scholarly journals Exploration of Infection Prevention and Control Practice of Designated Hospitals in During Corona Virus Disease 2019 Epidemic Period

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Haiquan Luo ◽  
Maojun Fu ◽  
Xiantao Chen ◽  
Yunliang Chen ◽  
Yichuan Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Hospital ◽  
National Health ◽  
Prevention And Control ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Virus Disease ◽  
Hospital Infection ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
Corona Virus ◽  
Epidemic Period ◽  
And Control

Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a new infectious disease that appeared in wuhan in December 2019 Since January 23, the national health and fitness commission has required hospitals to be designated in accordance with the principle of "concentrating patients, experts, resources and treatment". Designated hospitals are often the strength of the general hospital and general hospital complex layers of various kinds of personnel, campus area is large, multi-channel, ordinary outpatient accepts people more, for emergency and severe cases treatment in patients with normal difficulty pressure big, suspected/confirmed cases, combined with the COVID-19 occurred when the traditional holiday, the country launched the emergency response since, process reform faces a difficult labor, shortage of manpower, protective shortages, short time limit, and many other difficulties, hospital infection prevention and control is facing unprecedented pressure. In this paper, the West China-Guang'an Hospital, Sichuan University (Guang'an people's hospital) as a designated hospital, on the basis of the relevant scheme of the national health committee, epidemic prevention and control of the actual, combined with comprehensive hospital leadership, manpower allocation, protection, security, patient management, disinfection isolation, preview triage, preventive measures, training, monitoring, etc., with practical experience summary for the COVID-19 during the hospital infection prevention and control to improve the practice exploration.

scholarly journals Knowledge and practice of infection prevention and control among healthcare workers: a COVID-19 pandemic experience

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 596-602
Author(s):  
Rifat Yasmin ◽  
Huma Hussain ◽  
Syeda Turab Fatima Abidi ◽  
Syed Asim Ali Shah ◽  
Tazaeen Hina Kazmi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prevention And Control ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Virus Disease ◽  
Close Contact ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
P Value ◽  
Corona Virus ◽  
Knowledge And Practice ◽  
And Control

Background: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is a global outbreak caused by novel SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2). Study aims to evaluate knowledge and practices of healthcare workers (HCW) regarding infection prevention and control of corona virus disease Material and methods: A cross sectional validation study was conducted. Study was conducted at department of Medicine, Pakistan Ordinance Factory Hospital, Wah Cantt. Study duration was 2 months (May 2020-June2020)A sample size of 217 HCW was calculated using WHO calculator. HCW were selected through non probability sampling (consecutive). Ethical permission was taken and research consent was signed by each participant. SPSS version 24 was used for analysis purpose. Post stratification fissure exact and chi-square test was applied. We found p value ≤0.05 as statistically significant. Results: Total 217 HCW were included in our study. Out of them, 85 (39.2%) were male and 132 (60.8%) were female in our study. Mean age of HCW was 34.5±2.4SD. In knowledge assessment majority of HCW had fair knowledge (46.5%), followed by good (30%) and poor knowledge (23.5%) regarding corona virus associated infection control and prevention. In practice assessment, among all those, 38.2% HCW showed better practices while 61.8% showed poor practices. Knowledge is significantly associated with virus transmission mode (p = 0.00), close contact (p = 0.000), protection from COVID-19 in triage area (p = 0.000), wearing PPE (p = 0.000) etc. Conclusion: Corona virus disease is a major challenge in resource limited countries. Healthcare workers showed relatively improved knowledge and practices regarding infection prevention and control in this COVID-19 Pandemic. Key words: Corona virus disease, Healthcare workers, Infection Prevention and Control, Knowledge, Practices Citation: Yasmin R, Hussain H, Abidi STF, Shah SAA, Kazmi TH, Hussain H. Knowledge and practice of infection prevention and control among healthcare workers: a COVID-19 pandemic experience. Anaesth pain intensive care 2020;24 (6):597-602 Received: 8 November 2020, Reviewed: 17 November 2020, Accepted: 19 November 2020

The impact of supportive supervision of infection prevention and control practices on Ebola outbreak in Liberia

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 287-293
Author(s):  
Ogbaini-Emovon Ephraim ◽  
Sneh Cyrus ◽  
Pajibo Myer ◽  
Abah Steve
Keyword(s):  
Prevention And Control ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Virus Disease ◽  
Health Facilities ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Supportive Supervision ◽  
And Control ◽  
Isolation Facilities ◽  
The Impact

Background: Supportive supervision of infection prevention and control (IPC) practices was one of a range of interventions employed at the county level in the control of the world’s most deadly Ebola virus disease outbreak that affected Liberia during 2013–2016. Methods: Datasets generated from four consecutive assessment visits to 25 health facilities in Maryland County, in Liberia, were analysed. Information on IPC practices was obtained by interview, direct observation and completion of a standardised assessment tool. For each of the IPC fields assessed, a score < 50% was graded poor, 50–75% as fair, while > 75% was rated as good. Results: Before the intervention, the first assessment (baseline) indicated that the majority of the health facilities scored low in terms of isolation facilities, IPC administration, supply and equipment, personnel and staffing, triage and waste management. Following the application of supportive supervision and monitoring, all the facilities recorded moderate to good performance in all the fields during the fourth round of assessment, except for isolation facilities, which scored low. Conclusion: Supportive supervision and monitoring of healthcare facilities appeared to have contributed to the improvement in IPC standards and compliance during the Ebola outbreak as demonstrated in this small-scale study and should be sustained as a core component of IPC programs, particularly in prolonged outbreak situations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document