scholarly journals Intra-Operative and Anatomic Verification of a TKA Computational Model for Pre-Operative Surgical Planning

10.29007/hvqg ◽  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua Twiggs ◽  
Edgar Wakelin ◽  
Justin Roe ◽  
Brett Fritsch ◽  
Brad Miles
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Contact Force ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Koos Score ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Joint Dynamics ◽  
Operative Planning ◽  
Total Knee

A promising measure of dynamic outcomes in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is the simulation of joint dynamics. These simulations are potentially useful for pre-operative planning, but are not yet validated for patient-specific variations in anatomy, which forms the aim of this paper. 284 patients from a database of total knee arthroplasty patients were analysed using a pre-operatively defined simulation predicting post-operative knee dynamics; each patient had previously undergone pre- and post-operative CT imaging and had been assessed using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome (KOOS) score at 6 months following surgery. A significant correlation was found between the simulated contact force and laxity in mid-flexion (r=-0.452, p<0.0001), and between the medio- lateral difference in contact force and difference in distal-vs-posterior femoral collateral ligament offset (r=-0.473, p<0.0001). A significant difference of 5 KOOS pain points (p=0.02) was found for patients with unusually low or high simulated contact force compared to normal. These results indicate the preoperative simulation is capable of distinguishing patient-specific kinematics prior to surgery, thereby demonstrating the utility of this simulation for making pre-surgical predictions of patient-specific kinematics and patient-reported outcomes.

Patient-Specific Simulated Dynamics After Total Knee Arthroplasty Correlate With Patient-Reported Outcomes

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (9) ◽  
pp. 2843-2850 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua G. Twiggs ◽  
Edgar A. Wakelin ◽  
Justin P. Roe ◽  
David M. Dickison ◽  
Brett A. Fritsch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Total Knee

scholarly journals Does patellar denervation prevent anterior knee pain and improve patient-reported outcomes in patients undergoing non-resurfaced total knee arthroplasty? an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongzhi Liu ◽  
Zhaohui Liu ◽  
Qidong Zhang ◽  
Wanshou Guo
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Pain ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Anterior Knee Pain ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Anterior Knee

Abstract Background Anterior knee pain (AKP) is the most common complication of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It is unclear which procedure of addressing AKP is preferable. Some data suggest patellar denervation (PD) provides effective AKP prevention. The purpose was to assess the effectiveness and safety of PD in primary TKA.Methods A meta-analysis was performed of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) from inception to March 26, 2020, using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library. Study-specific RR and MD were aggregated using random or fixed effects models. The outcomes were incidences of AKP, PS (patellar scores), VAS (visual analogue scale), ROM (range of motion), KSS knee (American Knee Society knee scores), KSS function (American Knee Society function scores), incidence of complications and revisions.Results Ten RCTs involving 1196 knees were included. The meta-analysis showed no significant in PD group on the incidence of AKP (RR = 0.64; 95% CI 0.37, 1.11; p = 0.11) with moderate heterogeneity (P < 0.01, I2 = 84%). Our results indicated PD had a significantly better VAS (MD = − 0.25; 95% CI -0.41, -0.09; p < 0.01), ROM (MD = 7.68; 95% CI 0.34, 15.20; p = 0.04) and PS (MD = 0.91; 95% CI 0.36, 1.46; p < 0.01). However, there was no significant difference no matter in KSS knee, KSS function, complications or revisions.Conclusions This meta-analysis showed that no difference in AKP between PD and NPD in patients undergoing non-resurfaced TKA. PD could improve clinical outcome in VAS, post-operative ROM and PS.

The Effects of Patient Occupation, Hobbies, and Body Mass Index on Kneeling after Total Knee Arthroplasty

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karim G. Sabeh ◽  
Victor H. Hernandez ◽  
Wayne B. Cohen-Levy ◽  
Alvin Ong ◽  
Fabio Orozco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Substantial Impact ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
The Impact

AbstractA common patient concern after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the ability to kneel. Kneeling may have a substantial impact on the patients' ability to perform many activities of daily living, occupations, and hobbies. The purpose of this study was to quantify the percentage of patients able to kneel after TKA after 2 years and to evaluate preoperative patient characteristics that influence the patient's perceived ability to kneel after TKA such as obesity, occupation, and hobbies. We retrospectively assessed a cohort of 404 patients who underwent primary TKA with patellar resurfacing. We assessed the impact of patient hobbies, occupation, employment status, and body mass index (BMI) on the kneeling capacity and patient-reported satisfaction. Univariate analysis was performed using Fisher's exact test, and multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression with multiple imputations. A total of 404 patients were included. Sixty percent of patients were unable to kneel after TKA. Males (p < 0.001) and patients with occupations or hobbies requiring kneeling (p < 0.05) were more likely to kneel after surgery. We identified an inverse relationship between BMI and the ability to kneel. No correlation was found between duration and frequency of kneeling relative to patient-reported ease or difficulty with kneeling. Patient-reported factors that prevented patients from kneeling were pain, physical inability, and fear of damaging the prosthesis. Patient education may be helpful in improving patient expectations about kneeling after surgery. A small but significant difference in subjective patient satisfaction was observed when comparing patients able to kneel with those unable to kneel.

