scholarly journals Analisis Kemampuan Koneksi Matematis Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Geometri Berdasarkan Tingkat Berpikir Van Hiele di kelas VIII Mts Al-Fatah Singkawang

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 68
Author(s):  
Nurul Hayati ◽  
Rika Wahyuni ◽  
Nurhayati Nurhayati
Keyword(s):  
Van Hiele ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Level 2

<em>Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk: (1) Mendeskripsikan kemampuan koneksi  matematis siswa pada materi kubus dan balok. (2) Mengetahui kesalahan kemampuan koneksi matematis siswa pada materi kubus dan balok. (3) Mengetahui faktor penyebab kesalahan kemampuan koneksi matematis siswa pada materi kubus dan balok. Jenis penelitan ini adalah penelitian deskriptif analitis. Subjek dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas VIII Mts Al-Fatah Singkawang, dan objeknya adalah kemampuan koneksi matematis siswa pada kubus dan balok. Berdasarkan hasil analisis diperoleh: untuk indikator 1  yaitu mengenali dan memanfaatkan hubungan-hubungan antar gagasan matematika rata-ratanya adalah 66,67% dengan kategori sedang; untuk indikator 2 yaitu memahami bagaimana gagasan-gagasan dalam matematika saling berhubungan dan mendasari satu sama lain untuk menghasilkan suatu keutuhan yang koheren rata-ratanya adalah 26,11% dengan kategori rendah; untuk indikator 3 yaitu mengenali dan menerapkan matematika dalam konteks-konteks diluar matematika atau masalah kehidupan sehari-hari rata-ratanya adalah 0,36,% dengan kategori rendah. Bentuk kesalahan-kesalahan koneksi matematis siswa antara lain; (1) tidak mampu memahami masalah. (2) salah memaknai soal. (3) kesalahan konsep dan salah menentukan rumus. (4) kesalahan prosedur, (5) kesalahan dalam mengubah bahasa sehari-hari ke dalam bentuk matematika. (6) kesalahan dalam menuliskan langkah-langkah penyelesaian soal cerita kubus dan balok. Factor-faktor yang mempengaruhi siswa antara lain;</em> (1) <em>kurangnya dalam memahami masalah dan kurangnya kemampuan siswa dalam melakukan proses pengukuran dan penentuan suatu konsep, (2) kurangnya kemampuan siswa dalam mengungkapkan ide-ide yang ia miliki untuk menyelesaikan soal yang diberikan dan  siswa kurang teliti melihat hubungan-hubungan apa dari data yang ada, (3) kurangnya kemampuan siswa dalam mengubah soal dalam bahasa sehari-hari kedalam bentuk matematika</em><em>. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa persentase siswa dalam memecahkan masalah geometri berdasarkan teori Van Hiele masih berada pada kategori rendah. Jadi dari hasil penelitian didapat bahwa siswa yang memiliki kemampuan koneksi berdasarkan tingkat berpikir level 2 berada di kategori sedang sedangkan kemampuan koneksi dengan tingkat berpikir level 1 dan level 0 berada pada kategori rendah</em>

scholarly journals KOMUNIKASI MATEMATIKA BERDASARKAN TEORI VAN HIELE PADA MATA KULIAH GEOMETRI DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR MAHASISWA PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 159
Author(s):  
Fajar Hendro Utomo ◽  
Indah Setyo Wardhani ◽  
Muhammad Abdul Roziq Asrori
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Van Hiele ◽  
Construct Definition ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Van Hiele Theory ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Level 2

This objective of this study is to describe competency of mathematic communication based on Van Hiele theory on geometry course viewed from visual and kinesthetic learning styles.  The study was conducted in STKIP PGRI Tulungagung in November 2013 to August 2014, assigning 45 students as sample.  The study revealed that: First,  auditory learning style was achieved by: Level 1 = 0, Level 2 = 2, Level 3 = 9, Level 4 = 4, and Level 5 = 0, averaging at Level 3.  This means that students do not understand when they construct  definition, argument, role, formal deduction they worked;  Second, kinesthetic learning style was achieved by: Level 1 = 0, Level 2 = 6, Level 3 = 10, Level 4 = 2, and Level 5 = 0, averaging at Level 3.  This means that students do not understand on the work as done through auditory learning style.

