scholarly journals Implementation of the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla Salvadore
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Pain Assessment ◽  
The United States ◽  
Posttest Score ◽  
Assessment Instrument ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Nurses Knowledge

In the United States, greater than half of the adult patients who are admitted to critical care experience pain and report poor pain control. Inadequate management of acute pain is associated with negative outcomes, including high blood sugar, insulin resistance, higher infection risk, increased discomfort, decreased satisfaction, and chronic pain. Patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) cannot always express that they are having pain. Recently modified guidelines for the Sustained Use of Sedatives and Analgesics in the Critically Ill Adult recommend a reliable and valid pain assessment instrument for patients who are unable to verbalize pain. For the adult critically ill population, the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) and the Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS) were identified as the most reliable and valid instruments. The purpose of this program development was to provide education for nurses in the Cardiovascular Intensive Care Unit (CVICU) on the CPOT to assist in transitioning to the CPOT as part of the CVICU pain assessment. A pretest-posttest design was utilized to evaluate the nurses’ knowledge of the CPOT. The intervention consisted of a one-hour education session on pain assessment and the CPOT. Thirteen out of a potential twenty-two nurses (n=13, 59%) participated in the educational session with a mean pretest score of 42.3% and a mean posttest score of 93.1%. There was a 50.8% improvement post-intervention total scores. Findings from this quality improvement education intervention suggest that the CVICU nurses’ knowledge increased in both pain assessment and the CPOT following the intervention.

scholarly journals Advances in the Management of Sepsis and the Understanding of Key Immunologic Defects

2011 ◽  
Vol 115 (6) ◽  
pp. 1349-1362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lee P. Skrupky ◽  
Paul W. Kerby ◽  
Richard S. Hotchkiss
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Operating Room ◽  
The United States ◽  
Difficult Problem ◽  
Treatment Algorithms ◽  
New Treatment ◽  
Overall Mortality

Anesthesiologists are increasingly confronting the difficult problem of caring for patients with sepsis in the operating room and in the intensive care unit. Sepsis occurs in more than 750,000 patients in the United States annually and is responsible for more than 210,000 deaths. Approximately 40% of all intensive care unit patients have sepsis on admission to the intensive care unit or experience sepsis during their stay in the intensive care unit. There have been significant advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology of the disorder and its treatment. Although deaths attributable to sepsis remain stubbornly high, new treatment algorithms have led to a reduction in overall mortality. Thus, it is important for anesthesiologists and critical care practitioners to be aware of these new therapeutic regimens. The goal of this review is to include practical points on important advances in the treatment of sepsis and provide a vision of future immunotherapeutic approaches.

scholarly journals Assessing Nurses’ Knowledge of Noise in the Intensive Care Unit: An Educational Intervention Project

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Fortes
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Educational Intervention ◽  
Quality Improvement Project ◽  
Minimal Risk ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Staff Members ◽  
Nurses Knowledge

Noise in the intensive care unit (ICU) has been studied for over thirty years, but it continues to be a significant problem and a top complaint among patients. Staff members are now reporting detrimental health effects from excessive noise. One of the significant factors of inadequate noise control in the ICU is that nurses have insufficient awareness regarding the hospital noise issue and its negative impact on health status. The level of knowledge of clinical staff on the topic of noise is not known. A quality improvement project to explore noise in the ICU could facilitate better understanding of the phenomenon and formulation of new ways to continue to reduce noise at a community hospital in Massachusetts. The purpose of this quality improvement project was to evaluate nurses’ knowledge of the potentially harmful effects of noise on patients as well as on nurses, to identify opportunities for improvement of the environment, and to conduct an educational intervention aimed at reducing noise in the intensive care unit. The methodology for this project included a pre-test, followed by an educational session, and completion of a post-test. The participants included registered nurse staff members in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and the Critical Care Unit (CCU). Exclusion criteria included staff members who are not registered nurses. The project posed minimal risk. No identifying or biographical data was collected, and results included analysis of aggregate data. Descriptive statistics were used to assist with analysis. Results were disseminated to the staff of the ICU and CCU, posted on a bulletin board in the critical care area, presented as a poster presentation at the Spring RIC MSN Symposium, and available as a manuscript on the RIC Digital Commons.

