scholarly journals Development of Module of Learning Geometry Based on Van Hiele Theory

AKSIOMA ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 98-108
Author(s):  
Deshinta Puspa Ayu Dwi Argaswari

The aim of this research was to develop a teaching and learning module using Van Hiele theories for quadrilateral topics in grade VII students in middle school, which is valid, practical, and effective. Literatures explain that nowadays the students over generalize the concept of geometry without further understanding about the concept of geometry and the skills of proving and reasoning that geometry field try to improved. The method used was research and development with modification of Borg and Gall and Plump method. The initial investigation stage result stated that only 22.6% of students reached level 2 informal deduction, 35.5% students reached level 1 analysis and the rest of students were still in level 0 visualization. In order to solve this problem, the design and realization stages developed a module which was written based on phase of learning geometry. Next, the module was verified through trial test in a class of students grade VII in order to get data of validity and effectivity. Lastly, the module was tested through experimental research by comparing experimental and control class. The module was valid based on validator review. The module was effective because it can increase students geometry thinking level by 48%. The nonparametric test using K-S and Man Whitney show that the result of level of geometry thinking in experimental class was better than the control class. Overall result state that the module valid and effective.

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 276
Author(s):  
Deshinta Argaswari

The aim of this research was to develop a teaching and learning module using Van Hiele theories for quadrilateral topics in grade VII students in middle school, which is valid, practical, and effective. Literatures explain that nowadays the students over generalize the concept of geometry without further understanding about the concept of geometry and the skills of proving and reasoning that geometry field try to improved. The method used was research and development with modification of Borg and Gall and Plump method. The initial investigation stage result stated that only 22.6% of students reached level 2 informal deduction, 35.5% students reached level 1 analysis and the rest of students were still in level 0 visualization. In order to solve this problem, the design and realization stages developed a module which was written based on phase of learning geometry. Next, the module was verified through trial test in a class of students grade VII in order to get data of validity and effectivity. Lastly, the module was tested through experimental research by comparing experimental and control class. The module was valid based on validator review. The module was effective because it can increase students geometry thinking level by 48%. The nonparametric test using K-S and Man Whitney show that the result of level of geometry thinking in experimental class was better than the control class. Overall result state that the module valid and effective


2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 159
Author(s):  
Fajar Hendro Utomo ◽  
Indah Setyo Wardhani ◽  
Muhammad Abdul Roziq Asrori

This objective of this study is to describe competency of mathematic communication based on Van Hiele theory on geometry course viewed from visual and kinesthetic learning styles.  The study was conducted in STKIP PGRI Tulungagung in November 2013 to August 2014, assigning 45 students as sample.  The study revealed that: First,  auditory learning style was achieved by: Level 1 = 0, Level 2 = 2, Level 3 = 9, Level 4 = 4, and Level 5 = 0, averaging at Level 3.  This means that students do not understand when they construct  definition, argument, role, formal deduction they worked;  Second, kinesthetic learning style was achieved by: Level 1 = 0, Level 2 = 6, Level 3 = 10, Level 4 = 2, and Level 5 = 0, averaging at Level 3.  This means that students do not understand on the work as done through auditory learning style.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 90
Author(s):  
Sera Delta Tanjung ◽  
Ihsan Ihsan

In the curriculum informatics engineering program of South Aceh Polytechnic, functiom derivative is taught in the second semester. The derivative function is a mathematics concept who does manipulation toward a function, thus the function slope can be obtained quantitatively on the slanted point. The derivative function material is one of the difficult material faced by the students. Accordingly, the implementation of a learning model is a good thing to create students' interest on the subject. And the media also use to support teaching and learning process as software maple. The purpose of this research is to find out the students’ results who have taught by quantum teaching and also maple on derivative function and the students who have taught by conventional method, and also to know the students' responses after taught by quantum teaching and software maple on derivative material. Experimental method is used in this research by designing pre-test and post-test and control groups. The population is all of the second semester informatics engineering's students at South Aceh Polytechnic where they divided into two classes. The technique in gaining data is using two tests, they are written and questionnaire test. The result of data is analyzed by T-test, and questionnaire is analyzed by calculating the average scores which have set by Likert-scale. Research found that t-score > t-table that is 2.41>1,69. This showed that, the students' score on derivative material taught by quantum teaching by adopting media maple is better than the students' score taught by conventional method at informatics engineering of South Aceh Polytechnic. As for the students' responses, gainned the average of a proposed statements is 3.52. According to the specified criterias, the researcher concludes that the students' responses toward the implementation of quantum teaching by software maple on derivative function is very positive.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 74
Author(s):  
Azwar Anwar

