scholarly journals Emperor Alexander II and the South Urals: A New Collection of Documents Published by Archivists of the Chelyabinsk Region

2020 ◽  
pp. 306-311
Author(s):  
Sergey V. Lyubichankovsky ◽  
Keyword(s):  
National Archive ◽  
Southern Urals ◽  
The State ◽  
South Urals ◽  
State Archive ◽  
The South ◽  
The Southern Urals ◽  
Russian State ◽  
Chelyabinsk Region ◽  
The Impact

The article reviews the collection of documents “Emperor Alexander II and the Southern Urals,” published in 2019 and dedicated to the 200th anniversary of the Emperor. The book tells of the Tsarevich’s journey through the Southern Urals in 1837 and of manufacture of gifts to him by the Zlatoust craftsmen; a separate part consists of documents devoted to the reign of Alexander II and the impact of the Great Reforms on the development of the region. The collection ends with documents on the perpetuation of the Emperor’s memory. The review proves that this collection of documents closes the topic of relations between Alexander II and the Southern Urals, which has been little studied in the historiography. It concludes that the initiators of the publication – employees of the Joint State Archive of the Chelyabinsk Region – have included in the book legislative acts, recordkeeping materials, materials of the periodical press, sources of personal provenance, photographs, and visual materials. There is a list of archives and museums from which the sources originate: state archives of the Chelyabinsk, Orenburg, Sverdlovsk regions, the National Archive of the Republic of Bashkortostan, the Archive of the Zlatoust City District; the Verkhny Ufaley and Zlatoust local history museums; the Russian State Archive of Photo Documents, the State Russian Museum; the Department for Preservation of Historical Heritage of the South Ural Railway, the Russian State Historical Archive, and the State Archive of the Russian Federation. The review describes the structure of the collection and contends that it contributes to comprehensive coverage of the studied problems. It allows its readers to find the needed documents confidently and quickly, even with minimal research skills. Photo documents (little–known photographs and drawings) included in the collection complement the text quite successfully. The reviewers underscore that the publication contains three extensive introductory articles, the reading of which contributes to a deeper understanding of the sources. Thus, the review concludes that the collection has expanded the documentary base adequately in order to spur extensive research of the pre–revolutionary history of the Southern Urals.

The forest margin vegetation of the South Urals (Bashkortostan Republic)

2009 ◽  
pp. 54-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. M. Yamalov ◽  
S. V. Kucherova
Keyword(s):  
Southern Urals ◽  
South Urals ◽  
The South ◽  
The Southern Urals ◽  
New Associations ◽  
Class Distribution ◽  
Forest Margin ◽  
Eastern Border

The syntaxonomy of the Southern Urals’ forest margins in Bashkortostan Republic is presented. Three new associations and four communities are described. The criteria of identifying the forest margins communities to belong to the class Trifolio-Geranietea and the eastern border of the class distribution are discussed.

scholarly journals HEAT SECURITY AND THERMAL REGIME OF SOME TYPES OF NATURAL FOREST COMMUNITIES (AREA OF WIDE-DECIDUAL-CONIFEROUS FORESTS OF THE SOUTH URALS)

ÈKOBIOTEH ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 429-434
Author(s):  
Yu.P. Gorichev ◽  
◽  
A.N. Davydychev ◽  
I.R. Yusupov ◽  
A.Yu. Kulagin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thermal Regime ◽  
Heat Supply ◽  
Southern Urals ◽  
Natural Forest ◽  
Coniferous Forests ◽  
South Urals ◽  
Forest Communities ◽  
The South ◽  
The Southern Urals

The data of microclimatic observations carried out in the area of broad-leaved-coniferous forests of the Southern Urals are presented. The parameters of heat supply and thermal regime of some types of primary plantations are established.

scholarly journals Deployment of specialized hospitals for the Red Army wounded in the Southern Urals during 1941-1945