Survey of Physiotherapy Practice in Ontario Cardiac Surgery Intensive Care Units

2021 ◽  
pp. e20200069
Author(s):  
Anastasia N.L. Newman ◽  
Michelle E. Kho ◽  
Jocelyn E. Harris ◽  
Alison Fox-Robichaud ◽  
Patricia Solomon
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care ◽  
Physiotherapy Practice

Purpose: This article describes current physiotherapy practice for critically ill adult patients requiring prolonged stays in critical care (> 3 d) after complicated cardiac surgery in Ontario. Method: We distributed an electronic, self-administered 52-item survey to 35 critical care physiotherapists who treat adult cardiac surgery patients at 11 cardiac surgical sites. Pilot testing and clinical sensibility testing were conducted beforehand. Participants were sent four email reminders. Results: The response rate was 80% (28/35). The median (inter-quartile range) reported number of cardiac surgeries performed per week was 30 (10), with a median number of 14.5 (4) cardiac surgery beds per site. Typical reported caseloads ranged from 6 to 10 patients per day pe therapist, and 93% reported that they had initiated physiotherapy with patients once they were clinically stable in the intensive care unit. Of 28 treatments, range of motion exercises (27; 96.4%), airway clearance techniques (26; 92.9%), and sitting at the edge of the bed (25; 89.3%) were the most common. Intra-aortic balloon pump and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation appeared to limit physiotherapy practice. Use of outcome measures was limited. Conclusions: Physiotherapists provide a variety of interventions with critically ill cardiac surgery patients. Further evaluation of the limited use of outcome measures in the cardiac surgical intensive care unit is warranted.

Postoperative Delirium: A Literature Review of Management in Intensive Care Unit

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 44-48
Author(s):  
Cendy Legowo
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Postoperative Delirium ◽  
Mechanistic Explanation ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Care Plan ◽  
Prevention And Treatment

Perioperative delirium is a wide-ranging problem that directly affects primary clinical results. The anesthesiologist must understand how to define and diagnose delirium, identify patients at high risk of delirium, identify predisposing factors to adjust the care plan appropriately, and manage delirium in the acute postoperative period. Delirium is an organ dysfunction in critically ill patients, independently associated with improved morbidity. Research on delirium in hospitalized patients (including critically ill patients) has increased exponentially in the last decade. This study emphasizes the need for a mechanistic explanation of delirium to help advance the research that ultimately leads to its prevention and treatment. In this study, multinational and multidisciplinary clinicians, and researchers from the fields of critical care medicine, psychiatry, anesthesiology, neurology, and pharmacy sought to collaborate in the management of delirium in the intensive care unit (ICU).

An Analysis of Arguments for and Against Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide: Part One

1996 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
David C. Thomasma
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Assisted Suicide ◽  
The United States ◽  
Hospital Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Return Home ◽  
Life Prolongation

In advanced technological societies there is growing concern about the prospect of protracted deaths marked by incapacitation, intolerable pain and indignity, and invasion by machines and tubing. Life prolongation for critically ill cancer patients in the United States, for example, literally costs a fortune for very little benefit, typically from $82,845 to $189,339 for an additional year of life. Those who return home after major interventions live on average only 3 more months; the others live out their days in a hospital intensive care unit.

scholarly journals Critical Care Nurses’ Experiences During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A US National Survey

2021 ◽  
pp. e1-e7
Author(s):  
Jill L. Guttormson ◽  
Kelly Calkins ◽  
Natalie McAndrew ◽  
Jacklynn Fitzgerald ◽  
Holly Losurdo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Moral Distress ◽  
Community Support ◽  
Well Being ◽  
The United States ◽  
Critical Care Nurses ◽  
Emotional Symptoms