This study aims to determine the distribution of student geometry levels based on Van Hiele's theory and find out the differences in students' mathematics learning outcomes in grade VII junior high school. The sampling technique is probability sampling and a sample of 182 students is obtained. Data collection techniques used were Van Hiele level geometry tests and test results. Data analysis used descriptive statistics and anova with a significance level of 5%. The results showed that only 170 students were included in the Van Hiele geometry level, namely 62 students were at level 0, 97 students were at level 1, 5 students were at level 2, and as many as 6 students are at level 3. In the inferential analysis based on analysis of variance (two-way anova) concludes that for learning outcomes based on Van Hiele level geometry obtained Fcount = 13.793 > Ftable = 9.28 means H0 is rejected means that there are differences in mathematics learning outcomes based on Van Hiele geometry level.AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui distribusi level geometri siswa berdasarkan teori Van Hiele dan mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar matematika siswa di kelas VII SMP. Menggunakan teknik probability sampling dan diperoleh sampel sebanyak 182 siswa. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah tes level geometri Van Hiele dan tes hasil belajar. Analisis data menggunakan statistik deskriptif dan anova dengan taraf signifikansi sebesar 5%. Hasil analisis data menunjukkan bahwa dari 182 sampel, hanya 170 siswa yang termasuk dalam level geometri Van Hiele yaitu 62 siswa berada pada level 0, sebanyak 97 siswa pada level 1, sebanyak 5 siswa pada level 2, dan  6 siswa pada level 3. Analisis anova dua arah diperoleh Fhitung = 13,793 > Ftabel = 9,28 berarti H0  ditolak yang artinya terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar matematika berdasarkan level geometri Van Hiele.


Author(s):  
Chairunnisa Chairunnisa ◽  
Edy Surya ◽  
Bornok Sinaga

This study aims to (1) determine the level of students' spatial ability at Van Hiele's level in problem-based learning. (2) to find out the location of the students' difficulties in solving spatial power problems with the Van Hiele level. This research is a qualitative descriptive study. The subjects of this study were students of class XII SMK Bima Utomo Batang Kuis. The object of this research is the spatial ability based on Van Hiele's level in Problem Based Learning. The results of this study indicate that the level of spatial ability in the low category reaches 51.4%, while the medium category reaches 34.3%, and the high category reaches 14.3%. Subjects in the low category experienced skill difficultiesSubject S.01 (low spatial ability), at Level 1 experienced skill difficulties (question number 1) and concept difficulty (question number 4), at Level 2 experienced skill difficulties, at Level 3 and Level 4 experienced difficulty in principle. Subject S.02 (low spatial ability), has difficulty skills at Level 2 and has difficulty in principle at Level 3 and Level 4. Subject S.03 (moderate spatial ability), has difficulty in principle at Level 3 and Level 4. Subject S. 04 (moderate spatial ability), has difficulty skills at Level 3 and has difficulty in principle at Level 4. Subject S.05 (high spatial ability), has difficulty in principle at Level 4. Subject S.06 (high spatial ability), has difficulty principles at Level 4.Based on the results of this study, it is expected to be an inspiration for users.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 108
Author(s):  
Deshinta Puspa Ayu Dwi Argaswari
Keyword(s):  
Level 1 ◽  

Tujuan dari penelitian dan pengembandan ini adalah untuk melakukan pengembangan modul geometri berdasarkan teori geometri terkemuka yaitu teori geometri van Hiele. Pengembangan dilakukan dengan mengambil topik segiempat di kelas VII sekolah Menengah Pertama (SMP). Tahap penelitian dan pengembangan yang digunakan adalah modifikasi dari metode Borg and Gall dan metode Plump. Tahap awal dilakukan dengan melakukan tes level berpikir geometri siswa yang menunjukkan hanya 22,6% siswa berada pada level berpikir geometri yang memadai yaitu level 2 deduksi informal, sedangkan sisanya masih berada pada level 1 dan level 0. Bahan ajar yang digunakan juga ternyata tidak membantu siswa dalam meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir geometrinya. Oleh karena itu disusunlah modul geometri menggunakan teori van Hiele agar sesuai dengan tahap perkembangan siswa. Modul dikembangkan dengan berbagai pengujian kontruk agar mendapatkan modul yang valid. Kemudian modul di ujikan pada tes eksperimen dengan uji statistik K-S. Modul efektif meningkatkan level berpikir geometri siswa sebanyak 48% siswa..


2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 788
Author(s):  
Malahat Shabani Minaabad

There has been an upsurge of research in vocabulary teaching and learning since 1980s, part of the hidden motivation being due to technology of concordance giving birth to some new areas of inquiry such as corpus linguistics. As one category of vocabulary is collocations (Nation, 1990) its learning will be required to sound fluent in the language of our focus i.e., English. The present study investigates the effect of graphic organizers (GO) and marginal glossing (MG) on recalling of collocations among Iranian EFL learners with different proficiency levels. To accomplish the task, Quick Placement Test was administered to 270 EFL learners in order to determine their proficiency levels (elementary, intermediate and advanced levels). Then learners of each level were randomly assigned to one control and two experimental groups. Experimental and control groups received the collocation instruction differently. After seven session treatments, results of paired-sample revealed that all of the groups made gains from pre-test to post-test but it was significant for groups that received graphic organizers strategy. Furthermore, results of one-way ANOVA indicated that advanced group outperformed intermediate group, and intermediate group was better than elementary group.