scholarly journals Development of Module of Learning Geometry Based on Van Hiele Theory

AKSIOMA ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 98-108
Author(s):  
Deshinta Puspa Ayu Dwi Argaswari
Keyword(s):  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Nonparametric Test ◽  
Result State ◽  
Van Hiele ◽  
Learning Module ◽  
Trial Test ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
And Control ◽  
Level 2 ◽  
Better Than

The aim of this research was to develop a teaching and learning module using Van Hiele theories for quadrilateral topics in grade VII students in middle school, which is valid, practical, and effective. Literatures explain that nowadays the students over generalize the concept of geometry without further understanding about the concept of geometry and the skills of proving and reasoning that geometry field try to improved. The method used was research and development with modification of Borg and Gall and Plump method. The initial investigation stage result stated that only 22.6% of students reached level 2 informal deduction, 35.5% students reached level 1 analysis and the rest of students were still in level 0 visualization. In order to solve this problem, the design and realization stages developed a module which was written based on phase of learning geometry. Next, the module was verified through trial test in a class of students grade VII in order to get data of validity and effectivity. Lastly, the module was tested through experimental research by comparing experimental and control class. The module was valid based on validator review. The module was effective because it can increase students geometry thinking level by 48%. The nonparametric test using K-S and Man Whitney show that the result of level of geometry thinking in experimental class was better than the control class. Overall result state that the module valid and effective.

scholarly journals Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa ditinjau dari Level Geometri Van Hiele SMP Kelas VII

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 74
Author(s):  
Azwar Anwar
Keyword(s):  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Probability Sampling ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Van Hiele ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Level 2

This study aims to determine the distribution of student geometry levels based on Van Hiele's theory and find out the differences in students' mathematics learning outcomes in grade VII junior high school. The sampling technique is probability sampling and a sample of 182 students is obtained. Data collection techniques used were Van Hiele level geometry tests and test results. Data analysis used descriptive statistics and anova with a significance level of 5%. The results showed that only 170 students were included in the Van Hiele geometry level, namely 62 students were at level 0, 97 students were at level 1, 5 students were at level 2, and as many as 6 students are at level 3. In the inferential analysis based on analysis of variance (two-way anova) concludes that for learning outcomes based on Van Hiele level geometry obtained Fcount = 13.793 > Ftable = 9.28 means H0 is rejected means that there are differences in mathematics learning outcomes based on Van Hiele geometry level.AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui distribusi level geometri siswa berdasarkan teori Van Hiele dan mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar matematika siswa di kelas VII SMP. Menggunakan teknik probability sampling dan diperoleh sampel sebanyak 182 siswa. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah tes level geometri Van Hiele dan tes hasil belajar. Analisis data menggunakan statistik deskriptif dan anova dengan taraf signifikansi sebesar 5%. Hasil analisis data menunjukkan bahwa dari 182 sampel, hanya 170 siswa yang termasuk dalam level geometri Van Hiele yaitu 62 siswa berada pada level 0, sebanyak 97 siswa pada level 1, sebanyak 5 siswa pada level 2, dan  6 siswa pada level 3. Analisis anova dua arah diperoleh Fhitung = 13,793 > Ftabel = 9,28 berarti H0  ditolak yang artinya terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar matematika berdasarkan level geometri Van Hiele.

scholarly journals The Difficulty Analysis of Students Spatial Ability Based on Level Van Hiele in Problem Based Learning

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 158-164
Author(s):  
Chairunnisa Chairunnisa ◽  
Edy Surya ◽  
Bornok Sinaga
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Ability ◽  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
Descriptive Study ◽  
Van Hiele ◽  
High Category ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Qualitative Descriptive ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Level 2 ◽  
Experienced Difficulty