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 143-146
Author(s):  
Natalia Alexandrovna Degtyareva ◽  
Anna Gennadievna Alyatina
Keyword(s):  
Military Service ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Southern Urals ◽  
South Urals ◽  
The South ◽  
The Southern Urals ◽  
Specialized Treatment ◽  
Red Army ◽  
Patriotic Education ◽  
Army Soldiers

This paper discusses specialized treatment of the wounded in the hospitals of the Southern Urals in the Great Patriotic War (1941-1945). It is proved that the specialized treatment of the wounded undergone significant changes during 1941-1945. The paper defines nature of injuries and damage, treatment time, forming, distribution of hospital beds and a contingent of the wounded and sick Red Army soldiers. The author states that throughout the war the surgical activity in the South Urals hospitals increased. The study deals with the problem of death in base hospitals. The number of Red Army soldiers deaths was undercounted. This study has shown that due to medical workers of the South Urals hospitals specialized treatment of the wounded made a qualitative leap in the development of the stage treatment. At the beginning of the war general surgery and general therapeutic hospitals were created. Then, in order to ensure the most qualified assistance to the wounded, specialized hospitals and offices were deployed. The authors estimated that the application of advanced methods of treatment in the evacuation hospitals of the South Urals helped to heal 72,3% wounded and 90, 6% patients and they returned to military service. These materials can serve as a basis for further research in the Southern Urals health history and, in general, the history of the South Ural Region, as well as the patriotic education of the youth.

Sources on Regulatory Activity of the Inorodtsy Local Self-Government Agencies in the South of Russia in the 19th - Early 20th Century

2018 ◽  
pp. 364-374
Author(s):  
Irina V. Lidgieva ◽  
Keyword(s):  
20Th Century ◽  
National Archive ◽  
The State ◽  
Early 20Th Century ◽  
State Archive ◽  
Regulatory Activity ◽  
The South ◽  
Stavropol Region ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Republic

The article analyses public censure as a source of regulatory activity of the inorodsty (non-Russian indigenous ethnicities) local authorities in the South of Russia in the 19th – early 20th century. Integration of nomadic peoples in the all-Empire legal and economic sphere made provisions for continuation of some common law institutions. Among these were local self-government bodies. Local self-government activities in indigenous societies incorporate practices of representative democracy within the framework of customary and positive law and also interactions between state and society, all of which has much relevance to this day and age. Assembly (skhod) produced public censure that included purview with majority decision. Most sources come from the State archive of Stavropol Region and the National Archive of the Republic of Kalmykia. General and special scientific research methods assess public censure as a source on the history of the inorodsty in the South of Russia in the 19th – early 20th century. The form of sentence was not fixed by law, and yet content analysis of documentary materials from the State Archive of the Stavropol Region and the National Archive of the Republic of Kalmykia concludes that it remained unchanged throughout the 19th – early 20th century. Content of public censure allows to reconstruct the spectrum of issues put before the assembly and to classify them by topic: legal, social, and financial and economic. The author concludes that verdicts of the inorodsty societies of the period, as legal acts of local significance and great information value, are one of the main sources on socio-political and socio-economic history of the region.

Endemic associations of petrophytic steppes of the South Urals palaeoreefs

2011 ◽  
pp. 117-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. M. Yamalov ◽  
A. V. Bayanov ◽  
V. B. Martynenko ◽  
A. A. Muldashev ◽  
P. S. Shirokikh
Keyword(s):  
Plant Communities ◽  
Southern Urals ◽  
South Urals ◽  
The South ◽  
The Southern Urals ◽  
New Associations ◽  
Steppe Communities

Classification of the petrophytic steppe communities occurring on unique geomorphological formations of the Southern Urals (Bashkortostan Republik) — palaeoreefs (”shikhans“) have been performed. The plant communities were classified and included into two new associations (Minuartiо krascheninnikovii―Festucetum pseudovinae и Trinio muricatae―Centauretum sibiricae). Ecological, geographical, floristic and phytocoenotic characteristics of the syntaxa are discussed.