Background Given critical care nurses’ high prepandemic levels of moral distress and burnout, the COVID-19 pandemic will most likely have a tremendous influence on intensive care unit (ICU) nurses’ mental health and continuation in the ICU workforce. Objective To describe the experiences of ICU nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. Methods Nurses who worked in ICUs in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic were recruited to complete a survey from October 2020 through early January 2021 through social media and the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses. Three open-ended questions focused on the experiences of ICU nurses during the pandemic. Results Of 498 nurses who completed the survey, 285 answered the open-ended questions. Nurses reported stress related to a lack of evidence-based treatment, poor patient prognosis, and lack of family presence in the ICU. Nurses perceived inadequate leadership support and inequity within the health care team. Lack of consistent community support to slow the spread of COVID-19 or recognition that COVID-19 was real increased nurses’ feelings of isolation. Nurses reported physical and emotional symptoms including exhaustion, anxiety, sleeplessness, and moral distress. Fear of contracting COVID-19 or of infecting family and friends was also prevalent. Conclusions Intensive care unit nurses in the United States experienced unprecedented and immense burden during the COVID-19 pandemic. Understanding these experiences provides insights into areas that must be addressed to build and sustain an ICU nurse workforce. Studies are needed to further describe nurses’ experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic and identify effective resources that support ICU nurse well-being.

scholarly journals A California Hospital’s Response to COVID-19: From a Ripple to a Tsunami Warning

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. e1-e16
Author(s):  
Mary Kay Bader ◽  
Annabelle Braun ◽  
Cherie Fox ◽  
Lauren Dwinell ◽  
Jennifer Cord ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Intensive Care Units ◽  
Task Force ◽  
The United States ◽  
Tsunami Warning ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Evidence Review ◽  
Excellent Care

Background The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) rippled across the world from Wuhan, China, to the shores of the United States within a few months. Hospitals and intensive care units were suddenly faced with a “tsunami” warning requiring instantaneous implementation and escalation of disaster plans. Evidence Review An evidence-based question was developed and an extensive review of the literature was completed, resulting in a structured plan for the intensive care units to manage a surge of patients critically ill with COVID-19 in March 2020. Twenty-five sources of evidence focusing on pandemic intensive care unit and COVID-19 management laid the foundation for the team to navigate the crisis. Implementation The Critical Care Services task force adopted recommendations from the CHEST consensus statement on surge capacity principles and other sources, which served as the framework for the organized response. The 4 S’s became the focus: space, staff, supplies, and systems. Development of algorithms, workflows, and new processes related to treating patients, staffing shortages, and limited supplies. New intensive care unit staffing solutions were adopted. Evaluation Using a framework based on the literature reviewed, the Critical Care Services task force controlled the surge of patients with COVID-19 in March through May 2020. Patients received excellent care, and the mortality rate was 0.008%. The intensive care unit team had the needed respiratory and general supplies but had to continually adapt to shortages of personal protective equipment, cleaning products, and some medications. Sustainability The intensive care unit pandemic response plan has been established and the team is prepared for the next wave of COVID-19.

The Meaning of Our Work

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 397-407
Author(s):  
Clareen A. Wiencek ◽  
Betty R. Ferrell ◽  
Molly Jackson
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Moral Distress ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Critically Ill Patient ◽  
Current Profile ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
A Current

The prevalence and survival rates of critically ill patients with cancer in the intensive care unit have increased considerably in the past 2 decades; yet, the meaning of caring for cancer patients in this setting may fall along a continuum. This article addresses the nurse’s experience in caring for the critically ill patient with cancer by presenting a current profile of these patient in the intensive care unit in the context of the historical development and mission of critical care and the evolution of cancer as a chronic disease. The moral distress that can result when these 2 “cultures” or “realities” collide and the meaning of the nurse’s work will be examined. Strategies and resources for critical care nurses to incorporate into their practice when caring for the critically ill patient with cancer, and themselves, will be addressed.

Pain Management in the Critically Ill: What Do We Know and How Can We Improve?

1994 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele A. Alpen ◽  
Marita G. Titler
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Pain Assessment ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Critical Care Nurses ◽  
Critical Care Units ◽  
Knowledge And Attitudes ◽  
Nurses Knowledge

Pain management in the critically ill is a challenge and a problem of great concern for critical care nurses. The authors review research on pain in the areas of pain assessment, nurses’ knowledge and attitudes, pharmacologic interventions, and nonpharmacologic interventions for the management of pain. Although the research base is not completely developed in the critically ill population, implications for practice are provided, based upon the findings in populations akin to the critically ill. Strategies are outlined for achieving improved pain control in critical care units through education, adoption of standards on pain management, and quality improvement activities

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document