scholarly journals Technological and Legal Aspect in Digitalization of Movable Cultural Assets. Copyright and Intellectual Property Rights

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 35-45
Author(s):  
Kalina Sotirova-Valkova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
Cultural Values ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Legal Aspect ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Technological Aspect ◽  
Cultural Assets ◽  
Cultural Heritage Objects

The article presents the cycle of digitization of cultural heritage objects (movable cultural values stored in museums and galleries) with its three main stages: preparation, conversion and access. The focus is on the technological aspect, the preparation of the museum team and the standards used. In parallel, the legal framework of digitization is viewed as a serious, nationally specific and rarely presented topic related to copyright and intellectual property over the original and its digital derivative Keywords: digitization, cultural heritage, authorship and copyright, intellectual property rights, standards

scholarly journals MUSEUM SONGKET PALEMBANG DENGAN PENDEKATAN ARSITEKTUR NEO-VERNAKULAR

Arsitektura ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdul Aziz Arrosyid ◽  
Samsudi Samsudi ◽  
Ummul Mustaqimah
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
Cultural Values ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Architectural Design ◽  
Raw Materials ◽  
Vernacular Architecture ◽  
Museum Design ◽  
Limited Process

<p><em>Traditional weaving as a nation</em><em>al</em><em> cultural heritage </em><em>is</em><em> being abandoned, including songket in Palembang</em><em> city</em><em>. </em><em>S</em><em>ongket weaving craft has been abandoned</em><em> due to the limited process of the making, expensive raw materials</em><em>, and competiti</em><em>veness</em><em>, </em><em>either </em><em>other crafters</em><em> or</em><em> modern weaving. There are hundreds of Palembang songket motifs that have not </em><em>been </em><em>documented and collected well. O</em><em>nly</em><em> 77 motifs </em><em>which</em><em> have </em><em>been </em><em>registered </em><em>as</em><em> intellectual property rights. </em><em>The lack attention of this matter would give </em><em>possibility </em><em>for</em><em> neighboring </em><em>countries</em><em> </em><em>to claim it such an accident ever exist.</em><em> Songket Museum </em><em>is needed as</em><em> conservation</em><em> center</em><em>, exhibit</em><em>ion</em><em>, research, and songket craft workshop.</em><em> </em><em>Neo-Vernacular Architecture approach </em><em>is </em><em>used to</em><em> make museum </em><em>architectural design </em><em>which is </em><em>in </em><em>line </em><em>the cultural values of Palembang in contemporary design</em><em>. The design </em><em>issue </em><em>is</em><em> </em><em>how to </em><em>apply the principles of Neo-</em><em>V</em><em>ernacular</em><em> Architecture</em><em> into Palembang Songket Museum design. The method is designing the museum by taking both the physical a</em><em>n</em><em>d non-physical </em><em>e</em><em>lements</em><em> of local culture</em><em>. Beside, </em><em>re-interpretation the </em><em>shape </em><em>and philosophy</em><em>cal value</em><em> of </em><em>local </em><em>architecture</em><em> a</em><em>nd Palembang songket a</em><em>re apllied</em><em> in</em><em> a </em><em>new composition </em><em>of </em><em>Neo-Vernacular Architecture. The result is </em><em>a design of </em><em>Palembang Songket Museum </em><em>which</em><em> </em><em>applies</em><em> </em><em>Neo-Vernacular Architecture principles.</em></p><p><em> </em></p><p><strong><em>Keywords</em></strong><em>: Architecture, Neo-Vernacular, Palembang Songket, Songket Museum.</em></p>

PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KARYA SENI BATIK YANG BELUM TERDAFTAR MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 28 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG HAK CIPTA

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Inggrit Fernandes
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Rapid Growth ◽  
Economic Value ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Property Law ◽  
Market Demand ◽  
Work Of Art