Geometric thinking plays an important role in geometric achievement. It is also important in other fields, such as architecture, engineering, film, science, graphics, and arts. However, in Indonesian education curriculum, teaching and learning geometry does not emphasise the geometric thinking skills. Several studies revealed that Indonesian students could not come out from the lowered zone of the International exam, such as Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS), which caused by van Hiele levels of geometric thinking. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the van Hiele levels of geometric thinking among secondary school students in Makassar, Indonesia. A total of 298 respondents randomly took part in this study. The van Hiele geometric thinking test was used to assess the student's level of geometric thinking. Data were in ordinal form analysed according to the weighted van Hiele geometric thinking test scores presented in the table. The findings showed that most of the students were at the lowest level of geometric thinking. Several 123 and 93 respondents were at Level 0 (Visualisation) and Level 1 (Analysis), respectively. Meanwhile, 70 respondents were lower Level 0 and only a few respondents were in the upper Level 1. The result might be used as a fundamental source to produce a learning strategy in elevating van Hiele levels of geometric thinking.


1995 ◽  
Vol 89 (6) ◽  
pp. 514-523 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Miletic

This article reports on a study of the knowledge of the Level 1 and Level 2 rules of perspective taking by three groups of 8-year-old children with three visual conditions. Although all groups of children had knowledge of the Level 1 rules, their knowledge of the Level 2 rules was affected by their vision. Thus, the sighted children performed better than the children with low vision, and the children with low vision performed better than those who were congenitally blind.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 68
Author(s):  
Nurul Hayati ◽  
Rika Wahyuni ◽  
Nurhayati Nurhayati
Keyword(s):  
Level 1 ◽  

<em>Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk: (1) Mendeskripsikan kemampuan koneksi  matematis siswa pada materi kubus dan balok. (2) Mengetahui kesalahan kemampuan koneksi matematis siswa pada materi kubus dan balok. (3) Mengetahui faktor penyebab kesalahan kemampuan koneksi matematis siswa pada materi kubus dan balok. Jenis penelitan ini adalah penelitian deskriptif analitis. Subjek dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas VIII Mts Al-Fatah Singkawang, dan objeknya adalah kemampuan koneksi matematis siswa pada kubus dan balok. Berdasarkan hasil analisis diperoleh: untuk indikator 1  yaitu mengenali dan memanfaatkan hubungan-hubungan antar gagasan matematika rata-ratanya adalah 66,67% dengan kategori sedang; untuk indikator 2 yaitu memahami bagaimana gagasan-gagasan dalam matematika saling berhubungan dan mendasari satu sama lain untuk menghasilkan suatu keutuhan yang koheren rata-ratanya adalah 26,11% dengan kategori rendah; untuk indikator 3 yaitu mengenali dan menerapkan matematika dalam konteks-konteks diluar matematika atau masalah kehidupan sehari-hari rata-ratanya adalah 0,36,% dengan kategori rendah. Bentuk kesalahan-kesalahan koneksi matematis siswa antara lain; (1) tidak mampu memahami masalah. (2) salah memaknai soal. (3) kesalahan konsep dan salah menentukan rumus. (4) kesalahan prosedur, (5) kesalahan dalam mengubah bahasa sehari-hari ke dalam bentuk matematika. (6) kesalahan dalam menuliskan langkah-langkah penyelesaian soal cerita kubus dan balok. Factor-faktor yang mempengaruhi siswa antara lain;</em> (1) <em>kurangnya dalam memahami masalah dan kurangnya kemampuan siswa dalam melakukan proses pengukuran dan penentuan suatu konsep, (2) kurangnya kemampuan siswa dalam mengungkapkan ide-ide yang ia miliki untuk menyelesaikan soal yang diberikan dan  siswa kurang teliti melihat hubungan-hubungan apa dari data yang ada, (3) kurangnya kemampuan siswa dalam mengubah soal dalam bahasa sehari-hari kedalam bentuk matematika</em><em>. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa persentase siswa dalam memecahkan masalah geometri berdasarkan teori Van Hiele masih berada pada kategori rendah. Jadi dari hasil penelitian didapat bahwa siswa yang memiliki kemampuan koneksi berdasarkan tingkat berpikir level 2 berada di kategori sedang sedangkan kemampuan koneksi dengan tingkat berpikir level 1 dan level 0 berada pada kategori rendah</em>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document