scholarly journals The Effect of Patient-Specific Instrumentation Incorporating an Extramedullary Tibial Guide on Operative Efficiency for Total Knee Arthroplasty

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oh-Ryong Kwon ◽  
Kyoung-Tak Kang ◽  
Juhyun Son ◽  
Dong-Suk Suh ◽  
Dong Beom Heo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Surgical Time ◽  
Patient Specific Instrumentation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

This retrospective study was to determine if patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) leads to shortened surgical time through increased operating room efficiency according to different tibial PSI designs. 166 patients underwent primary TKA and were categorized into three groups as follows: PSI without extramedullary (EM) tibial guide (group 1, n=48), PSI with EM tibial guide (group 2, n=68), and conventional instrumentation (CI) group (group 3, n=50). Four factors were compared between groups, namely, operative room time, thickness of bone resection, tibial slope, and rotation of the component. The mean surgical time was significantly shorter in the PSI with EM tibial guide group (group 2, 63.9±13.6 min) compared to the CI group (group 3, 82.8±24.9 min) (P<0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the PSI without EM tibial guide group (group 1, 75.3±18.8 min). This study suggests that PSI incorporating an EM tibial guide may lead to high operative efficiency in TKA compared to CI. This trial is registered with KCT0002384.

Similar Healthcare Utilization and 1-Year Patient-Reported Outcomes between Cemented and Cementless Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael P. Erossy ◽  
Ahmed K. Emara ◽  
Christopher A. Rothfusz ◽  
Alison K. Klika ◽  
Michael R. Bloomfield ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Healthcare Utilization ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Cementless Fixation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Total Knee

AbstractCementless fixation for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has gained traction with the advent of newer fixation technologies. This study assessed (1) healthcare utilization (length of stay (LOS), nonhome discharge, 90-day readmission, and 1-year reoperation); (2) 1-year mortality; and (3) 1-year joint-specific and global health-related patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) among patients who received cementless versus cemented TKA. Patients who underwent cementless and cemented TKA at a single institution (July 2015–August 2018) were prospectively enrolled. A total of 424 cementless and 5,274 cemented TKAs were included. The cementless cohort was propensity score-matched to a group cemented TKAs (1:3-cementless: n = 424; cemented: n = 1,272). Within the matched cohorts, 76.9% (n = 326) cementless and 75.9% (n = 966) cementless TKAs completed 1-year PROMs. Healthcare utilization measures, mortality and the median 1-year change in knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS)-pain, KOOS-physical function short form (PS), KOOS-knee related quality of life (KRQOL), Veteran Rand (VR)-12 mental composite (MCS), and physical composite (PCS) scores were compared. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for PROMs was calculated. Cementless TKA exhibited similar rates of median LOS (p = 0.109), nonhome discharge disposition (p = 0.056), all-cause 90-day readmission (p = 0.226), 1-year reoperation (p = 0.597), and 1-year mortality (p = 0.861) when compared with cemented TKA. There was no significant difference in the median 1-year improvement in KOOS-pain (p = 0.370), KOOS-PS (p = 0.417), KOOS-KRQOL (p = 0.101), VR-12-PCS (p = 0.269), and VR-12-MCS (p = 0.191) between the cementless and cemented TKA cohorts. Rates of attaining MCID were similar in both cohorts for assessed PROMs (p > 0.05, each) except KOOS-KRQOL (cementless: n = 313 (96.0%) vs. cemented: n = 895 [92.7%]; p = 0.036). Cementless TKA provides similar healthcare-utilization, mortality, and 1-year PROM improvement versus cemented TKA. Cementless fixation in TKA may provide value through higher MCID improvement in quality of life. Future episode-of-care cost-analyses and longer-term survivorship investigations are warranted.

Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty Did Not Show Superior Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: An Updated Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials with at Least 2-Year Follow-up

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuhei Hiyama ◽  
Tsuneari Takahashi ◽  
Katsushi Takeshita
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Total Knee

AbstractKinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (KATKA) was developed to improve the anatomical alignment of knee prostheses, assisting in restoring the native alignment of the knee and promoting physiological kinematics. Early clinical results were encouraging, showing better functional outcomes than with mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty (MATKA). However, there have been concerns about implant survival, and follow-up at 10 years or more has not been reported. In addition, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing KATKA with MATKA have reported inconsistent results. The current meta-analysis of RCTs with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up investigated the clinical and radiological differences between KATKA and MATKA. A systematic review of the English language literature resulted in the inclusion of four RCTs. The meta-analysis found no significant difference in any of the following parameters: postoperative range of motion for flexion (mean difference for KATKA − MATKA [MD], 1.7 degrees; 95% confidence interval [CI], −1.4 to 4.8 degrees; p = 0.29) and extension (MD, 0.10 degrees; 95% CI, −0.99 to 1.2 degrees; p = 0.86); Oxford Knee Score (MD, 0.10 points; 95% CI, −1.5 to 1.7 points; p = 0.90); Knee Society Score (MD, 1.6 points; 95% CI, −2.8 to 6.0 points; p = 0.49); and Knee Function Score (MD, 1.4 points; 95% CI, −4.9 to 7.8 points; p = 0.66). In addition, there was no significant difference between KATKA and MATKA in the rate of complications requiring reoperation or revision surgery (odds ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.25–4.09; p = 0.99) or in the length of hospital stay (MD, 1.0 days; 95% CI, −0.2 to 2.2 days; p = 0.092). KATKA did not increase the number of patients with poor clinical results due to implant position, particularly for varus placement of the tibial component. In this meta-analysis based on four RCTs with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up, KATKA were only relevant to cruciate retaining TKA and could not be extrapolated to posterior stabilized TKA. Patient-reported outcome measures with KATKA were not superior to those with MATKA.

scholarly journals Core Outcome Measurement Instruments for Clinical Trials of Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 2439
Author(s):  
Vivien Reynaud ◽  
Anargyros Verdilos ◽  
Bruno Pereira ◽  
Stéphane Boisgard ◽  
Frédéric Costes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Oxford Knee Score ◽  
Measurement Properties ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Minimal Important Change ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Physical Tests ◽  
Total Knee

(1) Background: We have updated knowledge of the psychometric qualities of patient-reported outcome measures and, for the first time, systematically reviewed and compared the psychometric qualities of physical tests for patients with knee osteoarthritis who are undergoing total knee arthroplasty. This work was conducted to facilitate the choice of the most appropriate instruments to use in studies and clinical practice. (2) Methods: A search of medical databases up to December 2019 identified the studies and thus the instruments used. The quality of the measurement properties was assessed by the Bot et al. criteria. (3) Results: We identified 20 studies involving 25 instruments. Half of the instruments were questionnaires (n = 13). Among the condition-specific instruments, the Oxford knee score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score, and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index had the highest overall scores. Concerning generic tools, the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 (SF-36) or SF-12 obtained the highest overall score. For patient-specific tools, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale ranked the highest. Some physical tests seemed robust in psychometric properties: 6-min Walk Test, five times Sit-To-Stand test, Timed Up and Go test strength testing of knee flexor/extensor by isometric or isokinetic dynamometer and Pressure Pain Threshold. (4) Conclusion: To make stronger recommendations, key areas such as reproducibility, responsiveness to clinical change, and minimal important change still need more rigorous evaluations. Some promising physical tests (e.g., actimetry) lack validation and require rigorous studies to be used as a core set of outcomes in future studies.

Does Age Influence How Patients Rate Their Experience of Care after Total Knee Arthroplasty?

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (07) ◽  
pp. 647-651 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chukwuweike Gwam ◽  
Jaydev Mistry ◽  
Nequesha Mohamed ◽  
Morad Chughtai ◽  
Melbin Thomas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Significant Influence ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Negative Influence ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Experience Of Care ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Total Knee

AbstractThe Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) have recently modified models for physician compensation with the use of patient administered surveys, such as the Press Ganey (PG). Currently, it is not well understood how the age of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients influences PG scores and hospital ratings. Therefore, we asked: (1) is there a difference in how patients rate PG survey elements between patients < 50 years of age, 50 to 80 years of age, and > 80 years of age and (2) what factors influence PG overall hospital rating in the various age groups? The PG database from our institution was queried from November 2009 to January 2015, yielding 728 patients who received a primary TKA. Patients were stratified by age at the time of surgery, based on those < 50 years (n = 43), 50 to 80 years (n = 639), and > 80 years of age (n = 46). The means for each domain was calculated and multiple regression analyses were performed separately for the three cohorts, to assess the influence (β-weight) of each domain on overall hospital ratings. Chi-square tests and Student's t-tests were performed appropriately to assess differences in categorical and continuous data between the three cohorts. No significant difference in mean scores was observed in any individual domain category between the three age groups. Communication with nurses had a significant influence on overall hospital rating in all three age groups. In addition, perception of pain demonstrated a significant influence on overall hospital rating for patients < 50 years of age (β = 0.807, p = 0.011) and those 50 to 80 years of age (β = 0.248, p = 0.014). For patients who were < 50 years of age, communication regarding medication had a significantly negative influence on overall hospital ratings (β = − 0.387, p = 0.025). For patients who were > 80 years of age, staff responsiveness (β = 0.403, p = 0.002) also significantly influenced overall hospital ratings. With physician reimbursement partially dependent on patient-reported experiences of care, orthopaedists must recognize and improve on the factors that affect patient satisfaction to avoid financial penalties. Although age was found to not have a global effect on PG scores after TKA, the factors that patients consider most important during their experience of care may vary by age group.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document