Aquatic vegetation of the South Urals (Bashkortostan Republic). II. Class Potametea

2015 ◽  
pp. 40-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ya. M. Golovanov ◽  
S. MN. Yamalov ◽  
Z. B. Baktybaeva ◽  
s. S. Petrov
Keyword(s):  
Sea Level ◽  
Aquatic Vegetation ◽  
Southern Urals ◽  
South Urals ◽  
The South ◽  
The Southern Urals ◽  
Republic Of Bashkortostan

Republic of Bashkortostan (51º 34ʹ–56º 31ʹ N and 53º 08ʹ–59º 59ʹ E) covers an area of 143.6 thousand km2 stretching fr om north to south about 550 km, from west to east — 440 km. Its territory is located within the Southern Urals and adjacent plains. The relief is complex and diverse, strongly dissected. Elevations range from 60 to 1640 m above sea level.

scholarly journals “Greenhouses and Workers’ Dormitories”: Migration from Central Asia and China to Rural Areas of the Southern Urals

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 ◽  
pp. 74-84
Author(s):  
A. A. Avdashkin ◽  
◽  
E. I. Salganova ◽  
N. A. Gafner ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Central Asia ◽  
Rural Areas ◽  
Agricultural Sector ◽  
Population Decline ◽  
Southern Urals ◽  
The Southern Urals ◽  
Migration Flow ◽  
Chelyabinsk Region ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Depth Interviews

The purpose of this article is to examine the impact of migration from Asian countries on the rural areas of the Russian region using the example of the Chelyabinsk region. Addressing this problem allowed us to answer the following questions: what objects in rural areas are labeled as “migrant” and what are the assessments of this phenomenon by the public? Against the backdrop of the COVID-19 pandemic, natural population decline is growing. Restricting international migration has shown that migrants are very important for the Russian agricultural sector. The decline in the population in rural areas of Russia, the deterioration of the ecological situation in the Central Asian region shows the need for research on migration to the countryside. There is a high probability that after the removal of several restrictions, we will see an increase in the migration flow to some areas of the countryside (greenhouses, workers' hostels, empty villages). For this study, we applied a set of ethnographic and ethno-sociological methods: participatory observation, in-depth interviews, and massive ethno-sociological survey conducted within the framework of the RFBR and Chelyabinsk region project “Asian vector of migration to the Chelyabinsk region: historical retrospective, forecasts and risks”. In total, during the project, 150 hours of included observation were implemented. In 2021, 49 in-depth interviews were collected with residents of the Chelyabinsk region and 37 with migrants from Central Asia. The sample of objects for observation and establishment of contacts with informants included: greenhouses for growing vegetables, garden associations, settlements in the study areas, rural shops, etc. The focus of xenophobic sentiments may shift from large cities to suburbs and villages, where new objects are being built, labeled as “migrants” (greenhouses, dormitories for migrants). "Chinese" greenhouses are no longer perceived as objects directly related to the presence of the Chinese, but are associated with migrants in general. Greenhouse complexes, where the main contingent is made up of migrants from the Central Asia, seem to be perceived as "Chinese" by inertia. All negative characteristics and parameters that were attributed to them are automatically extended to all greenhouses where there are “others”.

scholarly journals The influence of ecological conditions on vegetative propagation of lilac varieties in the South Ural Botanical Garden (Ufa)

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 74-77
Author(s):  
Natalia Viktorovna Polyakova
Keyword(s):  
Vegetative Propagation ◽  
Southern Urals ◽  
Botanical Garden ◽  
Early Spring ◽  
Climatic Conditions ◽  
Research Centre ◽  
South Urals ◽  
The South ◽  
The Southern Urals ◽  
Aerial Roots