Batik artwork is one of the treasures of the nation's cultural heritage. Batik artwork is currently experiencing rapid growth. The amount of interest and market demand for this art resulted batik artwork became one of the commodities in the country and abroad. Thus, if the batik artwork is not protected then the future can be assured of a new conflict arises in the realm of intellectual property law. Act No. 28 of 2014 on Copyright has accommodated artwork batik as one of the creations that are protected by law. So that this work of art than as a cultural heritage also have economic value for its creator. Then how the legal protection of the batik artwork yaang not registered? Does this also can be protected? While in the registration of intellectual property rights is a necessity so that it has the force of law to the work produced

Intellectual Property Rights and Biodiversity Management: The Case of India

2004 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Cullet ◽  
Jawahar Raja
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
International Treaties ◽  
Human Right ◽  
Individual Level ◽  
Biological Resources ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Biodiversity Convention

This article analyzes the impacts of the international legal framework for the promotion of intellectual property rights on India's legal regime concerning the control over biological resources and inventions derived from biological resources. It focuses in particular on the newly adopted Biodiversity Act and Plant Variety Act as well as on amendments to the Patents Act and their organic relationship within the overall domestic legal framework. It analyzes these enactments in the context of the move towards the control of biological resources and derived products through property rights fostered by existing international treaties, in particular the TRIPS agreement and the biodiversity convention. This has impacts not only for control over biological resources and derived products but also more generally on the management of agriculture in India and other developing countries and the realization of food security and the human right to food at the individual level.

USE OF COPYRIGHT PROTECTED WORKS IN THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 607
Author(s):  
Liene Vindele ◽  
Renāte Cāne
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Copyright Protection ◽  
Scientific Research ◽  
Research Process ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Educational Process ◽  
Step Test ◽  
Legal Norms

Copyright is one of the intellectual property rights whose main activity is to promote creativity and protect the ownership of the author. However, these rights are not absolute and are subject to certain restrictions.In the Berne Convention, Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights and also WIPO Copyright Treaty embodied so-called “three-step test” allowing exceptions to copyright protection. They state that exceptions to copyright protection are admissible only in specific cases; if they comply with the rules of normal exploitation of the author's work; and do not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate rights of the author.While respecting the restrictions contained in international conventions, the Latvian Copyright Law also lays down various restrictions, when the author's work can be used without a special permit for the use of the author's work or for free, such as in the educational or research process. The free use of copyright-protected materials constitutes a restriction on the economic rights of copyright holders. These restrictions aim to strike a balance between the rights of the author and the interests of the public. Although copyright-protected works can be used in education almost everywhere in the world, restrictions on the exercise of these rights have not been clearly established.The aim of this paper is to research limits use of copyright-protected works in the educational process. Basis for this analysis will be the international and national legal framework about copyright exceptions in educational process.In the development of the research used an analytical method of scientific research, as well as a method of interpreting grammatical, teleological and historical legal norms. For the conclusions used inductive and deductive method of scientific research. 

scholarly journals Trade in counterfeit goods in Serbia: Methodological approach and quantification

Industrija ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-23
Author(s):  
Branko Radulović ◽  
Miljan Savić
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Methodological Approach ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Negative Effects ◽  
Counterfeit Goods ◽  
Product Categories ◽  
Counterfeit Products

The paper represents the first step in quantifying the categories of goods with the highest risk of being counterfeit during import into Serbia. Firstly, we present a methodology for quantifying the level of counterfeiting, its advantages, and its limitations. Secondly, we determine the product categories most likely to contain counterfeit products. Likewise, by using the OECD methodology, the GTRIC-p indicator for Serbia was formed, enabling comparison with OECD member countries. Based on the results, Serbia does not significantly differ from EU countries in terms of structure and product categories most at risk. The negative effects of imports of counterfeit products are borne mainly by the foreign intellectual property rights holders whose counterfeit products are imported into Serbia. In this context, despite the legal framework in place, incentives for its proper implementation are questionable.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document