This study aims to (1) determine the level of students' spatial ability at Van Hiele's level in problem-based learning. (2) to find out the location of the students' difficulties in solving spatial power problems with the Van Hiele level. This research is a qualitative descriptive study. The subjects of this study were students of class XII SMK Bima Utomo Batang Kuis. The object of this research is the spatial ability based on Van Hiele's level in Problem Based Learning. The results of this study indicate that the level of spatial ability in the low category reaches 51.4%, while the medium category reaches 34.3%, and the high category reaches 14.3%. Subjects in the low category experienced skill difficultiesSubject S.01 (low spatial ability), at Level 1 experienced skill difficulties (question number 1) and concept difficulty (question number 4), at Level 2 experienced skill difficulties, at Level 3 and Level 4 experienced difficulty in principle. Subject S.02 (low spatial ability), has difficulty skills at Level 2 and has difficulty in principle at Level 3 and Level 4. Subject S.03 (moderate spatial ability), has difficulty in principle at Level 3 and Level 4. Subject S. 04 (moderate spatial ability), has difficulty skills at Level 3 and has difficulty in principle at Level 4. Subject S.05 (high spatial ability), has difficulty in principle at Level 4. Subject S.06 (high spatial ability), has difficulty principles at Level 4.Based on the results of this study, it is expected to be an inspiration for users.

scholarly journals PENELITIAN DAN PENGEMBANGAN MODUL PEMBELAJARAN GEOMETRI BERBASIS TEORI VAN HIELE

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 108
Author(s):  
Deshinta Puspa Ayu Dwi Argaswari
Keyword(s):  
Van Hiele ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Level 2

Tujuan dari penelitian dan pengembandan ini adalah untuk melakukan pengembangan modul geometri berdasarkan teori geometri terkemuka yaitu teori geometri van Hiele. Pengembangan dilakukan dengan mengambil topik segiempat di kelas VII sekolah Menengah Pertama (SMP). Tahap penelitian dan pengembangan yang digunakan adalah modifikasi dari metode Borg and Gall dan metode Plump. Tahap awal dilakukan dengan melakukan tes level berpikir geometri siswa yang menunjukkan hanya 22,6% siswa berada pada level berpikir geometri yang memadai yaitu level 2 deduksi informal, sedangkan sisanya masih berada pada level 1 dan level 0. Bahan ajar yang digunakan juga ternyata tidak membantu siswa dalam meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir geometrinya. Oleh karena itu disusunlah modul geometri menggunakan teori van Hiele agar sesuai dengan tahap perkembangan siswa. Modul dikembangkan dengan berbagai pengujian kontruk agar mendapatkan modul yang valid. Kemudian modul di ujikan pada tes eksperimen dengan uji statistik K-S. Modul efektif meningkatkan level berpikir geometri siswa sebanyak 48% siswa..

scholarly journals EFEKTIVITAS MODEL PEMBELAJARAN INQUIRY UNTUK MENINGKATKAN PENALARAN MATEMATIS SISWA PADA MATERI PELUANG

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 39
Author(s):  
Sandi Triatma ◽  
Citra Utami ◽  
Rika Wahyuni
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Design ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Van Hiele ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Level 2

