not effect to Audit Report Lag partially, but Profit or Loss of current year and Company Size gave negative effect on Audit Report Lag partially. Auditor Switching, Opini Going Concern, Profit or Loss in year going and Company Size gave significant effect on Audit Report Lag simultaneously.


2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 514-530
Author(s):  
Arlen Djunaidi ◽  
Gatot Soepriyanto

This study aims to analyze the effect of auditor switching and audit quality on going concern audit opinion in listed manufacturing companies of the Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI) in the year 2006 to 2008. Auditor switching was marked by a change to the Public Accountant firms (KAP) who perform the audits or companies used the services of an auditor different than before. Audit quality is proxied by the scale of the BigFour auditors or non-Big Four. Going-concern audit opinion is the explanation given by the auditor if there is any doubt regarding the ability of the company to survive in the future. This study used 70 samples out of 452 populations, using purposive sampling technique in which the main criterion is the sample company received going-concern audit opinion in the year preceding the auditor switched. Results of the study showed that the change of auditors and audit quality is not a factor in determining going concern audit opinion of the company.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 137-167
Author(s):  
Indri Septiana ◽  
Patricia Diana

The objective of this study was to obtain empirical evidence about the effect of auditor switching, liquidity, leverage, disclosure and financial distress on the probability of going concern audit opinion. The object of this study is the mining companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2013 – 2016. Samples of this research were chosen by using purposive sampling and got 8 mining companies that matched the criteria. The criteria used for choosing the samples are listed on BEI as mining company during period 2013-2016, publish the annual report and audited financial statement in Rupiah, and has a net loss for two periods in a row. This research use regression logistic because the dependent variable measured by nominal scale. The result of this research showed that auditor switching, liquidity, leverage, disclosure and financial distress didn’t have effect to the probability of going concern audit opinion.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 276-297
Author(s):  
Oktavia Wardani

Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah menguji dan menganalisis pengaruh Auditor Switching, Biaya Auditor dan Kepemilikan Asing terhadap Penerimaan Opini Going concern dengan Spesialisasi Auditor sebagai Variabel Moderating. Populasi yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah perusahaan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) antara tahun 2014 dan 2017. Sampel dalam penelitian ini dipilih dengan metode purposive sampling dengan 40 perusahaan yang memenuhi kriteria. Pengujian dilakukan dengan menggunakan analisis regresi logistik. Hasil penelitian ini menyatakan bahwa penggantian auditor dan biaya auditor tidak mempengaruhi penerimaan opini audit going concern. Sedangkan variabel kepemilikan asing berpengaruh negatif terhadap penerimaan opini audit going concern. Selain itu, hasil penelitian ini juga menyatakan bahwa spesialisasi auditor tidak melemahkan pengaruh negatif dari pergantian auditor pada penerimaan opini audit going concern. Akan tetapi, memperkuat efek positif biaya auditor terhadap penerimaan opini audit going concern dan melemahkan pengaruh negatif kepemilikan asing pada penerimaan opini audit going concern.


2003 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 231-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann Vanstraelen

Previous studies have demonstrated that auditors are reluctant to issue going-concern opinions. Some suggest this reluctance is strategic and stems from the auditor's desire to avoid loss of clients or reputation. This paper investigates the threat of loss resulting from auditor switching and client bankruptcy in the regulatory context of Belgium. Belgium requires companies to engage an audit firm for a three-year period. Consequently, the client's threat of switching auditors is potentially more credible in the third year than in the first two years. The empirical results support the hypothesis that going-concern opinions significantly increase the probability of bankruptcy. Thus, going-concern reports remain relevant even in a country where debt financing is dominant. In addition, clients are four times more likely to switch auditors at the end of the mandatory term if they receive a going-concern opinion in the final year of the term relative to the previous two years. This strongly suggests that mandatory terms influence the association between going-concern opinions and auditor switching.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document