The paper presents the results of a long-term (2001-2018) study of vegetative propagation methods of the Syringa L. genus varieties on the basis of the South Ural Botanical Garden Institute of the Ufa Federal Research Centre of Russian Academy of Sciences. The objective of the study was to determine the most effective and affordable ways of lilac varieties propagating in the climatic conditions of the Southern Urals, as well as to identify environmental factors affecting the effectiveness of vegetative propagation. Throughout the research period, such methods of vegetative propagation of lilac varieties as spring vaccinations, summer budding, propagation by aerial roots, green cuttings propagation were studied. As a result of the studies, it was found that the maximum quantity planting material is obtained when varieties are propagated by green cuttings using sand or a mixture of sand with perlite as a substrate. In the South Urals, greenhouses in the open ground for rooting lilac cuttings are practically unsuitable, because rooted cuttings die in them in winter or early spring. Therefore, in the climatic conditions of Bashkortostan, the rooting of lilac cuttings is desirable to be carried out in a sheltered greenhouse. With the help of spring vaccination, you can rejuvenate old vaccinated specimens, and summer budding can be used provided that the grafted plants provide a comfortable wintering, since early frosts characteristic of the Bashkir Urals lead to the death of green and not yet lignified shoots. The method of aerial roots can be considered acceptable and promising for the vegetative propagation of lilacs varieties.

scholarly journals Analysis of the formation of large and small power generation in the Southern Urals

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 302-308
Author(s):  
Irina M. Kirpichnikova
Keyword(s):  
Power Plant ◽  
Energy Production ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Southern Urals ◽  
The State ◽  
The South ◽  
The Urals ◽  
The Southern Urals ◽  
Large Power ◽  
Hydropower Potential

The description of the state of power engineering in Russia in the pre-revolutionary period, data on the production of electricity per capita are presented. A brief history of the creation of a commission for the development of the State Electrification Plan of Russia (GOELRO plan) and some results of its implementation are provided. The construction of the first large power plant in the South Urals, built according to the GOELRO plan, - Chelyabinsk State District Power Plant, which at that time was of great importance for the development of the region's industry and remains one of the most powerful power plants at the present time, is described. The possibilities of using renewable energy sources, in particular local hydropower resources for energy production, are disclosed. The problems of the Porozhskaya Hydropower Plant - the oldest and unique hydroelectric power plant in the Urals are designated, the characteristics of small hydropower plants in the Southern Urals are given, the prospects for using the hydropower potential of the Chelyabinsk region are revealed. The potential of solar and wind energy is discussed, the characteristics and features of solar power plants in the Urals and wind power plants with a vertical axis of rotation, developed at the South Ural State University, are specified. It is established that biomass as a resource for energy production has good prospects for use, but due to climatic conditions, this direction has not yet been developed. It is shown that small and distributed energy is still an important component in the general energy of the region and the country.

scholarly journals ИСТОРИЯ СТАНОВЛЕНИЯ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОГО МУЗЕЯ ЮЖНОГО УРАЛА (HISTORY OF FORMATION OF THE STATE MUSEUM OF THE SOUTHERN URALS)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolay Antipin
Keyword(s):  
Natural History ◽  
Initial Period ◽  
Southern Urals ◽  
The State ◽  
The Southern Urals ◽  
Cultural Traditions ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
History Of ◽  
Scientific Truth ◽  
Chelyabinsk Region

The article reconstructs the initial period of the history of the state historical Museum of the southern Urals (Chelyabinsk). The purpose of the article is to determine the date of Foundation of the Museum, for which a wide range of archival sources is analyzed. In the modern Museum, the date of Foundation is July 1, 1923. The article proves that the date of Foundation of the Museum should be considered September 5, 1913, when a meeting of teachers, local historians and representatives of local authorities was held in Chelyabinsk, where a decision was made to organize a natural history Museum and a local branch of the Ural society of natural history lovers. The article shows that the period of 1913-1923 in the history of the Museum is full of events, the continuity from the first collection to the opening on July 1, 1923 is traced. In the article, the author also considers the issues of commemoration, the formation and development of the Museum, and the development of the Museum during the civil war. According to the author, strengthening the connection of one of the most important cultural institutions of the Chelyabinsk region – the State historical Museum of the southern Urals with the pre-revolutionary past is not only a tribute to scientific truth, but also an important image step that allows you to record deep cultural traditions in Russia

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document