<em>Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui efektivitas model pembelajaran Inquiry untuk meningkatkan kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa. Jenis penelitian ini adalah Quasi Experimental Design dengan desain penelitian Non Equivalen Control Group Design. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas IX SMP Barito Singkawang sebanyak 3 kelas yaitu kelas IXA, IXB, dan IXC. Pengambilan sampel dalam penelitian ini menggunakan sampling purposive yaitu kelas IXA kelas sebagai kelas eksperimen dan kelas IXC sebahgai kelas kontrol. Instrumen yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah tes kemampuan penalaran matematis, dan angket motivasi siswa. Sebelum digunakan instrumen terlebih dahulu diuji validitasnya dengan ahli. Hasil penelitian menunjukan : 1) kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa mencapai kriteria ketuntasan minimum (KKM = 70) secara individu dan klasikal yaitu sebesar  77,38 dan ketuntasan klasikal melampaui 75%; 2) Terdapat perbedaan peningkatan kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran Inquiry. 3) Motivasi belajar siswa kelas IX SMP Barito Singkawang tinggi pada materi peluang setelah diterapkan model pembelajaran Inquiry sebesar 128,31 dengan kategori sangat tinggi.penelitian menunjukan bahwa persentase siswa dalam memecahkan masalah geometri berdasarkan teori Van Hiele masih berada pada kategori rendah. Jadi dari hasil penelitian didapat bahwa siswa yang memiliki kemampuan koneksi berdasarkan tingkat berpikir level 2 berada di kategori sedang sedangkan kemampuan koneksi dengan tingkat berpikir level 1 dan level 0 berada pada kategori rendah.</em>

scholarly journals LEVEL BERPIKIR GEOMETRI MENURUT TEORI VAN HIELE BERDASARKAN KEMAMPUAN GEOMETRI DAN PERBEDAAN GENDER SISWA KELAS VII SMPN 8 PAREPARE

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Aditya Dwiwansyah Musa
Keyword(s):  
Gender Differences ◽  
Female Student ◽  
Male Student ◽  
Ability Test ◽  
Van Hiele ◽  
Van Hiele Theory ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
And Gender ◽  
Level 2

The study aimed at describing the level in thinking geometry according to Van Hiele theory based on geometry ability and gender differences. The subjects of the study were 4 people consisted of a male student with high geometry ability (LT), a female student with high geometry ability (PT), a male student with low geometry ability (LR), and a female student with low geometry ability (PR). The instrument of the study was the researcher herself as the main instrument assisted by test of geometry ability, test of Van Hiele, and guided interview which was valid and reliable. Data were collected by conducting test and test-based interview. The subject of the study grade VII students consisted of 4 people. The process of the study was conducted in several steps, namely (a) formulating the indicator of the level in thinking geometry according to Van Hiele theory based on the relevant theory and research, (b) formulating the supporting instrument (test of geometry ability, test of Van Hiele geometry, and guided interview) which was valid and reliable, (c) deciding the research subjects by providing test of geometry ability, (d) obtaining the data to reveal the level in thinking geometry of students on the characteristics of tetragon, (e) conducting time triangulation to obtain valid data, (f) conducting data analysis of the level in thinking geometry of students according to Van Hiele theory based on the geometry ability and gender differences, (g) conducting the discussion of the result of analysis, and (h) conducting conclusion drawing of the result of the study. The result of the study revealed that (1) the subject of LT was in level 2 of pre-ordering (unmaximized level 2), the subject had lack of understanding the correlation among planes in making the definition, (2) the subject of PT was in level 2 of pre-ordering (unmaximized level 2), the subject had lack of understanding the correlation among planes in making the definition, (3) the subject of LR was in level 1 of analysis, the subject could determine the characteristics of a plane; where as (4) the subject of PR was in level 1 of analysis, subject could determine the characteristics of a plane.

scholarly journals DEVELOPMENT OF MODULE OF LEARNING GEOMETRY BASED ON VAN HIELE THEORY

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 276
Author(s):  
Deshinta Argaswari
Keyword(s):  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Nonparametric Test ◽  
Result State ◽  
Van Hiele ◽  
Learning Module ◽  
Trial Test ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
And Control ◽  
Level 2 ◽  
Better Than

The aim of this research was to develop a teaching and learning module using Van Hiele theories for quadrilateral topics in grade VII students in middle school, which is valid, practical, and effective. Literatures explain that nowadays the students over generalize the concept of geometry without further understanding about the concept of geometry and the skills of proving and reasoning that geometry field try to improved. The method used was research and development with modification of Borg and Gall and Plump method. The initial investigation stage result stated that only 22.6% of students reached level 2 informal deduction, 35.5% students reached level 1 analysis and the rest of students were still in level 0 visualization. In order to solve this problem, the design and realization stages developed a module which was written based on phase of learning geometry. Next, the module was verified through trial test in a class of students grade VII in order to get data of validity and effectivity. Lastly, the module was tested through experimental research by comparing experimental and control class. The module was valid based on validator review. The module was effective because it can increase students geometry thinking level by 48%. The nonparametric test using K-S and Man Whitney show that the result of level of geometry thinking in experimental class was better than the control class. Overall result state that the module valid and effective

scholarly journals Level Berpikir Geometri Menurut Teori Van Hiele Berdasarkan Kemampuan Geometri dan Perbedaan Gender Siswa Kelas VII SMPN 8 Pare-Pare

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Aditya Dwiwansyah Musa
Keyword(s):  
Gender Differences ◽  
Female Student ◽  
Male Student ◽  
Ability Test ◽  
Van Hiele ◽  
Van Hiele Theory ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
And Gender ◽  
Level 2

The study aimed at describing the level in thinking geometry according to Van Hiele theory based on geometry ability and gender differences. The subjects of the study were 4 people consisted of a male student with high geometry ability (LT), a female student with high geometry ability (PT), a male student with low geometry ability (LR), and a female student with low geometry ability (PR). The instrument of the study was the researcher herself as the main instrument assisted by test of geometry ability, test of Van Hiele, and guided interview which was valid and reliable. Data were collected by conducting test and test-based interview. The subject of the study grade VII students consisted of 4 people. The process of the study was conducted in several steps, namely (a) formulating the indicator of the level in thinking geometry according to Van Hiele theory based on the relevant theory and research, (b) formulating the supporting instrument (test of geometry ability, test of Van Hiele geometry, and guided interview) which was valid and reliable, (c) deciding the research subjects by providing test of geometry ability, (d) obtaining the data to reveal the level in thinking geometry of students on the characteristics of tetragon, (e) conducting time triangulation to obtain valid data, (f) conducting data analysis of the level in thinking geometry of students according to Van Hiele theory based on the geometry ability and gender differences, (g) conducting the discussion of the result of analysis, and (h) conducting conclusion drawing of the result of the study. The result of the study revealed that (1) the subject of LT was in level 2 of pre-ordering (unmaximized level 2), the subject had lack of understanding the correlation among planes in making the definition, (2) the subject of PT was in level 2 of pre-ordering (unmaximized level 2), the subject had lack of understanding the correlation among planes in making the definition, (3) the subject of LR was in level 1 of analysis, the subject could determine the characteristics of a plane; where as (4) the subject of PR was in level 1 of analysis, subject could determine the characteristics of a plane.

scholarly journals Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa Kelas VII pada Materi Segiempat ditinjau dari Tingkat Berpikir Geometri Van Hiele

AKSIOMA ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 21
Author(s):  
Arctin Pebruariska ◽  
Achmad Dhany Fachrudin
Keyword(s):  
Van Hiele ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Level 2

Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif yang bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa pada materi segempat ditinjau dari distribusi level berpikir van hiele. Dari penelitian ini didapatkan bahwa siswa dengan tingkat berpikir van hiele level 0 (visualisasi) hanya mampu memahami masalah atau berada pada tingkat I. Sementara, siswa pada level 1 atau level analisis, mampu memahami masalah, menyusun rencana dalam penyelesaian masalah, melaksanakan rencana penyelesaian, akan tetapi siswa belum memeriksa dan mengkaji kembali hasil yang diperoleh, atau berada pada tingkat III. Sedangkan siswa pada level 2 (deduksi informal) sudah mampu memahami masalah, menyusun rencana penyelesaian, melaksanakan rencana penyelesaian, dan memeriksa kembali hasil penyelesaian, berada pada tingkat IV. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa semakin tinggi tingkat berpikir geometry Van Hiele siswa semakin tinggi pula kemampuan pemecahan masalahnya.Kata kunci:Pemecahan Masalah; Segiempat; level Van Hiele

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document